Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)

[FFI2013]

Just when I thought we got shit on by asics claymore saves the dual mining

[phuocduong]

dual ETH + XVG in claymore 11.0?

[Marvell2]

Quick test on a gtx 1070 Ti and gtx 1060 (not optimized).  -dcri flags are 140 and 175 respectively.

GTX 1070 Ti 8gb Micron, 75% PL, ETH+XVG 31.3 MH/s + 1450 MH/s
GTX 1060 3gb Hynix,      60% PL, ETH+XVG 15.5 MH/s + 900 MH/s

jesus 1450 ?! on a 1070ti ?

[Ratledge]

Nice job claymore , hope keccak dont took you too much time , it s an old ... algo, x17 would better

anyway thanks to follow my blake2s request , as told before , i think it was the best choice actually.

you saved our dual mining and again proove your deserve your  (2%) fees

/love ya

The bottom line is that basically Keccak likely has the most ASOC resistance compared to the other algos he might have chosen, so it is likely to survive relative to others.

As we go forward, these ASIC resilient algos will be the best to choose.

[Chromexnet]

Here is my report after mining XVG for over 25 hours straight on zpool with no more than 5 Rejected shares.

I have got roughly 2/3 of what whattomine says I should be getting.  That's quite the cut zpool is taking!

There was one point yesterday on Zpool I noticed the "total earned" report a number, but about one hour or so later, that number was reporting about 2 or 3 XVG less than the hour earlier.   That was a red flag WTF moment for me.

... Also I seem to be mining Ninja and Verge for some reason and can't figure out why.     Between that and the payout fishyness, I'm going to try another pool when I have the energy to make the changes to my .bat files.

I sincerely hope that a fair and properly functioning pool for XVG comes about for us, sooner than later.

I guess I have messed it up.  I have XVG-blake2s instead of XVG (from someone who posted earlier on this thread couple of pages back).  Duh!
That might be cause of my low earnings (even lower than others who are suspicious on zpool).


"YOU MUST ALWAYS set your currency in your password field that matches your wallet address: c=SYMBOL. The pool has mined hundreds of different coins and many have the same address version. We CAN NOT read your mind and possible know what currency you want. If no c=SYMBOL is set, your currency will be randomly chosen from any matching coins we have used. This HAS TO BE A REAL EXCHANGE SYMBOL. Do not use a symbol that has an ALGO added. Such as XVG-blake2s

EDIT: It seems there is no difference between c=XVG-blake2s or c=XVG.  I still mine random blake2s coins with c=XVG.

It seems many people here are confused how multialgo/multicoin pools like zpool work. When you set c=XVG, it's telling the pool you want to be paid in XVG coin. However, you can't choose what coin you will be mining. The pool will always decide for you, based on what's currently the most profitable coin to mine. So basically, you will be mining blake2s algo, the pool chooses the coin you will mine, and you get paid in XVG (or whatever coin you set).

[heavyarms1912]

Quick test on a gtx 1070 Ti and gtx 1060 (not optimized).  -dcri flags are 140 and 175 respectively.

GTX 1070 Ti 8gb Micron, 75% PL, ETH+XVG 31.3 MH/s + 1450 MH/s
GTX 1060 3gb Hynix,      60% PL, ETH+XVG 15.5 MH/s + 900 MH/s

jesus 1450 ?! on a 1070ti ?

Yup and can get to 1700+ with 90% PL and -dcri of 165

It seems many people here are confused how multialgo/multicoin pools like zpool work. When you set c=XVG, it's telling the pool you want to be paid in XVG coin. However, you can't choose what coin you will be mining. The pool will always decide for you, based on what's currently the most profitable coin to mine. So basically, you will be mining blake2s algo, the pool chooses the coin you will mine, and you get paid in XVG (or whatever coin you set).

Yup.  That's the rational behind it.  The symbol option is only what coin you would like to be paid and not the type of coin mined.  That's governed by the mining pool.

EDIT:  Mining on antminepool for past 5 hours.  No of share rejected is <0.5%.  Port 9008

[BlexPan]

I've been mining XVG for 24hrs, started with Antmine when there's was only 33 miner and now its like 500 miners, and all throughout the 24hrs, I discovered Unimining and been jumping back and forth between the two for comparison. Never tried zpool.

