This is because the project is no longer getting the right amount of money from outside to keep it on track. Axie Infinity is an example of terrible tokenomics, and anyone who says it's a solid project just hasn't gotten to the bottom of it. Axie economy couldn't cope with the large flow of new users, as a result SLPs were minted in overabundance, and one should also take into account that SLPs have unlimited issuance. The token burning mechanism was much slower than their mint, making the token inflationary and subject to rapid depreciation. Although the developers themselves tried to make attempts to increase the burnability of the tokens, but as we can see, this was not successful.

In theory yes, in practice the odds are even smaller, around 5/95 not in favor of the investor. Let me explain my position. The fact is that it is not enough only to buy the project, even if you bought it at absolutely the right time, the ideal time to buy. Then you must still wait for the right time to sell it, and that it was the maximum peak of the market and demand. Investors often neglect to sell and continue to hold the coins and sell them only when it has already worked off its highs and gone to the bottom. Buying a x100-x1000 coin doesn't mean you'll be able to take that x100-x1000 out of that project. And the moment when you should have sold will be known for most holders post factum, when everything happens.

Probably the biggest fantasy of the current generation of crypto investors is that by investing in Luna Classic, their investment can bring them big profits. Already repeatedly I see these conversations of traders and investors about how they buy several million coins in anticipation of a big miracle. Luna Classic at £1? Why would it suddenly rise to these values after the deafening failure and launch of a new version of this coin? Just because the price is small and it is a known coin in the past? As a gamble it is worth considering investing in this coin, as an investment there is very little intelligible argument to speculate on the future big growth of this scam.

И где то, что вы предлагаете (якобы) к обмену? На сайте у вас написано, что:


А что мы имеем на самом деле:



Revolut и USDT. Всё!

One would hope that this survey is a true reflection of the situation in the Metaverse. If the speculative trend does not change, then all these projects, even among those with a quality and original product, will become victims of market speculation. After all, users see these tokens as just a good way to get rich quickly, and this negatively affects the promotion of Metaverse and other trends in the crypto industry.

The idea is good, but it involves some risks. In my opinion, when investing in new tokens, it is important to consider the tokenomics of the project and look at who the investors in this project are, what funds are involved, and when these funds have a vesting schedule. This data will be a good signal for the future of this project. In itself, investing in new projects without any in-depth analysis of the project is just a guessing game and leads to the loss of funds.

But in the long run, these 2 coins are the ones with the strongest fundamentals and maximum utility. They have problems, you can't disagree with that, but where have you seen a crypto project perfect from every angle? They don't exist. The value of crypto projects is well seen over time and ETH has passed this test of time perfectly, no one has yet been able to come even close to ETH in terms of capitalization and utility (except bitcoin, of course ).

Actually, it is far from certain that a low price is a harbinger of great profit. The price of 34 cents does not seem so small, considering that these coins were sold for 1-2 cents for several years. That was a really low price. Now the project has already grown quite a lot, even taking into account the fact that it is now in a big drawdown. But this project has already entered a phase where it will no longer show super X's, but will grow at a steady pace. I don't think matic is going to give 500-1000x to its investors again next bullrun. That time is already gone, just like BTC and ETH are gone.

Несколько вопросов к вам:

А вы принимаете оплату в WMZ? Это платёжная система WebMoney.

У вас карты только в канадских долларах?

Вашими картами можно пополнять торговые счета на биржах?

The best NFT drops I've ever been involved in have been from interactions with some kind of lauchpads or early investments, test-networks, and similar events. Sometimes NFT drops brought in very good profits, but that was 2021. NFT drops on Twitter are 99% garbage, just like the whole NFT industry. OpenSea supports all this garbage and gets its interest from it, and the fact that the tokens traded on this site have no value either in terms of art or in terms of cryptocurrency, they don't really care.

Investors are now looking for a safe haven, but they are not in a hurry to invest in bitcoin, considering it a risky volatile asset. I met some forum posts with graphs showing bitcoin's behavior in periods of increased inflation, and the graphs there did not look positive. In periods of rising inflation, on the contrary, people try to get rid of bitcoin.

160-250% ? This is not enough, there were many projects that offered hundreds of thousands of percent, and of course these are all scams.

