Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2024, 04:58:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 [277] 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2144987 times)
ikicha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 788
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 09:25:45 AM
 #5521

v11 is way more stable than a previous once. Rigs going for days. Now if only the speed would get closer to competition.

Agree with you
V.11 is stable and i get higher hashrate, previous version i get 700 H/s for RX570, now i get about 800-850 H/s
Great job for dev, always better  Smiley
ilmoro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 10:32:08 AM
 #5522

Hi, RX 570 owner. Tried to mine Intensecoin but the batch stops just after the start. I cannot see any info except my batch string.

NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://intense.miningpools.us:3333 -u <wallet> -p x -allpools 1

Tried to add -dbg 1 but nothing changes, no log file has been generated.

I´m using Claymore´s Dual daily and it worked perfectly with ETH.

Any ideas?

Debug files are set to 1 by default. i use
Code:
-dgb -1
to disable it

Debug file are set to 0 by default and there is no reason to disable them with -1 in my case!
ilmoro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 11:00:39 AM
 #5523

Ok,this morning everything start running smooth!   Undecided
trooperx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 11:12:42 AM
 #5524

These cards are so random!  I've managed to get the Gigabyte RX580's up to around 890H/s.  But the new MSI Armor 580's with uber mix strap 3.1 are only pushing 818 H/s!!  I thought they would do much better.

This is a frustrating hobby!!

Apparently some folks don't have the compute option turned on.


edit:

I found this for all you folks who don't use Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit. Sad

Quote
   GPU Workload

    A new toggle in Radeon Settings that can be found under the "Gaming", "Global Settings" options. This toggle will allow you to switch optimization between graphics or compute workloads on select Radeon RX 500, Radeon RX 400, Radeon R9 390, Radeon R9 380, Radeon R9 290 and Radeon R9 285 series graphics products.

    Compute Support

    Radeon Software now supports compute workloads for up to 12 installed Radeon RX 400, Radeon RX 500 or Radeon RX Vega series graphics products on Windows®10 system configurations.
-- https://overclock3d.net/news/gpu_displays/amd_adds_compute_mode_and_support_for_up_to_12_different_gpus_with_their_latest_gaming_driver/1

edit2:

I bet MS had to twist their arm to get them to do that...
The drivers needed to use this option actually slowed my hash rates down!
carafleur
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


lost@bitcoinica.com


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:05:17 PM
 #5525

Firstly, thanks to Claymore for the improvements here! On most of my rx 470 4GB cards, I am seeing about a 3-4% increase in hash-rate!

However, I was hoping v11 would also alleviate an issue I've been seeing since starting to use v10.2 a while ago.  For some reason, GPU 0 on all 4 of my rigs acts very strangely... most of the time hashing well below the others... fluctuating between 0 and 450, while the other 5 are right at the 700 mark.  Now, if this were only on 1 rig I would think the GPU is going bad, but since it is the exact same GPU slot 0 on all 4 rigs, it is more likely some kind of setting that i need to tweak.

Has anyone else noticed this on their rigs?  If so, any suggestions on how to fix it?

FYI: after just upgrading all 4 rigs to v11.0, GPUs 1-5 are hashing better by about 3-4% but GPU 0 is still bad on all 4. Although, it doesn't seem to be fluctuating as much... pretty much stuck at 232 on 3 rigs and weirdly, 120 on the 4th.

Any help resolving this would be much appreciated!

When Claymore miner starts, you will see GPU0 has a few less MB than other same cards.
Code:
GPU #0: Pitcairn, 1975 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
GPU #1: Pitcairn, 1984 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
GPU #2: Pitcairn, 1984 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
GPU #3: Pitcairn, 1984 MB available, 20 compute units
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon 270/270X

Try to lower the -h parameter for GPU0

Thanks a ton for that tip! even though my GPU 0 was showing exactly the same MB available as other 5 GPUs I still gave your method a shot.  on startup, all were at -h value auto of 892, so I lowered GPU 0 to 812 as a test and it worked immediately!  Got that card up to 672 (from 120)!  I may play with it and inch up a bit but that's already a huge improvement! Now i will make that same change to my other rigs! Thanks again! Really appreciate it!

I'm glad to help !

Testing again and again when a card doesn't work like you think it should Wink
But sometimes a card is really lower than others : I have 2 Sph R9 290 ref board, one running at 700 H/s no matter how I overclock, the other at 810 H/s @1040/1500 . Flashing bios didn't help so far...

Anyway, if you feel like sending me some ETN, feel free to do so !
Code:
f4VR7QEKoHSNCosFG21EReQ3nS8TPxTUzHCzmFJ6trNe3KHG9rAKhq3F8AYWdLyCe7bLrPbKAX9seMhUmbRcCsxz9SBnNYMgfFk5JkJ9kqCst

Everyone have a lovely last 2017 day !

#Share #Data #Love

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true"
“Most certainly, some planets are not inhabited, but others are, and among these there must exist life under all conditions and phases of development.”

Tesla N
7anonminer7
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 01:29:40 PM
 #5526

v11 is way more stable than a previous once. Rigs going for days. Now if only the speed would get closer to competition.

