Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2019, 01:59:39 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 17:
$0 - 2 (1.6%)
<$6,500 - 7 (5.6%)
$6,500-$6,750 - 1 (0.8%)
$6,751-$7,000 - 2 (1.6%)
$7,001-$7,250 - 3 (2.4%)
$7,251-$7,500 - 6 (4.8%)
$7,501-$7,750 - 4 (3.2%)
$7,751-$8,000 - 12 (9.6%)
$8,001-$8,250 - 13 (10.4%)
$8,251-$8,500 - 6 (4.8%)
$8,501-$8,750 - 6 (4.8%)
$8,751-$9,000 - 11 (8.8%)
$9,001,$9,250 - 12 (9.6%)
$9,251-$9,500 - 15 (12%)
>$9,500 - 16 (12.8%)
$20,000 - 9 (7.2%)
Total Voters: 125

Pages: « 1 ... 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 19262 19263 19264 19265 19266 19267 19268 19269 19270 19271 19272 [19273] 19274 19275 19276 19277 19278 19279 19280 19281 19282 19283 19284 19285 19286 19287 19288 19289 19290 19291 19292 19293 19294 19295 19296 19297 19298 19299 19300 19301 19302 19303 19304 19305 19306 19307 19308 19309 19310 19311 19312 19313 19314 19315 19316 19317 19318 19319 19320 19321 19322 19323 ... 24217 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21224769 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (64 posts by 15 users deleted.)
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:55:49 AM

1560779979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560779979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560779979
Reply with quote  #2

1560779979
Report to moderator
1560779979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560779979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560779979
Reply with quote  #2

1560779979
Report to moderator
1560779979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560779979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560779979
Reply with quote  #2

1560779979
Report to moderator
NEW GAME FORMAT
JACKPOT UP TO $50000+
Guess The Symbols Of a Real Ethereum Hash
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560779979
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560779979

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560779979
Reply with quote  #2

1560779979
Report to moderator
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1399


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 01:58:03 AM

My wife is very happy with me.  Happy wife, happy life.


Edit:   I never knew I wanted a surfing bear.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:01:43 AM

Like the last 3 movies I watched included a gold digging wife that stayed with their shitty husband because he made money and then as soon as he loses the money they want to get a divorce and take the children.
suspiciously square
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:02:45 AM

Now THIS is the kind of capitulation talk we need more of.
The trend is down.

I CAN'T TAKE THIS PRESSURE ANY MORE !!! DON'T MAKE ME PLACE A SELL ORDER AT $10,500 YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE !!!

* BobLawblaw cries out in sobbing anguish. Dramatically tips back head, and places back-of-the-hand on forehead, while feigning fainting...

Is it going to the moon after you put your sell order on at $10,500?
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1933


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:07:57 AM

Is it going to the moon after you put your sell order on at $10,500?

I dunno, bro. I'm starting to think my sell order @ $12,500 is jinxing the whole shebang...
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:31:51 AM

Coinbase ... probably they were getting back-handers from Jihad , Roger and jbreher and those big-block bum-buddies to keep fees high and sow mayhem.

Shutteth up about things which thou knoweth not.

Fuckhead.

Come on, picnic bear. 


Don't be a party poop.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1162
Merit: 2206


Be a bank.


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:41:56 AM

So, good luck to you if you find yourself with only sporadic appearances in the official books of state, if you are a rural migrant without a recorded birthdate, identifiable parents, or an ID number. Sorry if you lack markers of stability, if you are a rogue traveller without permanent address, phone number or email. Apologies if you have no symbols of status, if you're an informal economy hustler with no assets and low, inconsistent income. Condolences if you have no official stamps of approval from gatekeeper bodies, like university certificates or records of employment at a formal company. Goodbye if you have a poor record of engagements with recognised institutions, like a criminal record or a record of missed payments.
https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/war-cash h/t @J9Roem
I missed this from 2016
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1275


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:51:45 AM

Quote
For those playing along at home, you'll no doubt note that (should my understanding be correct), BW consumption scales at O(n^2).
I'm sure it will improve when the routing invention breakthrough occurs.
Of course - the clueless developers! D'oh, what an unforgivable oversight! The system they implemented is doomed. They chose the SAN (Spam All Network) algorithm for both route discovery and node state update. They slept during their networking lessons, or was it calculus? So they failed to notice that bandwidth grows quadratically with the number of nodes. This way, it's almost as bad as if one increased the block size. But who would ever think of that?
Hyperbole duly noted. Be that as it may, do you have any evidence that suggests that my understanding is incorrect?

Honestly, I don't know which solution has eventually been adopted in this first version of the LN, but already in 2016 the proposed method was significantly better than the naive SAN technique you hint at.

Great. What does that have to do with the shipping implementation? Anything?

