Flat Earth

[BADecker]

... FE perspective, which essentially suggests that at distances of a few miles, light doesn't go in a straight line anymore, or that there is some other twisting of the medium through which light travels. ...

Thank you for making my Flat Earth arguments for me douchebag, of course atmospheric refraction is what you're trying to twist into looking like nonsense here. Scattering from things like dust & fog, refraction and perspective explain perfectly everything you see from ships over the horizon to the Moon and Sun.

Gotcha. I thought you might do something like this.

Sure, there are scatterings in the atmosphere. But they are all relative, and slow to appear... unlike the glass of water (or whatever it is) in your picture. In other words, whatever works to form a different perspective than is generally understood, also works to correct that perspective.

The point still is, that even if there are distortions, the ends of the earth would still be able to be seen at times. After all, we see the stars (whatever they are) thousands of miles away (miles rather than light years, if you want to believe FE). Even so, from the nearest points that we travel towards any FE distant ice ring, we would be able to observe the dome at the places it touches down, at least at some times. This info could not be hidden by any conspiracy... just as the scientific proof for the existence of God has always been with us, and millions of people understand it.

No you can't see to the ends of the Earth because there's crap in the air that blocks light and enough distance and the air itself becomes opaque, first creating a red filter then darker and darker. Combine that with perspective shrinking things down to nothing and you can't see shit.

The globalists have been busy promoting a very dark Satanic conspiracy to make everybody believe total bullshit about everything.

But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.

[1715160491]

1715160491

[BADecker]

Interesting questions about moon craters and impacts.  How is it that every crater on the moon have impacted the surface at 90 degrees?  Nothing appears to have hit a glancing blow or have hit at wider angles to create a variety craters, dig marks, trenches, and other shapes than a circular impact.  Clearly there should be other types of impact evidence on the moon if it really is the result of impacts.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmDaMbQn7bQ

Except if 99% of the craters were formed at once, like when mars passed near the earth thousands of years ago, or during the breaking up of the planet that formed the asteroid belt.

[BADecker]

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/why-is-the-flat-earth-conspiracy-still-a-thing-b-o-b-neil-degrasse-tyson

All people are "off" a little in their thinking in some ways. FE people simply have a blind spot in this area.

[BADecker]

Very interesting observations showing offshore rigs out over 9 miles off the coast of CA.  This is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP7lyAKNpj4

Of greater importance that proving globe earth is the chemtrail "dust" in the atmosphere.

[notbatman]

...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.

[MiSKLaCH]

 

[Longsnowsm]

...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.

I know the stars are close, but I don't know about "less than 3000 miles".  But the point is the same.  The stars are close, the sun and the moon are close.  The height and nature of this enclosed system is unknown other than what few glimpses we have of historical info, folk lore, and biblical accounts.  If anyone else actually knows more than that it appears they sure are not sharing the info.

Nobody knows how far this plane we live on extends, or if there are other areas like the known inhabited area we are in exists.  Admiral Bird seemed to indicate he had seen other areas.  Who knows if he had any particular reason to tell such a story, but it is out there for everyone to chew on.   

Here is some fun stuff, Globe Earth "Street interviews"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qRexQDqv14

[MiSKLaCH]

I know the stars are close, but I don't know about "less than 3000 miles".  But the point is the same.  The stars are close, the sun and the moon are close.  The height and nature of this enclosed system is unknown other than what few glimpses we have of historical info, folk lore, and biblical accounts.  If anyone else actually knows more than that it appears they sure are not sharing the info.

Nobody knows how far this plane we live on extends, or if there are other areas like the known inhabited area we are in exists.  Admiral Bird seemed to indicate he had seen other areas.  Who knows if he had any particular reason to tell such a story, but it is out there for everyone to chew on.   

Here is some fun stuff, Globe Earth "Street interviews"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qRexQDqv14

 

[BADecker]

...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...

You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky!

You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see.

Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us.

Guess what? The math has been done many times over. And the distance is so great that there is really no way to tell through standard triangulation how far away the stars are.

Oh, that's right. There is FE math that is different than standard math.

What funny farm are you in again?

[MisO69]

Very interesting observations showing offshore rigs out over 9 miles off the coast of CA.  This is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vP7lyAKNpj4

Yes this proves that curvature is working. Since its about 8 inches for 1 mile then 9.41 miles = 6.27 feet

Using this image I took from the video you posted we can all see that about 6 feet of the platform habitat cannot be seen. In other words it is obscured by the horizon due to the curvature of the earth.

[BADecker]

Even people with money understand that the earth is a globe:


The Globalists Strike Back With A Major Push Toward A Cashless Society

Last May we learned that the 500 euro note is being completely eliminated, and just a few weeks ago the European Commission released a new "Action Plan" which instructs member states to explore "potential upper limits to cash payments".  In the name of "fighting terrorism", this "Action Plan" discusses the benefits of "prohibitions for cash payments above a specific threshold" and it says that those prohibitions should include "virtual currencies (such as BitCoin) and prepaid instruments (such as pre-paid credit cards) when they are used anonymously."

This new document does not mention what an appropriate threshold would be for member states, but we do know that Spain already bans certain cash transactions above 2,500 euros, and Italy and France already ban cash transactions above 1,000 euros.

This is a perfect way to transition to a cashless society without creating too much of an uproar.  By setting a maximum legal level for cash transactions and slowly lowering it, in effect you can slowly but surely phase cash out without people understanding what is happening.

Read more at http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-globalists-strike-back-with-a-major-push-toward-a-cashless-society.

