Bitcoin Forum
August 24, 2026, 03:41:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 2132 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4677144 times)
pozmu
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 504


(っ◔◡◔)っ🍪


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:44:37 AM
 #1061

Somebody is attemping to relaunch == steal Monero  Shocked
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599580.0
I advise against posting in his topic at the moment to avoid bumping

surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:45:33 AM
 #1062

Don't post it here either.  Tongue
AnonyMint
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 527


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:48:14 AM
Last edit: May 08, 2014, 01:04:16 AM by AnonyMint
 #1063

Zerocash will be announced soon (May 18 in Oakland? but open source may not be ready then?).

Here is a synopsis of the tradeoffs compared to CyptoNote:

1. Zerocash hides everything, even the money supply so if the master key was compromised or if the highly complex bleeding edge crypto is cracked, no one will know.

2. They will claim to generate the master key at a ceremony or devise a way to compute in parts, but nothing they can do will insure it isn't compromised. CPUs even have special firmware that allows the NSA to reprogram them remotely, and even computation can be intercepted wireless with RF signals. Whereas we have to place all trust in a single party with Zerocash, with CN the trusted parties are changing on each transaction. Compromising the master key doesn't compromise the anonymity, but does compromise the money supply which could be expanded invisibly. Cracking the highly complex bleeding edge crypto which has not been sufficiently vetted over years, could compromise the anonymity ex post facto (it is all on the block chain).

3. Both CN and Zerocash use a form of cryptography which is not immune to quantum computation attack, if that becomes a reality in the future.

4. Zerocash transactions add up to 3 minutes of additional transaction delay which is much worse than Zerocoin. Zerocash (full node computation and block chain) resource requirements are centralizing but much improved over Zerocoin.

5. Zerocash hides everything so it is not necessary to obscure your IP address.



Thus on balance I prefer CN, but I like to see it altered to use a quantum computer resistant algorithm. And then we need to add IP address obfuscation as well that is superior to Tor and I2P.

Darkcoin (CoinJoin innovation) is really not at the level of the two above. You can review my comments in the Darkcoin thread to see why.

unheresy.com - Prodigiously Elucidating the Profoundly ObtuseTHIS FORUM ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:53:08 AM
 #1064

Main post now updated to the latest builds. Changes put in today:

- Source code change in slow_hash.c that doubles hashrate in both Linux and Windows.
- Windows from the same source + compiler optimization that puts Windows on par with Linux.
- 32-bit Windows binaries released. Please test these and report back.
AnonyMint
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 527


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:55:25 AM
 #1065

Quote
Thus on balance I prefer CN, but I like to see it altered to use a quantum computer resistant algorithm.

LOL

There is research demonstrating ring signatures with quantum computing resistant formulations.

unheresy.com - Prodigiously Elucidating the Profoundly ObtuseTHIS FORUM ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:56:04 AM
 #1066


Thus on balance I prefer CN, but I like to see it altered to use a quantum computer resistance algorithm. And then we need to add IP address obfuscation as well that is superior to Tor and I2P.

Darkcoin (CoinJoin innovation) is really not at the level of the two above. You can review my comments in the Darkcoin thread to see why.

Thanks for the overview. What do you recommend that's superior to Tor?
AnonyMint
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 527


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 12:56:39 AM
 #1067


Thus on balance I prefer CN, but I like to see it altered to use a quantum computer resistance algorithm. And then we need to add IP address obfuscation as well that is superior to Tor and I2P.

Darkcoin (CoinJoin innovation) is really not at the level of the two above. You can review my comments in the Darkcoin thread to see why.

Thanks for the overview. What do you recommend that's superior to Tor?

What I envision isn't available yet.

unheresy.com - Prodigiously Elucidating the Profoundly ObtuseTHIS FORUM ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
AnonyMint
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 527


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:10:23 AM
 #1068

Somebody is attemping to relaunch == steal Monero  Shocked
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599580.0
I advise against posting in his topic at the moment to avoid bumping

I would strongly suggest partial closed source until market dominance is achieved. Having the best developers will likely mean others can't readily fill in the gaps to release clones early in the ramp up.

unheresy.com - Prodigiously Elucidating the Profoundly ObtuseTHIS FORUM ACCOUNT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:14:15 AM
 #1069

Somebody is attemping to relaunch == steal Monero  Shocked
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599580.0
I advise against posting in his topic at the moment to avoid bumping

I would strongly suggest partial closed source until market dominance is achieved. Having the best developers will likely mean others can't readily fill in the gaps to release clones early in the ramp up.

Source is already out there.  Could make the pool software closed source when it comes out though.  That would give monero an edge.
Ivan166
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 112


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:25:26 AM
 #1070

Main post now updated to the latest builds. Changes put in today:

- Source code change in slow_hash.c that doubles hashrate in both Linux and Windows.
- Windows from the same source + compiler optimization that puts Windows on par with Linux.
- 32-bit Windows binaries released. Please test these and report back.