In general, in staking, if the APY is more than 10%, it is already considered an increased risk group. In my opinion, the most adequate and honest APYs that projects can offer are those that offer a rate in the range of 3-7%. Such pools are good as long-term partnerships and have strong fundamentals. All projects that offer tens of percent APY sooner or later come to a lower APY, they introduce floating interest and have a very large Impermanent Loss. All projects that offer hundreds and thousands of percent APY are more like ponzi schemes and work as long as there is a steady inflow of new cash from the outside.

When only the most convinced investors remain and there is no more selling pressure, growth will begin, and retail investors will follow, buying up the asset at any price. The market will never be without speculators, especially in the extremely volatile market that cryptocurrency creates. Retail investors just need a reason and a direction set by someone, and they will create demand immediately.

We are now in a deep bearish trend and it is obvious that prices of any asset will fall, regardless of news, even those that are fundamentally important. Right now ETH is only prone to fall, not rise, and I have big doubts that the merger will happen at all this year. ETH has only lost 79% of its value, and that's not the limit for altcoin, it could easily lose 85-90% as well. Although ether is as fundamentally strong as bitcoin, but if bitcoin continues its fall to 10k-14k, the fall of ETH to $700 is a matter of the near future.

After ATH at $1,900, the current price of $29 looks like a tempting investment. But the question is whether this play-to-eran project will be as successful and popular as an investment in the future. As we know, the P2E industry is going through bad times, and even the industry's flagship Axie Infinity remains extremely unclaimed and losing value. In fact, right now it only makes sense to invest in this project for the most hardcore fans and for the amount they wouldn't mind losing. Personally, I would refrain from investing in the p2e industry at this time.

Although Polkadot is another smart contract platform, a competitor to ETH, it has received very good support among exchanges, wallets and various services, so the native DOT token has a lot of applications, and the token has good tokenomics. So this token could make a good statement in the next bull run. I have allocated a place for DOT in my portfolio for long-term investing. I don't know if it makes sense to speculate and trade this token, but its potential is revealed in long term hold, and there is less risk if you invest in DOT instead of trying to trade it.

Don't have to twist words into a profitable victim position and try to make me look like some kind of scoundrel. I didn't say you were scammers. I said the project is a potential scam. This means that you have not cheated anyone, but the project has all the prerequisites to go bust and leave its investors with a loss. By the way, the projects do not always fail because of deception of developers and owners. It can also occur due to natural reasons, such as poor and ill-conceived tokenomics, very bad marketing, unoriginality of the product offered and other conditions.

I came into altcoin world not yesterday and I have reasons to think like that, not just randomly take information and throw it in anyone. Why do I consider this project a potential scam? Because there are no resources to tell about the project concept, white paper, roadmap, there are no venture capitalists, there is no support from various crypto communities. Do you really think that one smart contract address and a telegram group is enough to get people to start investing in you and see your project as a serious player in the crypto world?

If you think that I am prejudicially calling you a potential scam, you can contradict me and provide as an argument at least 3 projects that started their crypto journey just like you did (just smart contract address and telegram group) and succeeded, their token grew in value, they attracted investors, conducted a successful investment round and got listed on some exchange. Do you have any such examples?

Any trading inside a panic sale has absolutely nothing to do with trading, it's a real casino. No analysis works during such periods and it is impossible to predict anything. I have seen many people trying to place orders for quick rebound opportunities but quickly catching liquidations or stop loss triggers. Once UST lost its tether, then those 2 tokens were already completely unmanageable.

Oh, how many of these projects are already multiplied, I run out of time to keep track of this dump of add-ons and add-ons for DOGE. To answer the question of the topic - Hype or a Reality - of course, a hype. Another attempt to sell useless tokens that are associated with a popular name and project, another attempt to parasitize on a promoted brand. Will anyone remember this DOGE crutch in 2 years? Probably not, they will think of something else.

This once again proves that altcoins have no bottom and can fall very, very deeply, almost indefinitely, bypassing all kinds of analytical charts, technical analysis and indicators. Altcoins and borrowed funds are a terrible cocktail, which is a prohibitive risk and leads almost always to the same sad outcome - liquidation.