I'll take one!  |
|
|
|
(and fake depth is not an argument when there is the threat of someone dumping 45k unlimited).
This is an excellent point. It's a positive result of the dumper behaviour that I hadn't considered before. With the threat of a 45k dump hanging over you, you have to be particularly wary of putting up fake "walls" that you never intend to be sold. The depth chart seems to show that that is the case... no obvious bid walls are showing. I suspect the same is going to soon be true on the ask side too. In short: "manipulators" beware; you can't fight the market forever. The bid side is looking healthy! The ask side, meanwhile, has a few big walls, and if they disappear, there's relatively little depth beyond them... |
|
|
|
I admit, I am impressed as well. There seems to be a lot of interest for acquiring Bitcoins, considering how the depth to 5 is regenerating for the second or third time (and fake depth is not an argument when there is the threat of someone dumping 45k unlimited), and it’s now grown stronger than before. We are probably severely undervalued, but haven’t really noticed yet. What will happen once the stream of dumpers dries up?  Oh shit, Blitzboom goes bullish again  |
|
|
|
Hi,
you posted saying you are a great lender.
how much BTC you have?
We can start by you lending me some BTC, then if you are trustworthy, I will refer you to pirate.
Let me know.
thanks for the offer, but you don't mention your terms & what's this about "if you are trustworthy" - I'm offering to lend BTC not trying to borrow them so how exactly can I be untrustworthy I don't think chungenhung understood the "trustworthiness" thing quite correctly. You're right, all lenders are trustworthy insofar as the loan, but what pirate meant was that he does not want "bad money" in his program. |
|
|
|
would the forum admin put a "scammer" by the OP's name?
as we all know, he didn't repay for at least 3 loans.
The paperwork's probably being done... if you want to put the scammer tag on him faster then PM Maged. |
|
|
|
|
Warning: Item is an iPhone :\
|
|
|
|
Wow, people are already wasting time and the site won't even pay out yet!  This site is fucking great. |
|
|
|
The battle in the $5's has been going on for a while now. It seems that somebody does not want the price to fall below $5. It is being well defended. Today alone 200,000K volume on mt gox, with it hitting low of $5.3.
However, even after they hit the low of $5.3, a big market player(s), decided to reinforce their position again and drive the price back up.
Seems like they don't want it to fall below $5.00, and will prevent it at all costs.
There's somebody just as intent on the price falling. This. Right now it is a war between two big players leaving everyone else locked in the middle. Remember the Alamo!  |
|
|
|
heh I remember the day Litecoin was released... I got 2300 LTC in a single day times have changed. |
|
|
|
He seems like someone who was impersonated by the "bitcointalk kujoking" due to his established, reputable online identity, although they might be the same person. |
|
|
|
deja vu  |
|
|
|
I know some people at the ACLU. I talked to them about Bitcoin and they seemed interested if it would actually bring in a good amount of money. Would you guys be interested in donating to them?
I think this would be pretty big  |
|
|
|
|
gox loading in <1 second for me
|
|
|
|
 This is it, we're going down down down! |
|
|
|
|
Notice of default
This post is a public note that rexcoin has defaulted on a 23 BTC loan, originally scheduled to be repaid with 2 BTC interest on the 4th of February, 2012.
Disclaimer: This post is not a judgment on whether or not rexcoin is a scammer. rexcoin informed me a few days ago that he intends to repay before March.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, prices are going up again on 5830s?!
I thought they were all $70...
|
|
|
|
|
Only a fraction is hedged. (% shown publicly)
|
|
|
|
wow, people are still keeping this alive! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
