[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[holyprofit]

Hehe... and apple will be over priced like all of their normal shit! Then we got to see applecoin forked every 3 months for something "new" making your old stuff worthless and force you to fork out a premmy price for the "new".

But you'll be able to trade in three of your old coins for one of the new iCoins - and you'll be able to go to a genius bar if they don't stake properly - as long as the warranty hasn't expired on them. (God that sounds so likely I just scared myself)  

[akula999]

Apple is actually going to go this route -

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=10&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=(apple.AS.+AND+20130606.PD.)&OS=An/apple+and+pd/6/06/2013&RS=(AN/apple+AND+PD/20130606)

iMoney

[BrewCrewFan]

Hehe... and apple will be over priced like all of their normal shit! Then we got to see applecoin forked every 3 months for something "new" making your old stuff worthless and force you to fork out a premmy price for the "new".

But you'll be able to trade in three of your old coins for one of the new iCoins - and you'll be able to go to a genius bar if they don't stake properly - as long as the warranty hasn't expired on them. (God that sounds so likely I just scared myself)  

The warranty would only cover coins that are in the original addy too.... if it was transferred to another addy at any time, that warranty is void.

WTF on the 15 BTC worth of XC dump....

[akula999]

Hehe... and apple will be over priced like all of their normal shit! Then we got to see applecoin forked every 3 months for something "new" making your old stuff worthless and force you to fork out a premmy price for the "new".

But you'll be able to trade in three of your old coins for one of the new iCoins - and you'll be able to go to a genius bar if they don't stake properly - as long as the warranty hasn't expired on them. (God that sounds so likely I just scared myself)  

The warranty would only cover coins that are in the original addy too.... if it was transferred to another addy at any time, that warranty is void.

WTF on the 15 BTC worth of XC dump....

It's a coin, people want to make profit or if they perceive profit somewhere else, they will dump XC but eventually come back.
Real move would be to allow large coin holders possible 'stake' in the company through shares.
Think about it, if Google or Microsoft or Joe Schmoe wanted to buy the tech behind XC, they can theoretically kill the coin.  But I don't think this will happen - very drastic.   

[BrewCrewFan]

Hehe... and apple will be over priced like all of their normal shit! Then we got to see applecoin forked every 3 months for something "new" making your old stuff worthless and force you to fork out a premmy price for the "new".

But you'll be able to trade in three of your old coins for one of the new iCoins - and you'll be able to go to a genius bar if they don't stake properly - as long as the warranty hasn't expired on them. (God that sounds so likely I just scared myself) 

The warranty would only cover coins that are in the original addy too.... if it was transferred to another addy at any time, that warranty is void.

WTF on the 15 BTC worth of XC dump....

It's a coin, people want to make profit or if they perceive profit somewhere else, they will dump XC but eventually come back.
Real move would be to allow large coin holders possible 'stake' in the company through shares.
Think about it, if Google or Microsoft or Joe Schmoe wanted to buy the tech behind XC, they can theoretically kill the coin.  But I don't think this will happen - very drastic.   

I guess the only real thing I am ticked about is that I put in some recent cash ~ 130K.... I kinda had hoped that the 150k would have been the next floor... I hate flipping cryptos for profit, but I was going to cash out a few for school shit for the kids... guess that is on hold now ... they have all the supplies I guess that is good enough for now :/

BTW, I have seen this mentioned a few times...  but what is all this about shares and selling XC as a company? COnfused.

[The-C-Word]

As a Bag-holder you don't wan't a large company to buy XC because they would not buy your coins, they would buy Dan, his team and the source code. Your coins hold 0 legal protection like a stock does, only critical mass adoption of the platform will protect your coins against this scenario if it presented itself.

I was actually thinking about this recently and came to the same conclusion, which is concerning. I feel like the likelihood of major companies being interested in acquiring this tech is extremely high. I'm curious about Dan's stance on the issue. 

[sugarboy321]

I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?

Look at Monero.  They don't even have an official wallet yet.  And their website hasn't been updated in 2 months.  

And yet this very coin is traded at a higher price than XC... tell me how that works ?

I tried a few times and hit brick walls.  My biggest beef with XC has to do with the PoS as I believe it is fundamentally anti adoption.  It discourages it.  

Monero intentionally made their adoption curve slow (vs doing a quick 1 - 3 month mine).  This will offer more time rather than people accumulating the coins and then holding on to them while trying to drive the price up by inventing features.  Currency needs consensus.  And I think that's what the feature hounds don't get ... speculation may drive short term price.  But adoption drives consensus.  And PoW is better for adoption / consensus than PoS.

