Bitcoin Forum
September 23, 2019, 10:08:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Sept. 21 Closing Price:
$0 - 4 (3.7%)
<$8,000 - 5 (4.6%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 1 (0.9%)
$8,500-$9,000 - 2 (1.8%)
$9,000-$9,500 - 5 (4.6%)
$9,500-$10,000 - 7 (6.4%)
$10,000-$10,500 - 25 (22.9%)
$10,500-$11,000 - 20 (18.3%)
$11,000-$11,500 - 19 (17.4%)
$11,500-$12,000 - 6 (5.5%)
>$12,000 - 8 (7.3%)
>$20,000 - 7 (6.4%)
Total Voters: 109

Pages: « 1 ... 20576 20577 20578 20579 20580 20581 20582 20583 20584 20585 20586 20587 20588 20589 20590 20591 20592 20593 20594 20595 20596 20597 20598 20599 20600 20601 20602 20603 20604 20605 20606 20607 20608 20609 20610 20611 20612 20613 20614 20615 20616 20617 20618 20619 20620 20621 20622 20623 20624 20625 [20626] 20627 20628 20629 20630 20631 20632 20633 20634 20635 20636 20637 20638 20639 20640 20641 20642 20643 20644 20645 20646 20647 20648 20649 20650 20651 20652 20653 20654 20655 20656 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 20662 20663 20664 20665 20666 20667 20668 20669 20670 20671 20672 20673 20674 20675 20676 ... 25051 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21376908 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (106 posts by 21 users deleted.)
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1348


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 02:26:45 AM

Geeze, JJG - you need to look up the definition of 'fungible'. Within the three posts preceding yours, 2/3 of them stated that they were cautious of accepting Segwit transactions until they gained some confidence in it. That is definitively a lack of fungibility. A lack of fungibility is in no way limited to some sort of centralized blacklisting.


If the miners are as trustworthy as you big blockers think, then it shouldn't even be an issue.

Mining is orthogonal. We have evidence in this thread of users not wanting to accept Segwit transactions. That's users not miners, that's a lack of fungibility, and that's an issue.

Quote



Might have some relevance.

Were it not for DOGE's legacy as a joke coin, and its infinite emission schedule.

I'm not a mathematician, but doesn't that make bcash  at least 3X more of a joke coin?

No. That's just a silly sensationalist tweet. While DOGE may have more transactions, BCH transfers far more value.
1569233286
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569233286

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569233286
Reply with quote  #2

1569233286
Report to moderator
1569233286
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569233286

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569233286
Reply with quote  #2

1569233286
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1569233286
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569233286

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569233286
Reply with quote  #2

1569233286
Report to moderator
1569233286
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1569233286

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1569233286
Reply with quote  #2

1569233286
Report to moderator
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1160


born once atheist


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 02:51:48 AM



No. That's just a silly sensationalist tweet. While DOGE may have more transactions, BCH transfers far more value.


that maybe so, but BCH transfers don't have MUCH WOW...
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 3953


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 03:03:39 AM
Merited by sirazimuth (5)



No. That's just a silly sensationalist tweet. While DOGE may have more transactions, BCH transfers far more value.


that maybe so, but BCH transfers don't have MUCH WOW...

Or SUCH or MOON...
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1160


born once atheist


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 03:08:59 AM



No. That's just a silly sensationalist tweet. While DOGE may have more transactions, BCH transfers far more value.


that maybe so, but BCH transfers don't have MUCH WOW...

Or SUCH or MOON...

How did I know that was coming?  Cheesy Wink
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 3953


Pedal-powered plaguebot


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 03:36:42 AM

How did I know that was coming?  Cheesy Wink

I'm trained to respond to a doge whistle  Grin
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1148


yes


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 03:39:11 AM



No. That's just a silly sensationalist tweet. While DOGE may have more transactions, BCH transfers far more value.


that maybe so, but BCH transfers don't have MUCH WOW...

Or SUCH or MOON...

