BUMP

Чуть выше я ж написал. Зачем мне карта WebMoney? Я спокойно и без неё могу выводить фиат. На р2р обменниках я не встречал WebMoney, в основном там вайзы-шмайзы и т.д. Подскажите, если знаете такие р2р обменники.

Спасибо за ответ. В принципе, у меня есть топик в этом же разделе, там у меня всё описано, что мне надо и мои условия Обмен WebMoney на биткоин или альты.

Если не трудно вам, то можете глянуть и дать ответ. Прямо здесь можно.

Тема перемещена в Trashcan
 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5402603.0

Причина: дубль топика https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5354887.0

Страничка со статьёй появилась в поисковой выдаче 12 дней назад. Стало быть, 3 июня.

Obviously they are facing a lack of liquidity. All of these platforms are very shaky and vulnerable, don't expect full and total security from crypto services. In times of market panics and mass sell-offs, even the most reliable systems often fail to cope with the challenges that are thrust upon them. That's why their security is only conditional, no matter how harsh it may sound.

The problem with such platforms is that if people want to withdraw funds, the platform needs to give them back from their own pockets and it will be real cryptocurrency, not the synthetic one the platform has. And platforms do not want to cover the costs of the market situation at their own expense, so it is easier for them to limit participants' rights and temporarily block their money.

Trade volume is often inflated, so do not focus on it much. Don't forget that trading volume, which is shown on trading platforms, is not always the transactions of real people, bots are also involved. Obviously, this can be one of the metrics when choosing a project or deciding to buy/sell it. If you are concerned about trading volume formed on large-scale selloffs, it is also worth paying attention to the order book and looking at the depth of the market. If there are only sellers in the market, and the demand from buyers is very minimal, then clearly this project at the moment is not of interest in terms of investment.

There is another side to this case. When you buy an asset and it begins to fall, first you lose 0.5x, then the price falls by a factor of 2, by a factor of 2.5, etc. And the investor sells, fixing losses and supposedly saving at least part of his deposit. But then the project hits rock bottom and starts to grow and you are already out and then FOMO hits you, because you not only made a loss, but also did not get a solid profit, which the project gave, if you had waited a bit. So the approach you describe is not really justified. I've been caught in 2021 a couple of times myself.

Many telegram channels are built on the shilling model and advertising of specific projects, as well as on referral programs, so I would not trust the projects they select. I always analyze information from several resources to get more objective information, if some site publishes false information, which is very different from other resources, then this service can be abandoned, because most likely it just advertises the projects it needs, inflating the data on not the best ico and making them more attractive when making an investment decision.

What difference does it make how much an asset has fallen in a short period of time? Only speculators pay attention to that, investors look at long-term value preservation opportunities and older timeframes. And in those categories ADA loses to bitcoin. If everyone was looking at how much an asset loses in a week, we would have popular assets that aren't even in the first thousand on coinmarketcap.

Доказательства, пожалуйста, предоставьте. Голословные обвинения на форуме запрещены.

Тема перемещена в Trashcan
 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5402569.0

Причина: дубль многочисленных топиков про цену и будущее биткоина

That's not surprising, given the altcoin market environment. If this project had launched in mid 2021, I think it would have raised the necessary investment because at that time everyone was investing in all projects in a row. There was a hype back then, and people thought that by investing in gaming projects like this they would find a gem like industry leader p2e, axie infinity. But now, when even the top projects don't interest many people, what can be said about unknown newcomers in the GameFi industry.

I understand that Binance is the largest exchange, but why not start with a listing on less well-known and less expensive platforms. Listing on Binance is already a slightly different level, when large forces are involved in the project, there is a strong community and there are venture capital funds as investors.

In terms of attracting investment, have you conducted, for example, seed rounds to attract major investors?

And what prevents you from diversifying your staking and using 2 stablecoins? Why choose between 2 assets when you can have both in your portfolio and still balance your stablecoin portfolio and thereby reduce risk? To me, USDC is a slightly better asset than USDT. And I believe it will be a top stablecoin in the near future. Both USDC and USDT have similar problems with short-term loss of tethering and securing their tokens with real fiat.

And what real reflection of affairs does this poll show? What is its victory as the most common coin in the bear market? ADA has already lost over 80% of its value and could lose even more if bitcoin continues to fall. It might win in the poll, but in the market, right now ETH and BTC are losing their value more slowly than ADA.

NFTs are ICOs that were relevant in 2017, only 2021. NFTs have no value and the original idea of transferring art to blockchain has been drowned out in the floods of speculation, wasg trading and various manipulations. I have only occasionally seen real applications of NFT associated with real estate, it gave the right to acquire that very real estate, but those are isolated cases. The bulk of the acquisition of NFT has always been related only to one purpose, to more profitable resale to someone else.

When investing, many people fail because they use speculative rather than investment behavior. The main rule of investing is to remain calm, to sell when the market is rising and to BUY when the market is correcting. Most people have it the other way around, they buy when the market is rising and sell their portfolios for next to nothing on corrections. For investing you need to take into account only the fundamentals, and leave the various ups and downs to the traders at the exchanges.

It is unknown what competition between banks and cryptocurrencies will be after the widespread introduction of CBDC. It is unlikely that we will see the closure of banks in the next few years. Most likely, centralized finance and decentralized finance will develop and exist in parallel. Even if there is a direct threat to the banking system, governments are more likely to start restrictions for cryptocurrency than to destroy banking institutions. This is not beneficial to big capitals, and of course, no one will give full power to decentralized finance, where there is no state control. Therefore, replacing banks with DeFi is more of a fantasy.

I would not trust the judgement from some service, it could be a common manipulation, as youtube-influencers do. In any case, whether he is right or wrong, you can't make a decision based on his judgments. By the way, the service has some problems with data updates. Shows that the capitalization is 1.85 trillion, when it has long been below such values. If their portfolio is as up-to-date as their market data, then you can conclude that you should not trust this service.