Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments

[anks]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

[1714205092]

1714205092

[1714205092]

1714205092

[1714205092]

1714205092

[escapefrom3dom]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

it's nodejs issue.

OS/wallet ver.?

[anks]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

it's nodejs issue.

OS/wallet ver.?

I have win 7 32bit
wallet version 1.2.0

[escapefrom3dom]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

it's nodejs issue.

OS/wallet ver.?

I have win 7 32bit
wallet version 1.2.0

what's the PF path name: «C:\Program Files» or «c:\Program Files»?

have u got some antivirus running (try to temporary disable it)?

[anks]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

it's nodejs issue.

OS/wallet ver.?

I have win 7 32bit
wallet version 1.2.0

wthat's the PF path name: «C:\Program Files» or «c:\Program Files»?

have u got some antivirus running (try to temporary disable it)?

i temporary disabled the antivirus and now it works i try to set byteball to the security exception.
thank you very much for your help 

[escapefrom3dom]

i have a prpblem with chatting with the transition bot.
i created already a wallet but everytime when i click on "chat with the transition bot"
i cant send a message to him. i tried to send my byteball adress to him but i always get in red delayed: ("code"."self_signed_cert_in_chain")
can someone help me?

it's nodejs issue.

OS/wallet ver.?

I have win 7 32bit
wallet version 1.2.0

wthat's the PF path name: «C:\Program Files» or «c:\Program Files»?

have u got some antivirus running (try to temporary disable it)?

i temporary disabled the antivirus and now it works i try to set byteball to the security exception.
thank you very much for your help 

ur welcome. ☺

[DarkStar_]

Is is possible to link multiple addresses? I have one address linked right now and it's telling me to move all my funds to that address, but I don't want to do it because I'm holding ~1 BTC on an address I intend to use for something else, and it's important that those funds stay there.

[Krypt]

Is is possible to link multiple addresses?

|
|
V

You'll receive all bytes at the first BB address.  It's perfectly legal to link several Bitcoin addresses to the same BB address.

[ryvirath]

I was reading Gavin Wood's polkadot paper and came across this:

"Tangle [17] is a novel approach to consensus systems.
Rather than arranging transactions into blocks and forming
consensus over a strictly linked list to give a globally
canonical ordering of state-changes, it largely abandons
the idea of a heavily structured ordering and instead
pushes for a directed acyclic graph of dependent transactions
with later items helping canonicalise earlier items
through explicit referencing. For arbitrary state-changes,
this dependency graph would quickly become intractable,
however for the much simpler UTXO model2
this becomes
quite reasonable. Because the system is only loosely coherent
and transactions are generally independent of each
other, a large amount of global parallelism becomes quite
natural. Using the UTXO model does have the effect
of limiting Tangle to a purely value-transfer “currency”
system rather than anything more general or extensible.
Furthermore without the hard global coherency, interaction
with other systems—which tend to need an absolute
degree knowledge over the system state—becomes impractical."

How does byteball deal with arbitrary state changes?

[SatoNatomato]

I was reading Gavin Wood's polkadot paper and came across this:

"Tangle [17] —becomes impractical."

How does byteball deal with arbitrary state changes?

Byteball has the ball its in the name, that is the global state, witnesses decide it. Witnesses decide ordering of units. This is not "the tangle" where developers decide the consensus with milestones and snapshots.

[Come-from-Beyond]

This is not "the tangle" where developers decide the consensus with milestones and snapshots.

You are again spreading lies. I bet you'll play chicken if I ask you to put your money where your mouth is. 

[kola-schaar]

Is is possible to link multiple addresses?

|
|
V

You'll receive all bytes at the first BB address.  It's perfectly legal to link several Bitcoin addresses to the same BB address.

Perhaps a small addition to the general understanding for the new:

If you browse here http://transition.byteball.org/ . Then you will see that this is very common.
It is also more convenient than any BTC address to link to a new / discrete BB address (this is also possible).
In such a case, after each distribution, the shares received at the various BB addresses must be consolidated again at the address specified by the bot (primary BB address). This is needed to receive blackbytes for all these bytes (in the following distribution(s)).