So my observation, with Antmine you get bigger payment but you need to wait longer while Unimining you get payment like every 10-15mins.

I got 185mhs(ETH )and 7000mhs(XVG) on 6x rx570. And so far I got 84XVG in my wallet and I still have 13XVG in my Unimining account.

I prefer Unimining, I did not experience any problems with unimining, I've used the 5766 port and declared the c=XVG value. I'm not sure if that makes a difference.

Either way you can't go wrong, I just prefer seeing continuous payment compared to waiting for hours.

Thanks man! You do help me solve the unimining huge rejected share problem!
I use port 5770 which caused 10+% rejected share and I change to port 5766 which only 0-1% rejected share.
Hope other can solve the same problem by changing the port.

[Marvell2]

Quick test on a gtx 1070 Ti and gtx 1060 (not optimized).  -dcri flags are 140 and 175 respectively.

GTX 1070 Ti 8gb Micron, 75% PL, ETH+XVG 31.3 MH/s + 1450 MH/s
GTX 1060 3gb Hynix,      60% PL, ETH+XVG 15.5 MH/s + 900 MH/s

jesus 1450 ?! on a 1070ti ?

Yup and can get to 1700+ with 90% PL and -dcri of 165

It seems many people here are confused how multialgo/multicoin pools like zpool work. When you set c=XVG, it's telling the pool you want to be paid in XVG coin. However, you can't choose what coin you will be mining. The pool will always decide for you, based on what's currently the most profitable coin to mine. So basically, you will be mining blake2s algo, the pool chooses the coin you will mine, and you get paid in XVG (or whatever coin you set).

Yup.  That's the rational behind it.  The symbol option is only what coin you would like to be paid and not the type of coin mined.  That's governed by the mining pool.

I keep my 1070s and 1070 tis at 70% to 78% power limit max but i had no idea they could do 1400 , I had them all set to 90

[lostprophet007]

Anyone who has tried to mine SHIELD with antmine pool?
I have been triyng for a while but with this code

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0xe622f8199df755e540b41c857db42659545a4999.1 -dpool stratum+tcp://s.antminepool.com:5766 -dwal SQubiHhdgVR5Ex8tjJ1DBz88dZdkx5HNR1 -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XSH -dcri 30

I receive error form the server.
B2S autorizathion failed
socket was closed remotely


Thanks

[big_daddy]

Hi!
I stopped my dualmining on SC because the ASICs came out, but with the new ver. 110 there are 2 algo blake2s & keccak that we can mine
What coin is good in dual for AMD cards, RX 570/580/470 ?

[lncm]

OMG, this is really popular software.

Since it got out, Blake2s XVG mining on Antminepool went from ~200 GH/s to 5 TH/s... 

[peterboy1]

latest claymore seems doesn't respect config.txt

[patinencomun]

480 8G
30,5 ETH 1400 XVG / dcri 46
Great!

1080ti (bad one +150 / +490)
35,5 ETH 1650 XVG / dcri 140
Back to equihash.

Should be more optimized for nvidia cards...

[ltomovski]

Hi all
I have been mining on zpool blake2s but I can not seem to get what http://whattomine.com/coins/220-xvg-blake-2s suggest .. I am hardly getting the half of it .. which is much better than mining directly to nicehash blake2s ..
My question is does any of you manage to get better results on the other two pools (antmine unimine)?
And to those mining on zpool .. do you experience periodical network problems with the pool .. I can see on my hashrate graph drops to 0 and according to the logfile the share sent time is like 4000ms .. whereas I do not see any network degradation as my eth shares are sent within 62ms
best regards

[lostprophet007]

Anyone who has tried to mine SHIELD with antmine pool?
I have been triyng for a while but with this code

Code:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

ethdcrminer64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal 0xe622f8199df755e540b41c857db42659545a4999.1 -dpool stratum+tcp://s.antminepool.com:5766 -dwal SQubiHhdgVR5Ex8tjJ1DBz88dZdkx5HNR1 -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XSH -dcri 30

I receive error form the server.
B2S autorizathion failed
socket was closed remotely


Thanks

Try -dpsw c=XSHB if didnt work try wallet address change

Changed only the wallet address, now  it works!
many thanks!!

