[ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.

[DigiByte]

We wanted to drop you a line and let you know DigiByte v6.14.2 has been officially released with 3 soft forks: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases/tag/v6.14.2

Segwit activation can be tracked here:https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/

[1714314568]

1714314568

[1714314568]

1714314568

[1714314568]

1714314568

[1714314568]

1714314568

[rednoW]

could you please look into your zcoin pool?
Over the last few days i've gotten a maximum of ~70% of my hashrate credited by the pool. Usually i am even lower (40-50%).
I tested some other Pools and my hashrate was fine (only deviations you would expect).

Looking at my payout proves my point. I get around ~50-60% credited of what my hashrate should return when using MPH.
And as i said. I tested other Pools and the hashrate and payout are normal.

thanks in advance

+++
the same issue with ccminer 2.0, both lyra2z and myr-groestl are credited only half of the speed.

Tried with cpu-miner-opt with lyra2z ant it's ok. Speed in the miner corresponds perfectly with speed on the pool.

[scavern]

How often are altcoins actually traded?

I am struggling to see how I can benefit by autoexchanging if it doesn't get converted to BTC immediately?

[pornluver]

   Type: {AMD, NVIDIA}

Miner          Algorithm                         Speed            BTC/Day         BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----          ---------                         -----            -------         ---------- ----
ClaymoreDual30 {Ethash, Sia} {29.69 MH/s, 445.36 MH/s} {0.00180, 0.00017} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
ClaymoreDual40 {Ethash, Sia} {27.04 MH/s, 540.81 MH/s} {0.00164, 0.00021} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
ClaymoreDual20 {Ethash, Sia} {28.48 MH/s, 284.83 MH/s} {0.00172, 0.00011} {0.06050, 0.00038} {MiningPoolHub-Ethereum, MiningPoolHub-Siacoin}
Claymore       Ethash                       29.71 MH/s            0.00180            0.06050 MiningPoolHub-Ethereum


   Type: AMD

Miner    Algorithm         Speed BTC/Day  BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----    ---------         ----- -------  ---------- ----
Claymore Equihash    293.84  H/s 0.00191 6,492.64478 MiningPoolHub-Zcash
Sgminer  Ethash       27.76 MH/s 0.00168     0.06050 MiningPoolHub-Ethereum
Sgminer  Equihash    210.90  H/s 0.00137 6,492.64478 MiningPoolHub-Zcash
Claymore Cryptonight 744.00  H/s 0.00103 1,377.73283 MiningPoolHub-Monero
Sgminer  Cryptonight 730.70  H/s 0.00101 1,377.73283 MiningPoolHub-Monero




   Status: Running

                    Speed Active                      Launched Command
                    ----- ------                      -------- -------
              156.40 KH/s 01 Days 01 Hours 04 Minutes Once     Bin\Lyra2z-CPU\cpuminer.exe -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://europe.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17025 -u
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -p x
{30.21 MH/s, 453.12 MH/s} 01 Days 01 Hours 04 Minutes Once     Bin\Ethash-Claymore\EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020 -ewal
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -epsw x -esm 3 -allpools 1 -dpool hub.miningpoolhub.com:17022 -dwal
                                                               pornluver.multipoolminer -dpsw x -dcoin sc -dcri 30


MultiPoolMiner is 13% more profitable than conventional mining!

Miner                                              btc     usd
-----                                              ---     ---
MultiPoolMiner                                     0.00253 3.06008
{ClaymoreDual30-Ethash/Sia, CpuminerLyra2z-Lyra2z} 0.00224 2.71630

1. Is there a way to put power calculation in? For example, equihash consumes lower power than ethash. How to tell multipoolminer to do equihash instead?

What does it mean multipoolminer earns 13% more than conventional mining?

2. Also should we donate to multipoolminer? I don't mind. I just want to know what feature will I miss if I don't.

3. Is Sia coin always the best for claymore as the second coin for dual mining?

4. Multipool miner says I would make .00253 BTC. I wonder where does it get the number. It says if I use Ethash/Sia I would make .0024 BTC. Again, where is that number come from? This ClaymoreDual30 {Ethash, Sia} {29.69 MH/s, 445.36 MH/s} {0.00180, 0.00017} suggest that I would make only .00197 btc per day. Not .00253 btc per day.

[reachr]

Is LBRY/DRC going to add anytime soon?

keep up the good work.

Oh really sorry about the delay.
I'm working on various parts of pools.

I'll open DCR pool first.

Hi,
Is it expected to add musicoin and ubiq to the etash algo pool?

[aaronsace]

1. Is there a way to put power calculation in? For example, equihash consumes lower power than ethash. How to tell multipoolminer to do equihash instead?

What does it mean multipoolminer earns 13% more than conventional mining?

2. Also should we donate to multipoolminer? I don't mind. I just want to know what feature will I miss if I don't.

3. Is Sia coin always the best for claymore as the second coin for dual mining?

4. Multipool miner says I would make .00253 BTC. I wonder where does it get the number. It says if I use Ethash/Sia I would make .0024 BTC. Again, where is that number come from? This ClaymoreDual30 {Ethash, Sia} {29.69 MH/s, 445.36 MH/s} {0.00180, 0.00017} suggest that I would make only .00197 btc per day. Not .00253 btc per day.

