[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[helloal]

Well, some projects need time to develope even further. At the beginning of this project, there was not even a whitepaper and now we have a 260+ pages wp. The Team is also getting bigger and the future is getting brighter and brighter.

Ehealth is the kind of project that will benefit people around the world one day, its complexity and grandeur require a lot of patience from the Community, and surely the most benefited will be those who bet on the work of the Team regardless of how long it takes, Well-crafted WPP is proof of this

yeah maybe they'll make it, but I hope it will draw the investors needed for this to continue. a lot of people aren't attracted to the long term proposition.

I think it will be fine in terms of investors because switched-on medium-long term investors will be attracted to the project once they do their research on it.

[jonnytracker]

Well, some projects need time to develope even further. At the beginning of this project, there was not even a whitepaper and now we have a 260+ pages wp. The Team is also getting bigger and the future is getting brighter and brighter.

Ehealth is the kind of project that will benefit people around the world one day, its complexity and grandeur require a lot of patience from the Community, and surely the most benefited will be those who bet on the work of the Team regardless of how long it takes, Well-crafted WPP is proof of this

yeah maybe they'll make it, but I hope it will draw the investors needed for this to continue. a lot of people aren't attracted to the long term proposition.

I think it will be fine in terms of investors because switched-on medium-long term investors will be attracted to the project once they do their research on it.

Those who know the medical and pharmaceutical industry knows it's big. Not the average crypto trader.

[Piggy]

Well, some projects need time to develope even further. At the beginning of this project, there was not even a whitepaper and now we have a 260+ pages wp. The Team is also getting bigger and the future is getting brighter and brighter.

Ehealth is the kind of project that will benefit people around the world one day, its complexity and grandeur require a lot of patience from the Community, and surely the most benefited will be those who bet on the work of the Team regardless of how long it takes, Well-crafted WPP is proof of this

yeah maybe they'll make it, but I hope it will draw the investors needed for this to continue. a lot of people aren't attracted to the long term proposition.

I think it will be fine in terms of investors because switched-on medium-long term investors will be attracted to the project once they do their research on it.

Those who know the medical and pharmaceutical industry knows it's big. Not the average crypto trader.

Good investment opportunities comes with effort and research sometimes.

[chichidori]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

[wissy]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

[jonnytracker]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

The long roadmap shows it is a genuine project.

[cantdecide]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

Well, a platform like this needs regular updates for sure, and health care is really complicated. We are talking about human lifes, that is one reason why new products often needs years to pass trials etc.

[hicaribou]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

Well, a platform like this needs regular updates for sure, and health care is really complicated. We are talking about human lifes, that is one reason why new products often needs years to pass trials etc.

Yes of course, im pretty sure this project will be very disruptive in the future and we will talking about a new era of medic.

[king_of_alts]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

The long roadmap shows it is a genuine project.

That and the fact that we have seen members of the team on video. Most projects only show pictures of people you don't know if they even exist.

[jonnytracker]

I may not be inclined in medicine and the project is really big, my only worries is how accurate can the platform be and we are not talking about a simple matters here were talking about health.

I think that's exactly why the development of the platform will take so much time, roadmap till 2025 is no joke. Health care is a complicated industry, and in order to achieve something, it needs to be done without rush in order not to make mistakes.

The long roadmap shows it is a genuine project.

That and the fact that we have seen members of the team on video. Most projects only show pictures of people you don't know if they even exist.

They can show only pictures provided they also post a real professional profile link like linkid

[viljy]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

[Frickeladm]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

[matjas]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.

[aveon]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.

Sure, and the second opinion should be the first one. The final decision has to be the real doctor's one. At least now, as far as AI is not yet that developed to correctly diagnose different diseases.

[the_donald]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.

Sure, and the second opinion should be the first one. The final decision has to be the real doctor's one. At least now, as far as AI is not yet that developed to correctly diagnose different diseases.

that's why they're gonna have real doctors working for ETH. you can't have AI giving out diagnostics, not yet.

[belechau]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Actually it says on the website in Use cases section, among other things - "to get a "second opinion" about health condition and health professional's recommendations, to plan and get telemedicine services on demand". I'm sure it's also mentioned somewhere in the whitepaper.

Sure, and the second opinion should be the first one. The final decision has to be the real doctor's one. At least now, as far as AI is not yet that developed to correctly diagnose different diseases.

that's why they're gonna have real doctors working for ETH. you can't have AI giving out diagnostics, not yet.

Despite all the advances to be implemented through Ehealth and other AI-related projects currently, it still seems impossible to dispense with Human labor; at some point progress may evolve and lead us to a stage where the application of Human labor is expendable, and I believe they get there pretty quickly

[levyashin]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.

[hicaribou]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.

In my opinion, i think the real doctors can never be replaced by computers, so a doctor consultation will always be needed (about advanced/further solution/information)
There are some things that AI cant copy.

[Frickeladm]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.

In my opinion, i think the real doctors can never be replaced by computers, so a doctor consultation will always be needed (about advanced/further solution/information)
There are some things that AI cant copy.

I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.

[king_of_alts]

By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.

I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.

Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.

In my opinion, i think the real doctors can never be replaced by computers, so a doctor consultation will always be needed (about advanced/further solution/information)
There are some things that AI cant copy.

I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.

I agree. Doctors would even fight eHealth if they felt threatened by the project but it will just be a great complementary tool for patients and doctors.