Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2026, 12:19:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 [231] 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 ... 502 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"  (Read 1153870 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
PolarPoint
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 28, 2015, 10:20:54 PM
 #4601

If my client is connected to 20 other nodes (shown when I click on the network icon) and the ticket icon say I am staking, my settings must be correct, right? Do I need to forward a port from my home router to my computer? If so, which port should I forward? Is there a default port? I scanned through this thread and I see different ports specified. Thanks in advance.

20 other nodes probably means you can accept incoming connections.

To be absolutely sure, go to the debug console and type 'getpeerinfo'.

It will show you a bunch of information about each peer you are connected to, including its "inbound" status. If any of them show "inbound: true" then you are accepting incoming connections, and everything is OK.

Thanks Dooglus,

I did that just now. About 10 out of about 20 peers had "inbound=true", the rest are false. I think I am OK. I don't understand why the clam client assigns a unique port to each peer and increment the port number indefinitely above 49200. Can I set a parameter in clam.conf to tell peers I want to use the default 37114?
Bitcoiner2015
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 29, 2015, 09:32:39 AM
 #4602

I'm sure it's been mentioned before, but could the digger be Mt. Gox, or representatives of them involved in the liquidation settlements?
They must have a lot of addresses that weren't dust at the time of CLAMs creation.

Otherwise who has so many none dust accounts?  I am holding, there have been big diggers before, and it will happen again, but that is part of CLAMs.
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1335



View Profile
October 29, 2015, 05:12:27 PM
 #4603

I don't understand why the clam client assigns a unique port to each peer and increment the port number indefinitely above 49200. Can I set a parameter in clam.conf to tell peers I want to use the default 37114?

No, that's just how TCP/IP works. When you connect to port 31174 on remote hosts, it uses a port on your end which probably won't be 31174, and will be different for each connection you make. The operating system assigns the local port number. You can probably tinker with configuration of the OS to tell it which range to use, but there's not really any need to do so.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1335



View Profile
October 29, 2015, 05:17:37 PM
 #4604

I'm sure it's been mentioned before, but could the digger be Mt. Gox, or representatives of them involved in the liquidation settlements?
They must have a lot of addresses that weren't dust at the time of CLAMs creation.

Otherwise who has so many none dust accounts?  I am holding, there have been big diggers before, and it will happen again, but that is part of CLAMs.

Sites like walletexplorer.com and scorechain.com can 'cluster' addresses based on their blockchain history. Doing so suggests this digging isn't using Gox addresses.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
Kiritsugu
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1570
Merit: 1041



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 03:44:31 AM
 #4605

Forgive the noob-y question, but it's not anywhere easily visible in the OP or on the main CLAM website; What are the PoS statistics for CLAM?  What is the PoS % for each stake and each month (generally), and what is the minimum coin age to stake?
Kiritsugu
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1570
Merit: 1041



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 03:49:27 AM
 #4606

Forgive the noob-y question, but it's not anywhere easily visible in the OP or on the main CLAM website; What are the PoS statistics for CLAM?  What is the PoS % for each stake and each month (generally), and what is the minimum coin age to stake?
Finally found it, nvm.  Thanks Smiley
SuperClam (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


CLAM Developer


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2015, 05:44:56 AM
 #4607

Forgive the noob-y question, but it's not anywhere easily visible in the OP or on the main CLAM website; What are the PoS statistics for CLAM?  What is the PoS % for each stake and each month (generally), and what is the minimum coin age to stake?
Finally found it, nvm.  Thanks Smiley

Glad you found it Smiley 
For future travelers:
Reward is 1 CLAM per block staked, with 1440 blocks staked per day, or 1 block per minute.
This means "percentage" return is based on difficulty, much like Proof-Of-Work mining. 
Age is not a factor in chance to stake, only the coin pile(output) size.

As a side note, since it isn't percentage based, and can't be "saved" up it allows users to "beat" inflation; which, in many normal Proof-Of-Stake networks, is not possible.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147
Proof-Of-Chain, 100% Distributed BEFORE Launch.
Everyone who owned BTC, LTC, or DOGE at launch got free CLAMS.
Bitcoiner2015
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 08:10:05 AM
 #4608

I'm sure it's been mentioned before, but could the digger be Mt. Gox, or representatives of them involved in the liquidation settlements?
They must have a lot of addresses that weren't dust at the time of CLAMs creation.

