USERNAME -------- PERCENTAGE ---- PENDING ---- PAID -------- BITCOIN ADDRESS
ineededausername 50% 0 BTC 16.25 BTC 1Jy3vqmq9pSS8XgrtYfrbuz3GV2xKTb2x6
ptd 38.75% 0 BTC 12.59375 BTC 1H5sniC9u3CCFra7EVFuVcNoio8rDLmPFT
slider1978 11.25% 0 BTC 3.65625 BTC 1QAywNshfR2CpLkFZAMAEstWjTBdiiVSsC Current pending amount settled in txid c2d4123173c92a486467eb7634ba760303049df917dceef0c06aa0ed10f33364Note: It was sent without a transaction fee, but I doubt you guys are in a hurry. If you want me to pay the fee in the future, let me know and I'll happily remove the transaction fee from your amount. Awesome  |
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin community needs to excommunicate cancers like cryptoanarchist from our midst... people who are idiotic conspiracy theorists, allow ideology to dictate their reality, and make childish arguments against obvious facts.
I hope newbies don't see these people as representatives of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Does this guy understand what a representative sample is? Does he understand statistics at all? He thinks exit polls don't work because they're "0.3% of the total." LOL  |
|
|
|
Good luck
Your continued faith in the scammer is depressing. You're only leading on the scam. What if the guy's just incompetent, and not actually a scammer? I'd say we should give him a chance to prove himself. But I agree this all looks really shady. If it's legit, it's a miracle such an incompetent person can create a system that makes this kind of money automatically. Will you wait here a while, while I go dig up the 2 or so weeks of chatlogs from when BitScalper was first created and everyone was bitching at me for supporting him and defending him and he himself was begging me not to bail on him but everything slowly and meticulously became more and more obvious it was a scam and I had to (against my own wishes) admit to the fact that the entire thing was too fishy and ridiculous to even consider being legitimate? If anything, I have been the biggest devil's advocate for BitScalper from day one. I am the most qualified to say he's full of shit. Calm down Matthew. I have to admit that your language and unfounded allegations really turn me off. To me, you sound like you're either young (teenager/early 20s) and just like to spout off, or you're an infiltrator that is trying to bring down people and cause division. I don't think bitscalper is a "scammer". If he was, he'd already be long gone and not posting on here anymore - it'd be pointless. I DO think he is incompetent at building a secure website, but whatever, most people are. It's not appropriate to use derogatory, insulting language directed at someone for trying and failing. I probably know more about computers than you, Matthew, and my site got hacked too. I know how to build a website but providing security against pro hackers is a whole different story. Its obvious to me that the powers that be want to control the exchanges, so certain exchanges will be provided support, and others will be attacked. I want as many exchanges as possible, and to trade at as many as possible, even if they kinda suck - power in numbers. When I see people throwing around the "scammer" label without any real evidence, well, that sounds just like the good ole boys club to me (masons). Look here, we have all the good old ad hominems! > Age > "That's unbitcoin!" > Oh look, masons! Even if bitscalper is not a scammer, he still can't even handle the most basic shit like maintaining a DB. He ACCIDENTALLY DELETES TABLES. Is this a person you want to trust with your money? |
|
|
|
I just logged into my account.
I put 1 BTC in, even knowing it was risky, for a what the hell, I'll give it a shot.
Account Balance: BTC 0
Today Earnings: BTC 0
Total Earnings: BTC 0.09754291
I'd really like to know where my 1.09754291 is.
Is the transaction confirmed yet? Else you might have got scammed (again). facepalm |
|
|
|
exactly & exactly why I made this thread, for input on that & not to troll the Nigerian prince OMG someone may be about to drop $1M on this penny stock BS as ineededausername seemed to think
& also why I hope to move this forward in rl too, initial feedback is disappointing but if I feel it may be worthwhile I do it without any np
I'm sorry if that was not your intent... but you posted a thread about a billionaire + bitcoin in speculation, so it's easy to read it that way. |
|
|
|
No offense, but the speculation forum was the worst place to put this  Our goal is not to sell billionaires large quantities of bitcoins so that the price can go up... instead, we want these billionaires to support adoption with whatever influence they have. This should be moved to Bitcoin Discussion. |
|
|
|
add this; i would create an air gapped wallet for cold storage.
Personally what what I never liked about this option is that I might get to learn about some impending catastrophe and wish to sell immediately, not after 6 blocks. I want my Bitcoins liquid. I trust Gox pretty much now, so I don’t mind using them as a "bank". Can't you import private keys into MtGox? Doesn't that circumvent the confirmation wait time? no, it still needs 6 confirmations for some ridiculous reason |
|
|
|
|
A move to $5.5, which could happen naturally, would trigger a short squeeze to $6...
|
|
|
|
"...quantitative anti-market..."
The fuck is that?! What's an anti-market? I'm lost... |
|
|
|
The rally will be glorious.  |
|
|
|
|
A reasonably sized buy right now would end the entire correction. Come on, manipulator!
|
|
|
|
When will this hoarding fallacy die?
In essence it says "People will hoard bitcoins because they will always go up in value. Hence they won't be used; hence they won't go up in value.... DOOM".
It's a circular argument. If they aren't going up in value, then people won't hoard them, so they will spend them. So they'll go up in value. So people will hoard them. So they won't go up in value. So people will spend them....
As with all economics, the two sides will create two pressures. The magic of the market means those two pressures will compete until a balance is found -- at a particular price.
Jeez, it's a supply and demand curve. Isn't that pre-university economics?
Revalin's quote illustrates this phenomenon best: "Bitcoin is the devil's way of teaching geeks economics." When cryptographers attempt to analyze Bitcoin as a currency rather than as a protocol, they show their ignorance... after all, they're cryptographers. |
|
|
|
oh dear, now there are videos about fundamentals... I feel bearish  |
|
|
|
i'm in line too  |
|
|
|
|
we have two socialists? That's odd.
|
|
|
|
I believe a better observation is that IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER! Does it really matter whether everyone's the same person? |
|
|
|
Insanely good things never stay insanely good, but they can remain very good |
|
|
|
alright, looks like we're going the other way. keyword was "might" |
|
|
|
Bet: 1BTC from 16HzWMzman3ptChQukgLeWsfDJSBw8ciNa
# generated: 52
Payout: 2x bet, 2BTC
Thanks Kluge |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
