dstm (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2017, 09:35:10 PM |
|
How is going testing for Windows version?
If there are no major issues I'll start working on it next week.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2017, 10:14:58 PM |
|
Version 0.4.3 updated
Sol/W might have produced wrong values.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
September 18, 2017, 10:11:25 AM |
|
Haven't commented here in a while but I appreciate all the development and new versions. One thing I noticed on my 2 GPU rig is its not displaying the sum/total. Sep 18 03:03:45 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU2 connected to: zhash.pro:3060 Sep 18 03:03:47 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU2 server set difficulty to: 000400000000000000000000... Sep 18 03:03:48 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU0 connected to: zhash.pro:3060 Sep 18 03:03:50 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU0 server set difficulty to: 000400000000000000000000... Sep 18 03:04:08 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 62_C Sol/s: 739.9 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.9 I/s: 392.9 Sh/s: 0.000 Sep 18 03:04:10 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 68_C Sol/s: 737.1 Sol/W: 3.45 Avg: 737.1 I/s: 395.6 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:04:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 62_C Sol/s: 741.5 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 740.7 I/s: 390.1 Sh/s: 0.050 +* Sep 18 03:04:30 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 68_C Sol/s: 725.0 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.1 I/s: 392.6 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:04:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 64_C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.1 I/s: 390.0 Sh/s: 0.067 + Sep 18 03:04:50 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 728.3 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 730.1 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:08 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 65_C Sol/s: 738.9 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.0 I/s: 389.0 Sh/s: 0.075 + Sep 18 03:05:10 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 749.1 Sol/W: 3.45 Avg: 734.9 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 66_C Sol/s: 722.7 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 735.8 I/s: 389.1 Sh/s: 0.080 + Sep 18 03:05:30 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 723.8 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 731.6 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 735.1 I/s: 388.2 Sh/s: 0.067 Sep 18 03:05:50 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 730.9 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 732.4 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:06:08 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 719.8 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 732.9 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.071 + Sep 18 03:06:11 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 728.3 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.8 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.129 +++ Sep 18 03:06:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 721.2 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 731.4 I/s: 385.5 Sh/s: 0.075 + Sep 18 03:06:31 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 729.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.5 I/s: 392.2 Sh/s: 0.125 + Sep 18 03:06:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 719.8 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 730.1 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.067 Sep 18 03:06:51 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 734.1 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.8 I/s: 392.0 Sh/s: 0.133 ++ Sep 18 03:07:09 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 735.0 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 730.6 I/s: 385.9 Sh/s: 0.060 * Sep 18 03:07:11 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 727.5 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.4 I/s: 392.1 Sh/s: 0.120 Sep 18 03:07:29 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 725.7 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 730.2 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.055 Sep 18 03:07:31 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 728.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.2 I/s: 391.8 Sh/s: 0.118 + Sep 18 03:07:49 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 722.9 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 729.6 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.050 Sep 18 03:07:51 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 732.4 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.3 I/s: 391.5 Sh/s: 0.117 + Sep 18 03:08:09 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 722.9 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 729.0 I/s: 385.5 Sh/s: 0.062 ++
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2017, 10:53:35 AM |
|
Haven't commented here in a while but I appreciate all the development and new versions. One thing I noticed on my 2 GPU rig is its not displaying the sum/total. Sep 18 03:03:45 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU2 connected to: zhash.pro:3060 Sep 18 03:03:47 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU2 server set difficulty to: 000400000000000000000000... Sep 18 03:03:48 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU0 connected to: zhash.pro:3060 Sep 18 03:03:50 miner2 zm[21561]: # GPU0 server set difficulty to: 000400000000000000000000... Sep 18 03:04:08 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 62_C Sol/s: 739.9 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.9 I/s: 392.9 Sh/s: 0.000 Sep 18 03:04:10 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 68_C Sol/s: 737.1 Sol/W: 3.45 Avg: 737.1 I/s: 395.6 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:04:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 62_C Sol/s: 741.5 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 740.7 I/s: 390.1 Sh/s: 0.050 +* Sep 18 03:04:30 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 68_C Sol/s: 725.0 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.1 I/s: 392.6 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:04:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 64_C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.1 I/s: 390.0 Sh/s: 0.067 + Sep 18 03:04:50 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 728.3 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 730.1 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:08 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 65_C Sol/s: 738.9 Sol/W: 3.61 Avg: 739.0 I/s: 389.0 Sh/s: 0.075 + Sep 18 03:05:10 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 749.1 Sol/W: 3.45 Avg: 734.9 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 66_C Sol/s: 722.7 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 735.8 I/s: 389.1 Sh/s: 0.080 + Sep 18 03:05:30 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 723.8 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:05:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 731.6 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 735.1 I/s: 388.2 Sh/s: 0.067 Sep 18 03:05:50 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 730.9 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 732.4 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.100 + Sep 18 03:06:08 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 719.8 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 732.9 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.071 + Sep 18 03:06:11 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 728.3 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.8 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.129 +++ Sep 18 03:06:28 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 67_C Sol/s: 721.2 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 731.4 I/s: 385.5 Sh/s: 0.075 + Sep 18 03:06:31 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 729.