[techbabe]

what command I need to write to disable gpu2 and gpu3 from dual mining just to mine eth ?

https://www.photobox.co.uk/my/photo/full?photo_id=500569339488

like in pic I done manually with keyboard

thank you

EDIT:

EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal 0x9a0ed4f7a64a4c3e5d2e5b7672e585c0bbea1bcd.Frankenstein/faustasd@outlook.com -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:5770 -dwal D7smhMa6RQYTtX8WyfB3s829doEojRV8wT.Frankenstein -dpsw x -dcoin blake2s -allpools 1 -dcri 30 -asm 2 -mode 1-02 -mode 1-03 -mode 0-00

SET TO NOT MINE DUAL ONLY ON GPU2 AND 3 WORKING LIKE THAT

[mx100]

May I ask everyone?
1063G GPU double dig ETH + XVG
What is the -dcri value?

[nitrobg]

Hi all
I have been mining on zpool blake2s but I can not seem to get what http://whattomine.com/coins/220-xvg-blake-2s suggest .. I am hardly getting the half of it .. which is much better than mining directly to nicehash blake2s ..
My question is does any of you manage to get better results on the other two pools (antmine unimine)?
And to those mining on zpool .. do you experience periodical network problems with the pool .. I can see on my hashrate graph drops to 0 and according to the logfile the share sent time is like 4000ms .. whereas I do not see any network degradation as my eth shares are sent within 62ms
best regards

zpool is crap and you should stay away from it.

[Eomat]

hi can someone tell me what do i wrong

Code:

C:\Users\intexpc\Desktop\Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred_Siacoin_Lbry_Pascal AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0>EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal 0x8537525ab286d6c621ca3bebdd93d3243d0ebaa1.eomat -mode 0 -dpool stratum+tcp://pool-eu.smartcash.cc:3333 -dwal Eomat.Eomat -dpsw x -dcoin keccak

╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                Claymore's Dual GPU Miner - v11.0               ║
║              ETH + DCR/SIA/LBC/PASC/BLAKE2S/KECCAK             ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

no address specified - ignore
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
KC: 1 pool is specified
Main Keccak pool is pool-eu.smartcash.cc:3333
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool 
CUDA initializing...

NVIDIA Cards available: 7
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.0/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 1:0:0)

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 3:0:0)

GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 5:0:0)

GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 6:0:0)

GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 7:0:0)

GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 8:0:0)

GPU #6: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1  (pci bus 10:0:0)

Total cards: 7
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'etc-eu1.nanopool.org' <79.137.82.70> port 19999
ETH: Stratum - Connected (etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999)
DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+KECCAK
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333

