I am noticing your mind is incapable of abstaction.  Perhaps that's why you can't see that god is everywhere.  I will pray for you.

From what I see on the photo, she's not standing above that guy on the cross. She's behind on that guy and somehow pleasing that guy on the cross. I wonder what the connection of that green animal with it's tongue out.

Look what I found!



Jesus, Mary and The Green Lion

religions dont hate atheist. They just dont agree with their opinions.

Thanks for this poll. It's always good to know what's important for Americans to know what you should do (the opposite).

So for USA, the worst candidate is an atheist socialist... Well that's exactly what we would need then.

New Gallup Poll Shows That Atheists Are No Longer the Least Electable Group in America

For decades now, Gallup has been asking voters about their dealbreakers when it comes to electing a President:

    If your party nominated a generally well-qualified person for president who happened to be ________, would you vote for that person?

Every time they’ve asked that question, “atheist” has been at the bottom of the list.

In 2012, there was cause for celebration simply because more than half of those surveyed said they wouldn’t hold atheism against a politician.

Gallup released a new poll today asking the same question and — for the first time ever — “atheist” isn’t the worst trait in a Presidential candidate.

Thanks, Bernie Sanders!

    Independent Bernie Sanders, who is seeking the Democratic nomination, is the only Jewish candidate in the race. And while a large majority of Americans are willing to vote for a candidate of his faith, Sanders’ self-identification as a socialist could hurt him, as half of Americans say they would not vote for someone with that background.

Not only is being a Socialist less acceptable than being an atheist, nearly 6 in 10 Americans say they would be comfortable voting for a Godless candidate within their party.

That’s an incredible change!

(I mean, it’s not great. We’re still pretty damn low on the list. And we still have no realistic chance at getting an openly atheist candidate in the White House. But… we’re not last!)

The first time Gallup asked this question, in 1958, only 18% of respondents felt comfortable voting for an atheist. (That was the decade when “Under God” was stuck into the Pledge and “In God We Trust” was put on the currency. We were even less popular back then.)

So even though we’re nowhere near the upper echelon of Presidential traits, we’ve made some serious progress. Considering the religiosity of our country and the way just about every politician speaks about the importance of faith, this is a big freaking deal.

When it comes to the traits organizations like Gallup ask Americans about, we’re no longer the least electable group in America.

While some have high IQ and weak faith in God, others have weak IQ with great faith in God.

Its true that there are theist who do great things too but as what Steven Weinberg quoted "With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil — that takes religion."

What would jesus do?

I will make it easy on you: I hate everyone! People are smelly, noisy, 99% of the time stupidly competitive and don't appreciate life on spaceship Earth.

The English noun bigot is a term of abuse aimed at a prejudiced or closed-minded person, especially one who is intolerant or hostile towards different social groups (especially, and originally, other religious groups), and especially one whose own beliefs are perceived as unreasonable or excessively narrow-minded, superstitious, or hypocritical.

Like every ideologies there are radicals. Hoo(sic) please don't be offended, it's normal. Not all LGBT are fanatics, but there are some.

So who are the biggest ennemies(sic) of the radical LGBT community? For me it's religious people from the 3 main monotheist faith, because of the passages in each text against homosexuality and other practices. As such the radicals LGBT community members are at war with the representatives of the 3 monotheistic faith.

However you don't go overtly or frontally directly at war with christanity(sic) or islam... As such the radicals among the lgbt will use the marginal approach and hide themselves among the mainstream peaceful and legitimate lgbt groups.
However I think that the radicals or extremists in the lgbt community are a threat to the all.

For example I don't understand what is the source of this anti-God movement in the US army... I mean atheists don't care and find religious people a little bit stupid but if it helps a brother in providing a better quality fighting on the battlefield... How to oppose? And no one is forced to attend a religious service in the US army.

Opinions?

Pitty Hubble (HST) does not exist, would have been nice to look at moon and sun from space. (Ups, forgot there is no Space)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ItXCzyUt-A  



Evolution: if someone thinks or feels he is part animal, let him be. I am pure Human God's creation.

looks like wikipedia is the new bible of "scientism" lol

"Faith" a belief that is not based on proof

http://flatearthfiles.com/index.php/file/5-100-proofs-earth-is-not-a-globe-william-carpenter

Things working different in the past is the claim of science. Look at Big Bang. Things worked different back then. But nobody even knows that there was a Big Bang. Science is so mixed up, that there isn't any reason to believe a word they say.

C-14 amounts present today are not reliable because nobody knows for sure how much C-14 existed back prior to the Great Flood. If there were 100 times the C-14 present back then as we think now, it would throw the whole C-14 science off. And if there were 100 times less, it would be the same. We don't know how much there was back then. We are just guessing that it was similar as today.