Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 01:23:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 [2220] 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9722683 times)
GhostPlayer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:26:31 AM
 #44381

 Ok guys, 4 month of testnet I can firmly say, geographical has zero to do with it. At least in my experience.

 One fundamental flaw... dont look at those stats!! If people cash out, like I have, then the stated value is not going to represent all-time-payout, only current balance. Only way to know is to go MN by MN and check each and every individual wallet address, to take that into account and do the math.
splawik21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005


DASH is the future of crypto payments!


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:36:56 AM
 #44382

One thing I have noticed, USA based MasterNodes are getting a lot more payments than lets say, Singapore.  I think I'm going to move my nodes...
I wouldn`t agree Wink
http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html?srch&nmstr=XvXiNRmK8BnEStWAmTBqEjKiTU89mspFhL
based on Amazon in USA

BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
gadado
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 965
Merit: 515


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:38:01 AM
 #44383

689 MN, Payed Blocks 75%

Current chance that your MN get's a payment within a given time:

1  Day: 1- (688/689) ^  432 = 0.47 -> 47%
2 Days: 1- (688/689) ^  864 = 0.71 -> 71%
3 Days: 1- (688/689) ^ 1296 = 0.85 -> 85%
gadado
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 965
Merit: 515


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:51:37 AM
 #44384

One thing I have noticed, USA based MasterNodes are getting a lot more payments than lets say, Singapore.  I think I'm going to move my nodes...
I wouldn`t agree Wink
http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html?srch&nmstr=XvXiNRmK8BnEStWAmTBqEjKiTU89mspFhL
based on Amazon in USA

Owww ..   Shocked Lips sealed
Now that one has all reason to complain. No payments all this time.  Undecided
doubleredrolex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 211
Merit: 100

I Believe


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:21:12 AM
 #44385

Go DRK! and Go EVAN!!
No rush on RC4. Just hope its smooth this time  Smiley
stilgars
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:22:29 AM
 #44386

It is true that my recently reseted master nodes are way more efficient than the ones I set-up day one.
My original master nodes, which were perceiving payments since day one, only receive one to two payments within four days.
But the master nodes I had to reset (no payment during the first week) now receive 2 payments per day on average. Sometimes I collect as many as 5 payments per day.
I am now wondering if I should not reset the two first ones as well.

Words of Wisdom
 "I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
CryptoPleb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:23:57 AM
 #44387

Price is so stable I wouldn't mind if Rc4 doesn't come out until the last day of July, as long as its all working well. No rush.
stilgars
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:26:07 AM
 #44388

Price is so stable I wouldn't mind if Rc4 doesn't come out until the last day of July, as long as its all working well. No rush.

+1 - I fear that a botched launch would potentially kill DRK for good - it must be 100% smooth on launch day that time.

Words of Wisdom
 "I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
thunderdrum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:27:50 AM
 #44389



I read zero of what you say, because 100% crap is very hard to take to even turn my head that way. What is it with you? getting payed to be here? No one wants you here. What is your incentive to be here? Dont like it, leave! No one is forcing you to be here, and buy or mine DRK. WHY are you even mining DRK?

The immense amount of energy trying to defame DRK is really really intriguing.

And yes, unfortunately big bold coloured text does make me catch some snippets from you, and its always the lowest of disinformation.



He must of lost a lot recently in communitycoin.

Taking out his frustrations in here. Sad, very sad.

+1~ Agree. Hardly there will be another reason why this guy still in this thread and spread meaningless sh*t.

This is the best project in crypto----DarkCoin. Time will tell and don't blame you miss it.
FAQ
thunderdrum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:29:14 AM
 #44390

If we really don't want him here, just report all his posts as spam.

New skill get~!

This is the best project in crypto----DarkCoin. Time will tell and don't blame you miss it.
FAQ
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
July 13, 2014, 10:33:11 AM
 #44391

Price is so stable I wouldn't mind if Rc4 doesn't come out until the last day of July, as long as its all working well. No rush.

+1 - I fear that a botched launch would potentially kill DRK for good - it must be 100% smooth on launch day that time.
It would not kill it but it would severely damage an already damaged coin. Hopefully things go right this time.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
DogTheHunter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 272



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:40:35 AM
 #44392

How is the dev team going to respond if some of these pools decide to never update?  I think some of them are choosing to not pay masternodes on purpose
Orphan all their blocks. Has been the plan all month...

