listen=1
maxconnections=100
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=wyatt
rpcpassword=derp
port=15298
rpcport=15299


That's all mine has..synced fine

You were so right. But, doesn't this create a buying opportunity? XQD crap will get harder to mine. Once again, I'm LONG on this coin. That means, what happens over a few days isn't affecting me much.

Thanks, just emailed you the details.

We will get it added.

If anyone else has the issue then please use the "Hong Kong" address on our contact page:

hashra.com/contact

i wait now over 12 hours. i sent 22000 coino from my wallet to poloniex. the transfer has more than 1800 conformations. 

XDQ already got pumped and dumped from 7 NAUT to 40 and down to 20 NAUT

I fail to see how currency pairings is supposed to help NAUT
-people can just mine XDQ and trade if for NAUT
-The only real value of XDQ is that people will sell it for NAUT; why would anyone buy a coin that can't even by traded for BTC or LTC?
-XDQ flaws become NAUT's problems

Yes, so unless something happens, miners will just continue to:
Mine XDQ > Dump NAUT > Get BTC
"Because Dirac is NAUT based and merge mined with five other coins, it should be the most profitable coin to mine, ever."

There is a maximum of 16,180,000 NAUT to be minted..
With 1% premined and less than 2,400,000 NAUT currently out
We can assume
161,800 coins are from the premine
2,000,0000+ coin have been mined since the last two weeks

From this we can see Nautilus is going through the "early miner dump" phase
And if people continue to keep buying XDQ with NAUT for whatever reason, we can expect a lot more dumping

tl;dr XDQ was basically created as a second chance for early miners to dump Nautilus, AGAIN
XDQ on its own has zero worth and is only feeding off NAUT's value

The idea of using cryptocurrency as a substitute for fiat, is a proven market.
Trading a coin with value for another coin with value (BTC/LTC), yeah that makes sense too.
But Trading a coin with value for one with ZERO value? (NAUT/XDQ),   just...why?

Problems for Nautilus:
-Inflation from early mining
-Inflation from XDQ
-No Fiat trade pairs
-Only on one good exchange, MintPal (Cryptsy would help a lot)

Assuming BK and the "NSF" do nothing about these problems
The price of Nautilus won't go up for a loooong time until Nautilus AND Dirac to become less profitable from mining.
I doubt many people will want to buy or pump a coin that they will just get dumped on.

Also how is a current market cap of less than $500,000 with no fiat trade pairs supposed to be a "deep liquid market"?

You have recieved word from exchanges that they will place a fixed price limit on sells? In other words - The exchange will not allow users to sell below 0.01?

What if people won't buy for that price? Then we all have a bunch of coins unable to be sold?

Escrow?

We do see a tendency for a smaller number of errors, but not significantly. You may have a bad board in the stack that is effecting the others. You can buy as many of the boards @ $40 as you would like.

Is this some kind of unwritten law? Why do people insist on stating as fact that something is shit or invalid if it isn't posted here first immediately on release with a password protected wallet that must go to the pools first but must go to the solo miners first but must allow self designated forum members to grab the first blocks in the inevitable clusterfuck scenario all of the above creates.

This was an exceptionally smooth launch by recent standards.  The first block was was mined 5 minutes AFTER the twitter announcement.  When I started the wallet, approximately 10 minutes after the Twitter announcement and 10 minutes before this thread) it was on block 67.  In what way does that represent a pre-mine or an insta-mine?  the insta-mine came from people jumping on as soon as they'd got the wallet running, including myself.  If anything I'd say the dev waited quite deliberately before mining himself.  We all know how this works, somebody always ends up pissed off and thinking the whole world wants to know about it.

P.S.
I have no affiliation to Bryce, I am a Twitter follower and I've been stung at least once buying in to something he championed on Twitter (CTM).  Sometimes he speaks wisdom, sometimes he's an arsehole but always with deeply held conviction and one thing I'm pretty sure he isn't is a deliberate scammer / preminer / instaminer.

Like it or not, and a lot don't, but Blake-256 coins are going to give Scrypt coins a run for their money.

^ I will consider it but I may wait and see what comes around. US based.

I have a fairly large order of GoldStrike ASICs coming in the next couple of weeks and should have maybe 1000 chips left over..

They are the ASICs used in the TerraMiners and have a hashrate of about 504Gh/s each provided proper power is supplied (the TerraMiner IV design limits them to 400Gh/s)

In any case if anyone is interested in purchasing in a quantity of 5 or more please let me know, $425 per chip, discount for larger orders..