If you only use one BB address (and connect multiple BTC addresses with this), then this is not required.
If you don’t touch the wallet (trade, buy .. Bytes), you will automatically get your blackbytes for the shown bytes in every round.
The BTC's can be transferred from the linked address some hours after the snapshot.
They must then be shown again to the next round(s) (at one of the linked BTC-addresses or a newly linked BTC-address).

[grzem]

Dear Cryptox users. We recommend to take out of exchange your BTC and GBYTE balances in order to participate in 2nd round of Byteball distribution.
Those who forget, will be credited according to their 95% balance BTC and 95% GBYTE at the time of transition.
Blackbytes will wait for you to contact admin@cryptox.pl

[tonych]

I'll do the 2nd round distribution on testnet later today.
If you participated in the 1st round, get your testnet wallets ready and synced.
The pairing code of testnet transition bot is A89N05sSYB+ZakW6HH16mAHuFsf+HDi+Us3DeP/MyoAQ@byteball.org/bb-test#0000

Testnet distribution is complete, please check your balances if you linked your testnet coins.
Dust-size balances were not credited with new bytes: if an address had balance less than 10000 bytes (i.e. less than 1000 new bytes to be received), it was ignored.

[SatoNatomato]

This is not "the tangle" where developers decide the consensus with milestones and snapshots.

You are again spreading lies. I bet you'll play chicken if I ask you to put your money where your mouth is. 

Why are you still here?

You had ample opportunity to explain all my concerns in the IOTA Unmoderated thread - which you didnt, instead you, and iotatoken guy, again attacked me verbally and domsch fake acted nicely without in any way addressing technical concerns. And no selling vaporware and imaginary future where it will magically work doesnt count as a good answer.

Ive seen what shit you write about Byteball in your slack channel - now there we can talk about FUD and lies.

[tonych]

I was reading Gavin Wood's polkadot paper and came across this:

"Tangle [17] —becomes impractical."

How does byteball deal with arbitrary state changes?

Byteball has the ball its in the name, that is the global state, witnesses decide it. Witnesses decide ordering of units. This is not "the tangle" where developers decide the consensus with milestones and snapshots.

Witnesses do not decide ordering of units.  Ordering is determined by the algorithm that looks back at the witnesses-authored units in the DAG.

[Come-from-Beyond]

You had ample opportunity to explain all my concerns in the IOTA Unmoderated thread...

In a thread dedicated solely for trolling? C'mon. I won't waste time there.
I'm here to reveal your lies. You are still doing all those tricks that scammers do to conduct a long con.

[SatoNatomato]

I was reading Gavin Wood's polkadot paper and came across this:

"Tangle [17] —becomes impractical."

How does byteball deal with arbitrary state changes?

Byteball has the ball its in the name, that is the global state, witnesses decide it. Witnesses decide ordering of units. This is not "the tangle" where developers decide the consensus with milestones and snapshots.

Witnesses do not decide ordering of units.  Ordering is determined by the algorithm that looks back at the witnesses-authored units in the DAG.

Thanks for the correction, and even better explanation.

The important thing to note in relevance to the quote which spurred discussion, is that there is an ordering.

[Come-from-Beyond]

Witnesses do not decide ordering of units.  Ordering is determined by the algorithm that looks back at the witnesses-authored units in the DAG.

What TPS limit do you expect to see in the real world (order of magnitude)?

[tonych]

Witnesses do not decide ordering of units.  Ordering is determined by the algorithm that looks back at the witnesses-authored units in the DAG.

What TPS limit do you expect to see in the real world (order of magnitude)?

You know, there is no architectural limit in the DAGs.
Regarding the practical limits, I don't buy into this race to Visa tps.  The most pressing issue of crypto is not tps, it is adoption (which we address in the first place).  Tps will come second after the first is solved.