|
The long-term trendline has held... for now. I will be staying out of the market for now -- it doesn't have a strong direction and I will be observing it.
|
|
|
|
By the way, guys, I just want to say, thanks for the avatar!  |
|
|
|
I'm not baiting anyone on purpose. I'm quoting primary sources, opinionating on it, and looking for feedback from the bitcoin community.
He has his faults, but he's the least of the evils right now. |
|
|
|
|
We have confirmation... PSAR is bearish for the first time ever since the end of November.
During a bear market, this means a 33-50% plunge. During a bull market, it might mean a break of the major long-term trendline and a "bear rally" down to 5.5.
Since this is still a long-term bull market, this is a blip in the radar, but it is important not to be caught unawares and go 10:1 long on the TV show or something. It's time to cautiously short, folks.
|
|
|
|
I tried again and the links works now. Thank you! Anyone who has the Greasemonkey add-on should certainly install this. And since Atlas is back, there'll be plenty of updates  |
|
|
|
dude, you ruined it...you were perfect at 666 posts
^+1 and you have 333. |
|
|
|
|
By the way everyone, I don't recommend selling/shorting just yet. Hold until we break 6.2 or 6.
6.2: is a .2 support
6: long-term uptrend.
We had a strong support up at 6.7 with the medium-term trendline. I wanted to post something but didn't feel confident enough. I should have.
|
|
|
|
For those still listening to me, and I know you are few... Alternate scenario seems to be active scenario now. Target 5.8. Get ready |
|
|
|
Thanks, pekv and CIYAM. 62 BTC left. (rounded down) |
|
|
|
tvm i am out
The short from 6.5852? did you make any profit? aye now someone is selling like mad is not me hehe ok that screenshot is so fake it isn't even funny.. |
|
|
|
the 2000BTCs I deposited there.
Do you play russian roulette as well? No, he is a master troll who has successfully trolled you.. |
|
|
|
The data can be corrupted in so many ways it is pointless. Not only can bad people put in GOOD addresses into your database, but someone holding 'bad' bitcoins can spend them at any number of stores (like mine) is SOMEONE ELSES name. If they want to finger their enemy, they just place an order for stuff with the address and all contact info to that persons address. Pretty much any data you can scrape from this process is pointless.
1. This data was generated from one address. 2. Therefore we can be sure that all of the addresses in that list are from the same wallet. 3. Therefore that wallet has processed over 38 million coins and contains 14k coins. How many wallets in the Bitcoin world have processed over 38 million coins and contain 14k BTC? Not many, and I think that reduces the chance of an inaccurate list by a lot. |
|
|
|
someone is shorting from 7 again!  I'm not shorting. My position is long with 1500 bitcoins leverage 10:1. I have another 3000 bitcoins to buy if it drops down more. I'll just keep adding my long position until I cash out with a fat profit. That's called a martingale. Watch out, you'll get hurt... that is, if it goes down at all. And it will, but not to $2-3. Probably not even to $5. |
|
|
|
|
230btc 130btc now. anyone?
|
|
|
|
i jumped in  Those numbers don't look right... |
|
|
|
hi,
-What happens if you don't pay or your plan goes sour?
-What are the variables as to the success of your operation that are independent of your control?
Any information would be appreciated,
Thanks
1. He has rep. If you don't think it's enough, you don't have to lend to him. That's how it is for everything. 2. It doesn't matter. If he spends it on hookers and blow but then buys BTC to pay back to you, he would still not be a scammer. |
|
|
|
How did this yield a 2.5 MB list with 100000 entries?
We gathered these addresses by assuming that if two addresses both appear as inputs in the same transaction, then they are from the same wallet. So, I presume something like this: Take the list of addresses you know belonged to MBC; For each address in list: For each outgoing transaction from that address: If transaction has more than 1 input: Add any input addresses to the list if they aren't already there Seems quite reasonable This is correct. |
|
|
|
1. We took addresses from posts that were posted prior to our announcement. These people had no reason to fake their MyBitcoin Help me understand how a post would make a MyBitcoin address distinct from any other one. This would make sense if everyone who posted such an address advertised they were using MyBitcoin, but I don't suspect that's the case. A few people said this like "my MyBitcoin address is 1____ if anyone wants to investigate," or something of the sort. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