[Longsnowsm]

So you think you live on a ball?  Nice intro to Jeranism's Youtube channel...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4Im93dzWA

[Longsnowsm]

Very cool music video:
Eratosthenes Was Wrong - Cover of the Chris Wrock Original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhVGrjoFjhc

[TooQik]

So you think you live on a ball?  Nice intro to Jeranism's Youtube channel...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7I4Im93dzWA

Nope, I know I live on a sphere, or more accurately, an oblate spheroid...enough said.

[notbatman]

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/why-is-the-flat-earth-conspiracy-still-a-thing-b-o-b-neil-degrasse-tyson

I'm still not sure what psychological purpose being a flat-earth truther fulfills

What psychological purpose does knowing the truth about where you live serve?


Bad Slave

It serves to free your mind from 500 years of bullshit lies. It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.

[Przemax]

Dont you people think its all illusion as the shape of the earth looks like its flat and in the upper atmosphere it looks like its convex? Dont you think the only logical conclusion is that both of them are an illusion? The only logical conclusion that both of them are illusions.

From a logical point of view and every detective would tell you that, if you have two witnesses and both of them contradicts themselfs their cases are dismissed in favour of some other explanation because its logical to assume they are misled or misleading.

In Poland we have a proverb. When two are fighting the third is wins. In that sittuation a logical winner is the concave earth. Thats what logic says - you just dont want to admitt the defeat yet.

Youve got to love the logic when you love the truth. Most of you dont love logic because lets face it - 95% of you are a stinking liars or fools that does not know they are lying to themselfs.

In every other sittuation when you would see any item that looks different depending on the distance to it, you would not assume one of the look is true. You would assume ( if you are a sensible person) that there is something wrong with your vision.

[TooQik]

Dont you people think its all illusion as the shape of the earth looks like its flat and in the upper atmosphere it looks like its convex? Dont you think the only logical conclusion is that both of them are an illusion? The only logical conclusion that both of them are illusions.

From a logical point of view and every detective would tell you that, if you have two witnesses and both of them contradicts themselfs their cases are dismissed in favour of some other explanation because its logical to assume they are misled or misleading.

In Poland we have a proverb. When two are fighting the third is wins. In that sittuation a logical winner is the concave earth. Thats what logic says - you just dont want to admitt the defeat yet.

Youve got to love the logic when you love the truth. Most of you dont love logic because lets face it - 95% of you are a stinking liars or fools that does not know they are lying to themselfs.

In every other sittuation when you would see any item that looks different depending on the distance to it, you would not assume one of the look is true. You would assume ( if you are a sensible person) that there is something wrong with your vision.

Neither the earth appearing flat when standing on the surface or convex when viewed from a distance are illusions; they're simply different points of perspective.

[Przemax]

Neither the earth appearing flat when standing on the surface or convex when viewed from a distance are illusions; they're simply different points of perspective.

No. The earth is REALLY appearing flat the way it should not appear in globe earth. There is NO curvature . Nada, nothing, zero. Its not a matter of perspective. The curvature is observable only at a very high altitude. When you see no curvature at 10 miles high you can be sure something is wrong with the globe model. Thats an empirical fact, you can ignore it, you can put pictures from higher altitude. That does not make a difference that at that relativly low altitudes you see a shit not a curvature.

That ofcourse does not mean that the earth is flat. That means that you can have two witnesses that tell the truth what they see and both contradicts themselfs. You can say that there is a conspiracy like flat earthers do, or you can say that flat earthers are crazy. You dismiss one witness and problem is solved.

What if both are right and there is no conspiracy and flat earthers are not crazy? Its illogical to happen, so the answer is that both are wrong if both are right, thats the only logical solution. Thats the paradox of illusion. They dont lie about the facts but the facts are misleading, and there is a third deductive fact that can be deduced from the reasoning how that illusion works. Its common in science that inductive facts can form deductive fact if they are contradictory.

[Longsnowsm]

I'm still not sure what psychological purpose being a flat-earth truther fulfills

What psychological purpose does knowing the truth about where you live serve?


Bad Slave

It serves to free your mind from 500 years of bullshit lies. It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.

Once you figured out we live a locker at a bus station it is amazing how your perspective changes.  Now about 90% of the nonsense that is broadcast as news becomes obvious what the purpose is, to manipulate people and keep the slaves under control.  

You soon begin to realize that about 90% of the scientism(masquerading as science) stuff are theories to try and make sense of the lies that were told and the stories only get more ridiculous as the stories have to get wilder to explain the obvious.  

So many seemingly intelligent people have no idea what is going on and it is sad that the whole world believes the lies and stories of these psychopaths that enslave the earth.  

Once you discover the earth isn't what we were told you then question EVERYTHING, and find out most of it is BS.  So for those asking how does it affect you to know the nature of the earth... Well try it and find out.  It is one of the most profound things imaginable.  

So how does it affect you to know the nature of the place where we live.

[notbatman]

It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.

Bundles-of-Sticks are non-sentient. Your entire argument is invalid.

Like anything the queers at Vice print has any value (notice that Bob, a degenerate himself is ahead of the curve and has omitted any reference to the Vice article. +1 good goy points for you Bob!), they're probably defrauding their advertisers with fake clicks for fake news like the rest of the MSM.

You don't think being a degenerate has any bearing on the honesty and integrity of the material a media outlet produces? If Vice wants to be facetious with their Flat Earth comments then I'm going to call them out for being the faggot kikes they are.

IMO I'm making a valid point by linking degeneracy with a lack of honesty and integrity in reporting the news.