If bitcoin falls to these values, then all the altcoins you listed will collapse after it. The whole market will collapse. If you think that when bitcoin falls that much, the altcoin market will be up and bullish, you are dead wrong. Altcoins will fall even further at this bitcoin price, and many new projects will die altogether.

The transfer of funds from bitcoin to altcoins has a short effect and not always. More often than not, bitcoin market pulls all altcoin markets to the abyss.

And why the failure? I was talking about the end of the hype, not failure. I'm not saying that NFT is a failure, but it was heavily littered with spam when everyone wanted to make easy money from the industry. Remember DeFi hype. In the beginning there also were a lot of meaningless tokens which only had the goal to make money from the HYIP. Now that the hype has passed, there are projects that have some real product instead of empty promises.

I think something similar will happen with NFT and only quality products will appear in this industry now.

Ethereum killers were, are and will be. But so far no one has managed to do it. But at the same time I am not trying to choose the best platform for smart contracts. All of the competitors you listed are good, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. To interact with the crypto industry, you can use all of this list, for each of them has its own good projects, and cross-chain bridges allow to conveniently interact with these platforms.

As for Ethereum itself, I think it will remain the #1 platform for a very long time. It's like bitcoin, only among altcoins.

There are no benefactors in the crypto industry who are willing to help all people get profits. The primary goal of such stories about a project is to make money for oneself. First of all, the task of anyone who is trying to publicly tell everyone about a new super project is its own profit or referrals for new arrivals to the project.

When you invest in a project on someone else's advice from public places, you are not an investor, you are a liquidity provider for such people.

The project has already given x60 for the year. And this is on the wave of crypto market hype, when everything was growing and bitcoin reached 69,000. Of course, by the next bullrun cycle this project can seriously upgrade its ATH, but to reach x1000 it will need to raise a lot of money. If its maximum offer is 2,000,000,000,000 tokens, the circulating offer is 1 billion, and the target price at x1000 should be at $10, then the capitalization of the project would have to raise about $10 billion. This is the capitalization of a NEAR-level project, with its own blockchain and advanced ecosystem.

COTI is unlikely to reach such heights in 5 years.

Что вы имеете ввиду? Что вам надо перевести?

What do you mean? What do you need translated?

Judging by the latest news, I noticed that the interest of NFT industry leaves a double impression. On the one hand in the same March there was a drop in interest in NFT from retail traders and those interested in this direction of the crypto industry.




This is also reflected in the drop in trading volumes on OpenSea and a decrease in the number of searches on Google. That is, according to these factors we can conclude that the NFT haip is coming to an end. But on the other hand in March venture capital investments were mostly in the NFT projects.

What do you think, the NFT HYIP is over or the interest in investments in the NFT projects is due to the fact that now the market began to appear to a greater extent, high-quality projects, but not a mountain of spam, when NFT created everyone who is not lazy?

I think the correlation of bitcoin price movement with the altcoin market will continue. It has already become like the backbone of the crypto market. Bitcoin has a primary influence on altcoins, and also serves as a kind of hedge for crypto investors. For example, when bitcoin goes down, altcoins go down in value, when the price of bitcoin corrects, many investors pour their liquidity into altcoins. When bitcoin has a major price crash, it pulls the altcoin market with it.

This direct interaction mechanism will continue. It is also worth considering that on cryptocurrency exchanges, altcoins are traded in tandem with bitcoin. This also imposes a certain imprint on the correlation of bitcoin market with altcoins.

I think it is a conflict of interest. In all respects, cryptocurrency is better than the old banking system, but because of the use of leverage and restrictions by governments and banks, cryptocurrency will try to be as similar as possible to banking, with the same centralization, regulation, and ability to impose sanctions on assets. I understand that the nature of cryptocurrency excludes all these methods that come from traditional finance, but an unregulated and decentralized cryptocurrency threatens this whole system, so they will try all kinds of methods to break and restrain it, centralizing and de-anonymizing crypto users as much as possible. Look at the latest trends: continuous bans, legislation on disclosure of information about crypto users, leaks of data from exchanges to governments, expansion of regulation and taxation. It's just like the banking sector.

Judging by the dynamics of the community response to tweets of Ilon Musk, people are beginning to gradually realize that all this is the usual market speculation and that the price of DOGE after approving statements of Ilon Musk does not hold at its increased values and begins to fall, and therefore begin to lose money all those who have believed in these speeches of Ilon Musk. The last 2 news well showed the true demand for these coins. The demand is not as high as the hype that Musk is trying to create around this coin and Tesla. In any case, the fate of DOGE is not particularly important to him, the main thing is Tesla and everything associated with it.

