Hello I am looking for a reputable crypto exchange with good 24 hr. volume/trading and a fairly reasonably priced or free listing. If you have any with some of their listing prices or fees please list them here below. Thanks again.
I doubt that reputable exchanges with good volume provide cheap or free listing of crypto projects. As it happens, if project has too small budget and they can not afford listing on big exchanges with good volume, then they have only option of little-known exchanges, where all trades volume is barely over 50-100 bitcoins. At such exchangers there are always a huge number of various little-known projects, but it is unlikely that such exchanges can be called authoritative. Authoritative exchange and free listing, as it seems to me, are incompatible concepts from different worlds. |
|
|
|
|
In fact, Optimism, MetisDAO, Lido are great long-term investments. These areas are growing very strongly and are gaining support from many services. Although these tokens grew in the last few months, but if Lido drops below $1, it will be a good opportunity to add this asset to your portfolio. You can also consider such projects as Loopring, Polygon, Astar, Immutable, Scale, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Some dubious project offering me to buy tokens on Uniswap, via ETH swap. Tokenomics implies 80% of the entire supply in the Uniswap pool. There are no advisors, investors, etc. That is, almost all the supply will be concentrated on one exchange. What are the prospects of development of the project with such tokenomics, which keeps almost all its proposal in pool of one exchange and offers there to buy tokens in unlimited quantities? In my opinion, almost none. There are a lot of such projects that appear on DEX exchanges, but they die very quickly.
|
|
|
|
Blockchain technology has come a long way since those early days of Bitcoin, and it is clear that this blockchain technology is here to stay. Blockchain technology is about more than digital currency, of course. It is being used for so many different things, including facilitating blockchain-based gaming platforms.
In the coming years, I expect to see plenty of exciting developments in blockchain gaming. Blockchain gaming is already starting to build momentum, but I believe that in the coming years it will be more mainstream. As blockchain platform becomes more popular, and as more companies explore their potential, I expect that this innovation will continue, and it could potentially revolutionize the gaming industry along the way. But as with any emerging technology, until proven otherwise, there will always be naysayers.
It may take at least as many years for blockchain games to be fully adopted as bitcoin before these tokens have high value and go beyond trivial speculation. The main problem with such games is that investors are more likely to pull liquidity from some game than they are providers. As a result, the price of a token collapses as sales prevail over purchases. In the next 5-8 years, this industry may evolve a lot and there will be some foundations and benchmarks, but for now, all these blockchain games are not much different from each other, as they all depreciate equally fast over time and quickly lose interest among players. |
|
|
|
If you check the name itself testnet, it is for the purpose of testing whether or not you will use different Blockchain/network with your coin because in Ethereum there are different testnet network, like Ropsten. It is before deploying the actual chain or the coins itself.
You can never know whether a project would pay you, since it will always be a risk to the bounty hunters if they will believe in the project and hold the coin or something. Just choose something that you believe in.
The occupation of testnets is risky. The fact is that they often yield nothing, especially those that are free and do not require any real liquidity. 95% of such testnets turn out to be a waste of time. Occupations of testnets absolutely do not guarantee future rewards, this is exactly the main risk. Those testnets, which require real liquidity, adding real altcoins turn out to be solvent most of the time, but such testnets do not gather a large audience, because not everyone is ready to spend their altcoins in some test events without any guarantees. |
|
|
|
I can't mine ETH or any other coins right now but I do find a way that might look good but bad to many, I can mine a meme coin called Baby Doge, I can get 609,000,000 of this token per day but that's because the max supply of the project is enormous, what do you think about Baby Doge, some time back there are a lot of noise about this project, any believer here?
