Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
April 27, 2017, 07:06:44 AM |
|
this don't support verium right?
|
|
|
|
|
digaran2
|
|
April 28, 2017, 06:57:09 AM |
|
it support vrm,but many times to reconnet!
|
|
|
|
degxtra1
Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 46
|
|
April 28, 2017, 01:47:59 PM Last edit: April 28, 2017, 03:06:42 PM by degxtra1 |
|
Sorry, I can't find any faq how to compile it on debian . I tried build autogen sh configure tc but still no .deb package produced successfully - any help? so far after executing build.sh algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c: In function ‘hodl_scanhash’: algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:90:21: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘GenRandomGarbage’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] GenRandomGarbage( hodl_scratchbuf, work->data, thr_id ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:8:0: algo/hodl/hodl-wolf.h:25:6: note: expected ‘CacheEntry * {aka union _CacheEntry *}’ but argument is of type ‘unsigned char *’ void GenRandomGarbage( CacheEntry *Garbage, uint32_t *pdata, int thr_id); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Po g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iyes/include -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I. -Iyes/include -O3 -march=native -Wall -std=gnu++11 -MT algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o -MD -MP -MF algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo -c -o algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o `test -f 'algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp' || echo './'`algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp algo/hodl/hodl.cpp: In function ‘int scanhash_hodl(int, work*, uint32_t, uint64_t*)’: algo/hodl/hodl.cpp:96:18: error: aggregate ‘EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx; ^~~
Makefile:3335: recipe for target 'algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o' failed make[2]: *** [algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Po mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt' Makefile:3496: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt' Makefile:671: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2
Ok SORTED This works on debian testing Make sure you have installed : libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev g++ ./autogen.sh ./configure make sudo make install
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
April 28, 2017, 03:04:34 PM |
|
Sorry, I can't find any faq how to compile it on debian . I tried build autogen sh configure tc but still no .deb package produced successfully - any help? so far after executing build.sh algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c: In function ‘hodl_scanhash’: algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:90:21: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘GenRandomGarbage’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] GenRandomGarbage( hodl_scratchbuf, work->data, thr_id ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:8:0: algo/hodl/hodl-wolf.h:25:6: note: expected ‘CacheEntry * {aka union _CacheEntry *}’ but argument is of type ‘unsigned char *’ void GenRandomGarbage( CacheEntry *Garbage, uint32_t *pdata, int thr_id); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Po g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Iyes/include -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I. -Iyes/include -O3 -march=native -Wall -std=gnu++11 -MT algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o -MD -MP -MF algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo -c -o algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o `test -f 'algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp' || echo './'`algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp algo/hodl/hodl.cpp: In function ‘int scanhash_hodl(int, work*, uint32_t, uint64_t*)’: algo/hodl/hodl.cpp:96:18: error: aggregate ‘EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx; ^~~
Makefile:3335: recipe for target 'algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o' failed make[2]: *** [algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Po mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt' Makefile:3496: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt' Makefile:671: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2
It looks like you may be trying to compile someone else's fork. If so I can't help you. Otherwise I need more info.
|
|
|
|
degxtra1
Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 46
|
|
April 28, 2017, 03:09:11 PM |
|
It looks like you may be trying to compile someone else's fork. If so I can't help you. Otherwise I need more info.
yes, I published output from some fork, but problem existed till I updated missed libs. Would you explain me btw what is difference between build.sh vs autogen.sh ?
|
|
|
|
felixbrucker
|
|
May 01, 2017, 09:35:03 AM |
|
small question regarding cryptonight "stratum": each job contains job_id, blob and target
if i connect multiple miners (say 4) to a single stratum emit (job message), do they mine on the same data (effectively mining with lower efficiency)?
cheers
|
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 01:11:59 PM |
|
small question regarding cryptonight "stratum": each job contains job_id, blob and target
if i connect multiple miners (say 4) to a single stratum emit (job message), do they mine on the same data (effectively mining with lower efficiency)?
