digimonx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 02:12:23 PM |
|
For AMD cards, set the following environment variables, especially if you have 2GB cards:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Does this apply only to AMD cards, or Nvidia cards as well? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
ngdias
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 04:08:19 PM |
|
I'm trying to figure out if the latest version is compatible with R9 Fury X cards. OP mentions "1. Install Catalyst v15.12 for old AMD cards; for Fury, Polaris and Vega cards use latest blockchain drivers." and then "This version is for recent AMD videocards only: 7xxx, 2xx and 3xx, 2GB or more."
First, what are "blockchain drivers"? Was this a mistake? It seems that Fury is ok from this part, but then this card is not included in the "recent AMD videocards only: 7xxx, 2xx and 3xx" group.
Can someone clarify please? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4438
Merit: 3907
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 04:34:43 PM |
|
For AMD cards, set the following environment variables, especially if you have 2GB cards:
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Does this apply only to AMD cards, or Nvidia cards as well? amd only.
|
|
|
|
TunerDude007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:07:14 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each.
|
|
|
|
greatauror28
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 181
Merit: 101
Ethereum Miner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:08:28 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each. What version of Claymore do you use? What AMD driver do you use?
|
I build and sell rigs! I also sell ssd clones of the most stable Windows+Claymore+AMD driver combo you'd ever used.
|
|
|
TunerDude007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:11:01 PM |
|
People, does anybody have the exact information about ethereum switching from Pow to Pos? I just read an article that Casper is coming earlier than planned and maybe with the next ethereum upgrade (maybe even before the end of year or early in 2018). What exactly that means for us miners? Some say that it will be hybrid Pow/Pos... But, if it is just Pos, and if it happens in a couple of months, are we doomed?
I wouldn't sweat it, the ethereum camp has been saying this for 2 years now. They cant seem to get their shit figured out...And when they do get it figured out not to worry, there are many other coins to mine my friend. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
TunerDude007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:16:36 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each. What version of Claymore do you use? What AMD driver do you use? Claymore Ver 10, Win 10 pro with latest Blockchain drivers. In fact prior to blockchain drivers I was only getting 21mg/h per card. I wonder if I'm only running 5 cards on a asus z270 if its still necessary to change bios settings on the motherboard? I'm thinking probably yes, which I did anyways. Also if I turn up settings in AB the cards go down to 18-19mg/h each
|
|
|
|
PB_SilentMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:38:01 PM |
|
Before the Byzantium update, my average hashrate was withing 3-4MH of my reported rate. But as of late its nearer 25-28MH difference.
Any ideas?
Switch from Ethmine to Drawfpool. Share difficulty on E. 4000MH on D. 2000MH. so there should be less stales, or other pool with lower diff per share press S to see current diff My current diff is 4000MH. how is this any different to Dwarfpool? Still does not explain the difference and why it is happening. I am now 31MH difference (this is a whole cards hashrate), I have restarted the rigs, updated miner software, reset clock/mem/power settings. Made no difference, i really like ethermine and switching is not ideal as I need to mine a full coin before moving. Anyone else have any ideas?..... The same thing happens to me on Ethermine, for the last 5 days my average hashrate is at least 5% less then reported hashrate. And even reported hashrate seems to be a little lower then usual... not sure if it is pure coincidence but since switching pools from eu1.ethermine.org 4444, to eu2.ethermine.org 14444, my MH difference is now almost the same as it was.
|
|
|
|
P00P135
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 06:58:48 PM |
|
Before the Byzantium update, my average hashrate was withing 3-4MH of my reported rate. But as of late its nearer 25-28MH difference.
Any ideas?