If you think that the number of coins generated per day is considered some kind of good sign, that's not really true. Projects with a large circulating supply are the hardest to grow unless they have some kind of additional support from influencers or large holders. These coins are highly inflationary, so there isn't much value in having a lot of them. It's more of a psychological factor than an economic one. There are times when some investors choose to PoS mine coins that are the cheapest. They think there will be more rewards that way, but they don't consider other factors where that cheapness starts to cost them a lot and they lose money. |
|
|
|
Hi all
I have Bitcoin and Ethererum and a few other top 20 cryptos but looking at adding a few micro cap altcoins in the hope one or two 100x or more over the next few years.
Be interesting to hear who is for and against micro cap altcoins?
If you own any what is your plan with them and if not why do you not believe in them?
Altcoins with microcapitalization more often than others can give many thousands of percent in a short period of time. But capitalization alone is not enough, because without the interest of large holders and Influencers no one will need this project. There are hundreds and thousands of such projects with microcapitalization, and almost all of them are scam, dead tokens. Pay attention to other metrics that will allow you to discern a microcapitalization project as a potential gem. Study the tokenomics and investors of the project. |
|
|
|
The rumors about usdt reserve backing have been circulating for so long keeping people in doubt, it is better they clear the air so that investors will be confident enough and have the trust to store their assets with usdt.
It is very unhealthy for any investor to use usdt store the money when it is not transparent, see what happened with ust, even though the scenario is different but it still boils down to trust, many investors trust terra ust enough to store thousands and millions of dollars with it but at the end, things went really bad and people lose money.
Nobody wants a repetition of such a situation with usdt, it is better they own up and do as instructed by the court.
The comparison with UST is highly incorrect because USDT is a centralized stablecoin backed by dollars and securities. UST is an algorithmic stablcoin and has been backed by the dollar through a link to risky and volatile assets such as LUNA and BTC. Keeping money in algorithmic stablecoins is definitely not a good idea, as they are at maximum risk of de-peg. |
|
|
|
|
We should not expect the emergence and rapid development of AAA-level projects in the Play2Earn sector of cryptocurrencies right now. But there is no need to give up watching this industry. If you closely monitor the development of some new high-profile projects and invest in them at an early stage of their formation, before another crypto-hype happens, it can be very, very profitable. Now the whole industry is in decline, there is not much liquidity there, and there is no general excitement observed in 2021.
|
|
|
|
It would make sense if it was the other way around, but like I said before, hitman24 posted first. He couldn't copy amzad00's post by mistake.
Yeah, I didn't pay attention to that right away. I noticed it later. |
|
|
|
Look at these two posts, they are identical. In bounty, some users use previous posts as a sample, they copy that post and then edit it to suit themselves. Ninjastic remembers the post in its original form, which is why such mishaps occur. These two users are not really alts. |
|
|
|
I read online that A US court have ordered USDT owner Tether to disclose the reserves backing its stable coin, this is the largest Stable coin in crypto space presently and this doesn't sound like a good news to me, is this the great crypto collapse in play or I am just think way too much? This freaks me out.
It all depends on the real situation. If USDT does not have any problems and they are ready to confirm their reserves, it will increase the attractiveness of USDT in the eyes of investors and regulators. If the project can not confirm the reserves and it turns out that a large number of coins are not secured by anything or secured by some debt obligations, there will be an outflow of funds from USDT. Such a development would have a positive impact on USDT's direct competitor, USDC, because it could soon replace USDT in the table of stablcoins. |
|
|
|
To figure out if a new project is worth investing in at an early stage, you need to pay attention to a few things, among which will be the list of investors. If the investors in that project are in tier 1-3 of the investor list, that's a good sign. You can look at the tier list here. Next we look at those venture capital venues where the initial sales of tokens will take place. Watch here. Next, we look tokenomics, if the offer is too large and the price is high for a public sale, then you should not expect any miracles from the project. If the initial sale of tokens occurs exclusively on the project website, then close this site and never open it again, because it is very likely to turn out to be a scam and a pacifier project. |
|
|
|
|
It is not quite clear what people expect from an already dead ecosystem and a dead coin? That it will restart again and give away several tens of thousands of percent to recent investors? If Do Kwon is caught and convicted of fraud, all these coins will collapse very quickly. Investing in projects that are in limbo and looking for some hidden gems in it is not investing, it's a gamble.
