Ethereum network is very congested due to possible 2.0 release and the volatility in the price generated by it.
Ethereum really needs to move to PoS sometime soon, because fees are more critical to Ethereum network thatn to bitcoin. There are much more transactions in Ethereum network, which costs fees, because EVERY interaction with a dApp is a paid transaction.
It will be amazing for the whole ecosystem if Etehreum is successful in PoS release. Every shitcoin will be able to move to pos and let bitcoin alone in PoW, which has a better resilience against attacks, more decentarlized and censorship resistant.
|
|
|
Im referring to this tweet: https://twitter.com/qwqiao/status/1289631610137018369?s=12I quote: "Seriously tho the best way to trade shitcoins in a bull market is trend following. Draw a bunch of MAs and buy if price > MA. If you can code do this for 100 shitcoins at once. Sit back and watch your BTC double. This tweet will get 5 likes but it's the biggest alpha I've leaked." Could anyone explain in a simple word, what did he mean? Just as Lucius said,if you don't know what that means, just stay away from this kind of advice. There is nothing like "just watch your btc double". The risk is enormous, you will most likely just lose your btc by doing so. Or do you think every is an idiot by just holding btc? People don't do that because the odds are mostly against you (simple because most of those altcoins aren't worth anything, and most of their price should be zero)
|
|
|
Você pode criar um gráfico que exibe vários resultados ao mesmo tempo? Mérito e o número de postagens? Vou pesquisar sobre isso, mas acho q não tenho esse dado do número de postagens. O @ sabotag3x foi uma fonte de mérito e depois foi excluído? A distribuição de méritos é fraca, vou ler algumas das postagens e mover o indicador. Sabotag3x deixou o for um por uns meses, daí ele pediu pra deixar de ser Source. Nesse momento o theymos me colocou A distribuição dos méritos é "fraca" e desigual pq a qualidade de postagens entre os usuários é muito diferente. Alguns tem muito mais conhecimento técnico, outros participam mais do fóruns, outros nunca postam nada, etc... De forma geral, não é necessário muito conhecimento técnico pra ganhar Merits, mas ajuda né.. o mais importante é participar do for um.
|
|
|
Hello. I had a small chat with Tom Bombadil and he talked about making this race for Turkish Board. Thank you so much my dear friend. Your work is admirable Türkçe bölüm için böyle bir grafik hazırlamak istemiştim. 2018'den günümüze tüm merit kayıtlarını indirdim, verileri çeşitli data programlarında işlemeye çalıştım fakat başarılı olamadım. Arkadaş ile bir muhabbetimiz oldu sonra kaldı o iş. Bu arada veriler @DDMRDDMR'in Türkçe bölüm tablosu ile uyuşmuyor. Oradaki asıl liste ve sıralama çok farklı. Çok kalabalık bir veri olduğu için bir kısmı atlanmış olabilir. Yinede takdire şayan bir çalışma. Bu arada @DDMRDDMR de tüm veri arşivini açtı gönderdi bana. Ona da çok teşekkürler. Google translate: Veriler üzerinde çalışmak için python kullandım, daha özel olarak pandas kütüphanesi. DdmrDdmr verileri çok iyi olduğu için çok gelişmiş bir şey yapmadım. Kaggle.com 'da okuyabilirsiniz.
|
|
|
To keep Chainsfr to be a decentralized service required minimum trust, we need a database that only users can access to store their payment secret, aka, the security answers. We cannot store this sensitive data on our own server, otherwise, Chainsfr would be a centralized service.
Now Google drive comes along. The permission of Google drive can make sure that only users can access this data using Chainsfr frontend. And our server also does not have the permission to access this sensitive data. And all data in Google drive have been encrypted, which means Google cannot access it either.
This is not being decentralized. Your service is not decentralized. It is centralized in google services. Just because you cannot access security information because it is stored in a server owned by google doesn't mean your service is decentralized. Google not being able to access that data (which i doubt) doesn't make that decentralized either. It would be decentralized if there was no central point. For now, there is one central point in your service: google servers. If google just shut down tomorrow, will Chainsfr still be operating 100% as if nothing happened? If not, it is centralized in google servers. Bitcoin is decentralized because there isn't a single entity which you could break and shut down the whole network. If you shut down coinbase, bitmain, electrum servers, etc will not affect bitcoin at all.
|
|
|
Industries that he mentioned are: healthcare, logistics, insurance, governement and this list goes on. So do you really say that all the requirements that you wrote aren't necessary in this field?
they may be necessary, but that doesn't mean that blockchain is a good solution. Not even that blockchain is a solution. Then let me tell you that blockchain adds an extra layer of protection to data that's stored and this is especially beneficial for services like these.