1. Power calculation is coming with real time wattage monitoring. The best way currently is to simply knock a percentage off the hash rate by editing the files in the folder called 'miners'.
conventional: pertaining to the accepted usage of using one mining algorithm

2. It's completely free but I really appreciate any support that you can give to the project.

3. MiningPoolHub only has Sia at the moment and would like to support this pool. Feel free to add more pools in the pools folder if you so wish.

4. All the stats are stored as plain text in the folder called 'stats' for your perusal. You may notice a slight difference between your live stats and daily/weekly averages if you have only just started using the program.


For dual mining:

Is LBRY/DRC going to add anytime soon?

keep up the good work.

Oh really sorry about the delay.
I'm working on various parts of pools.

I'll open DCR pool first.

[not.you]

XMR pool is acting weird again. 

[pornluver]

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

Bin\AMD-GenesisMining\sgminer.exe --api-listen -k groestlcoin -o stratum+ssl://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17004 -u pornluver.multipoolminer -p x --gpu-threads 2 --worksize 128 --intensity d

 It doesn't work. Any wrong settings?

Is this how to run sgminer?

[miningpoolhub]

and how exactly you implement this?

Will B shares worth more than A? Assuming they both have the same stratum difficulty?

The reason I ask is that B is probably a smart miner. Buy hash from nicehash only when difficulty is low. While A may be a normal miner that just mine without paying attention to slight difficulty variation.

If A and B's share worth the same, B may have slightly more money than A. That's because there are more blocks found when B is mining than when A is mining. But B won't make 1000 times A even on average.

If N is big enough, for example, B will roughly make about the same.

In fact, if A and B mine interchangeably every 1 minute and we got coins every 1 hour to 2 hour and every time B mines the difficulty is 1/1000th, B will make the same money as A even though B contribute more to the pool than A.

PPLNS is already implemented at MPOS github, verified, used from various pools.

Share value depends on when it is submitted.
If N is too big, then there will be less difference as you mentioned.

Your theory does not work well in real world because you didn't care about block finding probability. Some block can be found 50% of expectation, and some can be 5%, 70%, 300%, 800%
PPLNS works well when block finding stats fluctuates, and this is the key why pool uses PPLNS.

Isn't it unrealistic that 1/1000 difficulty, 1 minute interchange?
Pool even don't switch miners within 1 minute interval. Pool switches minimum 20 minutes for each coin.

[miningpoolhub]

could you please look into your zcoin pool?
Over the last few days i've gotten a maximum of ~70% of my hashrate credited by the pool. Usually i am even lower (40-50%).
I tested some other Pools and my hashrate was fine (only deviations you would expect).

Looking at my payout proves my point. I get around ~50-60% credited of what my hashrate should return when using MPH.
And as i said. I tested other Pools and the hashrate and payout are normal.

thanks in advance

I bought qubit hash to miningpoolhub about 18 hours ago. My software says that I should make 30% profit.

I bought at .026 per ghday/s. I like to say it's .026 per (86400 giga  hash) but 86400 is just 1 day per second.

 Miningpoolhub says that https://miningpoolhub.com/?page=home&normalize=none qubit worth .037 per ghday/s. It's for digibytequbit. Within 6 minutes a block is fine.

I got 5k digibytequbit. However, value of qubit drops to .015 ghday/s quickly.

Also 5k digibytequbit worths .002 BTC and I spent .015 to get it.

I am tracking where things fail.

digibyte qubit price is actually stable. Where can I check it's difficulty graph?

And then there's the issue.  I wonder if I am credited for mining at lower difficulty.

It seems that the game is to quickly mine got some blocks and stop when difficulty is higher.

You can check digibyte difficulty from each pool's Pool page.
https://digibyte-qubit.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
I can see that current digibyte-qubit difficulty is 1453.4413540766

And here's block found history.
https://digibyte-qubit.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
I can see difficulty going up and down from 313.67 to 1043.89 in one page. It took roughly about 42 minutes.
About x3 difficulty change can happen very shortly with digibyte.

It's very risky to rental hash from nicehash. Situation can change rapidly.

Keep in mind that PPLNS penalize new comer at first. But your shares are counted even after you left.
This is just nature of PPLNS, logical calculation.

[miningpoolhub]

could you please look into your zcoin pool?
Over the last few days i've gotten a maximum of ~70% of my hashrate credited by the pool. Usually i am even lower (40-50%).
I tested some other Pools and my hashrate was fine (only deviations you would expect).

Looking at my payout proves my point. I get around ~50-60% credited of what my hashrate should return when using MPH.
And as i said. I tested other Pools and the hashrate and payout are normal.

thanks in advance

Hi
How's the hashrate shown at your Graphs page? Does it fluctuate much?
What miner are you using?

I lowered share insertion interval. I hope it helps but not sure at this moment.