Otherwise who has so many none dust accounts?  I am holding, there have been big diggers before, and it will happen again, but that is part of CLAMs.

Sites like walletexplorer.com and scorechain.com can 'cluster' addresses based on their blockchain history. Doing so suggests this digging isn't using Gox addresses.
Who does it suggest it may be? or is there no one specific that can be found?
chilly2k
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 12:40:48 PM
 #4609


   I thought we had the website set up as a WIKI, but I can't seem to find it. 

  I just got the wallet setup on a Raspberry Pi and got a stake on it.  I wanted to create an install guide to help anyone else trying to do this.  The daemon compile is pretty straight forward, but there are a few gotcha's that would be nice to see all in one place... 

SuperClam (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


CLAM Developer


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2015, 12:50:49 PM
 #4610


   I thought we had the website set up as a WIKI, but I can't seem to find it. 

  I just got the wallet setup on a Raspberry Pi and got a stake on it.  I wanted to create an install guide to help anyone else trying to do this.  The daemon compile is pretty straight forward, but there are a few gotcha's that would be nice to see all in one place... 

The website is just markdown, live compiled from the github repository here:

Website Repository


Example page:
Code:
http://clamclient.com/start/

Raw https://github.com/nochowderforyou/nochowderforyou.github.io/start/index.md

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147
Proof-Of-Chain, 100% Distributed BEFORE Launch.
Everyone who owned BTC, LTC, or DOGE at launch got free CLAMS.
chilly2k
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 07:33:29 PM
 #4611

Just noticed a weird problem...  running 1.4.17

I fired up my old client on a different box and it caught-up to the block chain and processed these fine.  I shut that down and started this guy back up and now it's running  fine.  Any clue what was happening there?  This is a new Raspberry Pi daemon, so I've been watching very closely.  This was running fine for around 18 hours. 