Consider yourself lucky. This version keeps crashing my rig so it needs hard reset every 24 hours or even more frequently. I'm getting rid of it for now. Not to mention Claymore "realised" there was a "bug" that resulted in dropping old jobs with delay:

Check GPU load in gpu-z (must be 100% all the time).
I will do some tests in 1-2 days to confirm that the miner produces correct number of shares, though I already did it for v11.

UPD: It seems I found the reason, when pool sends new job, v11.0 drops old job too late (loses 1-2 sec). I have fixed this bug but it will take 1-2 days to test it properly and release an update. However, you can test a fix right now if you want and tell me if it helps:
https://mega.nz/#!TlYQAJSZ!291Swk4GbJLC5JYmax_fc-tLWjfwKsFTnOUSVGqsDlA

It's been almost 5 days and no update from Claymore.
Dpminer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 02:06:22 PM
 #5527

quick question,

do i need to have adl library installed for cclock and mclock to work ?

because the command for overclock are not working on my rigs.

any quick tuto to how to install adl library under ubuntu would be much apreciated!

Thank you
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 03:26:45 PM
 #5528

v11.1

- fixed issue with stale shares, now effective hashrate must be higher.
- a few minor improvements.

PS. Linux version will be available in a few days.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
December 31, 2017, 09:05:09 PM
 #5529

v11.1

- fixed issue with stale shares, now effective hashrate must be higher.
- a few minor improvements.

PS. Linux version will be available in a few days.

There's an issue with nicehash causing segmentation fault under Linux. I've had to stop using your miner because of it.


screen-shot:

Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 10:36:53 PM
 #5530

There's an issue with nicehash causing segmentation fault under Linux. I've had to stop using your miner because of it.

Ok I'll check it.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
December 31, 2017, 11:48:47 PM
 #5531

Is 11.1 can handle fan/temp/clocks info/control with new adrenalin 17.12.x drivers?
Coinerrr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 12:30:43 AM
 #5532

v11.1

- fixed issue with stale shares, now effective hashrate must be higher.
- a few minor improvements.

PS. Linux version will be available in a few days.

Is this the same as the one you posted earlier (updated) or is 11.1 different?
Grinner888
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 08:17:59 AM
 #5533

Anyone know why this can be?

XMR - Total Speed: 5537 H/s, Total Shares: 1(0+1+0+0+0+0), Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
XMR: GPU0 953 H/s, GPU1 953 H/s, GPU2 954 H/s, GPU3 770 H/s, GPU4 954 H/s, GPU5 953 H/s

Note the 770 (will go to 0 aswell), all same cards, all same bios all same clocks. With claymore 9.7 all fine. Anyone has an idea on how to crank this one up aswell?

check your afterburner settings, sometimes one card goes back to default
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 10:47:58 AM
 #5534

Is 11.1 can handle fan/temp/clocks info/control with new adrenalin 17.12.x drivers?

No. Fix from AMD is required, we have to wait it. Or I will have to do their job again and find some workaround.

Is this the same as the one you posted earlier (updated) or is 11.1 different?

It's different, a bit better.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 11:17:05 AM
 #5535

Is 11.1 can handle fan/temp/clocks info/control with new adrenalin 17.12.x drivers?

No. Fix from AMD is required, we have to wait it. Or I will have to do their job again and find some workaround.

Allready a month has passed. Maybe it's time to stop waiting AMD and find some workaround? It's the great chance that this AMD bug will stay a long time...
Spreader1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 12:01:15 PM
 #5536

Pls mister Claymore include RX 550 support (lexa) ; i have a lot of them and i get 420h/s with 9.7
i want more than maximum 10 gpu per sistem; and hopefully a little speed bump
Csouza
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 01:07:05 PM
 #5537

Pls mister Claymore include RX 550 support (lexa) ; i have a lot of them and i get 420h/s with 9.7
i want more than maximum 10 gpu per sistem; and hopefully a little speed bump


420 whit a 550 UAL!!!! what model of yours 550 ?
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 02:34:20 PM
 #5538

Is 11.1 can handle fan/temp/clocks info/control with new adrenalin 17.12.x drivers?
No. Fix from AMD is required, we have to wait it. Or I will have to do their job again and find some workaround.
Allready a month has passed. Maybe it's time to stop waiting AMD and find some workaround? It's the great chance that this AMD bug will stay a long time...

That's AMD... Ok I will create a workaround, it will take 1-2 days.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
iRonNuke
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 6


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 06:43:10 PM
 #5539

Anyone here running Claymore CryptoNote on Vega card(s)? What hashrates do you get? Any tweaks to get higher hashrates? I got a hashrate at 1680-1710, is that good or bad?
trooperx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2018, 06:50:35 PM
 #5540

I've got my MSI cards up to an acceptable hash rate but I'm seeing some GPU memory errors in HWINFO.  Despite the errors, the mining is stable and there are little to no rejected shares.  So if its mining away quite happily, do the GPU errors really matter?  I've read a few other places but opinions are very mixed on the subject.
Pages: « 1 ... 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 [277] 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!