[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[Nazgar]

The team has the vision and the health-expertise required. For the team to deliver the product, it will require other things such as diligence, project management and sufficient funding.

yes they have a great team team for the health-expertise, i read it.

If you have a look to the general approach you will see that the team works very professional. All publications, documentations or interviews look like the team know what they are doing.
Of cause you are right, to deliver such a comlex product, you have to be professional.

[1715302183]

1715302183

[1715302183]

1715302183

[1715302183]

1715302183

[1715302183]

1715302183

[1715302183]

1715302183

[Altcoinrusher]

The tokens can use to participate in special health campaign, programs and check-ups, to get access to special healthcare expert community, sounds great.

it is really good that the tokens have a initial usage in their project and are not only there to have a securities factor.

Yeah it is a utility token designed as a medium for EHF platform transactions. This kinds of utility tokens will empower and kick start blockchain revolution this year.

[hicaribou]

Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?

I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap.

So they will really depend on the raised funds and maybe we wont see any prototype soon.
Thats quite bad, but good luck to the team.

[nkryuchkov]

Hi,

Foundico's eHealth First ICO rating 8.4 out of 10!

https://foundico.com/ico/ehealth-first.html …

More ratings, publications and listings to come within the next 2 weeks!

[Jepli]

Hi,

Foundico's eHealth First ICO rating 8.4 out of 10!

https://foundico.com/ico/ehealth-first.html …

More ratings, publications and listings to come within the next 2 weeks!

That is good news! Now, more and more people get to know EHF everyday. This will greatly benefit the project and I hope more good news will come these days.

[cantdecide]

Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?

I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap.

So they will really depend on the raised funds and maybe we wont see any prototype soon.
Thats quite bad, but good luck to the team.

Yes, don't think we will see any prototype soon, which is quite sad as it would give some trust but on the other hand I assume more then a bit of interface we couldn't see anyways.

[Vansire]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

[nkryuchkov]

Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?

I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap.

So they will really depend on the raised funds and maybe we wont see any prototype soon.
Thats quite bad, but good luck to the team.

Yes, don't think we will see any prototype soon, which is quite sad as it would give some trust but on the other hand I assume more then a bit of interface we couldn't see anyways.

Hi everyone,
The prototype for the screening module will be ready by the mid of 2019, first alpha web application will be developed by Dec 2019.
And yes, maximal features of the EHF platform will be developed, if the ICO reaches the hard cap.
Nevertheless, we will be able to create the applications with a fully functioning screening module in case of reaching the soft cap.
Moreover, to enhance the project attractiveness for investors, users and partners, EHF uses multiple ICO stages.
So if EHF can collect, say, $70M investments during the Round I + the Project progress will be OK, there would an opportunity to attract more investments during the Rounds II and III.
So even in the case mentioned above, finally all the milestones will be achieved on schedule.
And again, the EHF goals are really difficult to acheive, but in case of success, it will be a breakthrough in health care.
Thanks for your comments and interest!

[nkryuchkov]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

Hi,
As for the discounts, we believe that many investors will want to spend some EHF tokens paying for the Platform's services.
And yes, they will pay 10-50% less than other customers.
As you could see, the financial model (even the conservative scenario) is based on this assumption, and still NPV (10-y, 12%) is close to $600M, and EV (Y2023)= $1.4 bln.
How could the token holder check, if he / she really receives appropriate discount?
Just considering the cost in USD and the token price by the day of payment.
Yes, 50% discount isn't an average one 
But if token holders pay, for instance, 15% less for appropriate medical examination, will EHF and other investors lose money?
It is not necessarily, i.e. a business partner could be interested in flow of customers, agreeing to a reduction in profits per customer.
There are many opportunities.
In worst-case scenario, when EHF loses all the profits per client due to a discount (that's far from an average case), the missed profits per client aren't expenses, and they doesn't obligatory mean missed profit on a company scale.
In our view, the business aspects are quite well represented in the WP.
However, I'm agree indeed, some points could be improved and more details could be added.
Thank you!

