explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
June 14, 2018, 09:49:04 PM |
|
Interdasting. Intradesting to me because I figured on a retrace of 5000 since it was blasted past the first time. Its not so very far off now.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13205
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
June 14, 2018, 09:54:57 PM |
|
QUICK list 12288 is finisht GOOD LUCK WO's 16/04/2018 serveria.com 27/04/2018 BinaryReign 28/04/2018 Toxic2040 29/04/2018 BobLawblaw 30/04/2018 RayX12 05/05/2018 kaicrypzen 07/05/2018 InvoKing 08/05/2018 ChinkyEyes 13/05/2018 mfort312 15/05/2018 Paashaas 16/05/2018 player99 17/05/2018 bikerleszno 19/05/2018 Bitcoinaire 20/05/2018 willope 21/05/2018 rafanadal 22/05/2018 strawbs 24/05/2018 yonton 25/05/2018 JimboToronto 26/05/2018 Colonel Panic 29/05/2018 ivomm 30/05/2018 Lontonbit 31/05/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE 01/06/2018 RoomBot 02/06/2018 rjclarke2000 03/06/2018 oblox 04/06/2018 wachtwoord 05/06/2018 Wekkel 08/06/2018 hisslyness 09/06/2018 LodisMcguire 11/06/2018 Raja_MBZ 12/06/2018 bitcoinPsycho 13/06/2018 erre 14/06/2018 vroom 15/06/2018 d_eddie 16/06/2018 coralreefer 18/06/2018 Robin,Hood 20/06/2018 rolling 22/06/2018 Biodom 23/06/2018 Dunkelheit667 25/06/2018 bones261 26/06/2018 Arriemoller 28/06/2018 klaaas 30/06/2018 DarkStar_ 01/07/2018 o_e_l_e_o 02/07/2018 jojo69 03/07/2018 Karatma1 04/07/2018 Elwar 13/07/2018 sirazimuth 14/07/2018 Ludwig Von 21/07/2018 Lauda 22/07/2018 LFC_Bitcoin 26/07/2018 Icygreen 02/08/2018 fragout 03/08/2018 supremnoob 06/08/2018 cAPSLOCK 08/08/2018 infofront 10/08/2018 HairyMaclairy 15/08/2018 Phil_S 16/08/2018 Rosewater Foundation 17/08/2018 B1tUnl0ck3r 19/08/2018 Imbatman 21/08/2018 BitcoinBunny 27/08/2018 soullyG 28/08/2018 RealMachasm 29/08/2018 STT 04/09/2018 flynn 08/09/2018 xhomerx10 09/09/2018 vapourminer 11/09/2018 Dakustaking76 20/09/2018 Digigami 22/09/2018 Agapios 26/09/2018 itod 30/09/2018 DeathAngel 12/10/2018 IntroVert 15/10/2018 explorer 18/10/2018 Searing 26/10/2018 kurious 09/11/2018 fabiorem 15/11/2018 bitserve 20/11/2018 Globb0 22/11/2018 Last of the V8s 01/12/2018 Alexander_Z 07/03/2019 CoinCube 15/04/2019 Spaceman_Spiff_Original 20/06/2019 bitebits 13/12/2019 nikauforest 10/04/2020 yefi 05/09/2020 samson 23/06/2021 fortune143
|
|
|
|
infofront (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
|
June 14, 2018, 10:07:19 PM |
|
Pasting goatse images to satoshis.place. "Has Lightning gone to far ?" That's not goatse, silly. That's Roger Ver.
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 13205
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
|
|
June 14, 2018, 10:13:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:04:14 PM |
|
Are you really willing to let your current net worth get cut in half? Again?
Yes. Because the alternative scenario is letting my current net worth double. Again. Can't win if you forfeit the game.
|
|
|
|
samson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:08:02 PM |
|
QUICK list 12288 is finisht GOOD LUCK WO's 16/04/2018 serveria.com 27/04/2018 BinaryReign <snip> 10/04/2020 yefi 05/09/2020 samson 23/06/2021 fortune143 I really hope I'm wrong on this speculation....
