dafyk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2016, 05:55:51 PM |
|
I'm pulling in 12 sol/s on a gt 730, compute 3.5
On windows 10 with cuda toolkit 8.0 installed and using 375.86 diver i am getting "CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GT 730 Not compatible! "
|
|
|
|
xxcsu
|
|
December 09, 2016, 06:24:50 PM |
|
Im still using Zec miner 0.0.2b , running rock stable in the past 48 hours , the miner reported hash rate is almost the same what the reported rate on flypool ... Zec miner 0.0.2b 160-165 sol/s flypool : 163.3 sol/s average for the past 24 hours
win 10/64bit / reference gtx 980 / nVidia driver : 375.63 / stock settings
|
|
|
|
kavjlaeg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
|
December 09, 2016, 07:59:38 PM |
|
he's aware that its not working on miningrigrentals, please search the thread before posting duplicative comments.
you are not right :/ This miner is working with the miningrigrental pool. The miningrigrental pool have start port is 3333, after connect to the pool, it assigns you a NEW working port. You must specify a working port in *.bat ps, my working *.bat miner --server eu-01.miningrigrentals.com --user kavjlaeg.35273 --pass x --port 50435
|
|
|
|
blzflkn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 04:09:47 AM |
|
I'm pulling in 12 sol/s on a gt 730, compute 3.5
On windows 10 with cuda toolkit 8.0 installed and using 375.86 diver i am getting "CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GT 730 Not compatible!�" Win 7 with 375.70 driver for me. Cuda 8.0 installed as well.
|
|
|
|
dtawom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 05:49:31 AM |
|
Any chance you could add cuda 2.0+ support to your next revision? I suspect that my 580 rig would do pretty well with your miner.
BTW your miner is awesome, the 2% is well worth it, I've not got your miner running on three of my machines which were only getting @ 80 h/s per machine with Silentarmy v5. Now I'm getting @ 200 h/s per machine.
Before my R9 fury's were the best h/s with Claymore, but now with your miner the best h/s per watt efficiency looks like the 1080, but the 1070 seems to be the better buy when you consider up front cost.
Anyway thanks again for an epic miner.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 10, 2016, 06:05:40 AM |
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
|
|
|
|
JL97786
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 06:33:43 AM |
|
How is the rate on the pool. Confirmed? 333SOl/s will make it faster than the nicehashminer and the claymore miner on AMD cards.. (new world record)
Yeah, almost, I have both Fury X and GTX 1080...I got 330 on Fury X on claymore 8.0, and the claymore 9.1 bumps it to 367. But this does become the new efficiency king though, both in terms of power and memory bandwidth. The nicehash eqm is truly garbage for GTX 1080, they got bad sol/s on gTX 1080 and only know how to say GDDR5X is bad and so on. But I don't know why, I can't move my GTX 1080 core clock up when using this moner at this point, maybe I should reinstall driver later. Only getting 260 Sol/s with my GTX 1080, but I don't know if all the troubles came from putting AMD and Nvidia in the same machine lol. Also interesting is that whenever I run miner on GTX 1080, my screen's response becomes ridiculously slow, like almost half second lag
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 10, 2016, 06:58:39 AM Last edit: December 10, 2016, 08:54:56 AM by Amph |
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, you should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 10, 2016, 07:42:54 AM |
|
EWBF how much more performance do you think you can squeeze out of 1070s? Do you believe there is a lot of room left for optimizations? Do you have plans for continuing to increase performance in newer versions of your miner?
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 10, 2016, 08:30:47 AM |
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done. Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:02:19 AM |
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done. Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future I'd not bet that - ZEC doesn't seem to be QUITE as memory-system limited as ETH is, but it's definitely not completely compute-bound and the 1070 doesn't have a faster memory system than the top-end RX 480s.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:07:38 AM |
|
Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...
ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock
well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done. Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future I'd not bet that - ZEC doesn't seem to be QUITE as memory-system limited as ETH is, but it's definitely not completely compute-bound and the 1070 doesn't have a faster memory system than the top-end RX 480s. the 1080 is now faster than the 1070 on equihash, so global memory dependency is almost gone.
|
|
|
|
jk_14
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1292
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2016, 10:44:18 AM |
|
Your question about linux? Linux version will be soon today or tommorow.
we are waiting...
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
December 10, 2016, 11:10:17 AM |
|
Your question about linux? Linux version will be soon today or tommorow.
we are waiting... We are aware that he said when time comes there will be. So please stop asking over and over again... be patient and wait.,
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2016, 11:59:53 AM |
|
New version plus linux. Info in first post. Stock clocks:
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:07:24 PM |
|
EWBF how much more performance do you think you can squeeze out of 1070s? Do you believe there is a lot of room left for optimizations? Do you have plans for continuing to increase performance in newer versions of your miner?
If just optimize algorythm then 3 - 10%
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:27:55 PM |
|
New version plus linux. Info in first post. Stock clocks: this version has some form of boost over the others? or just linux and bug fixes?
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:29:36 PM |
|
just linux and bug fixes
|
|
|
|
Rastamany
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:51:05 PM |
|
Thanks!! Work fine (for now ) on Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 750 Ti stock @ 58 sol/s for 38W on Dwarfpool.com
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2016, 12:51:46 PM |
|
Any chance you could add cuda 2.0+ support to your next revision? I suspect that my 580 rig would do pretty well with your miner.
BTW your miner is awesome, the 2% is well worth it, I've not got your miner running on three of my machines which were only getting @ 80 h/s per machine with Silentarmy v5. Now I'm getting @ 200 h/s per machine.
Before my R9 fury's were the best h/s with Claymore, but now with your miner the best h/s per watt efficiency looks like the 1080, but the 1070 seems to be the better buy when you consider up front cost.
Anyway thanks again for an epic miner.
Compiled for comute 2.0 but i have not tested it. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiMDN6bUhPYTNOcTg
|
|
|
|
|