Qora does not want to open source now. I'll rally for open source after wallet rebuild which will only happen after asset exchange. I think that will be a good time, so I'd say we should open source in november. If qora isn't strong enough after wallet rebuild (and therefore also asset exchange) I think source should be open anyway.
Also, in case you don't remember I was the one who started the discussion about opening source. Everyone was cool about it being closed source but after the thread mistakenly got closed I thought it would be wise to bring up the subject. I sort of did that because I trusted less Qora at the time for a few moments but as soon as I trusted him again I decided to follow what he thinks best. But I can think for myself, even if Qora doesn't believe november (after wallet rebuild is done, which I suppose happens before november) is a good time to open source, I'll go against him and rally for opens source.
Told you guys he wasn't going to leave like he said. Rabbiter doesn't care about any coins, he is Kora/QoraKnight and only wants to clone Crypti and Qora to make a few bucks off innocent people.
Im going to ignore your last sentences, dunno of you have an agenda or what but my past posts are open to all and it would take a fool to think I was on Crypti as anything other than someone who is accusing them of being a scam clone.
So I'm goona try a civil conversation with you.
Ok first Qora planned originally to be open source after a couple of months, just want to set that record straight. He thinking was to be established before they release the code that's all, unfortunately it's a chicken and egg situation ie we can't really be some established until we go OS. Plus I want to add Qora I am confident does not believe in a closed source, we won't prolong it and all I have seen him express is a willingness to follow the community.
Ok I get you want to go open source in November but aren't you concerned that a handful of second gen coins are coming out in the next two months? NEM, NODE, Etherum?, and other have at least claimed to be new source like a crypti (lie) , Syscoin etc. My point is we are going to be behind other coins rather than in front of them? Ok so imagine there are some clones, I personally think there won't be but there is going to be NEM clones, NODE clones etc in theory and we would be swamped by them, no one will ever notice Qora. I simply don't get losing what was our major selling point as new source and by the time it's proven everyone will be so there are 20 new source coins.
I believe you want to accumulate cheap and then stop on the accelerator. BUt I warn you, if Qora comes to the party too late then We might never see vol over a few a bitcoin, that means it will take you months and months to actually sell your coins as a Whale.
Here's why now might be better than November. The technical stuff of the coin is mainly done, now is the time to do the wallet. This is where many people can get involved, the community and programmers. We release now before NEM and others so we don't get left behind. And if any clones come GREAT! If you know anything about crypto you know clones push the price of the original.
Do not call me someone who wants to clone Qora, that's a baseless accusation. I have common sense and logic on my side, if you want to prove yourself an adult attack my points now my guessed at intentions. What possible reason would November be better than now unless maybe you are trying to accumulate while the coin is down?
*Note if I did want to clone Qora then cloning in November and cloning now make no difference. Apart from having to wait I'm not sure I see how you disadvantage a would be cloner?