Switch from Ethmine to Drawfpool. Share difficulty on E. 4000MH on D. 2000MH. so there should be less stales, or other pool with lower diff per share press S to see current diff My current diff is 4000MH. how is this any different to Dwarfpool? Still does not explain the difference and why it is happening. I am now 31MH difference (this is a whole cards hashrate), I have restarted the rigs, updated miner software, reset clock/mem/power settings. Made no difference, i really like ethermine and switching is not ideal as I need to mine a full coin before moving. Anyone else have any ideas?..... The same thing happens to me on Ethermine, for the last 5 days my average hashrate is at least 5% less then reported hashrate. And even reported hashrate seems to be a little lower then usual... not sure if it is pure coincidence but since switching pools from eu1.ethermine.org 4444, to eu2.ethermine.org 14444, my MH difference is now almost the same as it was. It is because block times are so short that you are working on already solved blocks and reporting stale shares because Ethermine is so overloaded. Find a higher difficulty less congested pool and you'll gain back that 3-15% stale hashrate loss.
|
|
|
|
TunerDude007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 07:19:50 PM |
|
Before the Byzantium update, my average hashrate was withing 3-4MH of my reported rate. But as of late its nearer 25-28MH difference.
Any ideas?
Switch from Ethmine to Drawfpool. Share difficulty on E. 4000MH on D. 2000MH. so there should be less stales, or other pool with lower diff per share press S to see current diff My current diff is 4000MH. how is this any different to Dwarfpool? Still does not explain the difference and why it is happening. I am now 31MH difference (this is a whole cards hashrate), I have restarted the rigs, updated miner software, reset clock/mem/power settings. Made no difference, i really like ethermine and switching is not ideal as I need to mine a full coin before moving. Anyone else have any ideas?..... The same thing happens to me on Ethermine, for the last 5 days my average hashrate is at least 5% less then reported hashrate. And even reported hashrate seems to be a little lower then usual... not sure if it is pure coincidence but since switching pools from eu1.ethermine.org 4444, to eu2.ethermine.org 14444, my MH difference is now almost the same as it was. It is because block times are so short that you are working on already solved blocks and reporting stale shares because Ethermine is so overloaded. Find a higher difficulty less congested pool and you'll gain back that 3-15% stale hashrate loss. which pool would you recommend for this? As many of us mine on ethermine.
|
|
|
|
henrynguyen20
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 07:24:14 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each. What version of Claymore do you use? What AMD driver do you use? Claymore Ver 10, Win 10 pro with latest Blockchain drivers. In fact prior to blockchain drivers I was only getting 21mg/h per card. I wonder if I'm only running 5 cards on a asus z270 if its still necessary to change bios settings on the motherboard? I'm thinking probably yes, which I did anyways. Also if I turn up settings in AB the cards go down to 18-19mg/h each Did you use crimson 17.10.2 ? Did you change the graphic to compute with AMD driver ? Did you modded the bios with trap 1500 ? Did you install ATIDAG fix? Look for BBT videos of setting Asus z270 to see if you miss any step of bios setting If Rx 580 hashing around 23mg/h, look like it's at original state without, It should get around 25.3 with bios modded (not using AB yet) I'm just listing some possible steps of setting for my2cent I got rx 580 4 GB with -40 power limit and -100 mv voltage for hashing around 27.8 mg/h and I see that even power limit set, amd cards still pull more power ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thanks
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 07:54:26 PM |
|
Well, i strongly disagree. My personal experience (and plenty of others) is completely opposite to yours ... Please stay away from such a comments, you are fooling others!
really? this is where you want to be right? wow. fuck idiots... I guess
Watch you language here dude! fuck me if I'm the one
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 08:50:05 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each. What version of Claymore do you use? What AMD driver do you use? Claymore Ver 10, Win 10 pro with latest Blockchain drivers. In fact prior to blockchain drivers I was only getting 21mg/h per card. I wonder if I'm only running 5 cards on a asus z270 if its still necessary to change bios settings on the motherboard? I'm thinking probably yes, which I did anyways. Also if I turn up settings in AB the cards go down to 18-19mg/h each Probably open up a separate thread. What's the rest of the configuration? Are you providing sufficient power?
|
|
|
|
twicx
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 08:53:21 PM |
|
Having some major difficulties at the moment.
6 x MSI RX580 Armor 4gb Windows 10 Pro Flashed bios, ddu in safe mode, tried both blockchain drivers and new ones (set to compute if I use those) Can only seem to overclock/undervolt in wattman, and if I use latest drivers, can't change mem voltage.
I would ideally like to be able to use things like mvddc command in claymore, but whether I put it in config or start.bat, clock settings only work if applied in wattman.