^^ What he said.  Hunting down non-paying pools is a stop-gap measure while we await the implementation of code which will force pools to comply or render the blocks they find useless.  This is generally what people in this thread are referring to when they talk about "enforcement" (though enforcement can refer to any feature in a broader context).

So enforcement doesn't ban pools, the network just won't accept their blocks if they haven't paid a master node when a block is submitted?
thunderdrum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 102
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:41:23 AM
 #44393


Too bad the miners can't be so giddy about the reduction in their mining profits.

Realistically, all you see posted from masternode operators is profit profit profit.  This comes at the expense of the miners.  If the masternode operators can be so focused on profit then why shouldn't the miners?  It would be foolish to mine on a pool taking 20% of your profits when you can mine on a pool that doesn't.  In case anyone missed it, here is the list of pools where you'll earn 20% more for your mining efforts.


Again, having fun with your FUD, until I ignore you. But I like having pet trolls.
You're being totally ludicrous. Masternodes were set up to serve many purposes.
 Lets talk money, which is what you're clearly solely about.

 The more MN there are up, the better the decentralised anonymous transactions. This requires servers up, why wouldnt these server operators be rewarded by their services? Like pool operaters, or p2pool ops, doctor or and electrician... you spend time offering a service, and get payed for it, if and only, the job is well done.

Darkcoin's anonymity is yet to be debunked! It is fully functioning NOW ! despite the 10 DRK limit until the end of this month. Unlike all other anon-coins that got bitten by roadblock problems. Blockchain bloating, denomination crossing, yadda yadda yadda...

 MN require 1k DRK depoist. This is Proof of Stake theory, with added Proof of Service, because you're NOT ONLY STATIONING COINS... ug, sorry for the caps. MN's also provide a service, and get payed for it.

 The more nodes are up, the more secure the network, the broader the potential menu for services in the future (light weight clients, anon-communication, etc etc). The more 1k deposits out there, the more scarcity it promotes, driving the price up, called a positive feedback loop. So when prices go up, miners will get PAYED MORE FIAT MONEY when insta-cashing-out. DUH!

 -20% now mining at 0.013, is nothing compaired to mining 80% at 0.0027 ... previous all time high right before the second "bad" fork"... which was not bad at all... Evan responsibly reverted back because bad actors created mini-forks that simply took over the 2.5 minute to be orphaned by network confirmation consensus on each block. It would have eventually found consensus, but way too many people would have had orphaned blocks, getting their mining balance DEDUCTED. So thinking about the MINERS, Darkcoin was reverted back, to deal with bad actors and innocent unaware non-compliance miners.

And there started my endeavour of the Pool Police.

It was one of the most responsible and respectable things any dev has done, ever, in my book. My hat off to Evan. He could have cared less.
 With that, we discovered some shortcomings, and these are being addressed... in fact already are, with the "spork" solution.

Absolutely NOTHING in DRK is foul play. Quite on the contrary. It is the first coin to fully fulfil "money for internet", ergo, fungibility... Bitcoin's major "flaw" if you'd like to think of it that way. Non fungilbility is also heaven sent for some financial applications, and DRK can do that as well... but it can also be fungible, unlike BTC.

 Now please, without being a troll, refute this.

Everytime, when i come back to community, there is always some good post for quoting~  Grin

This is the best project in crypto----DarkCoin. Time will tell and don't blame you miss it.
FAQ
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:51:54 AM
 #44394

Could p2pool mining be built into the wallet? I mean, one-click your-own-node-setup-and-mine?

Solo mining is unlikely to get you anything unless you're very lucky but a bit of CPU on p2pool WILL get you a little at least.

edit: US masternodes having some sort of advantage is utter bollocks. Two of my 4.6 (US based) are 'underperforming' but the dataset is still far too small to draw any meaningful conclusions and the payment code is open source anyway AFAIK.
thelonecrouton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 11:59:31 AM
 #44395

Earn your own DRK coins by mining at the multipool. Not only that, you can earn DRK using your old ASIC hardware on SHA256 and SCRYPT coins!


