Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Last of the V8s]

Over the past 24 hours, the bears attacked $6350 and were repulsed.  A small bull victory, but a victory for the bulls none the less.

As long as $6350 holds I am bullish.

could it be?

[El duderino_]

Over the past 24 hours, the bears attacked $6350 and were repulsed.  A small bull victory, but a victory for the bulls none the less.

As long as $6350 holds I am bullish.

[Last of the V8s]

Haha you ain’t talking about me i guess  

Its just you and me left Mic.

hushed tones 'Here we see Harey Maclairy keeping watch on the price while the other Wall Observers weather the cruel crypto winter. Micg is just out of shot fetching memes and gin spritzes.'

[El duderino_]

^
and watching FOOTBALL , and going tomorrow on last months SESSION of BTCPOKER, increasing stash @the moment looking very VERY very bullish on that..... so still busy in a good way too    also busy with lot of HAT thoughts as well 

[El duderino_]

ON this 1st list ......... 3 very regular WO's almost catching a game, you guy's where unlucky there.

[infofront]

Pretty good Tom Lee interview from Friday. He's still holding onto his $25K prediction by year end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtSGd2eVjQ

[ivomm]

https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-etf-applicants-to-sec-stop-moving-the-goal-posts-eliminate-ico-double-standard/
Nice response from CBOE! Anyway, the meeting of SEC Commissioner Elad L. Roisman with VanEck-SolidX-CBOE is a sign he will be in favor of ETF. This means only 1 is needed for the approval. From this publication
https://ambcrypto.com/bitcoin-etf-sec-commissioner-provides-clarity-on-delay-specifies-guidelines-for-approval/ is evident that there is a chance Kara Stein to be the 3rd in favor of ETF. So, bakkt+ETF will mean that all those that sold in the last 9 months will eat their hats (quite popular on this thread recently  ) very soon. 

[JayJuanGee]

I think that there is decent evidence that a spam attack was occurring during that period, and if there is enough financial motivation to continue such spam attack, then I don't see why it would not happen again...

I dunno... Now with SegWit locked in, Core no longer has reason to 'incentivize' others via the clog-spamming of the network.

(It's a reasonable possibility)

Your speculation is NOT very reasonable.

Who from core has the BIG bags that they are ready, willing and able to spend for such speculative purposes as compared with some other BIG blocker nutjobs?

Reasonable inferences are against your dumbass (allegedly reasonable) fake news claim.

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/Awe_andWonder/status/1054687604119990272
terrifyingly, we ain't seen nothing yet

[El duderino_]

Mmmm sideways and boring good time to go and sleep........................
Long time i had a BTC-related dream, when its quiet i dream more of HAT’s instead

[StartupAnalyst]

#Signs are everywhere 

[bikerleszno]

ON this 1st list ......... 3 very regular WO's almost catching a game, you guy's where unlucky there.

Next time will be better

[figmentofmyass]

Pretty good Tom Lee interview from Friday. He's still holding onto his $25K prediction by year end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtSGd2eVjQ

that's too bad. i've been waiting for that guy to turn bearish for a while. permabulls gonna permabull, i guess.

at least novogratz brought his forecast back down to reality. when all the bulls finally become bears (or at least stop calling for new ATH) then we can finally go up.

[provalentine]

[digital_mine]

Sorry but I didn't get it really

[jbreher]

I think that there is decent evidence that a spam attack was occurring during that period, and if there is enough financial motivation to continue such spam attack, then I don't see why it would not happen again...

I dunno... Now with SegWit locked in, Core no longer has reason to 'incentivize' others via the clog-spamming of the network.

(It's a reasonable possibility)

Who from core has the BIG bags that they are ready, willing and able to spend for such speculative purposes as compared with some other BIG blocker nutjobs?

I dunno... Are you insinuating that nobody in the Core camp has any skin in the game? 'Cause that's what it looks like you're saying.

[provalentine]

https://image.ibb.co/m6mAdA/photo-2018-10-12-03-00-56.jpg

This is a bad post, and you should feel bad.

Why do you think so? Don't you like humor? Or irony?)

[JayJuanGee]

Pretty good Tom Lee interview from Friday. He's still holding onto his $25K prediction by year end.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtSGd2eVjQ

that's too bad. i've been waiting for that guy to turn bearish for a while. permabulls gonna permabull, i guess.

at least novogratz brought his forecast back down to reality. when all the bulls finally become bears (or at least stop calling for new ATH) then we can finally go up.

It is NOT a condition precedent for BTC prices to return to UP that "all the bulls finally become bears."     Get a grip, figass!!!  

[Elwar]

There won't be any spam attacks on the mempool until Bitcoin Ultra Super chain is proposed with major extra turbo block size.

[JayJuanGee]

I think that there is decent evidence that a spam attack was occurring during that period, and if there is enough financial motivation to continue such spam attack, then I don't see why it would not happen again...

I dunno... Now with SegWit locked in, Core no longer has reason to 'incentivize' others via the clog-spamming of the network.

(It's a reasonable possibility)

Who from core has the BIG bags that they are ready, willing and able to spend for such speculative purposes as compared with some other BIG blocker nutjobs?

I dunno... Are you insinuating that nobody in the Core camp has any skin in the game? 'Cause that's what it looks like you're saying.

Don't twist my words, and put some kind of illogical burden on me to disprove your stupid-ass baseless pie in the sky assertion.

You are the one who has the burden to show plausible evidence about how your claim is based on both fact and logic, and so far your claim seems extraordinary.. and you have provided absolutely no evidence in support of it, beyond a seemingly blind assertion.