Let's summarize our path so far:
you: I'll try it out
me: cool - please let me know about your BW use. My understanding is it broadcasts all state to everyone
you: oh posh! how dare you assume the devs did not do better
me: well, that's what I'm led to believe - you have better info?
you: no, but here's a possibly relevant scrap of a possibly workable design that would do better

I mean, I don't mean to misrepresent anything here, but that's the way it looks from my vantage point.

Quote
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@emabfuri/bitfury-bitcoin-routing-lightning-network-solution

Here's a relevant excerpt.
Quote
Using a fog of war like design, the collected information by the routing algorithm “includes channels within a low hop-distance and paths to randomly selected nodes further away… As a result, a node will have a well-illuminated map of its local neighborhood within the network, with random patches of visibility further away enabled by the selection of beacon nodes.”

I often write with rhetorical metaphorical flourish as well. But not within a technical specification that I expect to be taken seriously. So in addition to questioning this excerpt's relevance to current code, I also question it's author's capability.

Quote
So, it's not an initially low TTL that gets conservatively increased as I had wildly imagined, but not so far off either: closer nodes are exhaustively enumerated, while a small set of distant nodes is selected pseudorandomly.

Which still leaves quite the bulk elided from view. In what way is this anonymous? How does it handle nodes dropping off the network? And the ensuing rejoins? 'Beacons'? Is that a euphemism for trusted intermediary?

It just sounds like we're being asked to buy a pig in a poke. Again, my assumptions could be wrong. But life has taught me well that SW projects are rarely underpromised and overdelivered.
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1933


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:54:31 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhL2OWXZ26s

"How To Lose Your Life's Savings w Cryptocurrency"
h3h3Productions

Normie vloggers are reporting on BitConnect.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1275


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 02:54:57 AM

I was hoping not to have to install special instrumentation like wireshark.

Well, wireshark is about as universal a network analysis tool as exists.

Quote
BTW, 8333 is for bitcoind. LN uses a different port (can't recall right now).

Exactly. Filter out all 8333 and what are you left with? Traffic not to/from your validating client - which I believe was what you were looking for in your query.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1275


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 03:40:38 AM

yaya and jbreher is a lying scammer, but he's 'polite' so that's fine

What the hell have I lied about? Nothing.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1758


no FOMO


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 03:46:13 AM

Damn man, this Doug Polk guy is legit.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1034


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:06:48 AM

Like the last 3 movies I watched included a gold digging wife that stayed with their shitty husband because he made money and then as soon as he loses the money they want to get a divorce and take the children.

Where can I find a wife like that?
savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 511


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:31:48 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy
BobLawblaw
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1933


BitcoinTalk's Most Fabulously Gay Black Power-Top


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:38:51 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy

No siree. Will leave my order @ $12.5k in place and see what happens over the next 48 hours.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1758


no FOMO


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 04:39:53 AM

here's to hoping Bob gets filled


heh     heh heh
rezurect007
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 7


View Profile WWW
January 24, 2018, 05:00:52 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy

No siree. Will leave my order @ $12.5k in place and see what happens over the next 48 hours.

Depends on the exchange i guess 12.0 on CEX maybe.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 294


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 05:18:09 AM

It's beyond comical how rigged this market is by the same single entity constantly trying to paint the tape ever since the $200 price range.  Soon as price dumps near $10k, here comes the Bitfinex spoofer to place all of his fake 1000 btc walls to try and paint a perfect double bottom, then immediately tries to spike it afterwards.  Even the metals market, which is rigged 24/7/365 looks less rigged than BTC.  

The only difference is, the ESF manipulates metals down, while this single entity always attempts to manipulate BTC up.  Kind of makes you wonder why the govt sanctions the ESF to rig metals down while being fully capable of doing the exact same thing with bitcoin, yet this mysterious entity rigging BTC is always trying to push it upwards instead.  That is, unless the (((govt))) wants bitcoin to go up to try and force people into a centralized tracking system instead of buying metals...
Lontonbit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 108



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 05:22:18 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy

No siree. Will leave my order @ $12.5k in place and see what happens over the next 48 hours.
Cme futures scam expires Jan 26 = moon
Ivor Biggun
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 19


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 05:37:49 AM

Good job Boblawblaw !!!... It went under 10.500$ ... I hope your order got filled 100% !!! Cheesy Cheesy

No siree. Will leave my order @ $12.5k in place and see what happens over the next 48 hours.
Cme futures scam expires Jan 26 = moon

Can you give a basic explanation of the logic behind that? I don't understand how the Cme futures scam works.
Pages: « 1 ... 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 19262 19263 19264 19265 19266 19267 19268 19269 19270 19271 19272 [19273] 19274 19275 19276 19277 19278 19279 19280 19281 19282 19283 19284 19285 19286 19287 19288 19289 19290 19291 19292 19293 19294 19295 19296 19297 19298 19299 19300 19301 19302 19303 19304 19305 19306 19307 19308 19309 19310 19311 19312 19313 19314 19315 19316 19317 19318 19319 19320 19321 19322 19323 ... 24217 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!