damniatx
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2017, 02:04:09 PM |
|
anyone use rx470 with this miner ?, I can only got 620H/s. any tips for me guys ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
invicta
Member
Offline
Activity: 194
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2017, 03:32:29 PM |
|
anyone use rx470 with this miner ?, I can only got 620H/s. any tips for me guys ?
BIOS mod it (if you haven’t already) - strap the 1500 timings to the rest and OC the memory to 1800+. It should reach 700-750H/s easy and some have reported over 800H/s on Polaris. I’ve gone for stability and dialled mine back a bit.
|
|
|
|
BSAlex
Member
Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 10
|
|
November 23, 2017, 06:49:27 PM |
|
It was their Nicehash EU (SSL) servers, switching to the USA servers resolved it.
EU server also works OK now
|
|
|
|
recondiscord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
November 23, 2017, 10:57:39 PM |
|
Please add R7250 ;-;
|
|
|
|
bobymoore
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2017, 06:13:45 PM |
|
nanopool don't show my statistics.dont show my worker online,i use v10.2 beta,vega 56,blockchain driver.
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
November 25, 2017, 09:12:11 PM |
|
Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!! It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.
|
|
|
|
lankyman
|
|
November 25, 2017, 09:19:41 PM |
|
I get 633 hashes on all my 3 GPUs RX470 - using 9.7 and when i use 10.2 i get 300 odd hashes on my 3rd listed GPU.
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
|
November 25, 2017, 09:21:18 PM |
|
Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!! It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.
Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks.
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
November 25, 2017, 10:42:38 PM |
|
Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!! It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.
Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks. other miner: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b config: { "algorithm": "cryptonight", "rawintensity": "1008", "worksize": "8", "gpu-threads": "1", "gpu-fan" : "75", "no-extranonce" : true, "more-notices" : true, "pools": [ { "name": "FARMERPOOL-XMR", "user": "panda.miner", "pass": "x", "url": "stratum+ssl://xmr.pool.cn:8888" } ] }
note: I use a custom mining BIOS.
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
|
November 26, 2017, 09:47:10 AM |
|
Holy crap Claymore dude, one of my 480s gets 996 h/s!!! It was doing 830 h/s on the other miner I've been using.
Care to share with us what the 'other miner' was (and the config used) so we can do a little test for ourselves and see if Claymore is that much better - thanks. other miner: gatelessgate-0.1.3-pre6b config: { "algorithm": "cryptonight", "rawintensity": "1008", "worksize": "8", "gpu-threads": "1", "gpu-fan" : "75", "no-extranonce" : true, "more-notices" : true, "pools": [ { "name": "FARMERPOOL-XMR", "user": "panda.miner", "pass": "x", "url": "stratum+ssl://xmr.pool.cn:8888" } ] }
note: I use a custom mining BIOS. Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.
|
|
|
|
Pennywis3
|
|
November 26, 2017, 01:49:35 PM |
|
Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.
Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM. The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well. So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup
|
|
|
|
invicta
Member
Offline
Activity: 194
Merit: 10
|
|
November 26, 2017, 02:39:09 PM |
|
Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.
Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM. The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well. So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it.
|
|
|
|
Pennywis3
|
|
November 26, 2017, 03:12:07 PM |
|
Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it.
There a thread about it here on the forums, other than that, not really. Its everyone for himself when It comes to sgminer I guess. Otherwise I agree with you, Claymore are damn fine miners, I'm using them myself. Just not for Monero
|
|
|
|
Call_Me_Bambi
|
|
November 27, 2017, 12:30:54 AM |
|
Ah yes, gatelessgate; I gave it a quick go sometime back but found that Claymore's Cryptonote miner was much better. Sgminer is another one I've used but lately I've found Claymore's miner to be a bit better. Sgminer used to be, for me, better than Claymore, something must have changed in my setup, I shall investigate.
Don't know what GPUs you are using, but for mining XMR on RX 4x0,5x0 GPUs , claymore is not even remotely as fast as a properly set up SGminer GM. The only problem SGminer GM has is not being up to date, so there's problems with changing voltage, clock eth., but that can be done with other tools as well. So yea, there's probably something changed in your setup Do you have a suggested guide or thread for SGMiner GM? I know it's not been updated in a while. The thing I always liked about Claymore is it seems to auto-configure itself quite nicely and generally pretty well, that's why a lot of people (me included) use it. There is a thread for SGminer-GM here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1612329.0 . It's not a busy thread but there are still some occasional new posts but, as said, your pretty much on your own.