Or VERY.
Dabs
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1191


The Concierge of Crypto


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 04:08:44 AM
Last edit: June 17, 2018, 04:18:47 AM by Dabs

We have evidence in this thread of users not wanting to accept Segwit transactions. That's users not miners, that's a lack of fungibility, and that's an issue.

I didn't know that. If you gave me a legacy BTC address (if we had some sort of deal or transaction), I'd send you some BTC that came from a native segwit address. You'd still get your BTC, and you'll likely get it confirmed in a block faster too. Why would you not accept that? Would you return it?
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1160


born once atheist


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 04:24:03 AM

How did I know that was coming?  Cheesy Wink

I'm trained to respond to a doge whistle  Grin

doge whistle?? hey, you are off topic! shame!!   Cheesy
BitcoinNewbie15
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 291

Bitcoin isn't a bubble. It's the pin!


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 05:34:29 AM

We have evidence in this thread of users not wanting to accept Segwit transactions. That's users not miners, that's a lack of fungibility, and that's an issue.

I didn't know that. If you gave me a legacy BTC address (if we had some sort of deal or transaction), I'd send you some BTC that came from a native segwit address. You'd still get your BTC, and you'll likely get it confirmed in a block faster too. Why would you not accept that? Would you return it?

Its a crazy idea, but it is true. There are some Bitcoiners out there that will not accept a Bitcoin TX if there is any segwit TXs in its lineage. Take this with a grain of salt, as my understanding of this attack is very basic and I have no clue how viable it is. The idea behind not accepting Segwit TXs is because there could be a potential 51% collusion attack in the future, where the miners would roll back the Segwit fork and accept all the past Segwit txs as anyone can spend. They would then continue mining the original protocol satoshi designed. So theoretically, there would be two chains. The legacy BTC chain, and the rolled back Segwit chain with all the stolen coins. Any "Legacy" BTC that has no Segwit TXs in its lineage have no risk of being stolen in this attack.

Again, like I said, I have a very rudimentary understanding of this attack. I don't really know the specifics or its viability. This is something that Anonymint has been talking about on this forum recently under his alt account "anunymint".
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1348


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 06:13:43 AM

We have evidence in this thread of users not wanting to accept Segwit transactions. That's users not miners, that's a lack of fungibility, and that's an issue.

I didn't know that. If you gave me a legacy BTC address (if we had some sort of deal or transaction), I'd send you some BTC that came from a native segwit address. You'd still get your BTC, and you'll likely get it confirmed in a block faster too. Why would you not accept that? Would you return it?

I'm just saying that a couple of people upthread made that statement. That is -- by definition -- a lack of fungibility.

As to why, there may be several reasons. For me, it is the additional attack vectors.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 1456


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2018, 07:20:33 AM

I never accept any dollars with the numbers 666 on it. Because satan.

Thus. The dollar is not fungible.
Globb0
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1422


Accross the desert lies the promissed land


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 08:47:03 AM

fungible?



Free flowing, identical, mutually interchangeable


People from the Bath office cant work in the London office because they have different network adapters. Is bad for resource fungibility in the company. The cant easily move between offices and work.
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1073


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2018, 10:41:11 AM

+  a few more months would fit a little better. If the chart is to be validated, taking this as a short wave,  expect a resuming uptrend before the end of 2018. If the present trend is turning into a long bowl formation, then a low of =/- $3k, and a return to ath by 2021 still keeps the log trend intact.

You are catastrophe announcer. FFS!

3k! Omg I would have to buy more!