ETH: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #178...
 KC: Stratum - connecting to 'pool-eu.smartcash.cc' <108.61.199.235> port 3333
 KC: Stratum - Connected (pool-eu.smartcash.cc:3333)
 KC: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU6
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU4
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU5
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU3
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU1
Create GPU buffer for GPU4
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU2
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU1
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU6
Create GPU buffer for GPU2
Create GPU buffer for GPU3
Create GPU buffer for GPU5
GPU6 DAG creation time - 6476 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU6 done
GPU1 DAG creation time - 6464 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU1 done
GPU4 DAG creation time - 6461 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU4 done
GPU5 DAG creation time - 6471 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU5 done
GPU2 DAG creation time - 6472 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU2 done
GPU3 DAG creation time - 6471 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU3 done
GPU0 DAG creation time - 6605 ms
Setting DAG epoch #178 for GPU0 done
ETH: 02/10/18-09:56:54 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 195.960 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 27.678 Mh/s, GPU1 28.032 Mh/s, GPU2 27.921 Mh/s, GPU3 28.152 Mh/s, GPU4 28.001 Mh/s, GPU5 28.069 Mh/s, GPU6 28.107 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1959.601 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 276.777 Mh/s, GPU1 280.318 Mh/s, GPU2 279.211 Mh/s, GPU3 281.520 Mh/s, GPU4 280.012 Mh/s, GPU5 280.694 Mh/s, GPU6 281.069 Mh/s
ETH: 02/10/18-09:56:56 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 195.978 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 27.881 Mh/s, GPU1 28.008 Mh/s, GPU2 27.908 Mh/s, GPU3 28.084 Mh/s, GPU4 28.024 Mh/s, GPU5 27.938 Mh/s, GPU6 28.135 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1959.774 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 278.805 Mh/s, GPU1 280.076 Mh/s, GPU2 279.077 Mh/s, GPU3 280.839 Mh/s, GPU4 280.241 Mh/s, GPU5 279.383 Mh/s, GPU6 281.353 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:56:57 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
 KC: Share accepted (8875 ms)!
GPU0 t=55C fan=32%, GPU1 t=54C fan=32%, GPU2 t=56C fan=33%, GPU3 t=53C fan=31%, GPU4 t=53C fan=31%, GPU5 t=53C fan=31%, GPU6 t=54C fan=32%
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:12 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
 KC: Share accepted (890 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:15 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 194.868 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 27.723 Mh/s, GPU1 27.855 Mh/s, GPU2 27.711 Mh/s, GPU3 27.892 Mh/s, GPU4 27.878 Mh/s, GPU5 27.873 Mh/s, GPU6 27.937 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1948.677 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 277.230 Mh/s, GPU1 278.547 Mh/s, GPU2 277.105 Mh/s, GPU3 278.921 Mh/s, GPU4 278.781 Mh/s, GPU5 278.728 Mh/s, GPU6 279.365 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:17 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 6)
 KC: Share accepted (1469 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
 KC: Share accepted (797 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:22 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 194.629 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 27.692 Mh/s, GPU1 27.769 Mh/s, GPU2 27.661 Mh/s, GPU3 27.983 Mh/s, GPU4 27.928 Mh/s, GPU5 27.708 Mh/s, GPU6 27.887 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1946.285 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 276.923 Mh/s, GPU1 277.689 Mh/s, GPU2 276.606 Mh/s, GPU3 279.829 Mh/s, GPU4 279.283 Mh/s, GPU5 277.084 Mh/s, GPU6 278.871 Mh/s
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:22 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 192.957 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 26.430 Mh/s, GPU1 27.809 Mh/s, GPU2 27.657 Mh/s, GPU3 27.900 Mh/s, GPU4 27.695 Mh/s, GPU5 27.724 Mh/s, GPU6 27.742 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1929.564 Mh/s, Total Shares: 4, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 264.303 Mh/s, GPU1 278.087 Mh/s, GPU2 276.569 Mh/s, GPU3 279.000 Mh/s, GPU4 276.949 Mh/s, GPU5 277.238 Mh/s, GPU6 277.418 Mh/s
GPU0 t=69C fan=42%, GPU1 t=70C fan=42%, GPU2 t=71C fan=43%, GPU3 t=69C fan=42%, GPU4 t=69C fan=41%, GPU5 t=69C fan=41%, GPU6 t=69C fan=42%