DarkCoin by xpool - DRK Multipool

 
PROP reward system
DRK Payouts
Scrypt & SHA256 & X11 Algo's
DDoS Protected
High Performance Backend
Simple setup and usage
0% Fees while in BETA
To mine:

How does it work?

xpool offers 3 different sets of coins to mine. SHA256, Scrypt and X11. Each algorithm runs on a shift. Currently there is no set interval as there needs to be enough found and confirmed blocks to make trading worthwhile on the exchanges. We don't want to finish a shift only to find out, the exchanges are going to eat up the payout in fees or limit the withdraw with a large minimum. The confirmed coins are traded throughout the duration of the shift automatically to maximize the profits from exchanging them into DRK. Once enough confirmed blocked are accumulated, the shift is moved into "Trading" status while all the exchanged coins are calculated into DRK and then queued for payment. Once all the coins are confirmed as successfully traded and exchanged, the DRK payments are sent.

As the pool picks up more hashing speed and sufficient DRK can be picked up from the exchanges, the shifts will be set to a schedule and payouts more frequent and less worry about the exchanges. This is a growing phase so the more hash support the better.
If a DRK block is found, there's no exchanging or loss of fees as it can simply be moved into the X11 payout queue.

The advantage of the pool is that you can utilize your older ASIC equipment to earn you the more desired DarkCoin.
Cheers and Happy Hashing!

Donations welcome!
!

30.4431 DRK just sent out to X11 miners for the recent shift.

Thanks and enjoy!

crackfoo do you have any stats for DRK/TH on sha256?

I appreciate it will vary, just looking for ball park figures as I can acquire 1TH/s for £400 or ~100DRK currently.
Drobek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 12:12:13 PM
 #44396

What is the most likely problem when I am trying to start the MN and getting a message
"not capable masternode"

The conf file seems sound. I type darkcoind - server is starting
but when I type darkcoind masternode start, I get the "not capable masternode" message  Huh
CryptoPleb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 12:16:38 PM
 #44397

What is the most likely problem when I am trying to start the MN and getting a message
"not capable masternode"

The conf file seems sound. I type darkcoind - server is starting
but when I type darkcoind masternode start, I get the "not capable masternode" message  Huh

wallet.dat file had a transaction to it with exactly 1000drk in that one transaction?
Drobek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 251



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 12:19:18 PM
 #44398

What is the most likely problem when I am trying to start the MN and getting a message
"not capable masternode"

The conf file seems sound. I type darkcoind - server is starting
but when I type darkcoind masternode start, I get the "not capable masternode" message  Huh

wallet.dat file had a transaction to it with exactly 1000drk in that one transaction?

Thanks.. Running it from my cold wallet instead of the server sorted it out.
Schwede65
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 309
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 12:24:59 PM
 #44399

What is the most likely problem when I am trying to start the MN and getting a message
"not capable masternode"

The conf file seems sound. I type darkcoind - server is starting
but when I type darkcoind masternode start, I get the "not capable masternode" message  Huh

wallet.dat file had a transaction to it with exactly 1000drk in that one transaction?

Thanks.. Running it from my cold wallet instead of the server sorted it out.
you have the generated "masternode genkey" in both darkcoin.conf-files at cold wallet + server-wallet?
vertoe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 505


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 12:42:00 PM
 #44400

How is the dev team going to respond if some of these pools decide to never update?  I think some of them are choosing to not pay masternodes on purpose
Orphan all their blocks. Has been the plan all month...

^^ What he said.  Hunting down non-paying pools is a stop-gap measure while we await the implementation of code which will force pools to comply or render the blocks they find useless.  This is generally what people in this thread are referring to when they talk about "enforcement" (though enforcement can refer to any feature in a broader context).

So enforcement doesn't ban pools, the network just won't accept their blocks if they haven't paid a master node when a block is submitted?

Yes.

It's currently only one big pool which did not update. The rest can be considered as dust.

Last 24h - Pool / Blocks:
-    x11.ltc1btc.com 122
-    ghash.io 6
-    darkcoin.cryptocurrency.tw 5
-    nicehash.com 4
-    dark.v2.dedicatedpool.com 3
-    dark.hashrate.eu 0
Pages: « 1 ... 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 [2220] 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!