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 4615
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:15:38 PM |
|
Are you really willing to let your current net worth get cut in half? Again?
Yes. Because the alternative scenario is letting my current net worth double. Again. Can't win if you forfeit the game. ding ding ding ding we have a winner
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 5429
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:19:02 PM |
|
Pasting goatse images to satoshis.place. "Has Lightning gone to far ?" That's not goatse, silly. That's Roger Ver. Just Penises. Lol
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:22:51 PM |
|
BTC Dominance: 40
Can we get a new poll, at which price point will the miners run out of spare funds to support bcash?
Never. Same hash algo. They can instantly retarget their hashpower to whatever garners them profit. As some miners abandon BCH (as if -- who is it misguided BTC maximalists insist is the primary driving force behind BCH?), it becomes more profitable for those that remain. And unlike BTC, BCH can ratchet down its difficulty to ensure stability under any circumstance. kampai! When flip? Haha. I know you're just trolling me, but I'll play along. Don't know. Don't even know if it will. I think it will, due to the support of way more use cases at minimal complexity. But that's a future unknown to us as of yet.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:50:29 PM |
|
I'm very disheartened today. Lost a major chunk of my bitcoin holdings (almost 0.38 BTC) on Bitmex even though I've been longing since $8000 with just 4x leverage (adding more & more after every dump to average it further down), but still at $6140, I got liquidated. With this, I can pretty much assure that $6140 was actually the bottom. It was only to liquidate me, hard luck. Don't comment that I need to risk only what I can afford to lose, I know that very well, just had some real bad luck (as well as confusion) this time.
For reasons like this, I continue to conclude (personally) that leveraging is not necessary, especially in bitcoin. In bitcoin we are lucky to experience outrageously stupendous returns, and I we do not need to leverage in order to achieve such outrageously stupendous returns on our investment. Accordingly, if you just invest regularly, then the most that you can lose is 100% of what you put in - but if you employ leverage (especially using the margin trade vehicles supplied by exchanges), you not only can lose your 100% more quickly, you also lose it way faster, which causes a kind of magnification that if you employ 4x leverage than you can lose 400% - something like that. Therefore, I still consider any kind of leveraging to be too far into a "gambling" rather than "investing" category, especially with bitcoin. That's exactly what I'd like to conclude. It's a total gamble, and I'd not suggest anyone anymore to be a part of leveraging at BitMex. I still can't believe how easily I lost it all just because of a dump which is not even visible on CoinMarketCap (I'd repeat that again - I'm 100% sure & confident that I got liquidated right at the bottom which was $6140). Moreover, when I was about to get liquidated at $6140, I tried to increase the margin further with a little bit of more BTC (which would've increased the liquidation level to $6050 instead of $6140 and I'd have been saved from being liquidated), but effing system of BitMex gave me an error (system overload, try again later). It's not easy for me to just invest more into bitcoin when I've my whole family to support, my education bills to pay and all other hell. It's surely going to take a while to recover from the two recent losses of BitMex and DENT at CoinRail (I highly doubt that I'll get the DENT back from CoinRail, even though they've been telling me to calm down). A recap: -Sold my GPT websites network for 919 bitcoins in 2011, used bitcoin as "just another" payment processor. Started saving the dollars at LibertyReserve.com. -Lost every penny of savings at LibertyReserve.com (this is when I realized that bitcoin could be the future after reading an article at CoinDesk). -Bought a huge bag of ZCL from my savings in mid-2017 thinking it has gone down by 70%, and can't go further down, but it continued its decline. -Shilled ZCL in almost all 2017. Gave idea of Bitcoin Private to Rhett, but he said it's "worthless" and he's going to abandon the project of ZCL. I could've developed BTCP on my own if it wasn't for integration of stupid two way replay protection. Sold all ZCL in November at $2 each due to fear of getting it de-listed from Bittrex (as there was no trading volume present). He then introduced my idea of BTCP in December and ZCL skyrocketed to $200. Now John McAfee shills BTCP all the time. All of this can be considered as a proof that I got my savings liquidated right at the bottom and we won't see bitcoin below $6100 again.Nice words tweeted by Vinny Lingham: Vinny is not the deepest thinker.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3597
|
|
June 14, 2018, 11:58:21 PM |
|
I'm very disheartened today. Lost a major chunk of my bitcoin holdings (almost 0.38 BTC) on Bitmex even though I've been longing since $8000 with just 4x leverage (adding more & more after every dump to average it further down), but still at $6140, I got liquidated. With this, I can pretty much assure that $6140 was actually the bottom. It was only to liquidate me, hard luck. Don't comment that I need to risk only what I can afford to lose, I know that very well, just had some real bad luck (as well as confusion) this time.