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
November 27, 2017, 09:51:07 AM Last edit: November 27, 2017, 11:17:53 AM by notbatman |
|
Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze. My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running. Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed: ... 00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75
00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS) 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}} 00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared
|
|
|
|
tg88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1405
|
|
November 27, 2017, 11:25:59 AM |
|
Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze. My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running. Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed: ... 00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75
00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS) 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}} 00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared
That also happened to my rigs today. is a problem that occurs with some frequency mining in the nicehash.
|
.
| ▄██████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ █████████████▀░ ███████████▀▄░█ ██████████░███░ ███████▀▀░▀▀█▀▀ █████▀░░░░░░░▀▄ █████░░░░░░░░░█ █████▄░░░░░░░▄▀ ███████▄▄▄▄▄███ ███████████████ ▀██████████████ | ▄██████████████ ███████████████ ████████████▀██ █████████▀▀░░░▀ ████████░░░░░░░ ██████░░░░░░░░░ █████░░░░░░░░░░ █████░░░░░░░░░░ ██████▄░░░░▄▄▄░ █████████▀▀░░░▀ ████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ███████████████ ▀██████████████ | ▄██████████████ ███████████████ ██████████▀▀▀▀▀ ███████▀░▀█▄░░░ ██████░░░░░█▄░▄ █████░░▄▄▄▄▄██▀ █████▀▀▀░░░░▄█▄ █████░░░▄▄█▀▀░█ ██████▄█▀▀░░░░▀ ███████▄▄░░░░░░ ██████████▄▄▄▄▄ ███████████████ ▀██████████████ | ▄████████████████████████▄ ██████████████████████████ █████████████░████████████ ████████████▀▄████████████ █████▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▀█████ ████▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀████ ████░░░██░██░░░░█░░░░░████ ████░░░▄▄▀▄▄░░▀▀▄▀▀░░░████ ████▄░░▀▀░▀▀░░░░▀░░░░▄████ █████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ▀████████████████████████▀ | .
|
|
|
|
invicta
Member
Offline
Activity: 194
Merit: 10
|
|
November 27, 2017, 12:14:41 PM |
|
Crap, I was mining on nicehash via SSL when all my miners (linux/cc v10.2) got disconnected, when they reconnected they all complained about a server error then experienced a segmentation fault except for one rig that just froze. My windows rig was connected with gatelessgate via the regular nicehash port and it's still up and running. Here's a log snippet from one of the miners right before it crashed: ... 00:18:05:489 da70f740 GPU 5 temp = 63, old fan speed = 72, new fan speed = 75
00:18:07:574 98ff9700 cert subject: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 cert issuer: /C=SI/ST=Slovenia/L=Ljubljana/O=NiceHash/CN=*.nicehash.com/emailAddress=info@nicehash.com 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 SSL/TLS encryption is enabled 00:18:07:575 98ff9700 send: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "REDACTED_FOR_BCT_FORUM_POST", "pass": "x", "agent": "xmr/1.0"}, "id": 1}
00:18:07:575 98ff9700 XMR: Stratum - Connected (cryptonight.usa.nicehash.com:33355) (SSL/TLS) 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 got 79 bytes 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internal server error"}}
00:18:07:656 98ff9700 parse packet: 76 00:18:07:656 98ff9700 Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Internalservererror"}} 00:18:07:657 98ff9700 buf was cleared
I just wanted to add that it happened to me as well. If it keeps occurring I'll likely end up mining Equihash instead but their Cryptonote servers have been really flaky recently, first it was 'shareabovetarget' errors on EU, now this. Most of my rigs crashed the software but one hard-locks when the graphics cards come out of 3D mode and drop their clocks back (I assume it's voltage offset is too low). Has anyone had a response from Nicehash?
|
|
|
|
garytheasshole
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 105
Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk
|
|
November 27, 2017, 12:32:31 PM |
|
Nicehash is the work of Satan! Don't give them your hashrate they have way too much as it is, too much power in the hands of a single entity is never a good idea, power corrupts.
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
November 28, 2017, 02:26:33 AM |
|
I've added the -allpools 1 option, we'll see if that changes anything... As for mining on NH it's a double edged sword, It really does pay nicely even if new coins get totally fucked up. The skilled dev will tweak the difficulty re-targeting algorithm accordingly and the shitty dev will swap to ETH tokens. It's a hardening process, perhaps a hammer not a sword is a better analogy.
|
|
|
|
invicta
Member
Offline
Activity: 194
Merit: 10
|
|
November 28, 2017, 12:41:58 PM |
|
I've added the -allpools 1 option, we'll see if that changes anything... As for mining on NH it's a double edged sword, It really does pay nicely even if new coins get totally fucked up. The skilled dev will tweak the difficulty re-targeting algorithm accordingly and the shitty dev will swap to ETH tokens. It's a hardening process, perhaps a hammer not a sword is a better analogy. What do you expect 'allpools 1' will do? Nicehash is also good for getting paid in BTC without owning ASICs. Finally, Thor's hammer was smashed by Hela recently - how does that fit into the analogy
|
|
|
|
|