I would add that in general any scheme where you are asked to deposit any amount to get something is already a guaranteed SCAM. Such schemes existed even before the advent of cryptocurrencies and Airdrop. Also, any Airdrop that asks for your personal data should also be ignored. I've seen cases where a full KYC was asked for airdrop in exchange for tokens worth a total of $20. And the worst part is that there were users who sent their credentials in exchange getting nothing. Where there is a smell of free tokens, people often lose their minds and do extremely stupid things.

ByBit recently had an offer on FITFI staking with an APY of 999%. I didn't have time to go in, the shares sold out very quickly. If they don't cheat on the interest rates, that option looks a lot more attractive than a reward for running in sneakers, which you have to buy. I wonder what the minimum return on those sneakers in this project is?

The fears are confirmed. Algorithmic stablecoins look too fragile and can lose their link to the dollar very quickly. Anchor lowered the percentage on staking, instead of 20% it is already less than 18%.

Looking at the charts at https://terra.smartstake.io/anc, you can see that a lot of USTs are being withdrawn from the protocol now, more than 2 billion tokens have been withdrawn in the last few days, and this has led to a short-term detachment from the dollar. What happens when withdrawals exceed 5 or 10 billion? Staking rates will continue to decline massively.

Для расширения возможностей использования RIC был создан токен в Binance Smart Chain, поэтому Riecoin теперь можно использовать в некоторых DeFi сервисах и децентрализованных биржах.

Контракт токена: 0xc2097531d6cd4a712ae08f398283a92631dc39f9

В настоящее время RICB можно торговать с любым другим токеном BEP20 на PancakeSwap. В форме свопа контракт должен быть указан как токен.

Узнать больше/обсудить.

https://twitter.com/RiecoinDev/status/1519424041861459970

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446703.msg59987375#msg59987375

The bear market, global, has been raging for more than six months, only occasionally giving some periods for the price to rise, which then falls even lower. If a lot of people are waiting for a bitcoin below 20,000, the market, in its own way, may not let that lot of people buy, because the market always plays against the crowd.

Why do you think they are the best? Because you mentioned these coins in your last thread?


Acala Token (ACA) and Astar (ASTR) can fall in price very much. The reason is that these are relatively new projects and there have not yet been strong declines, when early investors are fixed. So buying such new projects now, especially at such an uncertain time, could leave you stuck in "perpetual investor" status for a long time. When a new project comes out, it is preferable to wait until the initial unloading of large volumes by early investors and then pick up such projects at the bottom, rather than on a HYIP.

Your mistake is that you misunderstand this phrase. It says buy at the bottom, not buy when the price falls. These are completely different things. First, you need to determine where the bottom might be, and to do that you need to be able to read charts and be aware of market trends and investor sentiment. Usually, they say about those who buy like you, that he waited for the bottom and got the second bottom as a present.

If you look at the market conditions, you should have bought in March, not April. That was the month when the market rebounded, and April was essentially for selling.

A complete list of all currently available Move-to-Earn tokens has been published in the Russian locale:

---

Largest projects by capitalization:

• STEPN
• Step.app
• Green Satoshi Token
• Genopets
• DOTMOOVS

Apparently the trend is gaining momentum, now might be a good time to invest in such projects, but as a yield mining by buying sneakers I am somewhat skeptical. I heard that the STEPN project may soon launch a sneaker rental feature.

I'm not sure they will leave Twitter. People tend to get used to it and are willing to put up with changes to their favorite service. Did we see users leave CoinMarketCap when CZ's manipulation of the service became apparent? No. The service is still popular. But popularity does not always mean quality. The same will happen with Twitter. How do I see CZ manipulating it? They can set up content filtering so that mentions of Binance and everything related to it will somehow always be at the top, like YouTube trends, or something like that.

I think the reason is that bitcoin is in a kind of uncertainty right now because of global events in the world of politics and economics. I have heard different opinions, some say that for bitcoin the current events will have a positive effect and investors will start to invest in bitcoin. Others, on the contrary, say that the current events have a negative effect on bitcoin due to investors shifting their assets to gold and other safe havens. Also, the Fed meeting with its policy tightening is negatively affecting the bitcoin price. But if you are a long-term holder you can not worry about bitcoin price, it will rise in time when bears will retreat.

I'm sure few people were able to buy bitcoins at the March fall because of the covid. The fact is that there was panic at the time and many were sure that the fall would continue. Most likely the whales, institutionalists and those who had insider information bought at those prices.

I don't believe bitcoin can ever get back to values like 3500 and below. Most likely the bottom will be somewhere around $24-$30,000.

P.S. This thread is for a different section, this is where altcoins are discussed.

A good investment if you are an early adopter or venture capitalist in such projects, but the very way of earning is more like a ponzi scheme and long-term investment in such projects can turn out to be a disaster. The idea itself is good for earning money and will probably be developed further, but you can not be sure that the project in its current form will also maintain interest at the same level and constantly attract new users. And without new users, this project will not survive, otherwise who will pay rewards?

If you decide to buy sneakers in this project and start earning tokens, it's a bad investment, especially now that the altcoin market is constantly tending downward and the value of these tokens is constantly dropping.

For me personally the worst is AVAX. ETH - nothing to say here, leader among blockchains, but not without flaws, SOL also has problems in speed, but the ecosystem is developing very rapidly, especially in the field of NFT, Polygon also showed excellent results both in price and ecosystem development.

AVAX has also grown in the last year and a half, but I don't often see it used in new projects, so it's less promising for me.

Everything that Binance touches, in terms of purchases, subsequently begins to work strangely. Remember CoinMarketCap, as soon as Binance bought it, it started showing false data and the service turned into a manipulative device working primarily for Binance interests. It's the same with Twitter. I think the purchases of such services will be used in further manipulation, because it is access to a multimillion-dollar audience.

Ну, давай перенесём обратно Репорт пришёл я и перенёс, предыдущего репорта я не видел.

Sorry, I didn't notice Well, if you found the source from April 3, then Nerdy doctor still turns out to be to blame.

No, it's much simpler. It's just that both of them (Nerdy doctor and worldtraveller321) copied without specifying the source / took/ stole (any choice) this text is from this source https://educationdoc.com/180/whats-preventing-bitcoin-from-worldwide-adoption

So both of them are to blame.

This is how they decided to artificially increase the demand for DOGE and speculate on the spam theme to make their users buy the coin. If this stupid decision is implemented, there will be a mass exodus of users. Who needs a paid social network where you have to pay for posting, anyway. I understand when the user gets paid for posting, but when it's the other way around, it's not worth it.

Immediately there will be someone who wants to poach dissatisfied users to his social network with similar characteristics to Twitter. Let Mark and Ilon communicate with themselves on their Twitter with such conditions.

What? The most popular and successful project of all time? Well, that depends on what you compare it to. And actually it's not, at what point is Safuu the most successful?

I see the project only recently started trading on the market, at the end of March. I think this project may very well get squeezed now, as the altcoin market is collapsing, and new projects, after a little growth, often tend to renew their historical bottom.

I saw in the article that this project has a huge APY: 383,025.80%. Really? Where would such a huge interest payout come from in the first place? At the expense of what? Too untrue numbers that are usually inherent in all sorts of shitcoins.

Not all of them, but only the hype ones that have become the most discussed and popular over the past 1.5-2 years. For example, this list does not include exchange tokens, DeFi, native protocol tokens, etc. In the types of tokens I listed, a lot of useless garbage appeared in the last 1.5-2 years, which does not offer any good product. The same Metaverse will not all survive, because the competition is large, and there are very few projects that are ready to provide an original and high-quality product.