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:42 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
 KC: Share accepted (672 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:46 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 191.562 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 26.439 Mh/s, GPU1 27.196 Mh/s, GPU2 27.345 Mh/s, GPU3 27.339 Mh/s, GPU4 27.826 Mh/s, GPU5 27.548 Mh/s, GPU6 27.868 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1915.613 Mh/s, Total Shares: 5, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 264.388 Mh/s, GPU1 271.958 Mh/s, GPU2 273.448 Mh/s, GPU3 273.393 Mh/s, GPU4 278.263 Mh/s, GPU5 275.479 Mh/s, GPU6 278.684 Mh/s
ETH: 02/10/18-09:57:47 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 193.065 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 27.029 Mh/s, GPU1 27.682 Mh/s, GPU2 27.410 Mh/s, GPU3 27.742 Mh/s, GPU4 27.717 Mh/s, GPU5 27.709 Mh/s, GPU6 27.776 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1930.644 Mh/s, Total Shares: 5, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 270.293 Mh/s, GPU1 276.821 Mh/s, GPU2 274.099 Mh/s, GPU3 277.415 Mh/s, GPU4 277.167 Mh/s, GPU5 277.092 Mh/s, GPU6 277.757 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
 KC: Share accepted (94 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:57:55 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
 KC: Share accepted (3218 ms)!
GPU0 t=76C fan=47%, GPU1 t=76C fan=47%, GPU2 t=77C fan=47%, GPU3 t=76C fan=46%, GPU4 t=76C fan=46%, GPU5 t=75C fan=46%, GPU6 t=76C fan=46%
ETH: 02/10/18-09:58:25 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 191.231 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ETH: GPU0 26.100 Mh/s, GPU1 27.525 Mh/s, GPU2 27.275 Mh/s, GPU3 27.599 Mh/s, GPU4 27.435 Mh/s, GPU5 27.538 Mh/s, GPU6 27.760 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1912.306 Mh/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 260.997 Mh/s, GPU1 275.250 Mh/s, GPU2 272.750 Mh/s, GPU3 275.987 Mh/s, GPU4 274.346 Mh/s, GPU5 275.376 Mh/s, GPU6 277.600 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:58:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
 KC: 02/10/18-09:58:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
GPU0 t=80C fan=49%, GPU1 t=79C fan=49%, GPU2 t=80C fan=49%, GPU3 t=78C fan=48%, GPU4 t=79C fan=48%, GPU5 t=78C fan=48%, GPU6 t=79C fan=48%
 KC: 02/10/18-09:58:40 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
 KC: Share accepted (1141 ms)!
 KC: Share accepted (1235 ms)!
 KC: Share accepted (1235 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:58:43 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ETH: Share accepted (63 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:58:46 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ETH: 02/10/18-09:58:46 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 191.027 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 25.890 Mh/s, GPU1 27.555 Mh/s, GPU2 27.284 Mh/s, GPU3 27.628 Mh/s, GPU4 27.450 Mh/s, GPU5 27.574 Mh/s, GPU6 27.644 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1910.269 Mh/s, Total Shares: 11, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 258.903 Mh/s, GPU1 275.554 Mh/s, GPU2 272.844 Mh/s, GPU3 276.282 Mh/s, GPU4 274.502 Mh/s, GPU5 275.744 Mh/s, GPU6 276.440 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:58:47 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
 KC: Share accepted (3938 ms)!
 KC: Share accepted (4016 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:58:52 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.125 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 25.285 Mh/s, GPU1 27.470 Mh/s, GPU2 27.325 Mh/s, GPU3 27.527 Mh/s, GPU4 26.996 Mh/s, GPU5 27.482 Mh/s, GPU6 27.040 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1891.244 Mh/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 252.850 Mh/s, GPU1 274.697 Mh/s, GPU2 273.246 Mh/s, GPU3 275.268 Mh/s, GPU4 269.964 Mh/s, GPU5 274.819 Mh/s, GPU6 270.400 Mh/s
ETH: 02/10/18-09:59:00 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.052 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 25.387 Mh/s, GPU1 27.003 Mh/s, GPU2 27.350 Mh/s, GPU3 27.646 Mh/s, GPU4 26.991 Mh/s, GPU5 27.547 Mh/s, GPU6 27.128 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1890.518 Mh/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 253.871 Mh/s, GPU1 270.033 Mh/s, GPU2 273.497 Mh/s, GPU3 276.463 Mh/s, GPU4 269.907 Mh/s, GPU5 275.469 Mh/s, GPU6 271.278 Mh/s