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.5 I/s: 392.2 Sh/s: 0.125 + Sep 18 03:06:48 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 719.8 Sol/W: 3.59 Avg: 730.1 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.067 Sep 18 03:06:51 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 734.1 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.8 I/s: 392.0 Sh/s: 0.133 ++ Sep 18 03:07:09 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 735.0 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 730.6 I/s: 385.9 Sh/s: 0.060 * Sep 18 03:07:11 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 727.5 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.4 I/s: 392.1 Sh/s: 0.120 Sep 18 03:07:29 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 725.7 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 730.2 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.055 Sep 18 03:07:31 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 728.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.2 I/s: 391.8 Sh/s: 0.118 + Sep 18 03:07:49 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 722.9 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 729.6 I/s: 385.6 Sh/s: 0.050 Sep 18 03:07:51 miner2 zm[21561]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 732.4 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 731.3 I/s: 391.5 Sh/s: 0.117 + Sep 18 03:08:09 miner2 zm[21561]: GPU2 68_C Sol/s: 722.9 Sol/W: 3.60 Avg: 729.0 I/s: 385.5 Sh/s: 0.062 ++
Thx, will check.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
September 18, 2017, 12:33:02 PM |
|
Something else I just noticed is the Sol/W would be normal then suddenly go all over the place Sep 18 04:55:10 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 720.8 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.6 Sh/s: 0.169 Sep 18 04:55:13 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 729.2 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.2 Sh/s: 0.175 ++ Sep 18 04:55:30 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.9 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.7 Sh/s: 0.169 + Sep 18 04:55:33 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 737.6 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.1 Sh/s: 0.176 ++ Sep 18 04:55:51 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 736.1 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.5 Sh/s: 0.169 ++ Sep 18 04:55:53 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 731.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.5 Sh/s: 0.175 Sep 18 04:56:11 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.0 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.0 Sh/s: 0.168 Sep 18 04:56:14 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 737.4 Sol/W: 1416.71 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.175 + Sep 18 04:56:31 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 729.5 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.3 Sh/s: 0.168 ++ Sep 18 04:56:34 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 737.5 Sol/W: 547.68 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.1 Sh/s: 0.175 ++ Sep 18 04:56:51 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 723.5 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.7 Sh/s: 0.168 Sep 18 04:56:54 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 733.4 Sol/W: 338.85 Avg: 732.7 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.175 ++ Sep 18 04:57:11 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.8 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.8 Sh/s: 0.169 ++++ Sep 18 04:57:14 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 740.0 Sol/W: 245.79 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.5 Sh/s: 0.174 Sep 18 04:57:31 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 738.5 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.7 Sh/s: 0.168 + Sep 18 04:57:34 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 733.0 Sol/W: 193.67 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.174 ++ Sep 18 04:57:51 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 723.4 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.5 Sh/s: 0.169 ++++ Sep 18 04:57:54 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 740.9 Sol/W: 159.65 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.0 Sh/s: 0.174 ++ Sep 18 04:58:11 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 731.8 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.4 Sh/s: 0.169 ++ Sep 18 04:58:14 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 738.5 Sol/W: 135.93 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.174 ++ Sep 18 04:58:31 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 729.9 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.8 Sh/s: 0.169 + Sep 18 04:58:34 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 70_C Sol/s: 739.5 Sol/W: 118.50 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.1 Sh/s: 0.174 Sep 18 04:58:51 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.7 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.0 Sh/s: 0.169 + Sep 18 04:58:54 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 730.0 Sol/W: 105.27 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.2 Sh/s: 0.175 ++++ Sep 18 04:59:11 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 721.2 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.1 Sh/s: 0.169 + Sep 18 04:59:14 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 734.4 Sol/W: 94.52 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.174 Sep 18 04:59:31 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 728.6 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.2 Sh/s: 0.168 Sep 18 04:59:34 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 737.3 Sol/W: 86.05 Avg: 732.9 I/s: 391.9 Sh/s: 0.173 Sep 18 04:59:51 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 721.1 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.9 Sh/s: 0.168 ++ Sep 18 04:59:55 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 722.5 Sol/W: 78.84 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.7 Sh/s: 0.173 + Sep 18 05:00:11 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 733.3 Sol/W: 3.55 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.0 Sh/s: 0.168 ++ Sep 18 05:00:15 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 734.8 Sol/W: 72.86 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.2 Sh/s: 0.173 ++ Sep 18 05:00:31 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.1 Sol/W: 1137.56 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 390.3 Sh/s: 0.168 + Sep 18 05:00:35 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 738.8 Sol/W: 67.75 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.174 ++++ Sep 18 05:00:52 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 726.5 Sol/W: 521.40 Avg: 727.7 I/s: 389.8 Sh/s: 0.169 +++ Sep 18 05:00:55 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 736.5 Sol/W: 63.29 Avg: 732.9 I/s: 392.4 Sh/s: 0.173 Sep 18 05:01:12 miner2 zm[22687]: > GPU2 63_C Sol/s: 725.4 Sol/W: 339.23 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 389.7 Sh/s: 0.168 Sep 18 05:01:15 miner2 zm[22687]: GPU0 69_C Sol/s: 718.4 Sol/W: 59.44 Avg: 732.8 I/s: 392.3 Sh/s: 0.173
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2017, 12:44:52 PM |
|
Version 0.4.3 updated
Sol/W might have produced wrong values.