The value of NFT is too subjective. In the long term, projects like NFT (with the rarest of exceptions) should not be in your portfolio. Right now, these projects are mostly used for ordinary speculation and nothing more. People buy their own NFTs from themselves to create an atmosphere of demand and interest around them. Maybe if you decide to invest in some NFT project, you too will be sold such a pacifier.

Invest in established protocols that have their own blockchains, ecosystem and strong community.

Investing in new or young projects is always a risk, especially if the development team is not experienced. They may encounter various difficulties in the course of project development and the project will die, having lost all its capitalization. Even despite the fact that the team sincerely wanted to develop their project. The competition in the crypto industry is very high, so you should use as much analysis as possible before investing. Especially you should take into account which funds are interested in the project and what kind of tokenomics.

And that's a good thing. People are enlightened and understand that their wishes are not true and that bitcoin cannot gain the price they want so quickly. People have become more knowledgeable about bitcoin, so there are a lot fewer of those naïve predictions we saw in 2017-2018. And even if they appear, people try to explain it as intelligently as possible, not just wishful thinking.


Yes, CBDC development is underway and it is unknown how the governments of the countries where these products will be launched will behave towards bitcoin. If these countries decide to go the way of China, we will definitely not soon see bitcoin at a million dollars. Because such bans will greatly slow down bitcoin adoption and hold back its growth.

I wanted to get acquainted with the site, but a rather strange link that leads to some folders, where-you have to choose another folder to get the site. And I can not go to it without registration. And I'm also suspicious of projects that borrow some of the names from popular projects, like Shiba inu. If I'm not mistaken, I've already seen about ten such tokens with the name inu at the end. What's the point of this copying? A new trend?

Checked coinmarketcap, the token only appeared on the radar on April 8, no data. So far, an extremely questionable project.

I would not use a mobile wallet, because it is not a safe solution to store your funds, especially if we are talking about an Android phone. At most, it's a mobile wallet for making some small crypto payments, and that no more funds come in. I choose a desktop wallet paired with a hardware wallet. In my opinion, this is the best solution in terms of management and security of your cryptocurrencies.

I was pleasantly surprised by the LUNA Foundation's bitcoin purchases . If the hype for bitcoin-backed algorithmic stablecoins starts, Bitcoin Treasuries Holdings could grow in earnest. NEAR is also rumored to want to release something similar. Stablecoin's capitalization has grown to 160 billion in the last 2 years. This is a very progressive market direction.

Also Bitcoin Treasuries Holdings can add to ETF fund stocks if the mass approval of spot ETFs begins.

Full decentralization is more of a myth than a reality. Even decentralized services are essentially centralized, and they are subject to regulators, they block access to different jurisdictions. So what kind of decentralization can there be after that? The crypto industry is slowly coming to full centralization. More than 100 countries in the world have already adopted the necessary regulatory and tax laws to help the crypto industry. Now there is a trend to de-anonymize all transactions that exceed a certain limit. KYC and AML are everywhere, exchanges are cooperating with governments, Chainalysis has learned to track addresses and belonging to a certain geolocation and identity.

This is the future of the crypto industry, complete control and regulation.

So it's healthy competition. Different stabelcoins, supported by different blockchains, have their own commissions and their own collateral. It's just like real life. You wouldn't like it if you were offered to buy only one car on the planet, even if it had all the useful features that only you need. Competition and variety are important in the industry. In addition, all of these stabelcoins are built on different blockchains, which means you can't come up with one common project, simply because it can't function equally across different blockchains.

If Michael Saylor says he will never spend bitcoins, or he won't even spend them in 100 years (or something like that), how is he going to profit from his huge investment? I somewhat don't understand the point of a company investing in an asset that they won't be able to spend or lock in a profit in their lifetime. You can buy all the time and all the time, but how is that going to help the company if they are not going to make a profit on their investment? Will they pass this function on to their descendants or does Sailor just not want to touch the subject of the fact that he will have to sell some bitcoins at some point and it could bring down the market? After all, everyone is used to reading that Sailor is only buy bitcoins.

Dreams of a million-dollar bitcoin have been going on for five years, since the famous controversy of the now-deceased McAfee. A million-dollar bitcoin is a reality if mass adopting happens. Will it happen in the next 10 years? There is a possibility, if of course bitcoin can solve the many problems it now faces. It is unclear how much more speculation in the industry about the harm of bitcoin mining, its speculative nature, high volatility, etc.

Personally, I think in 10 years bitcoin could be worth $400,000. There are still too many unmined coins for a $million price.