cheers
I can only relate my observations of how multiple threads work. Each thread hashes using the same data but chooses a unique nonce to avoid multiple threads submitting the same solution. Althouh Cryptonight uses a different RPC version than all other algos, that mechanism is the same.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 01:28:58 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
I have no first hand experience with Ryzen and SHA and an have not seen any user reports other than the limited testing that was done by coinbutter. cpuminer-opt is the only miner I know of that uses the SHA extension on Ryzen so it should be the best. Only algos that use sha256 (listed in release notes) will benefit from this feature. Most of those algos are not attractive to CPU miners. Ryzen also has a larger L3 cache that gives it an advantage on memory intensive algos. Ryzen (AMD in general) has lower single thread performance but compensates with more threads. Mining is an excellent multithreaded application. In my opinion Ryzen is a good choice for CPU mining based on its price, high thread count and large L3 cache. Ironically SHA does not seem to be a significant factor.
|
|
|
|
curtis8706
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2017, 01:40:22 PM |
|
Hey Guys, I'm new to altcoin mining in general so bear with me. My apologies if this was already addressed, I went through the thread and couldn't find the answer. If it is out there please just direct me to the answer. So I found this thread and started trying this cpuminer-opt. I've been using cupminer-multi for a few months now, and was excited to see something newer and possibly more optimized. I have a mix of older and newer hardware as I mine. When I run the CPuminer-opt, I am getting reports of rates that far exceed what is actually being recognized by the Pool I am in, MiningPoolHub. I am mining XZC (Zcoin) and when using cpuminer-multi I was seeing rates of about 200-300Kh/s. The cpuminer-opt with the same hardware was reporting as high as 14 Mh/s. Here is the line from my batch file: (separate for each .exe) cpuminer-sse2.exe -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u curtis8706.12 -p x Here is a bit of what I am seeing. ----------------CPUMINER-MULTI---------------------- ** cpuminer-multi 1.3-dev by tpruvot@github ** BTC donation address: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd (tpruvot)
[2017-05-01 09:26:54] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm. [2017-05-01 09:26:54] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 [2017-05-01 09:26:55] Stratum difficulty set to 1 [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #2: 27900.83 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #6: 27641.73 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #1: 27560.29 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #7: 27456.29 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #3: 27387.39 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #5: 27227.97 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #0: 27194.04 H/s [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #4: 26415.17 H/s [2017-05-01 09:27:40] Stratum difficulty set to 0.722113 [2017-05-01 09:27:48] CPU #1: 27608.08 H/s [2017-05-01 09:27:48] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 218831.49 H/s yes! ----------------CPUMINER-OPT----------------------------------- ********** cpuminer-opt 3.5.9.1 *********** A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs with AES_NI and AVX extensions. BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d, Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz CPU features: SSE2 AES AVX SW built on Mar 4 2017 with GCC 4.8.3 SW features: SSE2 Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2 Start mining with SSE2
[2017-05-01 09:23:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 [2017-05-01 09:23:17] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm. [2017-05-01 09:23:17] Stratum difficulty set to 1 [2017-05-01 09:23:18] Stratum difficulty set to 1.4737 [2017-05-01 09:23:18] Stratum difficulty set to 1 (0.00391) [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #6: 65.54 kH, 25.57 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #2: 65.54 kH, 25.52 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #1: 65.54 kH, 25.15 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #7: 65.54 kH, 25.07 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #0: 65.54 kH, 24.86 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #3: 65.54 kH, 24.83 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #5: 65.54 kH, 24.78 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #4: 65.54 kH, 24.29 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:07] Stratum difficulty set to 1.03159 [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #5: 1486.57 kH, 24.92 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #2: 1531.17 kH, 25.51 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #6: 1534.16 kH, 25.54 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #3: 1489.95 kH, 24.83 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #7: 1504.21 kH, 25.05 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #0: 1491.65 kH, 24.84 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #1: 1508.83 kH, 25.07 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:24:22] CPU #4: 1457.34 kH, 24.18 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:03] Stratum difficulty set to 0.722113 [2017-05-01 09:25:07] CPU #0: 1149.34 kH, 24.91 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:08] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 11.66 MH, 200.02 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:09] CPU #1: 1189.11 kH, 25.11 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:09] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 11.34 MH, 200.06 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #5: 1495.26 kH, 24.91 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #2: 1530.60 kH, 25.51 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #6: 1532.39 kH, 25.55 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #3: 1489.99 kH, 24.84 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #7: 1503.25 kH, 25.06 kH/s [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #4: 1450.97 kH, 24.30 kH/s
Same hardware, just different miner. I let it run overnight and I saw a minor increase in the hashrate recognized by the pool, but no where near what the reported hash rate is. Am i missing a seeing or an argument to correct this? I'm not sure what I am doing wrong with this. Any help you guys can provide is much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 04:10:31 PM |
|
The cpuminer-opt with the same hardware was reporting as high as 14 Mh/s.