[helloal]

Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?

I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap.

So they will really depend on the raised funds and maybe we wont see any prototype soon.
Thats quite bad, but good luck to the team.

Yes, don't think we will see any prototype soon, which is quite sad as it would give some trust but on the other hand I assume more then a bit of interface we couldn't see anyways.

Hi everyone,
The prototype for the screening module will be ready by the mid of 2019, first alpha web application will be developed by Dec 2019.
And yes, maximal features of the EHF platform will be developed, if the ICO reaches the hard cap.
Nevertheless, we will be able to create the applications with a fully functioning screening module in case of reaching the soft cap.
Moreover, to enhance the project attractiveness for investors, users and partners, EHF uses multiple ICO stages.
So if EHF can collect, say, $70M investments during the Round I + the Project progress will be OK, there would an opportunity to attract more investments during the Rounds II and III.
So even in the case mentioned above, finally all the milestones will be achieved on schedule.
And again, the EHF goals are really difficult to acheive, but in case of success, it will be a breakthrough in health care.
Thanks for your comments and interest!

Thanks for clearing up some of the questions Nickolay. It is true that people are itching to see a prototype and some won't be able to wait until mid 2019, but for those that are willing to wait (myself included) it is a good reassurance that the module can be developed even with the soft-cap amount.

[Piggy]

Hi,

Foundico's eHealth First ICO rating 8.4 out of 10!

https://foundico.com/ico/ehealth-first.html …

More ratings, publications and listings to come within the next 2 weeks!

And got 10 for the team

Nice to get some concern questions answered.

Nickolay is there any news you can share with us about how the private placement is going? Thank you

[batako]

Hi,

Foundico's eHealth First ICO rating 8.4 out of 10!

https://foundico.com/ico/ehealth-first.html …

More ratings, publications and listings to come within the next 2 weeks!

8.4 out of 10 is a good result and I think ehealth will get better rating day by day. Looking forward for the next 2 weeks for more good news!

[chichidori]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

[omwibya]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

plus the higher the bill payments the higher the token value.

[cevap]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

plus the higher the bill payments the higher the token value.

I don't think bill payments will influence the token value, of course provided that there will be a good volume of transactions happening through the platform.

[viljy]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

Here the only way for investors to make a profit is the speculative growth of the price of tokens. This is so written in whitepaper. About 50% discount for payment you can not even think about, since the start of the working product will take place in many years. And there are still a lot of rounds of ICO.

[Piggy]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

Is actually also serving as a place to seek a doctor for telemedicine purposes among other things

[loup]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

Is actually also serving as a place to seek a doctor for telemedicine purposes among other things

Indeed it's going to be possible to contact a doctor through the platform. I think the potential of the project is huge and many more applications will be added to it in the future.

[Frickeladm]

Investors want to know if they can make a profit. For EHF it's hard to predict. The white paper is not that detailed about the business side despite the 277 pages.

For example 10-50% discount when paying with tokens, what does that mean? If a medical bill is twice as high when paying with fiat everyone will pay with tokens. So in practice there's no discount. But suppose it's really a 50% discount, means 50% less revenue. Good for users, bad for investors.

Just an example, I've got more questions but this shows not everything is really thought thru.

For what i have read this project is a repository of medical records and not in direct contact with any medical institution, so the user might be paying for medical information and not medical bills.

Is actually also serving as a place to seek a doctor for telemedicine purposes among other things

Indeed it's going to be possible to contact a doctor through the platform. I think the potential of the project is huge and many more applications will be added to it in the future.

I think that is a question of subscription. If you get the highest subscription tier, there will also be a doctor available for you. If you have a "free" tier or so, maybe it will take you a long time to speak to a doctor if at all, because their time also needs to be payed.

[Korsakopf]

I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.