|
|
|
|
This token has good support and a good chart. Of course, it's no longer a gem and it's unlikely to earn x100 on an investment in BAT, but it's quite suitable for long-term investment. Maybe in the next bull run, BAT will be able to cross the $2 mark. Right now the price is around $0.30. I think it's a good start to start investing.
in the next bull run I doubt BAT will be able to touch $2, most likely BAT will only touch $1 (as the highest price for the next bull run). So far, I see that the development of BAT is not so significant, besides that the use case is not very visible, so I have doubts about the long-term future of BAT. If the crypto market can raise $3-5 trillion in the next bull run, then BAT's rise to $2 is not so unlikely, given the rate at which coins are pumped with liquidity during such periods of excess liquidity. Perhaps this BAT rush will be fleeting after reaching such a price, but in some short period of time it is very likely, because we are not talking about BAT raising $10-15 billion in capitalization, $3 billion will be enough for it. |
|
|
|
Everyone expected explosive growth after the merger, just as everyone expected growth after bitcoin's halving. People started buying ETH to make money on the event. Merger happened, nothing important happened in ETH price, consequently people began to get rid of ETH, large amount of coins was sent to exchanges again and this caused the price to go down. Everything is standard and such scenarios in cryptocurrency are not rare. People buy assets in anticipation of some kind of event and then a dump occurs after that event.
Indeed. It is because people don't really understand what the merge is. They think it is the same as BTC halving, but it is not. People bought ETH because of the good issue about ETH development, sadly they don't know what exactly the development is. Since the merge is nothing to do with the price, surely there is no significant increase in ETH price. Well, people who bought ETH before the merge, must hold their ETH now. It is decreasing a lot along with the decrease in BTC price. But still some managed to make money on this event. Buying ETH was justified in July, when ETH was worth about $1,050 to $1,100. Since then, it began to grow, when Buterin announced the final date of the merger, ETH continued to grow due to increased demand. Before the merger, these investments yielded nearly 70% returns. For an asset that has a huge capitalization and a great price, 70% in 2.5 months is a great result. |
|
|
|
There is no decentralization in PoS, and never has been. This is a big myth, which is imposed on us by developers of such coins and those who actively promote them in the network. It has been noticed more than once that when some PoS coin votes, 90% of addresses belong to one or several addresses. What kind of decentralization with such distribution of coins and votes can we talk about? ETH became just as centralized after the merger. More than 50% of the network validators are owned by a few large companies.
Exactly. PoS is utter centralization at its core. It enriches whales (mainly exchanges, big companies, and wealthy investors), while leaving the little guy out of the system. ETH made a bad decision by pleasing the regulators instead of the community. Now it's going to pay big time as centralized exchanges gain control of all of the network. ETH will now become an easier target for mainstream governments who'd want to censor people's ability to participate in "De-Fi" and gain financial privacy. I would say that the U.S. government could now take complete control of the entire ETH network. The first alarm bells are already starting to ring. The head of the SEC says that 44% of validators are located in the United States, which means that most of the validated transactions are American. In addition, the SEC wants to equate ETH to a security rather than a commodity and then the American securities laws will apply to ETH. The American government will block and confiscate any addresses at will and nobody will be able to object. This could kill the whole network, because it would be no better than the normal banking system. |
|
|
|
Would you consider investing now in Ripple instead of Bitcoin?!
Very often it happens that during a bearish bitcoin market, some major altcoins start to grow rapidly. Earlier this was seen in ETH, which grew by 70% in 2.5 months. Now liquidity has started to flow into XPR, which has grown 30% in the last 4 weeks. This is a normal occurrence for the market, but it doesn't mean it will always be there. If you want to invest short term, of course you should consider altcoins, but when the full scale bitcoin pumping starts, it will be the opposite. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