[miningpoolhub]

We wanted to drop you a line and let you know DigiByte v6.14.2 has been officially released with 3 soft forks: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases/tag/v6.14.2

Segwit activation can be tracked here:https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/

Updated! Thanks

[miningpoolhub]

could you please look into your zcoin pool?
Over the last few days i've gotten a maximum of ~70% of my hashrate credited by the pool. Usually i am even lower (40-50%).
I tested some other Pools and my hashrate was fine (only deviations you would expect).

Looking at my payout proves my point. I get around ~50-60% credited of what my hashrate should return when using MPH.
And as i said. I tested other Pools and the hashrate and payout are normal.

thanks in advance

+++
the same issue with ccminer 2.0, both lyra2z and myr-groestl are credited only half of the speed.

Tried with cpu-miner-opt with lyra2z ant it's ok. Speed in the miner corresponds perfectly with speed on the pool.

Thanks for the report. Actually I heard similar reports already from ccminer users.
sgminer, cpuminer users didn't say this issue until now.

I'll contact ccminer dev.

[miningpoolhub]

If we drop the assumption that
D
and
B
are fixed, this simple variant is not hopping-
proof. A participant’s contribution is determined by the current diffi
culty, while his reward is influenced by the future difficulty. Pool-hoppers can use knowledg
e of imminent difficulty adjustments to their advantage – joining when the difficulty is set to
decrease, and leaving when the difficulty is set to increase. Another simple variant, where t
he number of shares is chosen as a given multiple of the difficulty at the time a block is found, su
ffers from similar problems.  To be completely hopping-proof, the following method, called “unit-PPLNS”,
should be used:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980.pdf

So if I mine when difficulty is low, I am mining when difficulty is set to increase. That paper says I should be leaving. If N is small enough it's not a big issue. But small N means bigger variant.

What the paper suggest is the same with what I suggested

When a share is submitted, store two attributes for it – units, eq
ual to the value of p at the time it was submitted, and amplifier, equal to the value of B
at the time it was vsubmitted

So each share should have a weight. That weight doesn't depend only on difficulty of stratum pool but also the inverse difficulty of the network. p in that paper is 1/D.

After that it gets complex. I would say just pay proportional to the unit but the guy has this complex formula. I got to look that up yet. Basically they have the same constant and whether you're in range or not depends on the 1/D of the block finding time.

Thanks for the document. Didn't know that someone wrote paper about this.

Maybe setting minimum N value seems good. I'll test a bit.

[miningpoolhub]

Is LBRY/DRC going to add anytime soon?

keep up the good work.

Oh really sorry about the delay.
I'm working on various parts of pools.

I'll open DCR pool first.

Hi,
Is it expected to add musicoin and ubiq to the etash algo pool?

I'll check. Thanks.

[miningpoolhub]

XMR pool is acting weird again. 

Sorry.
Wallet updated for upcoming hardfork and there was a bit a problem with payout.
Checked all things and it looks working fine.

Let me know if there's problem still.

[miningpoolhub]

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

Bin\AMD-GenesisMining\sgminer.exe --api-listen -k groestlcoin -o stratum+ssl://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17004 -u pornluver.multipoolminer -p x --gpu-threads 2 --worksize 128 --intensity d

 It doesn't work. Any wrong settings?

Is this how to run sgminer?

What is the output?
Try removing trailing options and try. Add one by one.
Groestlcoin is not easy to mine with 1 GPU currently. I believe there's some ASIC or FPGA.

Try other algo if you are GPU miner.

[aaronsace]

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

Bin\AMD-GenesisMining\sgminer.exe --api-listen -k groestlcoin -o stratum+ssl://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17004 -u pornluver.multipoolminer -p x --gpu-threads 2 --worksize 128 --intensity d

 It doesn't work. Any wrong settings?

Is this how to run sgminer?

You are best using MultiPoolMiner to get the most effective algorithm for your computer then set your auto exchange coin in MiningPoolHub to the coin that you want (i.e. bitcoin).
https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/releases

[pornluver]

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

Bin\AMD-GenesisMining\sgminer.exe --api-listen -k groestlcoin -o stratum+ssl://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17004 -u pornluver.multipoolminer -p x --gpu-threads 2 --worksize 128 --intensity d

 It doesn't work. Any wrong settings?

Is this how to run sgminer?

What is the output?
Try removing trailing options and try. Add one by one.
Groestlcoin is not easy to mine with 1 GPU currently. I believe there's some ASIC or FPGA.

Try other algo if you are GPU miner.

groestl is suggested by whattomine for a while. So I tried to mine those. What I basically did is I add groestl to list of algorithm in my miningpoolminer.

I see some output they produce and I tried to run it. It says your pool don't exist wrong username or something.

Notice that the -ewal in claymore that miningpoolminer set is also strange (but working). Instead of putting my wallet address it put my username at miningpoolhub. It's working

[pornluver]

What is

https://digibyte-qubit.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks

Expected shares?
Actual shares?

Actual number of shares to find a block?

Can you have a PPS pool with higher fee, say 3% or 4%. I'll pm you why