Do you think that this "extra layer of protection " is free? Is mining free? Would like to pay extra fees when you buy something in the supermarket and they want to register that in their blockchain? Would like to pay fees when you make an exam? Because nothing is free in blockchain. You pay for EVERY interaction in a dApp in ethereum network for example. Blockchain technologies are successfully implemented on land title registry in some countries and this isn't the place where governments plan to stop. In Brazil, as far as I remember they decided to use Blockchain technologies for newborn baby registry. That information is just false. I live in Brazil and this is not happening. I read something about that, probably just a hyped project which never got out of the paper. Specially here in Brazil where people lack money to buy food, cloths, will people pay extra fees to have babies? In overall, it's great in such industries, where the transparency and accuracy of information matters and I think there are a lot of like them, especially medicine too.
And, blockchain is slow because of high security and decentralization, it takes a lot of time to process these.
Not only time, but money as well. We pay fees for transactions not because its fun, because someone has to pay for that processing power. Edit: Don't get me wrong. I am not bashing bitcoin neither the blockchain. Just explaning how it works and why it is not suitable to be used in EVERYTHING. Blockchain is not a new free "extra layer of security". It was not designed for that.
|
|
|
I use 2.2 sat/byte fee, https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/ says it can finish in 15-300 minutes, but my transaction still stuck after about 10 hours. How long it takes for the transaction to finish? Thank you very much! It is very hard to tell. It could take just one or more hours and it could take one more day. One thing I can tell is that it WILL get confirmed. Don't worry. ALL websites overestimate fees of them overestimate fees. https://www.buybitcoinworldwide.com/fee-calculator/It says it will take more than 24hours (144 blocks)
|
|
|
I liked the idea. Certainly adoption will somehow move to solutions similar to paypal or send by email as you suggested. ✔️ No compromise on security* Open-sourced on github.com/ventureum/Chainsfr ➡️ * Non-custodial architecture * Google 2-step authentication * SOC2 & SOC3 security compliance * Multi-signature smart contract escrow * Client-side encryption However, it is very important to point out that no matter if you use 2FA or not, security is compromised in ANY online device, because you don't need 2fa to steal funds, just the private keys. We greatly appreciate your feedback💜.
I went to your website and put my e-mail address to receive ETH testnet coin as a test. Sadly you asked for a Google Account. Wouldn't you be able to do so with ANY email provider? Google is not exactly loved here.
|
|
|
ANY wallet on a phone that you do not think is secure IS NOT SECURE There is no security you can use other then a separate hardware device to make it secure if the phone has been compromised. If you do not think your phone is safe do not store any more crypto on it then can afford to loose.
-Dave
The advantage is convenience. I have the majority of my BTC in cold storage x of y multisig with a password. I have some "warm" in a hardware wallet. I have my day to day spending in a multicoin wallet on my phone. I know the risk.
Same way. I have most of my fiat sitting in a bank. I have some of it locked away in a fireproof safe @ home I have my day to day spending in the wallet I carrry with me.
YMMV on what the amounts are for each type of storage are good for you. But if you want to send someone $20 in crypto, do you really want to deal with a hardware wallet that you have to carry with you, or do you want to whip out your phone, scan a QR code, and go.
-Dave
I agree with thiose both statements. I like to use this "metric" when using mobile wallets: Never put more money in a mobile wallet than the value of your smartphone.
|
|
|
Só tenho 80 sMerits sobrando, e não sou um merit source. Só 80? kk Acho que seria interessante ser um merit source. Hoje em dia, eu não foco tanto em sair meritando todo mundo por ai. Mas tendo merits "infinitos" seria outra história. Sei de uns merit sources das abas lá de fora que saem dando 7 merits de uma só vez por que se não eles não acabam nunca (é assim que é ser rico?) Até ai tudo bem, pq normalmente os conteúdos sao de qualidade. Exceto por alguns pequenos grupos que claramente trocam quantidades altíssimas merits entre si... Até fazem conteúdos de qualidade... mas enfim... O que eu acho absurdo mesmo é nas abas locais ai fora que saem distribuindo sem dó mesmo. Tem muitas abas locais como árabe, filipinas, russia, alemanha, etc que é absurda a distribuição. Os usuários acumulam literalmente milhares de merits só na aba local. Aqui seguimos nesse conta gotas de merits...
|
|
|
But it may change the way government can confiscate your money. You can, for now, legally buy bitcoins and store them in a safe place, or sent it abroad. This way people will be less affected by governments abusive policies.
Depends a bit on what kind of government we're talking about. Is Finland's government asking you to pay back some money, then you can pretty much sleep peacefully at night that it will be a legal process, you're going to hire a lawyer and so on Is the government that's after you, known to poison people in foreign country and stage suicides? Then bitcoin will not really help you at all, you will cough those private keys at a rate of 10 keys per beating! I guess the idea is not to run away with the money while they beat or process you, but to move the money way before any of those processes take place... Similar to buying gold and storing it somewhere safe. Nobody doesn't even need to know you have it. Edit: Besides, BTC is exactly opposing this, so you can't really be a fan of wealth redistribution and of BTC at the same time. 100% agree with this. I don't get people who want the governments to control the economy buying btc at the same time.
|
|
|
But it may change the way government can confiscate your money. You can, for now, legally buy bitcoins and store them in a safe place, or sent it abroad. This way people will be less affected by governments abusive policies.