No. Just a balanced view. In fact my post was bullish, as I was not mentioning the third case scenario.
ccminer.net
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 595
Merit: 251


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 10:44:22 AM

The trading volumes are very very low, once they will rise again soon a new dump will happen
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1036


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 10:58:08 AM

Come on, people, it's Father's Day. Daddy needs a new pair of Lambos. Sideways at 6500 just doesn't cut it.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 301


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 12:33:10 PM

Come on, people, it's Father's Day. Daddy needs a new pair of Lambos. Sideways at 6500 just doesn't cut it.

r0ach security systems have been deployed to stop all bitcoin pump and dump scammers:

TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 12:35:45 PM

A PAIR of lambos? I do not even want to buy one. Why does a lambo seem like a big waste of money no matter how much one has? My car can beat a lambo and it doesnt even cost half as much.
kingcolex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1213


First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold


View Profile
June 17, 2018, 12:46:54 PM

A PAIR of lambos? I do not even want to buy one. Why does a lambo seem like a big waste of money no matter how much one has? My car can beat a lambo and it doesnt even cost half as much.
I mean true, i'll be fair, I'm young (26) and I like the idea of one but as a family guy, no fucking way. What am I going to do, leave the baby at home? Show up to my office job in a fucking lambo? If I was divorced and looking for tail I get it but no thanks. If I came into a windfall of money I would go GTR, tons of power and that back seat.
d_eddie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 681



View Profile
June 17, 2018, 12:50:45 PM

So you cede that these issues exist. Great.
Did my reply imply as much? I don't think they are issues - that's why I was asking. After bitserve, fluidjax too pointed out the meaninglessness of focusing on 51% attacks as segwit-specific attack vectors.

Fungibility isn't a real issue, either - still IMHO. As SW transactions become the majority, only old or newborn coins will be left in your Type 1 (coins that were never touched by a SW transaction). Besides, LN acts as a kind of giant mega-tumbler. If/when LN really gets into widespread use, it will only help fungibility rather than undermine it.

Geeze, JJG - you need to look up the definition of 'fungible'. Within the three posts preceding yours, 2/3 of them stated that they were cautious of accepting Segwit transactions until they gained some confidence in it. That is definitively a lack of fungibility. A lack of fungibility is in no way limited to some sort of centralized blacklisting.
Those two posters stated that they were wary of SW transactions right after the soft fork. This hasn't much to do with fungibility in my understanding - more of a reasonable wait-and-see attitude motivated by sane skepticism about the technology itself - skepticism that might have been triggered by the FUD wave that some were spreading at the time.

Quote
Peace out.
I'm totally cool.

markj113
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1041



View Profile
June 17, 2018, 01:23:59 PM
Merited by Globb0 (2), Ibian (1)

A PAIR of lambos? I do not even want to buy one. Why does a lambo seem like a big waste of money no matter how much one has? My car can beat a lambo and it doesnt even cost half as much.
I mean true, i'll be fair, I'm young (26) and I like the idea of one but as a family guy, no fucking way. What am I going to do, leave the baby at home? Show up to my office job in a fucking lambo? If I was divorced and looking for tail I get it but no thanks. If I came into a windfall of money I would go GTR, tons of power and that back seat.

You buy a daily driver for normal life and a lambo for those sunny weekends when you have a bit of free time.

A waste of money, well depends on your circumstances.  If you and your family are financially secure then why not, when your an old man laying on your death bed will you remember how much money you hoarded, that boring shit box of a family car or will you remember flying around in the sun driving a lambo.

I happily trade money for life experiences.
Pages: « 1 ... 20576 20577 20578 20579 20580 20581 20582 20583 20584 20585 20586 20587 20588 20589 20590 20591 20592 20593 20594 20595 20596 20597 20598 20599 20600 20601 20602 20603 20604 20605 20606 20607 20608 20609 20610 20611 20612 20613 20614 20615 20616 20617 20618 20619 20620 20621 20622 20623 20624 20625 [20626] 20627 20628 20629 20630 20631 20632 20633 20634 20635 20636 20637 20638 20639 20640 20641 20642 20643 20644 20645 20646 20647 20648 20649 20650 20651 20652 20653 20654 20655 20656 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 20662 20663 20664 20665 20666 20667 20668 20669 20670 20671 20672 20673 20674 20675 20676 ... 25051 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!