I don't see any 14 MH/s in anything you posted. Also you're using the slowest version of cpuminer-opt on a CPU that can handle the fastest AVX2 code.
|
|
|
|
curtis8706
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2017, 04:38:41 PM |
|
Thanks for the reply. I didn't copy from when it was running overnight. so perhaps I am reading it wrong then. Again, I apologize because I am new to this stuff, so if I sound ignorant I don't mean to. I tried running the cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe and it kept crashing on me. I was able to get cpuminer-aes-avx.exe to work though.
[2017-05-01 12:24:09] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 13.71 MH, 267.44 kH/s
Perhaps I am just reading the whole thing wrong then. I was just talking to a friend about it. So I am wondering then, is the 13.71MH the total work done, and the second part is the rate that is completed the work? I'm sorry if I missed that earlier in the thread.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 04:48:35 PM |
|
Thanks for the reply. I didn't copy from when it was running overnight. so perhaps I am reading it wrong then. Again, I apologize because I am new to this stuff, so if I sound ignorant I don't mean to. I tried running the cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe and it kept crashing on me. I was able to get cpuminer-aes-avx.exe to work and I've copied that below. ********** cpuminer-opt 3.5.9.1 *********** A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs with AES_NI and AVX extensions. BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d, Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz CPU features: SSE2 AES AVX SW built on Mar 4 2017 with GCC 4.8.3 SW features: SSE2 AES AVX Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2 Start mining with SSE2 AES AVX
[2017-05-01 12:23:00] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 [2017-05-01 12:23:00] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm. [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1 [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1.70876 [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1 (0.00391) [2017-05-01 12:23:00] lyra2z block 32377, diff 3184.655 [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #1: 65.54 kH, 33.95 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #6: 65.54 kH, 33.75 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #3: 65.54 kH, 33.70 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #7: 65.54 kH, 33.68 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #4: 65.54 kH, 33.04 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #5: 65.54 kH, 31.83 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #2: 65.54 kH, 30.16 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #0: 65.54 kH, 28.42 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:37] Stratum difficulty set to 1.70876 (0.00667) [2017-05-01 12:23:54] CPU #0: 1705.30 kH, 33.46 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:23:56] CPU #2: 1809.77 kH, 34.11 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:01] CPU #5: 1910.07 kH, 33.01 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:02] CPU #6: 2025.26 kH, 33.97 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #7: 2021.09 kH, 33.65 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #4: 1982.35 kH, 32.96 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #3: 2022.13 kH, 33.41 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #1: 2036.81 kH, 33.63 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:09] CPU #4: 182.30 kH, 32.19 kH/s [2017-05-01 12:24:09] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 13.71 MH, 267.44 kH/s
Perhaps I am just reading the whole thing wrong then. I read that last line which is where I get that ~14 Mh/s from. So is it actually the second part after the comma that is the real output? Is that the number I am supposed to be reading as the actual hashrate? Thanks for your help! You're reading it wrong, it said 267 kH/s, don't confuse it with the hash count 13.71 MH. You should also use the mainstrean version (currently 3.6.3) of cpuminer-opt.
|
|
|
|
curtis8706
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2017, 05:23:05 PM |
|
I understand now. sorry for the confusion. Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
May 01, 2017, 10:27:31 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results.
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 10:46:23 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results. Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m.
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
May 01, 2017, 10:55:13 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results. Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m. I used pre-compiled binaries (I think your binaries). I am not smart/experienced enough to compile anything myself (I tried and it was a mess for me). *Is Windows 10 Pro (vs Home) needed for compiling?
|
|
|
|
joblo (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
May 01, 2017, 11:02:18 PM |
|
Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .
Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results. Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m. I used pre-compiled binaries (I think your binaries). I am not smart/experienced enough to compile anything myself (I tried and it was a mess for me). *Is Windows 10 Pro (vs Home) needed for compiling? I don't think so. I haven't been able to create a mingw/msys environment om Windows that supports compilation with SHA.
|
|
|
|
|
|