|
www.www
|
 |
August 04, 2015, 04:02:50 PM |
|
> 10k after hard fork, anyway I like this project
50k+ with GUI.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
nioc
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:04:29 PM |
|
Yes all I get with the LucasJones miner is booooo for Moneromoo's pool and for Arux's I was getting booooo and now I get "Stratum connection failed: couldn't resolve host "http" (I have http://52.8.47.33 ) followed by :3333 |
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:05:53 PM |
|
Make sure with the lucasjones miner you use -a cryptonight-lite
I think with the some of the others ones it is misspelled as cryptonight-light
If you use the wrong algorithm and send bad share the pool will likely ban you, although MoneroMooo said he had temporarily disabled banning.
|
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:13:27 PM |
|
I am useing -a cryptonight-lite
|
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:16:29 PM |
|
I am useing -a cryptonight-lite
Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs? |
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:24:56 PM |
|
I am useing -a cryptonight-lite
Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs? No because of Arux's posting............... use non-AES-NI on old cpu (else you will get a message 'cpu not supported") That be LucasJones AFAIK. Wolf's non AES-NI never worked for me in the past. Back to work I go, ohhhh |
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:30:02 PM |
|
I am useing -a cryptonight-lite
Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs? No because of Arux's posting............... use non-AES-NI on old cpu (else you will get a message 'cpu not supported") That be LucasJones AFAIK. Wolf's non AES-NI never worked for me in the past. Back to work I go, ohhhh OK, I'll take a look at lucasjones and see I can find something. Check back later. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
|
August 04, 2015, 04:45:42 PM |
|
I was able to identify a half dozen bad nodes which when blocked cause virtually all of the errors to stop. I don't want to post IP addresses, but if you are having trouble with your log file getting too big and you are able to block IPs in a firewall, PM me and I'll send you the list.
Most errors now come from three IP addresses. Two of them belong to Minergate and the other to some russian private pool. Minergate is mining on his own invalid chain as you can see on their block explorer. |
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:13:02 PM |
|
Thanks to MoneroMooo who identified the bug in cpuminer-multi. I pushed the fix to my repo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arux
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:17:36 PM |
|
I am useing -a cryptonight-lite
Hmm. Maybe there is a bug in it. Did you try Wolfs? No because of Arux's posting............... use non-AES-NI on old cpu (else you will get a message 'cpu not supported") That be LucasJones AFAIK. Wolf's non AES-NI never worked for me in the past. Back to work I go, ohhhh my apologies, LucasJones binary don't work as expected. there is an error but i still don't know wich one. Wolf binaries are OK. AES-NI optimization for recent hardware and non AES-NI for older. |
|
|
|
|
Arux
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:20:32 PM |
|
Thanks to MoneroMooo who identified the bug in cpuminer-multi. I pushed the fix to my repo
ok, no time to build a new w64 binary now, i will see later. meanwhile, cpumine is ok on windows with wolf's binaries. |
|
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:23:32 PM |
|
Did you guys notify chainradar? It seems they are on the wrong fork. Height 592037Edit: I have dropped them a line. |
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:29:19 PM |
|
Did you guys notify chainradar? It seems they are on the wrong fork. Height 592037Edit: I have dropped them a line. Yes they've been notified, yes they are on the wrong fork. |
|
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
August 04, 2015, 05:45:32 PM |
|
AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!
I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 04, 2015, 06:29:55 PM |
|
Is http://aeonpool.mooo.com/ on the correct chain? My miner says it's detecting new blocks and finding shares, but the front page says no block found for an hour. This pool has what looks like the correct info on the front page: http://52.8.47.33:8080/You probably just need to do a proper browser refresh. I've seen pool stats not getting updated often (browser fault?). Mooo's pool is definitely on the correct chain, and it has found a few blocks since the fork (current round is an unlucky one though, at ~40 minutes at the moment). |
|
|
|
MoneroMooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1276
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 04, 2015, 06:36:57 PM |
|
Yes, it's as Myagui said. Last block 40 minutes ago. Blocks are now targetted a 4 minutes, and I've lost about half of the miner hash from people who haven't updated yet, so block finding rate on the pool has gone down a lot. On the plus side, we get 40 AEON per block instead of 10  I've seen the not-refreshing-problem, no idea what it is about as I'm not super clued in to Javascript/browser tech. |
|
|
|
|
|
nikos64
|
|
August 04, 2015, 06:37:13 PM |
|
AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!
I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...
AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads @4GHz is at 850 h/s. Claymore's can easily beat 1 Kh/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
August 04, 2015, 06:44:37 PM |
|
AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads using wolf's updated miner is giving ~700H/s. Thanks for compiling this for us losers still using windies!
I'd love an AMD GPU miner for windies. I'll go give the Claymore thread another nudge...
AMD FX-8320 with 8 threads @4GHz is at 850 h/s. Claymore's can easily beat 1 Kh/s. Mine is @3.5GHz. I'm trying to keep the heat and noise down |
|
|
|
|
|
BoscoMurray
|
|
August 04, 2015, 06:45:34 PM |
|
Is http://aeonpool.mooo.com/ on the correct chain? My miner says it's detecting new blocks and finding shares, but the front page says no block found for an hour. This pool has what looks like the correct info on the front page: http://52.8.47.33:8080/You probably just need to do a proper browser refresh. I've seen pool stats not getting updated often (browser fault?). Mooo's pool is definitely on the correct chain, and it has found a few blocks since the fork (current round is an unlucky one though, at ~40 minutes at the moment). Indeed, hard refresh did the job. Rookie mistake.. |
|
|
|
|
|