I've reuploaded ver 0.4.3. I haven't changed the version number, since it was a very small change. You might check the sha1sum to check whether you're on the latest version.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
September 18, 2017, 12:52:13 PM Last edit: September 18, 2017, 01:23:47 PM by NameTaken |
|
Using d98792ad93b85f85df66d6e7ab9c2f00aec27cfd ansible miner2 -m stat -a "path=/opt/zcash2/zm get_md5=no" 192.168.1.52 | SUCCESS => { "changed": false, "stat": { "atime": 1505740130.6073422, "attr_flags": "", "attributes": [], "block_size": 4096, "blocks": 1840, "charset": "binary", "checksum": "d98792ad93b85f85df66d6e7ab9c2f00aec27cfd", "ctime": 1505740118.3274462, "dev": 2049, "device_type": 0, "executable": true, "exists": true, "gid": 0, "gr_name": "root", "inode": 29622570, "isblk": false, "ischr": false, "isdir": false, "isfifo": false, "isgid": false, "islnk": false, "isreg": true, "issock": false, "isuid": false, "mimetype": "application/x-executable", "mode": "0755", "mtime": 1505720881.7276628, "nlink": 1, "path": "/opt/zcash2/zm", "pw_name": "root", "readable": true, "rgrp": true, "roth": true, "rusr": true, "size": 939144, "uid": 0, "version": "53788745", "wgrp": false, "woth": false, "writeable": true, "wusr": true, "xgrp": true, "xoth": true, "xusr": true } }
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2017, 12:56:57 PM |
|
Using d98792ad93b85f85df66d6e7ab9c2f00aec27cfd
OK, will check again.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2017, 04:02:42 PM |
|
For people that were asking why there is a delay while bringing up the GPUs. It's there to protect your power supplies, an instant current increase may damage your power supplies in the long run, so I'm increasing it slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
nUm81
|
|
September 19, 2017, 04:04:33 AM |
|
Looking forward to a windows version of this, I have some 1070 and 1080ti rigs that am willing to test with.
|
|
|
|
bigjee
|
|
September 19, 2017, 05:07:14 AM |
|
Looking forward to a windows version of this, I have some 1070 and 1080ti rigs that am willing to test with.
+1 would like to see how this compares to EWBF's
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
September 19, 2017, 12:02:38 PM |
|
v0.4.4-dev fixed the sum and Sol/W.
|
|
|
|
opposumi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2017, 12:11:04 PM |
|
Thanks for new miner software On my initial testing this seems slightly faster than ewbf's. If need more ssh access to test stuff, i can provide it too. Have some 1060/1080/ti. Keep up the good work! ps. benchmark option would be really nice, helps a lot to find best clocks for cards... O.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 19, 2017, 12:23:50 PM |
|
Thanks for new miner software On my initial testing this seems slightly faster than ewbf's. If need more ssh access to test stuff, i can provide it too. Have some 1060/1080/ti. Keep up the good work! ps. benchmark option would be really nice, helps a lot to find best clocks for cards... O. Benchmark mode is already on my todo list For performance measurements / best clocks settings for cards: Don't look at the solution rate, it's probabilistic, that's why it's jumping all the time. Look at the iterations per second (I/s) that the GPU is doing, it measures the raw performance of the GPU and that's why I've included it into the output.
|
|
|
|
cogswap
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2017, 01:58:38 PM |
|
Hello!!! Are you going to release version for windows ?? I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.
Thx !!
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
September 19, 2017, 02:07:35 PM |
|
Hello!!! Are you going to release version for windows ?? I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.
Thx !!
Yes, as soon as the linux build runs perfectly stable, there are currently some corner cases that need improvement.
|
|
|
|
cogswap
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2017, 03:19:59 PM |
|
Thx!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
grunoff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2017, 03:22:05 PM |
|
Hello!!! Are you going to release version for windows ?? I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.
Thx !!
Yes, as soon as the linux build runs perfectly stable, there are currently some corner cases that need improvement. Our rigs are waiting!!!!
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
September 20, 2017, 02:46:56 PM |
|
Is it possible to run Linux miner on Windows?))
NO, BUT YOU CAN SET UP A DUAL-BOOT SYSTEM-- Ubuntu will allow a user to set up a dual-boot, Windows and Linux system. It is relatively simple, and 32GB of hard-drive space is about all you would need. This would be practical if you would like to try mining on a single system. I have two Win 7 x64 rigs with a small partition set aside for Linux. I can test Linux miners when needed. My other rigs are all Linux. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|