[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[cevap]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same

I think decent youtubers usually say or write if video is sponsored or not, at least I've seen some of them clearly stating sponsored videos.

[1715321612]

1715321612

[1715321612]

1715321612

[hicaribou]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same

Well we should be looking for the fact / information that they tell to us, not focusing on the praise.
And after watching the video, i think we will be able to be more to the point when we read the whitepaper, save a lot of time.

[belechau]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same

I think decent youtubers usually say or write if video is sponsored or not, at least I've seen some of them clearly stating sponsored videos.

The Wpp as well as the project is long and complex, many people dodge things that give them a lot of work, and this approach people project patients and studies who do their own research to make good profits. Ehealth is the type of project that requires dedication and continuous determination of both the Team and its followers

[zgrdyg]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same

I think decent youtubers usually say or write if video is sponsored or not, at least I've seen some of them clearly stating sponsored videos.

I agree with you but you can't be sure %100 if they are telling the truth or not about the sponsorship, but besides website ratings ico reviewers can effect project in many good ways. I think we'll see some reviews about ehealth in following months.

[king_of_alts]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

Maybe we will see one or the other some youtuber with their review when they are finished with reading the whitepaper 

That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video.

[zgrdyg]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

Maybe we will see one or the other some youtuber with their review when they are finished with reading the whitepaper 

That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video.

280 paged whitepaper, roadmap stretchs to year 2025, i'm pretty sure that video won't be short.

[sambuki]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos?

Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team.

There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps

Maybe we will see one or the other some youtuber with their review when they are finished with reading the whitepaper 

That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video.

Watching videos is the best way to understand something for most people including me. But if the video duration is too long, we can get bored sooner. It will be better to cut the video into parts hence it'll be more comfortable to watch.

[aveon]

The last video on Youtube is neither professional nor informative. Guys (the devs), PLEASE make your demo videos clear and intuitive, without that damn accent and nonsense. I watched it several times and still do not get the idea((

[hicaribou]

That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video.

280 paged whitepaper, roadmap stretchs to year 2025, i'm pretty sure that video won't be short.

Watching videos is the best way to understand something for most people including me. But if the video duration is too long, we can get bored sooner. It will be better to cut the video into parts hence it'll be more comfortable to watch.

If the youtuber is attractive/funny, it certainly wont be as boring as reading the whitepaper and for some people, the information will go deeper into the brain.

[BY_ATOM]

Hi,

Foundico's eHealth First ICO rating 8.4 out of 10!

https://foundico.com/ico/ehealth-first.html …

More ratings, publications and listings to come within the next 2 weeks!

8.4 out of 10 is a good result and I think ehealth will get better rating day by day. Looking forward for the next 2 weeks for more good news!

I do not trust all these sites that evaluate projects by their criteria. For me, it is important to study the project personally, but this time I agree with the assessment!

[ImTotya]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading.

Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary.

I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project.

The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project.

If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms.

I am sure that the documents should be read in any case, even if you are a small investor. Otherwise you risk losing your money!

[Genesis07]

how are the machines going to work with? blood spike check? breath checking the deseases of a person?

[hanshammer]

The last video on Youtube is neither professional nor informative. Guys (the devs), PLEASE make your demo videos clear and intuitive, without that damn accent and nonsense. I watched it several times and still do not get the idea((

It's hard to understand what they really plan to do. I read the brochure and I have still no clue what the plan all to do.

[tudor_simion]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading.

Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary.

I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project.

The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project.

If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms.

I am sure that the documents should be read in any case, even if you are a small investor. Otherwise you risk losing your money!

There are always risks in investments. You always have to document very well about the project you want to invest in.
A summary of the project is made in the brochure.
Indeed, the White Paper is very massive, but needs to be read in detail.
It's a long-term project and it's a big one.
I do not know how many people will read the Whitepaper fully, but all investors are either as small as they should.

[the_donald]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading.

Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary.

I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project.

The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project.

If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms.

I am sure that the documents should be read in any case, even if you are a small investor. Otherwise you risk losing your money!

never invest without reading the white paper. you're throwing money away in the case.

[CryptoCutie]

Thats a winning Combination. Blockchain, Al, and Medical Expertise sounds like a Successful ico.

[aveon]

Thats a winning Combination. Blockchain, Al, and Medical Expertise sounds like a Successful ico.

It is, but they have to clear everthing out now. Very general terms were ok like 2 months ago, and now the public need more precise ideas

[CryptoCutie]

Thats a winning Combination. Blockchain, Al, and Medical Expertise sounds like a Successful ico.

It is, but they have to clear everthing out now. Very general terms were ok like 2 months ago, and now the public need more precise ideas

good thinks take time and the ico is not startet yet, so give the team 2 weeks more.

[hanshammer]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading.

Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary.

I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project.

The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project.

If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms.

I am sure that the documents should be read in any case, even if you are a small investor. Otherwise you risk losing your money!

never invest without reading the white paper. you're throwing money away in the case.

You are right but I think that's the case why this project doesn't have more attention. It's simply because people have not enough time to read the whole whitepaper.

[Frank37]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.

I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this.

I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading.

Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary.

I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project.

The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project.

If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms.

I am sure that the documents should be read in any case, even if you are a small investor. Otherwise you risk losing your money!

never invest without reading the white paper. you're throwing money away in the case.

You are right but I think that's the case why this project doesn't have more attention. It's simply because people have not enough time to read the whole whitepaper.

... and most people want quick profit, eHealth is a long long long time investment.
Thats the main reason for the low attention.