Help very urgently needed.
|
|
|
|
greatauror28
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 181
Merit: 101
Ethereum Miner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 09:31:38 PM |
|
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool stratum+tcp://us.ubiqpool.io:8008 -ewal 0xc86bb711033e00abd01b197a57be42421678a987 -epsw x -eworker rig1 -allcoins 1 -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:3252 -dwal neverrazor.1 -dpsw x
Your hashrate is at ~50% of your's equipment normal performance. I thought that mining intensity was set wrong (ethi and dcri). After runing a short test, I found that GTX1060 are not very sensible to dcri level (at least DCR). Cranking DCR intensity from 40 to 130, the DCR hashrate increased 190% and ETH hashrate decreased 10%. Such dcri level, to halven the ETH hashrate, should be within 200-300 range, that is either stupid or unsupported by Claymore miner. Better define explicitly your ethi and dcri, say 16/40, 16/50. Check your BIOS settings - enable Above 4G decoding/TOLUD (works only in UEFI-enabled systems) and PCI-E speed - switch it to Gen1 or Gen2. i enabled 4g ... and tried different pci-e gen speed all same results ... the problem is ONLY in the hashrate of eth ... .. i tried another eth miner ... same problem I seem to be having the same issue on my Asus Z270 board with 5 Rx 580's hashing all at around 23mg/h each, another one of my rigs with same config but older asrock H81 board and 6 rx 480 is 31mg/h each. What version of Claymore do you use? What AMD driver do you use? Claymore Ver 10, Win 10 pro with latest Blockchain drivers. In fact prior to blockchain drivers I was only getting 21mg/h per card. I wonder if I'm only running 5 cards on a asus z270 if its still necessary to change bios settings on the motherboard? I'm thinking probably yes, which I did anyways. Also if I turn up settings in AB the cards go down to 18-19mg/h each Assuming all mobo settings are correct, no issue with hardware and you have properly done bios mods, I think the only missing in the equation is AMD's latest 17.10.3. I can personally vouch for this driver as this fixed my OpenCL issues (totally different topic). It's worth a try considering you probably have done lots of troubleshooting already. Also, consider updating to Win10 Fall Creator's Update if you're already in the brink of reinstalling your Windows just like me. Who knows if that would magically fix your issues like what happened to me.
|
I build and sell rigs! I also sell ssd clones of the most stable Windows+Claymore+AMD driver combo you'd ever used.
|
|
|
bitcoin.dbi
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 256
Merit: 11
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 10:50:11 PM |
|
Hello. Im using claymore for nvidia and amd cards at the same moment. Both mine in dual (SC and DCR). What should i write in Dpools.txt file for separate mining? Because whenever nvidia lose eu SC pool server it goes further and use DCR pools instead. I tried to add -dcoin SC in the end near SC pools but it didn't help. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
jimmykl
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 11:19:01 PM |
|
Well, i strongly disagree. My personal experience (and plenty of others) is completely opposite to yours ... Please stay away from such a comments, you are fooling others!
really? this is where you want to be right? wow. fuck idiots... I guess
Watch you language here dude! fuck me if I'm the one guess i missed the fucking memo too? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
Lontonbit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 11:35:23 PM |
|
|
It’s gold for nerds
|
|
|
burzolak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 31, 2017, 11:41:36 PM |
|
I have a problem. I have R9 270 and want to mine expanse on dwarf. So in UBIQ pools i have 75-79 M/hash. But on dwarf i have only 66 M/hash. On site is written - stratum. What i must enable on config in claymor to get better rusults?
|
|
|
|
twicx
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 01, 2017, 01:08:17 AM |
|
10.1 crashing pretty much on startup, on with this in the log:
21:03:50:757 1ae0 GPU #0: algorithm ASM 21:03:50:786 1ae0 GPU #1: algorithm ASM 21:03:50:790 1ae0 cudaGetDeviceCount failed (35, CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version), probably no CUDA devices 21:03:50:794 1ae0 No NVIDIA CUDA GPUs detected. 21:03:50:799 1ae0 Total cards: 2
Running 10.1, W10 Pro with FCU. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|