Is Burning the ultimate solution to get prices going up for our coins out there? And why is this mostly done by a certain niche of coins like xxxxx finance, xxxx inu etc
It is only if the number of coins burned exceeds the number of coins generated, for example by mining or unlocking. Coins exceed the number of coins generated, but how does this happen I thought If coins are reported to have 21million coins as the total supply it can never exceed this number... And by the way don't these projects go for a coin audit and the alike to avoid such under counts Burning occurs in many coins of limited issue. Don't think that burning is only relevant for coins with infinite issuance. For example, BNB has a limited issue of 200 million tokens, but Binance constantly reports on the coins it burns. This is necessary to control the balance between supply and demand, i.e. the developers redeem their tokens in order to normalize the price of the asset and prevent a rise in inflation, which would cause the price of the token itself to fall. .As a prime example, we can remember the burning of the Axie token, which was not enough to beat inflation and the increasing supply of coins on the market. As a result, the price of that token began to decline very quickly, despite the fact that there was constant coin burning in the tokenomics of the project.
Clearly demand was missing from this and the herd mentality was all locked on selling which resulted in putting so much pressure on price to keep tanking. But the situation would have been different if the team or whales countered by buying all coins from dumping hands this would have seen price going to the moon. Whales buying coins from weak hands doesn't mean there will be lightning-fast growth. Look at bitcoin, in the last 5 months several millions of coins were bought at $18,000-23,000, but for some reason the price has been stomping on the same price point for months, even though the purchases continue. Strange, don't you think? The thing is, until market makers steer the market in the right direction, these accumulative whale purchases won't have the desired effect.
|
|
|
Here's the deleted post. The interest of new investors certainly does not care about the current market situation (Bear Market or Bull Market), they feel confident in the future or in the next few years Bitcoin will be more valuable. In fact, new investors will regret looking at the history of Bitcoin prices in recent years because they have only just been able to jump into this field. people who care about bear market or bull market to be precise for those who trade short term because the main goal is to make profit by relying on market sentiment
can be said only to seek daily profit. it's true that an investor who has thoughts of long-term investing in crypto, especially bitcoin, they will never care about market situations like bears or bulls but they only think that the value of the crypto assets they hold will have a high value in the future. bears and bulls are just market situations that will indeed occur in the next few years, for an investor will just keep buying and buying more and more to add to bigger assets in the future to come. Why are you surprised? You just picked up and practically retold the post you quoted. Naturally, someone among the users sent a report on your post and the moderator correctly responded to that report by deleting your post. So there's nothing to be surprised about.
|
|
|
It is unlikely to benefit the social network itself, and if any paid subscriptions appear, The Indepenndent may be right in saying that the arrival of Ilon Musk to Twitter will mean the death of this platform. If we're talking about introducing DOGE to Twitter, clearly not as a way to collect money from verified accounts. It would make more sense to add DOGE as a way to pay for tips, donations or to pay for some merchandise within Twitter. Surely Musk would make some sort of internal marketplace.
|
|
|
Is Burning the ultimate solution to get prices going up for our coins out there? And why is this mostly done by a certain niche of coins like xxxxx finance, xxxx inu etc
It is only if the number of coins burned exceeds the number of coins generated, for example by mining or unlocking. That is, if the coin will not create deflation, then the burning will not have much effect on the price. As a prime example, we can remember the burning of the Axie token, which was not enough to beat inflation and the increasing supply of coins on the market. As a result, the price of that token began to decline very quickly, despite the fact that there was constant coin burning in the tokenomics of the project.
|
|
|
So lets dicuss , why TPS more important than previous years? as far as i know , TPS is more important if Crypto adoption massivly happended, TX need to more speed.
I can't agree with the fact that for crypto adopting it is more important such indicator as TPS. To prove this, I will give bitcoin as an example. No one will argue that bitcoin has the strongest mass adopsion among all cryptocurrencies, but at the same time bitcoin has an extremely weak TPS. In addition to TPS, a cryptocurrency must have good tokenomics, a robust protocol, interest among investors and the community, strong demand for blockchain, and a deflationary model to strive for mass adopting. No one is interested in an inflationary altcoin with pos and exposure to censorship, even if it has a TPS of 100,000 transactions per second.
|
|
|
Just of yesterday I have seen a strong move of the ethereum gaining about 10 percent from the previous price and I was triggered to know if the bull about to kick off. What do you smells from it?
This could be a common manipulation to make market participants believe that a bull market is now beginning and thus begin to buy. Don't forget, the market is manipulative and often the big players create purposely needed conditions, which many participants are waiting for. Although this does not negate the possibility that it could be the beginning of a real market reversal, but I would not rush too much and wait for more signals confirming increased demand for cryptocurrencies and new players coming to the market.
|
|
|
Очередная скамина. Проехали и пошли дальше
|
|
|
У меня тоже все цифры на месте. Через 4 часа посмотрим.
|
|
|
На сайте ни слова о токене TRIBL. Или я не нашёл?
|
|
|
Исправьте ссылки. У вас там двойной https://
|
|
|
First of all, it is morally indecent to draw the attention of the community in such a "dirty" way. Secondly, you have a similar thread in the archives. I do not know who moved it there, but it does not change the essence. It's the same "dirty" marketing. I don't recommend taking it out of the archive, otherwise it will probably be deleted as well.
|
|
|
Until bitcoin decides on the price movement and trend direction, ETH will definitely hang around in a sideways trend as well. Now the whole market has sharply decreased activity and trading activity as well. No matter what the trading indicators show, if bitcoin will stagnate, ETH will follow it too. It would be too naive to expect that a single coin, in contradiction to the whole market, will start some growth. If a further dump happens, the main thing is for ETH to be able to keep the $1,000 price.
