If it is to believed pool hashrate is correct, then Bminer does overstate hashrate in console by a big margin...
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2FfpAACx%2Fscr1.jpg&t=665&c=yE7v1K1Fq-NDmg)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2Fk5vcsx%2Fscr2.jpg&t=665&c=ZZkadpgMmVgpMw)
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2FdvDfCx%2Fscr3.jpg&t=665&c=X0XsznT5ziHpow)
11 038 in console, but just 10 094 on the pool...
I can tell from my tests so far that Bminer is a little better then dstm.
And I can tell from my tests that Bminer reports more hash then dstm
1294 for 2 1080ti's = Bminer
1257 for 2 1080ti's = Dstm
these numbers are what smos reports and what can be seen if I attach a monitor to either pc
so 1294 /1257 = 1.0294 that means Bminer is 2.94% faster then Dstm on identical machines with the same settings
nicehash has reported $5.37 in earning for dstm and $5.48 in earns for bminer
so 548/537 = 1.0204 which is 2.04 % faster for bminer
so 2.94 vs 2.04 both show Bminer to be faster and the variance between 2.94 and 2.04 is small enough to be luck.
Bottom line shows that bminer would earn more.
I will continue testing but so far bminer shows better hashrates at the pc and the pool then dstm.
I still need to test power draw those test will be next week.