Bitcoin Forum
July 18, 2024, 02:56:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (2%)
7/28 - 7 (14%)
8/4 - 9 (18%)
8/11 - 5 (10%)
8/18 - 1 (2%)
8/25 - 2 (4%)
After August - 25 (50%)
Total Voters: 50

Pages: « 1 ... 31779 31780 31781 31782 31783 31784 31785 31786 31787 31788 31789 31790 31791 31792 31793 31794 31795 31796 31797 31798 31799 31800 31801 31802 31803 31804 31805 31806 31807 31808 31809 31810 31811 31812 31813 31814 31815 31816 31817 31818 31819 31820 31821 31822 31823 31824 31825 31826 31827 31828 [31829] 31830 31831 31832 31833 31834 31835 31836 31837 31838 31839 31840 31841 31842 31843 31844 31845 31846 31847 31848 31849 31850 31851 31852 31853 31854 31855 31856 31857 31858 31859 31860 31861 31862 31863 31864 31865 31866 31867 31868 31869 31870 31871 31872 31873 31874 31875 31876 31877 31878 31879 ... 33552 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26419114 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 2212



View Profile
March 01, 2023, 02:03:04 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2023, 12:54:09 PM by dragonvslinux


Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions Wink
Gachapin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1970


bitcoin retard


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 02:14:33 PM


Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions Wink

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it first. And no other source linked, hence my question.

Thanks for the info.

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 2212



View Profile
March 01, 2023, 02:33:21 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2023, 12:54:01 PM by dragonvslinux


Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions Wink

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...



In case this doesn't make any sense (snapshot vs screenshot), as without using tradingview it's probably not obvious, here are examples:

   

Left: Screenshot of a published chart, so naturally I provide a source. No namestamp or timestamp, nothing to prove I published it without a link.
Right:  Snapshot of a private chart, so there isn't a source to provide. There is a namestamp and timestamp in top left corner however.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 02:39:50 PM

Look out buddy I am gaining on you

Buddy. 10

Phil.      6
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 03:01:21 PM


Explanation
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 03:06:21 PM

right back at you buddy

Buddy. 11

Phil.      7
OutOfMemory
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 3203


Man who stares at charts


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 03:19:57 PM


You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.


The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
However, imho you're very right about the pasta.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 03:55:56 PM


You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.


The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
However, imho you're very right about the pasta.

Well the merit system had some effect on posting style.

meanwhile I will catch and pass buddy soon.

Buddy 11
Phil       8
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 04:01:18 PM


Explanation
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 04:08:46 PM


Right back at you buddy

Buddy 12
Phil       9
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 05:01:18 PM


Explanation
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 05:10:16 PM


and a counter punch to buddy

Buddy  13

Phil      10


Place is a ghost town. With out more posters Buddy will win due to my sleep breaks.
Gachapin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1970


bitcoin retard


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 05:12:03 PM


Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions Wink

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...



In case this doesn't make any sense (snapshot vs screenshot), as without using tradingview it's probably not obvious, here are examples:

 

Left: Screenshot of a published chart, so naturally I provide a source. No namestamp or timestamp, nothing to prove I published it without a link.
Right:  Snapshot of a private chart, so there isn't a source to provide. There is a namestamp and timestamp in top left corner however.

Thanks.  You are right, I was too suspicious and lazy that I didn't checked in a new tab.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 05:24:03 PM

Yeah at times  screenshot and link can be confused.







and some more gaining on buddy

Buddy 13

Phil     11

I think beating buddy for 1 entire month will be hard.
Gachapin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1970


bitcoin retard


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 05:27:10 PM


You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.


The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
...


That's exactly the point....  If you live in a low income country getting merits can be a very serious thing.  It may provide you at least with a 2nd income the wellbeing of your family might depend on.

I can tell ya, if I lived under such circumstances, I would rather do some posting on Bitcointalk than being exploited in a badly paid and exhausting 3rd world employment.

And that creates some very "motivated" merit farmers.

I don't think any of the older WO participants take Merits very serious.  But merit farmers do, for sure
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 2212



View Profile
March 01, 2023, 05:33:03 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2023, 12:52:49 PM by dragonvslinux


Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions Wink

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...

Thanks.  You are right, I was too suspicious and lazy that I didn't checked in a new tab.

To be honest I was surprised when I realised it was from the poster, so I'm not here to criticise your suspicions! For sure many if not most of the charts posted here these days are plagiarised.

More to the point all snapshots taken from tradingview will look like plagiarism due to never having a source, especially from non-reputable WO posters, but is easy to verify at least.

It's now made me wonder why Toxic240 doesn't use snapshot function and instead takes screenshots, not that I'm accusing, I imagine there's a legit reason but has made me curious.

Anyway, nuff said. This has so far become one of the most boring pages to date with phil trolling (spamming) buddy and me explaining what a snapshot is. Buddy isn't even real.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 8219



View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 05:41:43 PM
Merited by Gachapin (2), philipma1957 (1), Toxic2040 (1)

WO is full of farmers these days

My theory is its actually just 3-4 farmers that run 10-20 accounts.

They are like beggars -- if you reward them they will just keep coming back and never learn to provide on their own. Basically you guys (mainly El Duderino and JJG) are cursing them to a lifetime of begging with each merit sent.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8174


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2023, 05:42:37 PM


You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.


The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
...


That's exactly the point....  If you live in a low income country getting merits can be a very serious thing.  It may provide you at least with a 2nd income the wellbeing of your family might depend on.

I can tell ya, if I lived under such circumstances, I would rather do some posting on Bitcointalk than being exploited in a badly paid and exhausting 3rd world employment.

And that creates some very "motivated" merit farmers.

I don't think any of the older WO participants take Merits very serious.  But merit farmers do, for sure

Also many third world jobs are very unsafe.

So typing at a keyboard even if it is 12 hours a day is more attractive.






Buddy = 13
Phil = 12


d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 3224



View Profile
March 01, 2023, 05:52:09 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Put the limes back in your purse

https://youtu.be/Tbgv8PkO9eo
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2240
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 01, 2023, 06:01:20 PM


Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 31779 31780 31781 31782 31783 31784 31785 31786 31787 31788 31789 31790 31791 31792 31793 31794 31795 31796 31797 31798 31799 31800 31801 31802 31803 31804 31805 31806 31807 31808 31809 31810 31811 31812 31813 31814 31815 31816 31817 31818 31819 31820 31821 31822 31823 31824 31825 31826 31827 31828 [31829] 31830 31831 31832 31833 31834 31835 31836 31837 31838 31839 31840 31841 31842 31843 31844 31845 31846 31847 31848 31849 31850 31851 31852 31853 31854 31855 31856 31857 31858 31859 31860 31861 31862 31863 31864 31865 31866 31867 31868 31869 31870 31871 31872 31873 31874 31875 31876 31877 31878 31879 ... 33552 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!