Reading JayJuanGee posts will probably give you a heart attack, ack, ack, ack, ack, ack.
Now you are trying to quote from Billy Joel. Go figure?
He thinks bitcoin is "money", but you oughta know by now.
Get the fuck out of here with informing about what JJG thinks, when all the fuck you want to do is to ramble on with your stupid-ass talking points?
I did not narrow in on what I think bitcoin is, including whether it is money, but to suggest that it remains a good investment with opportunities for folks who can recognize what bitcoin is bringing to the table, whether that is some kind of present of future money or some other use case that bitcoin has currently or into the future... and if we compare bitcoin to gold or silver, it seems to offer a lot, relatively speaking, and that is only one kind of set of use cases..... .
It's a designed to centralize, non-fungible, permissioned ledger, valueless token.
You just making shit up because you want to someone to talk about each of these talking points. You are using descriptors that are the opposite of what bitcoin is... so get the fuck out of here with your misinformation that is asserting opposites as if they were true descriptors of bitcoin.
You're not empowering yourself by participating; you're surrendering power to the centralized transaction validators who can blacklist your funds at will.
How the fuck is that going to happen, you nutjob? Each of us has the ability to use the amount of discretion that we would like in terms of how much of our quasi-liquid investment capital that we want to put into bitcoin. Of course, we can start slow by buying and accumulating bitcoin, and then we can figure out various ways to store bitcoin in order that we can keep our bitcoins completely secure. On the one hand, if we accumulate our bitcoin's through KYC and AML institutions, then there is going to be more chances that our exact quantity of bitcoins (and their locations) will be known. But there are also various creative ways in which we could be able to accumulate and store our bitcoin, with at least a certain amount of plausible deniability regarding our exact holdings. Surely, there are going to be more and more tools built on the governmental end to attempt to track coins, and there are going to be more tools that attempt to make it possible for bitcoin to be somewhat anonymous like cash.. but the back and forth and the tension in these implementations are not necessarily going to be easy to figure out.. and therefore, each of us will need to continue to figure out our own means to accumulate, report and store (whether we believe that our coins are somewhat private or we just assume them to be completely known and taxable at whatever time we chose to cash them out... that is if we do not take them to the grave with us?).
It's an obvious 1984 system that only dumbasses have not caught onto yet.
This is called FUD spreading... for some reason an attempt by you to magnify fear, and sure you are likely butt hurt because to the extent that you might have had any coins, you sold most, if not all, of your coins below $600.. sorry about that
you butt hurt fuck...
I love how none of you idiots can offer any type of explanation as to why evil Jews like Larry Summers and Ben Bernanke support craptocurrency.
Yeah, everyone is an idiot, except for you, because you were smart enough to get out of this obvious trap below $600. You sure do seem smart to be trolling and spreading nonsense FUD, ever since.
If that's what it's all about, if you think that's movin up, then I'm movin out.
It's about figuring out a strategy that works for yourself, and if you are able to earn more than the investment average over time, then more the power to you... .. again, your pumping of PMs seems a poor substitute investment for someone who might be considering various advantages and disadvantages of bitcoin in regards to their own personal circumstances including other investments that they may have, their view of bitcoin and other investments, their risk tolerance, their timeline and other relevant factors.