If the merge hype was not enough to make ethereum enter some kind of altcoin season then it is too naive for people to think it can still present massive growth when the hype is gone, I do not understand why it is so hard for people to simply admit they were wrong in their predictions, I was also one of those which thought ethereum could do well after the merge, it did not happen and I simply admitted my mistake and moved on. I'm still inclined to believe that people hoped for a hype at the expense of the merger event in order to speculate on the hype as much as possible. I don't think that after the merger, the hype would have continued because the altcoin market is very weak and there is almost no cash flow into cryptocurrencies. While I don't really expect exorbitant prices for ETH, the only thing that really upsets me is the insanely growing rate of censorship and centralization in the new Ethereum network. I'm already thinking of reducing my stock of ETH
|
|
|
How many different business models have appeared on the crypto market. But all of them, in my opinion, have one big problem: they do not stimulate participants to develop this business model and the token or coin that supports this model. The majority of people come to these projects for earnings and are not interested in the project itself, its features, etc. The goal is only one: to make a quick buck, preferably involving the connection of many accounts and profiles. Over time, no matter what interesting models developers offer, they all fade away, the price of the token falls to the bottom and the community migrates to some new offer. As long as people don't want to develop projects and only come for earnings, all these models will continue to crumble over time.
I think it happens because the developers itself are also only targeting to thicken their pockets instead of continuing to develop them so that they can develop to good track and many projects whose ideas are not relevant to the needs of the crypto world itself. Seeing new projects grow and die in a fast time will always be there because sometimes the ideas they develop do not provide any solution. Likewise with the idea of this project vote to earn, the focus that follows this project will only be on earn because there is never a guarantee of how long they will last and people definitely don't want to waste time just supporting a project without getting a profit Of course, developers also hunt for quick profits through the hype of attracting new users to the project. But even if the developers really want long-term development of their project and do not see the pump-and-dump scheme as the primary goal, the community and bots still ruin any promising business models, because the primary goal of entering such projects is always the same: - Get in before anyone else
- Make money
- Take everything and leave to find another project.
|
|
|
A bear market is a useful opportunity where all major crypto investors are waiting for this situation. Because the professional investors buy in the bear market and sell in the bull market. They take entry in the bear market.and getting out in a bull market. Because in a bear market, All coins fall well below their all-time highs and then as the market recovers and the bull run takes hold, all coins can double your profit. So the bear market proves to be very useful if you take entry in good coins at the right time.Bear market is very good chance to make profit where we should choose good and strong projects and then buy coins with small entry and buy in every dip. In this way we can take good profit from bear market.
Only on the condition that you managed to lock in the profits from the last growth. Many investors have not fixed their portfolios and now they are sitting with a big loss and no free money, because all of their liquidity is left in cryptocurrencies, they have no stablecoins or fiat. This is a common mistake many investors make, thinking the bull market will go on forever and those prices that were good to lock in profits were ignored because those investors had a feeling the coin will get even more expensive soon. Institutional investors can afford to buy during a bear market, while ordinary market participants suffer losses and don't buy anything, just wait for the past price to return.
|
|
|
It's the most common mistake to think that if an exchange mentions a coin and tells you how to buy it or send it to a stake, someone is bound to think that it will cause that coin to grow. No, it won't. Binance also had similar guides about various coins, but in the end, almost 2 years passed after they were published and no listing happened. You can talk about listing only when exchange announces this listing and not when they just write about how to buy this or that coin. Do NOT try to look for any connection in these events. There is none.
|
|
|
Did you notice? It is shitcoin season!!! Memecoins are not to be left behind!
What are Shitcoins?
Shitcoins are crypto assets with little to no value or digital currency that has no immediate, discernible purpose. On the other hand, Memecoins are genres of crypto assets with it?s value derived from it?s community?s support. They are largely speculative.
Everything you described applies to any altcoin, regardless of its category, whether it is a utility token or a meme coin. All coins depend on community support and whales. Without them, there will be no demand and the creation of a certain market by market makers. If we are talking specifically about meme koins, it is a class of cryptocurrency whose demand depends only on the availability of some influencer. If a meme coin doesn't have an influencer, who will distribute mentions about the coin in social networks, then this meme coin will remain unknown and unwanted. The popularity of this or that coin depends on the degree to which it is distributed in social networks by some person, a so-called opinion leader.
|
|
|
Предлагаю дополнительный бонус - 10 первых участников аирдропа получат 1 токен SbercoinOne: укажите здесь в теме ссылку в своей соц. сети, где вы опубликовали ссылку на проект sbercoin.one и свой eth-адрес, переведу вам 1 токен SbercoinOne
Раздачи альтов на форуме запрещены. Можно заработать бан. Рекомендую убрать из своего поста эту фразу.
|
|
|
The project has good backers as well as binance support. At the moment about 35% of the whole offer is available. As a medium-term investment, you could make a purchase of 70-75 cents. There is a chance that this project could grow to at least $5 during the next bull run, which is a very good profit. But again, not investment advice, DYOR.
|
|
|
|