Code:
2015-10-30 18:54:35 SetBestChain: new best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:54:35 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
2015-10-30 18:54:36 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:41 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:54:44 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:48 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:53 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:56 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:57 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:55:01 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 prev tx 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d index entry not found
2015-10-30 18:55:01 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d  height=708541  trust=95795821283295403912  blocktrust=394802330145311  date=10/30/15 18:54:56
2015-10-30 18:55:01 InvalidChainFound:  current best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:55:01 ERROR: SetBestChain() : SetBestChainInner failed
2015-10-30 18:55:01 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
2015-10-30 18:55:01 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-10-30 18:55:05 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:55:13 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:55:30 stake took 1s
2015-10-30 18:55:45 Postponing 1 reconnects
2015-10-30 18:55:45 REORGANIZE
2015-10-30 18:55:45 REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a
2015-10-30 18:55:45 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d
2015-10-30 18:55:45 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 prev tx 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d index entry not found
2015-10-30 18:55:45 ERROR: Reorganize() : ConnectBlock a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d failed
2015-10-30 18:55:45 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=401a920919215869d558be3528cc43ecc4fa6c614f5cbf75a0dac4a4860fff25  height=708542  trust=95796216491626745705  blocktrust=395208331341793  date=10/30/15 18:55:44
2015-10-30 18:55:45 InvalidChainFound:  current best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:55:45 ERROR: SetBestChain() : Reorganize failed
2015-10-30 18:55:45 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
2015-10-30 18:55:45 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-10-30 18:55:46 stake took 1s
2015-10-30 18:56:01 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:56:17 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:56:33 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:56:34 Postponing 2 reconnects
2015-10-30 18:56:34 REORGANIZE
2015-10-30 18:56:34 REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a
2015-10-30 18:56:34 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d
2015-10-30 18:56:34 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 prev tx 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d index entry not found
2015-10-30 18:56:34 ERROR: Reorganize() : ConnectBlock a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d failed
2015-10-30 18:56:34 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=5811802af96f11fd29e126e55e25682e7e73653d8575d2500e50dc1d55743019  height=708543  trust=95796612106795179040  blocktrust=395615168433335  date=10/30/15 18:56:32
2015-10-30 18:56:34 InvalidChainFound:  current best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:56:34 ERROR: SetBestChain() : Reorganize failed
2015-10-30 18:56:34 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
2015-10-30 18:56:34 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-10-30 18:56:35 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:56:43 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:56:49 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:57:06 stake took 1s
2015-10-30 18:57:14 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:57:21 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:57:29 Postponing 3 reconnects
2015-10-30 18:57:29 REORGANIZE
2015-10-30 18:57:29 REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a
2015-10-30 18:57:29 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d
2015-10-30 18:57:29 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 prev tx 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d index entry not found
2015-10-30 18:57:29 ERROR: Reorganize() : ConnectBlock a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d failed
2015-10-30 18:57:29 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=45ea26b6c5e277023f30a7bec65eb5c12065d759bcd0d00d16895c64571cf04f  height=708544  trust=95797008129639183109  blocktrust=396022844004069  date=10/30/15 18:57:20
2015-10-30 18:57:29 InvalidChainFound:  current best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:57:29 ERROR: SetBestChain() : Reorganize failed
2015-10-30 18:57:29 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
2015-10-30 18:57:29 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-10-30 18:57:37 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:57:53 stake took 0s
2015-10-30 18:57:57 Postponing 4 reconnects
2015-10-30 18:57:57 REORGANIZE
2015-10-30 18:57:57 REORGANIZE: Disconnect 0 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a
2015-10-30 18:57:57 REORGANIZE: Connect 1 blocks; 3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a..a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d
2015-10-30 18:57:57 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 prev tx 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d index entry not found
2015-10-30 18:57:57 ERROR: Reorganize() : ConnectBlock a22b8c842f7e4855331f564e686db009fb3e464109bd789f8a8dd490d9fd9b8d failed
2015-10-30 18:57:57 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=be297a55e10d467734b2b1f238aa7c39d1a1e81ee0fb003bf3c558a8e3c9c2b8  height=708545  trust=95797404356636212698  blocktrust=396226997029589  date=10/30/15 18:57:52
2015-10-30 18:57:57 InvalidChainFound:  current best=3f5c063a6a5cae2d744656415f8bbf78d3ec0d93bdd90f02d56b08f66cb9438a  height=708540  trust=95795426480965258601  blocktrust=394397162270365  date=10/30/15 18:54:24
2015-10-30 18:57:57 ERROR: SetBestChain() : Reorganize failed
2015-10-30 18:57:57 ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed
2015-10-30 18:57:57 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-10-30 18:58:10 stake took 1s
2015-10-30 18:58:26 stake took 1s


dooglus
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1335



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 07:49:02 PM
 #4612

I fired up my old client on a different box and it caught-up to the block chain and processed these fine.  I shut that down and started this guy back up and now it's running  fine.  Any clue what was happening there?

Code:
2015-10-30 18:54:44 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:48 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d
2015-10-30 18:54:53 ERROR: FetchInputs() : 2735bdf592b697b34a4ce9533ff0af647342b660da6779dae75bd4d4c43dcb15 mempool Tx prev not found 467a9d7a17de112f1766d53b32ee57f3869c6c2d04d1468870d6f5a2b8345d1d

No idea. It's saying that the new 2735... tx is invalid because it spends a coin from tx 467a which it doesn't know about, but that 467a transaction is in block 699197 (2015-10-24 05:55:12), so I've no idea why it couldn't find it, or why restarting would fix it.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
Wintermute420
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


Mighty Dub


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 09:38:24 PM
 #4613

I downloaded the client earlier in the week and started syncing, but I am stuck at 21 weeks behind.  Can somebody provide me with a current list of nodes?  Thanks in advance.
SuperClam (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


CLAM Developer


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 01:09:26 AM
 #4614

I downloaded the client earlier in the week and started syncing, but I am stuck at 21 weeks behind.  Can somebody provide me with a current list of nodes?  Thanks in advance.

If you have the newest version of the client, from the repository - it should automatically get an up-to-date list of active nodes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147
Proof-Of-Chain, 100% Distributed BEFORE Launch.
Everyone who owned BTC, LTC, or DOGE at launch got free CLAMS.
Wintermute420
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


Mighty Dub


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:29:04 AM
 #4615

I grabbed it from the link on the front of this thread.  It looks it is syncing after a restart and adding the nodes.  20 weeks behind now, I see higher network activity from clam-qt.  Thanks for your help.
romjpn
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 02:28:25 AM
 #4616

Aaand it's dropping again.  Undecided

---~~~***~~~--- http://InvestBitcoinGuide.com ---~~~***~~~---
Invest your bitcoins/altcoins into legit businesses. Get solid returns !
We hate scams and ponzis !
SuperClam (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


CLAM Developer


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 02:41:43 AM
 #4617

Aaand it's dropping again.  Undecided

And yet, the asks spread thinner. 
Currently, 44 BTC in purchases to a price of 0.01 BTC.