(I actually suspect that PoS after a 3 year mining phase would work fine.)

I think this is a valid point - PoS does discourage trading and although everyone here seems happy that most of the XC are off the exchanges because no-one wants to sell them, low volume
gives the impression of no interest in the coin which is certainly not true. Of course there is very little real commerce going on in any crypto right now so all volume is fake and bot driven to that extent. So my hope here is that once crypto actually starts being used by real people this would no longer be an issue.  

Good Points,

                I like POS because it contributes to price stability.

[almond]

As a Bag-holder you don't wan't a large company to buy XC because they would not buy your coins, they would buy Dan, his team and the source code. Your coins hold 0 legal protection like a stock does, only critical mass adoption of the platform will protect your coins against this scenario if it presented itself.

I was actually thinking about this recently and came to the same conclusion, which is concerning. I feel like the likelihood of major companies being interested in acquiring this tech is extremely high. I'm curious about Dan's stance on the issue.  

You guys are right.  The Dev Team, and Dan Metcalf in particular are what make XCurrency the unique alt that it is.  If they act as rational economic entities they will sell their services elsewhere, but only if they think they can make more money.  And with XC's current market cap at a petite $ 4 million, that's easy to imagine.  However, staying independent offers lots of non monetary returns as well in that very independence.  And if XC moons, the money will be extreme.

And you guys are assuming that any purchaser would necessarily buy their services in exclusivity;  it's also easy to imagine the team getting hired to develop portals to the XCnet for the big isp's, or leveraging the current and growing XCnet in some other fashion.

all just wild speculation ............

[wooder]

As a Bag-holder you don't wan't a large company to buy XC because they would not buy your coins, they would buy Dan, his team and the source code. Your coins hold 0 legal protection like a stock does, only critical mass adoption of the platform will protect your coins against this scenario if it presented itself.

I was actually thinking about this recently and came to the same conclusion, which is concerning. I feel like the likelihood of major companies being interested in acquiring this tech is extremely high. I'm curious about Dan's stance on the issue.  

You guys are right.  The Dev Team, and Dan Metcalf in particular are what make XCurrency the unique alt that it is.  If they act as rational economic entities they will sell their services elsewhere, but only if they think they can make more money.  And with XC's current market cap at a petite $ 4 million, that's easy to imagine.  However, staying independent offers lots of non monetary returns as well in that very independence.  And if XC moons, the money will be extreme.

And you guys are assuming that any purchaser would necessarily buy their services in exclusivity;  it's also easy to imagine the team getting hired to develop portals to the XCnet for the big isp's, or leveraging the current and growing XCnet in some other fashion.

all just wild speculation ............

instead of trying to push your imagination to the limit, tell more people about XC and share posts in fb/twitter

[cryptico]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

[Teka]

All questions regarding QI have been answered. If you have any questions directly regarding their coin, please post in their thread. I would also like to remind that due to this partnership, we have an extra way of xnodes earning money and are getting close to Web 3.0 implementations.

[Teka]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

Here is rev 1, the only one open source for now: http://pastebin.com/G4mH4AxR

[cryptico]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

Here is rev 1, the only one open source for now: http://pastebin.com/G4mH4AxR

Thanks Teka

[the_game1224]

So was this just a Q session rather than Q&A   
http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/179-trustless-mixing-diagram-qa-session/

[akula999]

All questions regarding QI have been answered. If you have any questions directly regarding their coin, please post in their thread. I would also like to remind that due to this partnership, we have an extra way of xnodes earning money and are getting close to Web 3.0 implementations.

How exactly do the extra Xnodes help XC stakers earn money?

[Mountaingoat]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

Here is rev 1, the only one open source for now: http://pastebin.com/G4mH4AxR

I send you a PM with a concern of mine, but you didn't respond yet .

[Teka]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

Here is rev 1, the only one open source for now: http://pastebin.com/G4mH4AxR

I send you a PM with a concern of mine, but you didn't respond yet .

Sorry about that. Looking at the time frame, I probably saw it and went to sleep.

[Mountaingoat]

Hi guys anyone can give the link for the open source code for rev 1.5? I would like to send it to a friend of mine not into crypto but informatic ingeneer to see what he tells me.

thx

Here is rev 1, the only one open source for now: http://pastebin.com/G4mH4AxR

I send you a PM with a concern of mine, but you didn't respond yet .

Sorry about that. Looking at the time frame, I probably saw it and went to sleep.

That is fine.

[ssmc2]

I need my daily update fix! 

[laredo7mm]

...Troll picture removed...

lol

ahahhahahahaha go razorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........ ....

You should probably delete your quote since the original troll picture was deleted.