[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[LD2164]

So what's the status on the Multipool?

I've been using this one: http://www.altmining.farm
because the one at hashevolved is down
but their payouts seem a bit low
and I haven't gotten payed for the past few days
but I an still mining there because my alternative is dark and that is looking like a bit of a lost cause right now.

[KimmyF]

So what's the status on the Multipool?

I've been using this one: http://www.altmining.farm
because the one at hashevolved is down
but their payouts seem a bit low
and I haven't gotten payed for the past few days
but I an still mining there because my alternative is dark and that is looking like a bit of a lost cause right now.

Had a nice run with my gpu miners but all shutdown atm, hot summer and roi was just to low. What kind of return you get these days?

[Mountaingoat]

Guys, you need to convince MrWDunne or Reddit user Mimex of adding XC to Mimex.

If you don't know what Mimex is, it is an upcomming exchange, you can read about it here: Mimex.

[onealfa]

Btw am I the only one seeing the XC logarithmic chart on mintpal as a giant falling wedge that will reach it's target between 1st and 9th of September?

Relax. You are not alone  But ...I can hardly name it "falling"

[Artoodeetoo]

What happens then?

[Mountaingoat]

Btw am I the only one seeing the XC logarithmic chart on mintpal as a giant falling wedge that will reach it's target between 1st and 9th of September?

Relax. You are not alone  

What does that mean?

[xojex]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

[Pizpie]

So what's the status on the Multipool?

The MP is being worked on and we will have some more news soon.

[Mountaingoat]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

So that will be the lowest point?

[onealfa]

What happens then?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4RjJKxsamQ 

[wooder]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

So that will be the lowest point?

doing a technical analysis on that small datasets and markets that have a low marketcap is nonesense and won't provide any future predictions you should count on. Nearly all crypto markets are manipulated as only a small amount of BTC/LTC is needed to create a sudden price increase.

It has the same amount of information as the "richlist"

[SpringfieldM1A]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

He is hinting on a flag pattern breakout, which I think is very possible

[Mountaingoat]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

He is hinting on a flag pattern breakout, which I think is very possible

I really do not know what that means, I will try and find it out.

[holyprofit]

What does that mean?

http://www.investopedia.com/university/charts/charts7.asp

So that will be the lowest point?

doing a technical analysis on that small datasets and markets that have a low marketcap is nonesense and won't provide any future predictions you should count on. Nearly all crypto markets are manipulated as only a small amount of BTC/LTC is needed to create a sudden price increase.

It has the same amount of information as the "richlist"

Not sure I agree. Manipulated or not, if TA was completely invalid you wouldn't see the same patterns in crypto as normal stocks, but
if anything the TA patterns are more precisely followed - e.g. the accuracy of resistance and support lines is often
amazing including for XC. On the other hand you can ask if TA "predictions" in general aren't just confirmation bias and there I might have to agree - if you go
on tradingview you get as many conflicting predictions of future btc/usd movements as there are assholes - (i.e. a lot). But  
anyway I'll throw my hat in the ring and say that TA's indicating a movement (probably up) before the 11th.  EDIT: by the way I'm sure we
can revisit these pages on the 12th and see how we did.  

[rdnkjdi]

Coverage of XC on Bitcoinist.net


http://bitcoinist.net/xcurrency-a-serious-contender-for-the-2-0-crown/



Spread the word:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/504245718803296256

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XCurrency?fref=ts

From the article - "With development led by Boston based Dan Metcalk, XCurrency is still technically a DAC."

Where did he get the idea that XC is a DAC?  As far as I knew, there isn't anything contained within XC that would qualifies anything of that nature at this time.  Is he confusing XC with the recent BTSX excitement or is there a veiled hint in there?

Web 3.0

Finally the outside world is catching up on the fact of XC being a company instead of "just a coin" And those XC "coins" you are holding? well those are stock. I've been saying this for months.
I wouldn't be surprised if some bigshot company swoops down and says "listen Dan, we want to buy ALL of your tech, the messaging, your web 3.0 EVERYTHING" Well when that happens, any XC holder will have a very big grin on their face. If you hold 1k+ XC and such a takeover is even suggested you won't need to work another day in your life again. I am not saying that XC will ever be sold, but take it from me there will be huge interest.