At a certain point a large portion of the entire CLAM moneysupply is purchasable for a 'relatively' small amount of BTC.
Not attempting to make price predictions - simply pointing out the fact that the distribution is no less conservative.

Fundamentals haven't drastically changed with the exception of a large amount of CLAM, which already existed, coming into circulation via claims.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147
Proof-Of-Chain, 100% Distributed BEFORE Launch.
Everyone who owned BTC, LTC, or DOGE at launch got free CLAMS.
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4634
Merit: 1399


AltQuick.com Owner


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 03:08:00 AM
 #4618

Aaand it's dropping again.  Undecided

And yet, the asks spread thinner.  
Currently, 44 BTC in purchases to a price of 0.01 BTC.

At a certain point a large portion of the entire CLAM moneysupply is purchasable for a 'relatively' small amount of BTC.
Not attempting to make price predictions - simply pointing out the fact that the distribution is no less conservative.

Fundamentals haven't drastically changed with the exception of a large amount of CLAM, which already existed, coming into circulation via claims.

Need a 300 Bitcoin wall @ .001....

Someone needs to nut up and get this shit done.  (I got my bid in my service)

I'm standing tall on it and I expect other people around the project to hold firm or else all your digs are belong to Clamchecker!   Tongue


https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - A Bitcoin-based exchange for Altcoins, Signet, & Bitcoin Testnet (no fiat, stables, or KYC) - PGP D2F6EB9E127D75D6F994BA5F6862DDA3084922EE
SuperClam (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1002


CLAM Developer


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 03:14:49 AM
 #4619

Aaand it's dropping again.  Undecided
And yet, the asks spread thinner.  
Currently, 44 BTC in purchases to a price of 0.01 BTC.
At a certain point a large portion of the entire CLAM moneysupply is purchasable for a 'relatively' small amount of BTC.
Not attempting to make price predictions - simply pointing out the fact that the distribution is no less conservative.
Fundamentals haven't drastically changed with the exception of a large amount of CLAM, which already existed, coming into circulation via claims.
Need a 300 Bitcoin wall @ .001....
Someone needs to nut up and get this shit done.  (I got my bid in my service)
I'm standing tall on it and I expect other people around the project to hold firm or else all your digs are belong to Clamchecker!   Tongue

No one is going anywhere - this is our network.

When this is all finished we can thank the digger for increasing the money supply and hence the coefficient for 'market cap' Grin

EDIT:
My 142% biased prediction that no one should pay any attention to: 5 million market cap within two months of the digger finishing  Cool

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147
Proof-Of-Chain, 100% Distributed BEFORE Launch.
Everyone who owned BTC, LTC, or DOGE at launch got free CLAMS.
crazyivan
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007


DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 06:19:19 AM
 #4620

Aaand it's dropping again.  Undecided
And yet, the asks spread thinner.  
Currently, 44 BTC in purchases to a price of 0.01 BTC.
At a certain point a large portion of the entire CLAM moneysupply is purchasable for a 'relatively' small amount of BTC.
Not attempting to make price predictions - simply pointing out the fact that the distribution is no less conservative.
Fundamentals haven't drastically changed with the exception of a large amount of CLAM, which already existed, coming into circulation via claims.
Need a 300 Bitcoin wall @ .001....
Someone needs to nut up and get this shit done.  (I got my bid in my service)
I'm standing tall on it and I expect other people around the project to hold firm or else all your digs are belong to Clamchecker!   Tongue

No one is going anywhere - this is our network.

When this is all finished we can thank the digger for increasing the money supply and hence the coefficient for 'market cap' Grin

EDIT:
My 142% biased prediction that no one should pay any attention to: 5 million market cap within two months of the digger finishing  Cool

When do you expect him to finish? Also, how do you know his total supply?

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
Pages: « 1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 [231] 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 ... 502 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!