Russian thread also updated as well.

Monero is your money privacy.
surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:26:50 AM
 #1071

Somebody is attemping to relaunch == steal Monero  Shocked
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=599580.0
I advise against posting in his topic at the moment to avoid bumping

I would strongly suggest partial closed source until market dominance is achieved. Having the best developers will likely mean others can't readily fill in the gaps to release clones early in the ramp up.

Source is already out there.  Could make the pool software closed source when it comes out though.  That would give monero an edge.
Not going to happen. A condition of the pool software bounty is that it is open source.
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:35:51 AM
Last edit: May 09, 2014, 08:11:20 PM by eizh
 #1072

Altcoin history shows that except in the case of premine (Tenebrix), the first implementation stays the largest by a wide margin. We're repeating that here by outpacing Bytecoin (thanks to its 80% mine prior to surfacing). No other CN coin has anywhere near the hashrate or trading volume. Go check diff in Fantom for example or the lack of activity in BCN trading.

The only CN coin out there doing something valuable is HoneyPenny, and they're open source too. If HP develops something useful, MRO can incorporate it as well. Open source gives confidence. No need for any further edge.
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:37:02 AM
 #1073


Not going to happen. A condition of the pool software bounty is that it is open source.

Yep, that was the entire point of the bounty.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2982
Merit: 1203



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:45:08 AM
 #1074

Altcoin history shows that except in the case of premine (Tenebrix), the first implementation stays the largest by a wide margin. We're repeating that here by outpacing Bytecoin (thanks to its 80% mine prior to surfacing). No other CN coin has anywhere near the hashrate or trading volume. Go check diff in Fantom for example or the lack of activity in BCN trading. Tomorrow you can watch this Monero "relaunch" troll coin fail when it goes live.

Fantom will likely catch up in terms of difficulty due to merged mining but will still likely be a shitcoin that miners just dump for a little extra income (like the BTC merged coins).

I personally find it a bit irratating that they went ahead and did merged mining even though this coin's community specifically said we didn't want it. I would really like to see the ability to merge mine coins against MRO removed. Let them build their own network.

MINIGO
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 02:51:36 AM
 #1075

strange when none of these accounts were around for the discussions that took place 3 weeks ago. Such vested interests with no prior indications. Hmm..

Johnny Mnemonic
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 795
Merit: 514



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 03:21:55 AM
 #1076

Could you remind me of these flaws you perceived? I honestly don't remember.

A bitcoin style emission means the circulating money supply will continue to decrease. As block reward decreases miners will become more and more dependent on tx fees. Eventually the transaction fees will be so expensive the transaction won't be worth conducting. You must have a steady debasement or even the smallest currency unit will eventually be too valuable. Ideally, there shouldn't be any tx fees at all.

Bitcoin is only maintaining its circulating supply because new coins are still being created. However, with mining becoming more and more privileged and block reward decreasing, the circulating wealth will dry up and a tx fees will spiral out of control.
huhliki.k
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 07:17:57 AM
 #1077

Is it possible to use daemon and wallet across proxy?
?
skybot13x
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 251



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 07:46:21 AM
 #1078


Whats the benefit of these new ones?

█████████████████████████████
██████▀ ▀███████████▀ ▀██████
████▀ ▄█▄ ▀███████▀ ▄█▄ ▀████
███▄ ▀████▄ ▀███▀ ▄████▀ ▄███
█████▄ ▀████▄ ▀ ▄████▀ ▄█████
███████▄ ▀████▄ ▀██▀ ▄███████
█████████  █████ ████████████
███████▀ ▄████▀ ▄██▄ ▀███████
█████▀ ▄████▀ ▄ ▀████▄ ▀█████
███▀ ▄████▀ ▄███▄ ▀████▄ ▀███
████▄ ▀█▀ ▄███████▄ ▀█▀ ▄████
██████▄ ▄███████████▄ ▄██████
█████████████████████████████
..XIRCUS..                       ▄████▄
    ▄███▄              ██████
    █████             ▀████▀
     ▀▀▀ ▀▄         ▄▀
           ▄█████▄
           █████████
           █████████
           ▀█████▀
         ▄▀    █    ▀▄ ▄▄
       ▄▀      █      ████
▄████▄     ▄█████▄   ▀██▀
██████      ███████
 ▀▀▀▀       ▀█████▀
||
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 09:28:13 AM
 #1079

Is it possible to use daemon and wallet across proxy?
?

Nothing within the code provides this yet. You would have to configure your connections on your own.



Previously 32-bit wasn't possible, which is the biggest change. These were the other improvements:

1. Simplwallet can set extra for transfers
2. Improvements in JSON RPC for wallet
3. Minor user experience improvements in simplewallet

The top two don't really matter for ordinary users.
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 09:32:35 AM
 #1080

eizh: Will these changes help exchange owners that want to add MRO?
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 2132 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!