ETH: 02/10/18-09:59:04 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 190.093 Mh/s, Total Shares: 2, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 25.214 Mh/s, GPU1 27.351 Mh/s, GPU2 27.224 Mh/s, GPU3 27.627 Mh/s, GPU4 27.501 Mh/s, GPU5 27.578 Mh/s, GPU6 27.597 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1900.921 Mh/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 252.141 Mh/s, GPU1 273.514 Mh/s, GPU2 272.239 Mh/s, GPU3 276.266 Mh/s, GPU4 275.009 Mh/s, GPU5 275.783 Mh/s, GPU6 275.969 Mh/s
GPU0 t=82C fan=50%, GPU1 t=81C fan=50%, GPU2 t=81C fan=50%, GPU3 t=79C fan=49%, GPU4 t=80C fan=49%, GPU5 t=79C fan=49%, GPU6 t=80C fan=49%
 KC: 02/10/18-09:59:12 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
 KC: Share accepted (296 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:59:16 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ETH: Share accepted (46 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:59:28 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
 KC: Share accepted (406 ms)!
 KC: 02/10/18-09:59:30 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
 KC: Share accepted (688 ms)!
GPU0 t=83C fan=51%, GPU1 t=82C fan=50%, GPU2 t=81C fan=50%, GPU3 t=80C fan=49%, GPU4 t=81C fan=50%, GPU5 t=80C fan=49%, GPU6 t=80C fan=49%
ETH: 02/10/18-09:59:41 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.864 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:02
ETH: GPU0 25.244 Mh/s, GPU1 27.387 Mh/s, GPU2 27.328 Mh/s, GPU3 27.534 Mh/s, GPU4 27.441 Mh/s, GPU5 27.401 Mh/s, GPU6 27.530 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1898.638 Mh/s, Total Shares: 15, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 252.439 Mh/s, GPU1 273.867 Mh/s, GPU2 273.281 Mh/s, GPU3 275.335 Mh/s, GPU4 274.410 Mh/s, GPU5 274.007 Mh/s, GPU6 275.299 Mh/s
 KC: 02/10/18-09:59:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
 KC: Share accepted (797 ms)!
ETH: 02/10/18-09:59:58 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.818 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 25.310 Mh/s, GPU1 27.383 Mh/s, GPU2 27.132 Mh/s, GPU3 27.572 Mh/s, GPU4 27.438 Mh/s, GPU5 27.420 Mh/s, GPU6 27.563 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1898.173 Mh/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 253.095 Mh/s, GPU1 273.834 Mh/s, GPU2 271.318 Mh/s, GPU3 275.719 Mh/s, GPU4 274.377 Mh/s, GPU5 274.199 Mh/s, GPU6 275.631 Mh/s
GPU0 t=83C fan=51%, GPU1 t=82C fan=51%, GPU2 t=82C fan=51%, GPU3 t=81C fan=50%, GPU4 t=82C fan=50%, GPU5 t=80C fan=49%, GPU6 t=81C fan=50%
ETH: 02/10/18-10:00:10 - New job from etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
ETH - Total Speed: 189.610 Mh/s, Total Shares: 3, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
ETH: GPU0 24.957 Mh/s, GPU1 27.389 Mh/s, GPU2 27.216 Mh/s, GPU3 27.650 Mh/s, GPU4 27.494 Mh/s, GPU5 27.381 Mh/s, GPU6 27.523 Mh/s
 KC - Total Speed: 1896.094 Mh/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0
 KC: GPU0 249.567 Mh/s, GPU1 273.890 Mh/s, GPU2 272.164 Mh/s, GPU3 276.497 Mh/s, GPU4 274.942 Mh/s, GPU5 273.809 Mh/s, GPU6 275.225 Mh/s
GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 3, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 3 failed
GPU 3, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 3 failed
GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 5, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 5, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 5 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 5 failed
GPU 0 failed
GPU 0, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 0, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 0 failed
GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 6, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 6, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 6 failed
GPU 6 failed
GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 1, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 1, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 1 failed
GPU 4 failed
GPU 4, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 4, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 4 failed
GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 2, GpuMiner cu_k04 failed 4, unspecified launch failure
GPU 2, GpuMiner kx failed 1
GPU 2 failed
GPU 2 failed
WATCHDOG: GPU error, you need to restart miner :(
Restarting OK, exit...



╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                Claymore's Dual GPU Miner - v11.0               ║
║              ETH + DCR/SIA/LBC/PASC/BLAKE2S/KECCAK             ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

no address specified - ignore
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999
KC: 1 pool is specified
Main Keccak pool is pool-eu.smartcash.cc:3333
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool
CUDA initializing...

[leecher2k16]

which is the best nvidia driver gtx 1070 windows 10 - 1709?