eduffield (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
|
 |
May 30, 2014, 10:49:54 PM |
|
|
Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
|
|
|
|
sharkbyte093
|
|
May 30, 2014, 10:50:45 PM
Last edit: May 30, 2014, 11:06:15 PM by sharkbyte093 |
|
Rumors of your death have been greatly exaggerated. This is splendid. edit: any hints on what the "significant improvements to anonymity" line is about? I am seeing a vision of rings in the sky! Am I close? 2nd edit: Masternode payments will be in RC3 in mid-june then. Ok! https://darkcointalk.org/threads/development-update-5-30-2014-fork-causes-and-solutions.994/TsuyokuNaritai said: ↑
Thank you for all your hard work! :-)
So to be clear... paying masternodes has been moved to mid-July?
Mid-June. July we'll have the privacy enhancements and other functionality.
-eduffield |
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
May 30, 2014, 10:57:34 PM |
|
Thanks for all the HARD WORK Evan. Realise it's difficult. I have only two questions: 1. If there is no way for pools to hardcode/set which MN they vote for - why are 6 "votes" required? 2. Re: auto checkpointing - is this for MNs only or for the entire network of nodes? |
|
|
|
|
sharkbyte093
|
|
May 30, 2014, 10:58:07 PM |
|
From the wild markets point of view Duffields new post is "good" and "bad" (somethings got pushed back to July) Will be interesting to see the reaction.  Well considering a mere bird fart sends headless chickens running about screaming... I'm willing to bet we'll see some irrational market reactions. edit: how do headless chickens scream if they don't have heads? I don't know... |
|
|
|
AustinGlobal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:00:04 PM |
|
If you have not had a chance please check out the DRK/BTC market on Austin Global: agx.io
-Austin Global Team
Find us at:
agx.io
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507474
bitcointalk handles: "agx.io," "AustinGlobal"
twitter.com/AustinGlobalX
austinglobal.tumblr.com
|
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:00:57 PM |
|
Thank you for the update. Loving the professional approach, it is clear where we are and where we are headed, as an investor I really appreciate the transparency. |
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:01:07 PM |
|
This is great stuff.
Markets can do what the f*ck they want, but if anyone ever needed any confirmation that something real is going on here then this is it.
I said before that this period is a 'right of passage' phase for DRK and the longer it goes on the more unique and difficult to challenge it will be. (In particular the news about the emerging additional manpower on the dev team).
Congrats to devs for getting to the bottom of the recent issues and being so transparent about it. It might cause a ripple in the markets but if it does it's a price well worth paying for the progress thats being made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:04:54 PM |
|
This is great stuff.
Markets can do what the f*ck they want, but if anyone ever needed any confirmation that something real is going on here then this is it.
I said before that this period is a 'right of passage' phase for DRK and the longer it goes on the more unique and difficult to challenge it will be.
Congrats to devs for getting to the bottom of the recent issues and being so transparent about it. It might cause a ripple in the markets but if it does it's a price well worth paying for the progress thats being made.
Positive ripple, or two....nice new anon features due, got some nice big exchanges circling, and bitcoin's heading back up dragging the whole market up. |
|
|
|
|
|
kiki6990
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:07:25 PM |
|
Yes, now he is rich, so why working ? ;-)
You think he was broke before darkcoin? lol.. I bet his most important target in life is not getting rich! |
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:10:36 PM |
|
This is great stuff.
Markets can do what the f*ck they want, but if anyone ever needed any confirmation that something real is going on here then this is it.
I said before that this period is a 'right of passage' phase for DRK and the longer it goes on the more unique and difficult to challenge it will be.
Congrats to devs for getting to the bottom of the recent issues and being so transparent about it. It might cause a ripple in the markets but if it does it's a price well worth paying for the progress thats being made.
Positive ripple, or two....nice new anon features due, got some nice big exchanges circling, and bitcoin's heading back up dragging the whole market up. Yeah! As an investor I find it very reassuring, timeline feels right, the last fork issue has been identified and trust-less masternode payments to start mid June! |
|
|
|
|
|
sharkbyte093
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:11:23 PM |
|
Yes, now he is rich, so why working ? ;-)
You think he was broke before darkcoin? lol.. I bet his most important target in life is not getting rich! It might be... actually creating something of utility! You can hear the collective gasp of the altcoin world in the background at the mere suggestion! |
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:13:09 PM |
|
That's right, the Dark is rising........  multiple tickets for MN......getting a few more while they're cheap off the ATH. |
|
|
|
|
|
kiki6990
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:18:01 PM |
|
Darkcoin wii take the second place after bitcoin, litecoin will be third. This is my idea about this top 3.
|
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:18:17 PM |
|
That's right, the Dark is rising........ multiple tickets for MN......getting a few more while they're cheap off the ATH. This multi ticket idea is not good from three angles: 1. Reduces the number of MNs, which decreases resiliency. 2. If the MN with the huge pot in it gets compromised, the whole pot is gone. 3. If gov't infiltrated the large pot MN, you will have a compromised coinjoin service. i.e. This is back to the centralised coinjoin problem again. |
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:18:35 PM |
|
That's right, the Dark is rising........ multiple tickets for MN......getting a few more while they're cheap off the ATH. a question: what is this multiple ticket-thing about? |
|
|
|
|
|
Ozziecoin
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:20:58 PM |
|
a question: what is this multiple ticket-thing about?
Ability to stack multiple lots of 1000 darks on one MN to get more chances of winning MN reward. |
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:23:46 PM |
|
a question: what is this multiple ticket-thing about?
Ability to stack multiple lots of 1000 darks on one MN to get more chances of winning MN reward. ah...ok thx |
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:25:12 PM |
|
That's right, the Dark is rising........ multiple tickets for MN......getting a few more while they're cheap off the ATH. This multi ticket idea is not good from three angles: 1. Reduces the number of MNs, which decreases resiliency. 2. If the MN with the huge pot in it gets compromised, the whole pot is gone. 3. If gov't infiltrated the large pot MN, you will have a compromised coinjoin service. i.e. This is back to the centralised coinjoin problem again. 1. The multi ticket idea does not imply infinite number of tickets, somebody suggested a cap of 3, in the end it can be capped so we find the right balance between network performance and resiliency. 2. You are not obliged to create a single node with a huge pot (I dont think it will be possible anyway as it can be capped), the community is working on security guidelines I think the only case we have had was because of very poor security and completely the fault of the op. 3. See 1. |
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:25:17 PM |
|
That's right, the Dark is rising........ multiple tickets for MN......getting a few more while they're cheap off the ATH. This multi ticket idea is not good from three angles: 1. Reduces the number of MNs, which decreases resiliency. 2. If the MN with the huge pot in it gets compromised, the whole pot is gone. 3. If gov't infiltrated the large pot MN, you will have a compromised coinjoin service. i.e. This is back to the centralised coinjoin problem again. Personally I prefer the security (real or imagined, because if you have 2FA, good password / air gapped ssh key, all ports except 9999 closed, disabled root access and only ssh access from specified IPs, and most importantly a strong wallet password, nobody can steal your DRK) of several MNs vs. just one, but I don't think giving people the choice is the end of the world - it may even lead to more MNs as you now only have to pay for a single server, not two or three or twenty seven... |
|
|
|
|
|