For reasons like this, I continue to conclude (personally) that leveraging is not necessary, especially in bitcoin. In bitcoin we are lucky to experience outrageously stupendous returns, and I we do not need to leverage in order to achieve such outrageously stupendous returns on our investment. Leveraging is a power tool that shouldn't be used lightheartedly. An understanding of the underlying arithmetic helps. On Bitmex in particular, shorts that are leveraged under 1 can't be liquidated at any price and only become a loss if/when the position is closed. Accordingly, if you just invest regularly, then the most that you can lose is 100% of what you put in - but if you employ leverage (especially using the margin trade vehicles supplied by exchanges), you not only can lose your 100% more quickly, you also lose it way faster, which causes a kind of magnification that if you employ 4x leverage than you can lose 400% - something like that. Well, kind of, yes. For example, if you make 4 repeated trades that burn each of their 100% approximately 4x times faster. Other side of the coin: for example, if you are using a leveraged position as a hedge, so you can hedge 4x times as much for the same "cost" (margin), admittedly on a smaller range. Not necessarily 4x smaller, though. The arithmetic details can get tricky.
|
|
|
|
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505
|
|
June 15, 2018, 12:03:00 AM |
|
I'm very disheartened today. Lost a major chunk of my bitcoin holdings (almost 0.38 BTC) on Bitmex even though I've been longing since $8000 with just 4x leverage (adding more & more after every dump to average it further down), but still at $6140, I got liquidated. With this, I can pretty much assure that $6140 was actually the bottom. It was only to liquidate me, hard luck. Don't comment that I need to risk only what I can afford to lose, I know that very well, just had some real bad luck (as well as confusion) this time.
For reasons like this, I continue to conclude (personally) that leveraging is not necessary, especially in bitcoin. In bitcoin we are lucky to experience outrageously stupendous returns, and I we do not need to leverage in order to achieve such outrageously stupendous returns on our investment. Leveraging is a power tool that shouldn't be used lightheartedly. An understanding of the underlying arithmetic helps. On Bitmex in particular, shorts that are leveraged under 1 can't be liquidated at any price and only become a loss if/when the position is closed. Accordingly, if you just invest regularly, then the most that you can lose is 100% of what you put in - but if you employ leverage (especially using the margin trade vehicles supplied by exchanges), you not only can lose your 100% more quickly, you also lose it way faster, which causes a kind of magnification that if you employ 4x leverage than you can lose 400% - something like that. Well, kind of, yes. For example, if you make 4 repeated trades that burn each of their 100% approximately 4x times faster. Other side of the coin: for example, if you are using a leveraged position as a hedge, so you can hedge 4x times as much for the same "cost" (margin), admittedly on a smaller range. Not necessarily 4x smaller, though. The arithmetic details can get tricky. *sounds like a Bitmex'er*
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
June 15, 2018, 12:04:51 AM |
|
I'm so tired of all of this ignorant anti lighting network rhetoric that I keep hearing and seeing constantly. Do you guys think Ver is funding this BS.