Depends a bit on what kind of government we're talking about. Is Finland's government asking you to pay back some money, then you can pretty much sleep peacefully at night that it will be a legal process, you're going to hire a lawyer and so on Is the government that's after you, known to poison people in foreign country and stage suicides? Then bitcoin will not really help you at all, you will cough those private keys at a rate of 10 keys per beating! I guess the idea is not to run away with the money while they beat or process you, but to move the money way before any of those processes take place... Similar to buying gold and storing it somewhere safe. Nobody doesn't even need to know you have it.
|
|
|
Uncontrolled inflation is bad and causes a crisis for the economy. But some people argue that low inflation figures also indicate an economic downturn. If the low inflation rate indicates sluggish purchasing power. The impact of inflation is too low to encourage the central bank to reduce interest rates so that people are not too fond of saving and spending or investing money. The sluggish economy will have an impact on the termination of employment due to minimal profits and not meeting sales targets.
There is a mainstream opinion that a low inflation is good for the economy, while a negative or zero inflation is bad. But good to whom? Inflation means your money is decreasing value, while governments are keeping that value difference for them. I don't trust that opinion and economic researches, as those researches are mostly paid by governments themselves. Just for fun, when your exchange rate is 1 dolar per kilogram
|
|
|
Actually, this graph can not show us a detailed meaning behind it. I mean, maybe they just move their money in order to invest something abroad.
No, it's people that move, not the money, if you read the articles these are people who are getting out of those countries and choosing another, not for investment but to protect their money and in some other cases to protect their lives. Having money in some of those listed above means you must also change your political views or learn to shut up!That's called taxes It's called stupid socialism when you have to tax to give away free money for those that scream louder.No wonder France has managed to get a place there when the crowds shout to tax the kulaks what choice you have? There are countries that match France in normal taxes for the average Joe, but France was one of the last that scrapped the wealth tax in the EU, guess who put it there in the first place? It starts with Socialist and ends with Party Those are the exact points that I though when I posted the images. I live in a country were rich people have a very good quality of life (brazil). We have a good weather, there is a good health care for who is rich, beautiful place, and so on... But the problems comes in security, "changing political views or learn to shut up", abusive taxes to give away mooney to screamers who don't work and so on. France is a good example of that. Amazing country in many aspects, but socialist policies and just kicking away millionaires Anyhow, just as bitcoin won't be able to make watermelons grow in the Sahara it won't be able to change people's opinion and needs
But it may change the way government can confiscate your money. You can, for now, legally buy bitcoins and store them in a safe place, or sent it abroad. This way people will be less affected by governments abusive policies.
|
|
|
What I want the forum to discuss is this: I believe that the application of Blockchain cut across many industries such as healthcare, logistics, insurance, governement, education and so and so forth. Why is the application of Blockchain to finance has this popularity than application of Blockchain to other sectors? What do you think?
Simple because the application of the blockchain technology to other industries is very doubtful. Blockchain is a very slow and heavy database. Immutability, Transparency and so on are not necessarily good for those industries you mentioned. There might be some applications in other industries, but that is not what blockchain was designed for. It was designed for financial transactions record. I believe when people try to apply blockchain to other industries, like those you mentioned, they are thinking in the wrong way. The common approach is: "I have the solution, the blockchain. What do I have to do to fit the problem to my solution?". While it is, in fact, the other way around: "I need a database with transparency, immutability, security, etc. What are the available solutions? Will blockchain do it?" When thinking like this, most people will realize that they don't need blockchain at all at their industries.
|
|
|
Sim, UM Bitcoin é uma merda. Centenas de Bitcoins são uma benção.
E eu pensando que eu era altcoin maximalist.. kkk achou um shitcoin maximalist Eu sou shitcoin minimalist
|
|
|
O Bitcoin tem muito disso, mas ele está tentando ser uma moeda global. A moeda global. Se ele, do jeito que está, conseguir, ele terá se tornado simplesmente uma merda pior do que a que temos atualmente.
Já que ninguém se manifestou querendo criar moeda nenhuma, vou iniciar o mini bitcoin em breve. Fique atento se quiser entrar no início.
Ue, mas o bitcoin não era uma "merda"? Pq voce vai usar a tecnologia dessa merda para fazer uma mini merda? Pq voce nao faz um mini-dolar, ou um mini-reais? Ou entao um mini-bitconnect?
|
|
|
|