scryptr
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
 |
December 12, 2016, 08:09:04 PM |
|
GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --
At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a. This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago. For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:09:06 PM |
|
GTX 960 GETS 120Sols/s --
At stock clocks my GTX 960 cards are mining Equihash at 120Sols/s with EQM v1.0.3a. This is not so impressive, just look at the above post, but it is far better than the 30-40Sols/s they were earning a week or so ago. For some reason, NiceHash miner auto-tunes EQM better than I was able to with a simple batch file. --scryptr
NHM runs 2 threads/instances by default. If you do the same, you will get the same speed as NHM. i have 6xgtx 1070
my bat file -
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca -ca
or right
eqm -u btcadress -w worker -t 0 -cd 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
log:
[22:21:05][0x00000d68][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1
[22:21:29][0x00000d68][info] device#35 | Initializing thread #35 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#5) M=1
the speed drops in 5 min
2665 ....2150
TPD in AfterBurner 80-85%
As said before, there is no sense to run so many instances... that may rather slow you down over a time due to massive context switching needed. Just do -ca -ca and nothing more (no -cd) and you will be fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:16:52 PM |
|
We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?
|
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:21:27 PM |
|
We did not have an issue. You have overclocked cards? Try different driver? What happens if using multiple eqm instances?
with multiple eqm instances(or wit 2 threads) speed is slower. With overclock, or without. 1 thread : $ ./eqm -cd 0 -b
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
CPU solver: by xenoncat
CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
[00:19:57][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Log started
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:19:58][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:00][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb222b4700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] device#0: 178 I/s, 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 178 I/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Total measured: 326.016 Sols/s
[00:20:20][0x00007ffb2c022740][info] Theoretical: 334.471 Sols/s 2 threads: $ ./eqm -cd 0 0 -b
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
CPU solver: by xenoncat
CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Log started
[00:20:28][0x00007f958269d740][info] Starting up miner instances...
[00:20:28][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:28][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:20:30][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:20:50][0x00007f9577c9a700][info] device#1 | Thread #1 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f957849b700][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#0: 76.8692 I/s, 146.437 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] device#1: 76.8615 I/s, 144.629 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 153.731 I/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Total measured: 291.066 Sols/s
[00:20:50][0x00007f958269d740][info] Theoretical: 288.868 Sols/s |
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:34:02 PM |
|
Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
|
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:42:43 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2016, 09:52:49 PM by krnlx |
|
Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
a bit overclocked. Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware $ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
CPU solver: by xenoncat
CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s 350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release and memory controller usage 76% vs 73% https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206 |
|
|
|
|
wacko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
|
|
December 12, 2016, 09:48:04 PM |
|
Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
Since most miners use non-reference 1070s (Founder's edition is noisy), there's really no such thing as "stock 1070".  Cards from different brands all come with quite different "stock" clocks; what's considered "stock" by someone will be a noticeable overclock to someone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:08:23 PM |
|
Do you get ~330 on overclocked or stock 1070 ?
a bit overclocked. Anyway, I ran the windows version under wine on same hardware $ /opt/wine-staging/bin/wine eqm.exe -cd 0 -b
fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 1.9.23 is a testing version containing experimental patches.
fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org.
fixme:heap:RtlSetHeapInformation 0x3f0000 0 0x23fd20 4 stub
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
EQM v1.0.3a equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash.
This miner is using proprietary base code by NiceHash.
CPU solver: by xenoncat
CUDA solver: by djeZo; heavily modified Tromp solver
==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Log started
[00:39:49][0x00000026][info] Starting up miner instances...
fixme:module:load_library unsupported flag(s) used (flags: 0x00000800)
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW (0x31ec34, (nil), {f7b697a3-4db5-4d3b-be71-c4d284e6592f}, 7, 0x3debb0, (null), (null), 0x3e2280): stub
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {72b14a7d-704c-423e-92f8-7e6d64bcb92a}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {e2091f8a-1e0a-4731-84a2-0dd57c8a5261}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {e8a3bf1f-a86b-4390-9c60-5390b969d22c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {5727a00f-50be-4519-8256-f7699871fecb}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {7e854ec7-cdc4-405a-b5b2-aaf7c9e7d40c}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {79a60dc6-5fc8-4952-a41c-1163aeec5eb8}
fixme:ntdll:EtwRegisterTraceGuidsW register trace class {2718d25b-5bf5-4479-8e88-babc64bdbfca}
fixme:process:GetNumaHighestNodeNumber (0x23e7a0): semi-stub
fixme:ver:GetCurrentPackageId (0xfbe550 (nil)): stub
[00:39:49][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-DJEZO) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) M=1
[00:39:51][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking, please wait about 20 seconds...
[00:40:11][0x00000033][info] device#0 | Thread #0 ended (CUDA-DJEZO)
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Benchmarking finished
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total time : 20 s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] device#0: 186.828 I/s, 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 186.828 I/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Total measured: 342.001 Sols/s
[00:40:11][0x00000026][info] Theoretical: 351.059 Sols/s 350 vs 330 , I reported same issue on 1.0.2 version, and you fixed it (1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f) in last release and memory controller usage 76% vs 73% https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17068170#msg17068170https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1677369.msg17064206#msg17064206We will take a look into this... |
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:21:22 PM |
|
Did you change the payment threshold from 0.01 to 0.1 BTC? I really dont to wait a week for a payout.
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
|
TR8888
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:24:01 PM |
|
Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
|
|
|
|
|
peonv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:30:35 PM |
|
346 per 1070 with overclocked memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NiceHashSupport
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:33:22 PM |
|
Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed. |
|
|
|
|
TR8888
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:51:29 PM |
|
Which drivers should I use for this miner for a 1070? I'm currently using 372.54 and it seems a little slow with 290 sols on stock 1070, W10
Use -cd 0 0 or -ca -ca to get better speed. I tried both, -cd 0 0 is the best achieving 299 sols. Which drivers are recommended? The most recent from nVidia website? |
|
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:06:10 PM |
|
i cant pass 300 sols either..
Gigabyte g1 1070 (6 pin, does it matter??), win 7 64, 4 gb... latest drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
dakky
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:06:28 PM |
|
with single 980Ti and (single) -ca @ 340 sols/s
but Off Topic... why next payout time at @ 0.03 ?? something changed, not anymore at 0.01?
|
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:06:35 PM |
|
Yeah good question was the payout frame changed again?
It was usually always each night when reaching 0.01
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:10:31 PM |
|
I just got paid for two days, just a bit over 0.1, might be new limit,.. BTC blockchain is so overloaded I see sometimes even with fee BTC do not pass for hours
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:16:37 PM |
|
China wake up
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
|
TR8888
|
|
December 12, 2016, 11:53:41 PM |
|
When wantring to CPU mine only, It asks for cuda.dll , even the newes ver of nh miner cpu mining only for equi asks for cuda dll's..
|
|
|
|
|
|
