[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[maximum2014]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

[djm34]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library (you can get it from microsoft, or may-be just pick it up in the december release of cudaminer)

[ManIkWeet]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

[djm34]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

(debug or not msvcr100 is needed)

[MexiMelt]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

I'm sorry but you need to double check your facts before calling others wrong.

He needs this http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5555.

He's not trying to compile anything.

[maximum2014]

i downloaded the latest cuda miner for maxcoin, want to run it on 32bit, so made bat file in x84 and getting that message. my other 64bit is cpu and gpu mining with no problems. just cant get this old shitty 32bit computer to work.

sorry for being a noob

[ManIkWeet]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

I'm sorry but you need to double check your facts before calling others wrong.

He needs this http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5555.

He's not trying to compile anything.

Then why did the 12-18 version work for EVERYONE without the .dll?

[djm34]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

I'm sorry but you need to double check your facts before calling others wrong.

He needs this http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5555.

He's not trying to compile anything.

Then why did the 12-18 version work for EVERYONE without the .dll?

I believe Christian changed something in the compilation so that this library is included within the executable so it doesn't require a dynamic library (called when the program is run)

[cbuchner1]

He's not trying to compile anything.

Then why did the 12-18 version work for EVERYONE without the .dll?

calm down guys

most people already have the Visual Studio 2010 runtime installed already. Some however do not, and they need that download from Microsoft.

Because the download is comparatively huge, I did not include the Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 SP1 redistributable in the cudaminer distribution. It would have blown up my cudaminer downloads in size significantly with little benefit to the end user.

the guys arguing about debug/release builds are confusing the MSVCR100d.dll (debug version) with the MSVCR100.dll (release version).

Christian

[Lacan82]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

install this:

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26999

[ManIkWeet]

calm down guys

Okay sorry 

[maximum2014]

thank you very much for all your help  you guys are great 

[MexiMelt]

now i try running from x84 and getting the following message . this application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found??

any ideas please?

you said it all, not found... you need to add this library

WRONG
He needs to compile "Release" not "Debug"

I'm sorry but you need to double check your facts before calling others wrong.

He needs this http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5555.

He's not trying to compile anything.

Then why did the 12-18 version work for EVERYONE without the .dll?

Because almost everyone has that distributable installed. I've had people with 12-18 come to me with the same error. It's not exclusive.

[cbuchner1]

Okay, I have everything (about 1 GHash) pointed at the pool now. One Windows box, two Linux boxes. No CPU validation errors. good accept rates verywhere.
Let's see how this plays (pays) out over time.

Did my latest commit fix your CPU validation issues?

Christian

[whitetoo]

well I have been testing this new pool out, seems to be running very well. Dashboard stats are in real time too which is nice.
Cudaminer also working well!

The pool is in search of their first block tho, so I assume needs more dedicated miners to make that happen quicker?
http://pool.max-coin.net

Think for me personally I can stop baby sitting my miners on pools which keep getting DDoSed and hope that this maybe faster than solo mining at least. If you have some spare hashing power, it may pay to throw it onto that pool?

[dbbit]

Christian I got this with settings -R 2 --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 512 -l K1024x32 -C 2 -m 1 -i 1 -o stratum+tcp://max.netcodepool.org:5555 -u ManIkWeet.nvidia -p gpu:

Code:

[2014-02-09 00:38:07] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 159006 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:07] accepted: 111/208 (53.37%), 159006 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:08] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 157707 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:09] accepted: 112/209 (53.59%), 157707 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 158071 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:19] accepted: 113/210 (53.81%), 158071 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:21] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 156465 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:31] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 157016 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:36] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 155436 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 155511 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:39] accepted: 114/211 (54.03%), 155511 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:47] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 156940 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 result for nonce $b87707f3 does no
t validate on CPU!
[2014-02-09 00:39:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 0.00 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 95321 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 163385 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:35] accepted: 115/212 (54.25%), 163385 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:39:41] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:39:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 162740 khash/s

Edit:
It's all good spinkick

Wow. Are you seriously only getting 160khash on a GTX 780? I can get that on a 7850, and that's a $150 card.

Or are the Cudaminer and Cgminer displays not directly comparable?

[_Wolverine_]

Okay, I have everything pointed at the pool now. One Windows box, two Linux boxes. No CPU validation errors. good accept rates verywhere.
Let's see how this plays (pays) out over time.

Did my latest commit fix your CPU validation issues?

Christian

No

Compiled from github (like 10 minutes ago) and getting validation error on ever share (but they are valid)

Code:

[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB, 15550 khash/s
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 62180 khash/s (yay!!!)

ideas?

[miau]

can anyone share a Gtx Titan settings for maxcoin please ?

Im using this for my 2 titinas and getting 330-340 Mh/s with them combined (cca. 160 Mh/s per card) at default voltage and no OC

cudaminer.exe --algo=keccak -d 0,1 -l K1000x24 -L 1024 -i 0 -H 2 -o stratum+tcp://max.netcodepool.org:5555 -u xxx -p 1

Tried using the T instead of K but performs less and using anything higher  than 1000x24  just cant run in my case tho Ive seen reports of better performance
any further advice is wellcome

[cbuchner1]

Compiled from github (like 10 minutes ago) and getting validation error on ever share (but they are valid)

Code:

[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB result for nonce $aca702b9 does not validate on CPU!
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] GPU #2: Tesla K10.G1.8GB, 15550 khash/s
[2014-02-08 22:13:39] accepted: 17/17 (100.00%), 62180 khash/s (yay!!!)

ideas?

those hashes that aren't validating on the CPU are not sent to the pool at all (that would be a guaranteed boo and wasted network bandwidth!) So they don't go into the 17/17 statistics you see below.

I intend to count them as "hardware errors" in separate (GPU specific) statistics though. It just isn't done yet

What compute capability is a Tesla K10.G1.8GB ?

Christian

[_Wolverine_]

those hashes that aren't validating on the CPU are not sent to the pool at all (that would be a guaranteed boo and wasted network bandwidth!) So they don't go into the 17/17 statistics you see below.

What compute capability is a Tesla K10.G1.8GB ?

Christian

3.0, and the hash rate is low isn't it?

and i have two C2050 (capability 2.0) that does the same thing