It won't be tomorrow, but the fundamentals are being laid out further every day. Just hold on to your "coins" and don't ever make the mistake of selling them because you are impatient.

The trick to being succesful in this crazy crypto world is to invest in platforms that offer real world applicability, not just in "crypto currencies". Crypto won't be going away, you can count on that. But in the end only a couple of currencies will prevail, which are being used in infrastructures or platforms. These platforms have to offer something that people either need or want, with XC it's privacy and that's something that, in the light of current and future world affairs, everybody needs and wants. That gives intrinsic value to the XC platform, regardless of current unit price or market cap.

Except everything is delayed opensource?  So to call it a company is to say it's a company that owns nothing (except whatever code has been written since last time it was opensourced)



This "Open Source Coins = DAC" make no sense

[rdnkjdi]

and I'm not just picking on XC fwiw

[cryptico]

Dev Team I admire all of you but with the speed of the new tech releases nowadays in the crypto world we will need to move our ass a bit faster with the releases, updates, and start to deliver our features much faster. I don't know if Dan is working on is own or not he is not posting here since very long time and I would like to know where we are at the moment and what we can expect for the next upcoming future. Rev 2.5 was expected at the beginning a while ago... I am excited by where the XC project is headed but I see other coins delivering decentralised Markets, first android staking wallets bitshares...etc

I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?

[rdnkjdi]

I don't know if I am becoming too impatient but the frustration keeps growing inside me. Please give me your feedback guys. Am I becoming an impatient ass or this feeling is justified?

For whatever it's worth - from what I can tell XC is moving much faster than other coins.  There are coins that have features XC doesn't have and so they run out and try to grab it (include advertising and call it a touring "platform"), anon chat, etc.

Look at Monero.  They don't even have an official wallet yet.  And their website hasn't been updated in 2 months.  

[BrewCrewFan]

Coverage of XC on Bitcoinist.net


http://bitcoinist.net/xcurrency-a-serious-contender-for-the-2-0-crown/



Spread the word:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/XCurrency/status/504245718803296256

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/XCurrency?fref=ts

From the article - "With development led by Boston based Dan Metcalk, XCurrency is still technically a DAC."

Where did he get the idea that XC is a DAC?  As far as I knew, there isn't anything contained within XC that would qualifies anything of that nature at this time.  Is he confusing XC with the recent BTSX excitement or is there a veiled hint in there?

Web 3.0

Finally the outside world is catching up on the fact of XC being a company instead of "just a coin" And those XC "coins" you are holding? well those are stock. I've been saying this for months.
I wouldn't be surprised if some bigshot company swoops down and says "listen Dan, we want to buy ALL of your tech, the messaging, your web 3.0 EVERYTHING" Well when that happens, any XC holder will have a very big grin on their face. If you hold 1k+ XC and such a takeover is even suggested you won't need to work another day in your life again. I am not saying that XC will ever be sold, but take it from me there will be huge interest.

It won't be tomorrow, but the fundamentals are being laid out further every day. Just hold on to your "coins" and don't ever make the mistake of selling them because you are impatient.

The trick to being succesful in this crazy crypto world is to invest in platforms that offer real world applicability, not just in "crypto currencies". Crypto won't be going away, you can count on that. But in the end only a couple of currencies will prevail, which are being used in infrastructures or platforms. These platforms have to offer something that people either need or want, with XC it's privacy and that's something that, in the light of current and future world affairs, everybody needs and wants. That gives intrinsic value to the XC platform, regardless of current unit price or market cap.

Except everything is delayed opensource?  So to call it a company is to say it's a company that owns nothing (except whatever code has been written since last time it was opensourced)



This "Open Source Coins = DAC" make no sense

In a way think of it as a trade secret. Ask KFC for the recipe for the breading on the chicken and I bet you will be laughed out of the office. XC is the same way, but it IS open sourced, just on a delay ... that way when the next 100 clones come out they use tech that is old.

[holyprofit]

and I'm not just picking on XC fwiw

I don't see why it always has to be the open source model - at the moment
it's important to build trust and confidence but ultimately there might be other models. If e.g. the XC infrastructure/code were bought
out by e.g. apple, for sure future developments would no longer be open source.
(Of course we'd all have to rely on the goodness of apple to preserve the trustless principle but that's a different question.)

And anyway first mover advantage is everything - delayed open source still keeps XC ahead of the pack.