If you live in a high conflict area where you fear that your property may be destroyed at anytime, then you have a lot more problems to deal with than.whether or not to put your property in Bitcoin or not.

Your first priority should be safety and security.

Ninjastic space does not scrap way back to when the merit system was newly created.

The plausible situation here is the user had enough posts and activity to get the airdrpped merits and deleted their posts soon after that which does not affect their activity count.

Signature campaigns are not forum dedicated or related to the forum at all. More than half of them do not promote crypto projects and are gambling related.
Of course the projects have to have some appeal to the audience here, so the casino houses are mostly those that accept cryptocurrency, other popular services are mixers for crypto and Bitcoin wallets, but their are not forum related in any way, just regular services being advertised.

Anyone looking to hire or be hired should be able to read through 2-3 pages of threads, but maybe the services board should have a child board to advertise a service that one offers and the current one will be to hire people to work on a service, that can help declutter it a little bit.

This is very far from he truth. Ban appeals are not granted cause most bans are legitimate and the banned user actually broke the rules deliberately, sometimes they broke it multiple times and they are not net positive members to the forum.
However you construct the appeal and the support you get will not change the verdict.

If you are banned, this is the most ideal way to appeal it. A thread in meta can be made to support this and get the attention of mods quicker.

Let me prefix by saying anyone can advertise what they want as long as it is not a scam.

Now to the point of the discussion, I don't think users should wear signatures of projects they do not agree with, they feel may be detrimental and will not use for themselves. The world is not utopian and people do things for money in the real world due to situation and circumstances, but this is an online forum and what you do here is well within your control.

There are also numerous campaigns available, granted majority of them are gambling related but there are definitely others.
You can simply apply for some other campaign.

---

There's another argument that endorsement can have different meaning. Advertising a site can be me telling you that it's not a scam website. I'm not encouraging you to gamble, but if you must this is a good website to do it on.

A country is already a small enough group, breaking that off into specific locations will lead to less and less discussions and presents a privacy risk for the users.

The focus should be on getting your local board approved, then working out the most needed childboards to include in it.

Violating many of the rules will only get you a slap on the wrist and nothing more. For you to get more serious punishments you need to break one of three rules;
• Steal someone else's content and pass it off as yours,
• Excessively spam the forum despite repeated warnings,
• Share malwares.

The above rules are not broken in ignorance, so if you have no plan toncheat the system you will be fine here.

---

To understand how the forum works you have to interact more with it, join discussions and try out the available features. Visit the Help option for assistance.

Time to lock this thread and move on since you're aware of what happened now.

It will also be nice if we stopped policing the moderators and assuming they take action cause a higher ranked or more "reputable member" requested for it.

I remember doing same around 2016/2017, less than a handful of years ago.
How much value has been lost shows nothing is being created by the economy, SMEs are everywhere but the majority of them end up falling.

Appointments by the president were made based on nepotism Ora's a reward to that helped him to climb on that seat.

Out of curiosity.
Will positive comments about the proposed regulation also be taken into account and what stops the government from sponsoring comments encouraging it inorder to counter any criticism that it gets?

Do not risk money you cannot afford to lose.

Bitcoin is a reliable investment, but expecting returns in four to five months is highly risky due to the volatility of the market. Investments are best done with spare money and a long term target, so you will not anxiously check the charts every few hours and be forced to sell at a loss.

It's not too late to invest, the price can go well beyond $40k but do not rush into an investment cause of movement in the market.

Do your research and take your time.

• They CAN start a crackdown on privacy tools for whatever boogey reason,
• They can do the same to P2P platforms and any other service that doesn't comply for the same non existent reason.

If this is allowed the cost of privacy will keep growing until those seeking it are considered to be doing something illegal.

There are a couple of non KYC compliant options that you can use.

This is not a new low at all. Scammers have always been doing things like this throughout all recorded cases of violence or crisis.
It makes it almost impossible to trust anything one sees on the internet, I certainly will not send money to any random website or handle without doing days worth of research and communication with those who are handling it.

No one should trust a blue tick enough to be scammed by one.

There is no unique way to earn Bitcoin, it's a form of money. You offer a skill that someone needs and they pay you in Bitcoin if both parties are in agreement with it. You would be thinking; "what skills do I possess that someone is willing to pay for?"

I share the same sentiment. With how high the percentage of the circulating supply is already, the halving will start having less and less effect on the market and the price will peak around a certain range and adjust downwards to accommodate the lose of price speculators. At this time I expect the use case to have significantly changed and for us to have a much higher level of adoption.

It just seems that the safest option is to use an exchange that allows the freedom to trade anonymously and not to play around the regulation as it gets stricter. There are decentralized options that require no KYC that one can opt for.

If someone spammed this system with multiple maximum order transactions the exchange will very likely flag such an account after a while and freeze what's left on it.

MtGox was a scam exchange and screwed over thousands of users on their website.

I don't see a point discussing events of the past but this goes to show how long centralized exchanges have been scamming people and how it's ironic that people still trust them with their bitcoins.

Privacy lost cannot be regained, but one can choose to prioritize it after a period of not doing so and still achieve some levels of anonymity.

If I have submitted documents to two centralized exchanges and have email and password links around, I cannot redact that information, but I can isolate that from any future transactions I make.
If I buy Bitcoin anonymously through decentralized, P2P services and send them to an unused address on non custodian wallets, no one can link that activity to my already exposed identity. And if there is no transaction activity on my already exposed identity it hopefully doesn't get as much attention.
There's of course always the risk it is sold on the darkweb.

This will only increase the cost of privacy for the few.

The propaganda machines has been working for several years now to changed the narrative is on Bitcoin and privacy, and they've done such a good job at it that even some Bitcoin users start asking the question of 'why someone wants privacy?' and even those who do not ask the question and sees nothing wrong in wanting privacy does not d anything to protect theirs or teach others how to.

I am starting to do this now.
I often use some KYC services, albeit without completing KYC and felt that was okay cause I was not enabling the anti privacy war, but even if you do not send them your documents, the time period when you use such services, you are dependent on that as a central authority, so if you use an exchange but don't pass through KYC, they can still choose to freeze the coins you are about to trade for no reason and force you to send documents to identify yourself or abandon the coins you just sent. They also collect tons of other information about you which can easily be gotten if you don't use at form of anonymity tool.

You are also promoting those anti privacy platforms when you use them to trade, buy/sell or store your coins.

They have to first realize what their mistakes are. Many people don't see using centralized platforms and submitting your documents as detrimental to their privacy.

Bitcoin does not need legalisation from the government and the government in turn will not want to endorse a technology they cannot control.
All citizens can access Bitcoin directly.

You first have to research on the demand for bitcoin payment option.
Some businesses accept bitcoin as a form of advertising for it to attract investors, if that's not your motive and there's no demand for it, I will suggest you focus on more popular payment methods.