My guess is 'no'. I'm probably the most persistent Bitcoin* believer / SegWit skeptic still participating in this thread, and I ain't getting paid. (Most others of my opinions seem to have left for more hospitable climes). And while I may have a limited perspective on the matter, I think this thread is one of the most important centers of mindshare in Bitcoindom. You'd think that if there were expenditures on shillery, this thread would be one of the major targets. *whether BTC or BCH Incidentally, the Bitcoin network topology is nothing like the diagram on the right.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3597
|
|
June 15, 2018, 12:08:50 AM Last edit: June 15, 2018, 12:35:16 AM by d_eddie Merited by infofront (1), Toxic2040 (1) |
|
Well, at least somebody is trying to hold "The bottom" up... . (Mic post some good pic) Confirmed. Bottom is being held up. Sometimes I feel like my biggest contribution to this thread is butt pictures, but I guess that's good enough. Here goes the last merit in my quota for legendaries or quasi-legendaries (>1k guys). I was hoping to give it to Last of the V8's, but he didn't take my invitation. About time for me to tribute infofront's status as a top bottom poster. As an aside for gentlemen only - If I had that kind of panorama readily available, I wouldn't mind the current search for any other bottoms. EDIT - sh** I f*** up, not 2! I never gave more than 1 merit to any single post. I tricked myself into clicking that button with both... uh, hands.
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 15, 2018, 12:09:55 AM |
|
Incidentally, the Bitcoin network topology is nothing like the diagram on the right.
It's like the one on the right but with crap dangling off of it. There is a large community of full node operators, that community looks like that picture on the right, if others decide to tack their own structures onto it that doesn't change the fact that the underlying one is still there.
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3597
|
|
June 15, 2018, 12:58:43 AM |
|
(quotes freely snipped for relevance) Still having more money than you could probably spend (as such whales do) is not that terrible even if your net worth gets a cut of several hundred millions. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think they are as much depressed as I am right now.
I played this past peak much worse than I did the previous (2013) in which I doubled my Bitcoin count. The blame is on me (or my greed).
P.S.: No, not going to break/sell. I can perfectly (and depressedly) ride this thing until ZERO. I am more worried about the amount of profits already (even if temporarily?) lost than what I still have to lose (which is LESS).
We're soul brothers in a way - but swings and opportunities aren't over yet. New profits can and will come, and the one thing I learned about trading is: The only way to really learn a lesson is pay for it. You paid handsomely, but you're still in the green. Your glass is half full, see? And it's Don Simon Premium, not the usual stuff! It's basically that.... I didn't play well this time... But hindsight is 20/20... and I really don't like to have a substantial exposure to exchanges anymore.
So yeah, hodl and suck it up. In the end I will be fine... or not. We will see.
I also paid my lessons through the nose. Still in the green, though, using my new knowledge from old mistakes to make some corn on the side, and still learning useful tidbits at a much more reasonable price. See you at the 100k party sooner than we both think?
|
|
|
|
Toxic2040
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 4184
|
|
June 15, 2018, 01:15:23 AM |
|
Bitcoin...1 year later. 4h D Rising volume is what I am noticing, a good sign. Still shying away from testing the 9 day conversion line(tenkan-sen). Looks to me like bears are going to make another push downward over the weekend. #stronghands
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4018
Merit: 8852
|
|
June 15, 2018, 01:18:30 AM |
|
~snip Nice words tweeted by Vinny Lingham: Very poorly worded. It actually doesnt make sense as written. Which luxury is he lacking? Has he been living a hand-to-mouth existence? He's a fucking millionaire. Edit: im a fucking idiot. I'll blame it on the night shifts... It's perfectly written in plain english.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
June 15, 2018, 01:26:26 AM |
|
Real money can only be created out of production and only after this has happened, can it be borrowed to create debt, not the other way around. The current monetary system is not real money, it is a house of cards built on decades of mind-fucking the public. There will be an awakening.
Or, there will be a reckoning. Brought on by a r3kt-oning.
|
|
|
|
|