Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[dragonvslinux]

Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions

[1714563449]

1714563449

[1714563449]

1714563449

[1714563449]

1714563449

[1714563449]

1714563449

[Gachapin]

Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it first. And no other source linked, hence my question.

Thanks for the info.

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.

[dragonvslinux]

Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...


In case this doesn't make any sense (snapshot vs screenshot), as without using tradingview it's probably not obvious, here are examples:

   

Left: Screenshot of a published chart, so naturally I provide a source. No namestamp or timestamp, nothing to prove I published it without a link.
Right:  Snapshot of a private chart, so there isn't a source to provide. There is a namestamp and timestamp in top left corner however.

[philipma1957]

Look out buddy I am gaining on you

Buddy. 10

Phil.      6

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[philipma1957]

right back at you buddy

Buddy. 11

Phil.      7

[OutOfMemory]

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.

The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
However, imho you're very right about the pasta.

[philipma1957]

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.

The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
However, imho you're very right about the pasta.

Well the merit system had some effect on posting style.

meanwhile I will catch and pass buddy soon.

Buddy 11
Phil       8

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[philipma1957]

Explanation

Right back at you buddy

Buddy 12
Phil       9

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[philipma1957]

Explanation

and a counter punch to buddy

Buddy  13

Phil      10


Place is a ghost town. With out more posters Buddy will win due to my sleep breaks.

[Gachapin]

Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...


In case this doesn't make any sense (snapshot vs screenshot), as without using tradingview it's probably not obvious, here are examples:

 

Left: Screenshot of a published chart, so naturally I provide a source. No namestamp or timestamp, nothing to prove I published it without a link.
Right:  Snapshot of a private chart, so there isn't a source to provide. There is a namestamp and timestamp in top left corner however.

Thanks.  You are right, I was too suspicious and lazy that I didn't checked in a new tab.

[philipma1957]

Yeah at times  screenshot and link can be confused.







and some more gaining on buddy

Buddy 13

Phil     11

I think beating buddy for 1 entire month will be hard.

[Gachapin]

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.

The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
...

That's exactly the point....  If you live in a low income country getting merits can be a very serious thing.  It may provide you at least with a 2nd income the wellbeing of your family might depend on.

I can tell ya, if I lived under such circumstances, I would rather do some posting on Bitcointalk than being exploited in a badly paid and exhausting 3rd world employment.

And that creates some very "motivated" merit farmers.

I don't think any of the older WO participants take Merits very serious.  But merit farmers do, for sure

[dragonvslinux]

Hoping for a green week ahead of us.

since there is no source linked, it was you who created that TA pic, right?

There is a source linked in top left corner: "Inthesilence" as the publisher. So safe to assume In the silence created this TA.

Always worth checking the publisher's name from TV charts before making assumptions

yes I saw that there was a name. But I couldn't read it. And no other source linked, hence my question.

I see. Without intending to sound patronising then right click and "Open image in new tab" is the usual solution to this problem for full size version. This normally always works.

The irony being there is no original source for that chart (I checked) as it's a snapshot from a private chart, rather than a screenshot, so not sure what publisher can do apart from take snapshot.

I guess they could say "I published this" underneath, but then anyone could claim this from a screenshot. Hence the publisher name-stamp & timestamp on snapshot is more accurate...

Thanks.  You are right, I was too suspicious and lazy that I didn't checked in a new tab.

To be honest I was surprised when I realised it was from the poster, so I'm not here to criticise your suspicions! For sure many if not most of the charts posted here these days are plagiarised.

More to the point all snapshots taken from tradingview will look like plagiarism due to never having a source, especially from non-reputable WO posters, but is easy to verify at least.

It's now made me wonder why Toxic240 doesn't use snapshot function and instead takes screenshots, not that I'm accusing, I imagine there's a legit reason but has made me curious.

Anyway, nuff said. This has so far become one of the most boring pages to date with phil trolling (spamming) buddy and me explaining what a snapshot is. Buddy isn't even real.

[nutildah]

WO is full of farmers these days

My theory is its actually just 3-4 farmers that run 10-20 accounts.

They are like beggars -- if you reward them they will just keep coming back and never learn to provide on their own. Basically you guys (mainly El Duderino and JJG) are cursing them to a lifetime of begging with each merit sent.

[philipma1957]

You are right though, I'm a bit disappointed by so much copypasta in the WO recently.  I liked it better without the merit system.

The merit system wasn't established for us to take it too serious, though.
...

That's exactly the point....  If you live in a low income country getting merits can be a very serious thing.  It may provide you at least with a 2nd income the wellbeing of your family might depend on.

I can tell ya, if I lived under such circumstances, I would rather do some posting on Bitcointalk than being exploited in a badly paid and exhausting 3rd world employment.

And that creates some very "motivated" merit farmers.

I don't think any of the older WO participants take Merits very serious.  But merit farmers do, for sure

Also many third world jobs are very unsafe.

So typing at a keyboard even if it is 12 hours a day is more attractive.






Buddy = 13
Phil = 12

[d_eddie]

Put the limes back in your purse

https://youtu.be/Tbgv8PkO9eo

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation