Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2019, 05:09:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 ... 290 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] AEON [2018-11-30: update to 0.12.7.0+ ASAP; 0.12.8.0 on Windows]  (Read 587258 times)
joshafest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 370
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 04:33:29 PM
 #2321

ok...see on github

▄███████████████▄
▄██▀ ▀██▄
▄▄██▀ ▀██▄▄
█████▀▀ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄ ▀▀█████
██ ▄▀ ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄▀█▄▄ ██
▐█▌ ▄▀ ▄▀ ▄▄▄▀▀▀▄▀▀▀███ ▐█▌
██ ▄▀▄▀▄▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀█ ▄█▀ ██
▐█▌ █▄▀▄▀▄█▀▀▀ ▀█▀ ▄▀▄▀█ ▐█▌
██ █▄▀▄▀▄▄█▀ ▄▀ ▄▀▄▀▄▀█ ██
▐█▌ ▀▄█████▀▄▄▀▀▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀█ ▐█▌
██▌▀████▀██▄▄▀▀▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█▀ ▐██
██▌▀█▀▀█▄▀▀▄▀▀▄▄▀▄█▄▄█▀ ▐██
██▌ ▀ ▀███▄▄▄█████▀ ▐██
██▄ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▄██
▀██▄ ▄██▀
▀██▄ ▄██▀
▀██▄ ▄██▀
▀███▄███▀
▀███▀
DeepOnion
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!
TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED
Your Anonymity Guaranteed
Your Assets Secured by TOR
Guard Your Privacy!
|Bitcointalk
Reddit
Telegram
| ▄▄▀▄▄▀▄▄▀▄▀▀
▄▄██▀█▀▄▀▀▀
▄██▄█▄██▀
▄██████▀
▄██████▀
▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
██████▀▀▀▀▀██████▀
▀█████ ▄███████
████████████▀██
██▀███████▀ ██
██ ▀████▀ ██
██ ▀▀ ██
▀█████████████▀
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
americanpegasus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 05:03:01 PM
 #2322

jwinterm, i'm not a fan of the fuzzy versions but the clean one up top looks awesome!  i'd probably tweak it by lightening up the colors a little bit.  If we added a little brightness and contrast (to liven up the blue and grey) then we have a gorgeous logo on par with the serious technology that belies it.  Great work with this, and thanks.
  
I have high hopes for this blockchain in the future!  I'm sure we won't just serve as a valuable testbed for CN ideas but perhaps will even establish a personality of our own over time.

Account is back under control of the real AmericanPegasus.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1065



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 06:44:19 PM
 #2323

Pushed a fixed AEON miner to GitHub - reconnecting should work now. Also updated the example config.

Thanks Wolf0! Don't forget you still have a bounty coming. Once we get some tests that it does work it can be paid out.

smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1065



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 06:48:58 PM
 #2324

Looks like the network is getting pretty healthy. I see a lot more nodes including nodes some new nodes accepting incoming connections. Minergate is still >50% but down considerably from before. Please continue to deploy nodes and spread out the hash rate!

Arux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 500
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 09:47:09 PM
 #2325

updating binary of wolf's gpu miner at https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-aeon-miner/releases
reconnection to pool seems to be fine

Code:
[22:17:13] Stratum connection to pool timed out.
[22:17:14] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:14] Reconnected to pool... authenticating...
[22:17:14] Request: {"method": "login", "params": {"login": "WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41
hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs",
 "pass": "x", "agent": "wolf-xmr-miner/0.1"}, "id": 1}

[22:17:14] Reconnected to pool.
[22:17:14] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"8
19246329274028","job":{"blob":"0100cdded4b105ad43d30a2046242d15dd927ead7b922a69c
5f4e994fd1fdd5f3f1bb51d6ec40f000000007372d3433fc80a1330aaf15eafd5a18281c084e1b0a
f21c7bf76100c93e8729901","job_id":"711614679871127","target":"9bc42000"},"status
":"OK"}}

[22:17:18] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:18] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: Detected new job, regenerating
work.
[22:17:22] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: SHARE found (nonce 0x000007E3)!

[22:17:22] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s

[22:17:23] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "819246329274028", "jo
b_id": "711614679871127", "nonce": "e3070000", "result": "ae7d49d7b6333872a1fe63
ca4d4dee8ed92746879496dc27e6b0a139da770600"}, "id": 1}

[22:17:23] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status
":"OK"}}

[22:17:23] Share accepted: 9/10 (90.00%)

first test, for a unknown reason, i have some rejected shares
Code:
2015-10-31 22:36:49 [pool] (Thread 1) Retargetting difficulty 2000 to 4000 for WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 4 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 2 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:36:50 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) Rejected low difficulty share of 5 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:10 [pool] (Thread 1) Share trust broken by WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:21 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:21 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/12170 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/4302 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) height 623852, light 1
2015-10-31 22:37:25 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 4000/5383 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx


smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1065



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 09:59:53 PM
 #2326

I said why earlier - it says low diff share no matter what, but it's stale.

Does it send significantly more of these than other miners? If so it seems that might fail because if you send enough bad shares you probably get banned? (Mostly guessing as I don't know exactly how the pool software works.)

If it is comparable to other miners then I don't see a problem.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1065



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 10:21:51 PM
 #2327

Okay as long as it doesn't cause banning and the net hash rate is decent then it seems acceptable.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 1065



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 10:44:05 PM
 #2328

Okay as long as it doesn't cause banning and the net hash rate is decent then it seems acceptable.


It's not to me. I'll be fixing it.

Oh okay, that's even better. I misinterpreted your comment as suggesting it wasn't worth fixing. I look forward to the improved version then.
Arux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 500
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 10:53:01 PM
 #2329

i guess this one is a stale.
Code:
[23:21:13] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 546.02H/s
[23:21:13] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: Detected new job, regenerating work.
[23:21:13] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "128613995830528", "job_id": "553629737067967", "nonce": "741a0000", "result": "155f66bfda238ae34751b774af4b593d5ddac97b2dcaf2257f2441c2ce0cbaa2"}, "id": 1}
[23:21:13] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Low difficulty share"}}
[23:21:13] Share rejected ((null)): 46/49 (93.88%)
[23:21:13] Total Hashrate: 546.02H/s
[23:21:17] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 548.14H/s
[23:21:20] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: SHARE found (nonce 0x0000088E)!
[23:21:20] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tahiti: 545.88H/s
[23:21:22] Request: {"method": "submit", "params": {"id": "128613995830528", "job_id": "553629737067967", "nonce": "8e080000", "result": "4c9949095e8213cd9d7897cc2e779699703d8bf305f82bafef31202a1ffa0000"}, "id": 1}
[23:21:22] Got something: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}
[23:21:22] Share accepted: 47/50 (94.00%)
on this test, rejected are ~5% (vs 14% on the first run and ~0% with cpu miner)
still no problems with reconnection

@Wolf0 : i configured my 7950 with rawintensity at 2112 (max accepted before error -61) and worksize at 256. my hashrate look weak (comparing other report)

opennux
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 11:16:06 PM
 #2330

Looks like the network is getting pretty healthy. I see a lot more nodes including nodes some new nodes accepting incoming connections. Minergate is still >50% but down considerably from before. Please continue to deploy nodes and spread out the hash rate!


I'm amazed people still mine at minergate...

It was recommended in the OP up until just a few weeks ago.
Arux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 500
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 11:39:27 PM
 #2331

with rawintensity not divisible by worksize, i was banned from my pool. i wasn't aware it will cause issue.
Code:
2015-11-01 00:03:33 [pool] (Thread 1) Accepted valid share at difficulty 2000/41394 from WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
2015-11-01 00:03:33 [pool] (Thread 1) Banned WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

and now with rawintensity at 2048 and worksize at 16, hashrate is still weak 540h/s but rejected are less.
Code:
[00:28:29] Share accepted:  51/53 (96.23%)
[00:28:29] Total Hashrate: 542.37H/s

muchoman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 466
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 07:34:08 AM
 #2332

Miner is working now but it uses only 60% of the GPU and CPU usage is over 70%.
Arux
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 500
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 07:56:45 AM
 #2333

windows gpu miner is running for ~10 hours on my pool (var diff) without problems.
Code:
[08:48:08] Share accepted: 975/1072 (90.95%)
[08:48:08] Total Hashrate: 542.37H/s
if someone can confirm his % of accepted (perhaps my pool or windows build are the reason)

not tested if it's better on mooo's pool and if linux is faster.

cpu usage: 50% with peak at 80-90% every 3 seconds.
platform: win64 and hd7950, pentium g2030


muchoman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 466
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 08:13:56 AM
 #2334

Miner is working now but it uses only 60% of the GPU and CPU usage is over 70%.

What CPU, out of curiosity? I've not added a lot of sleeping code to it, so it likely does use a lot of CPU. Still, that sounds a tad high.

i5-3570k
280x and 270x
imihal44
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 08:14:41 AM
 #2335

Getting about 695 h/s on r9 280x....but how can get going other cards on rig...4 threads...or add device?
On r9 270x 4gb about 560 h/s
imihal44
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 08:38:49 AM
 #2336

Getting about 695 h/s on r9 280x....but how can get going other cards on rig...4 threads...or add device?
On r9 270x 4gb about 560 h/s

Add a device.

For example, my config file for Freya looks like this:

Code:
{
"Algorithms":
[
{
"name": "AEON",
"devices":
[
{
"index": 0,
"corefreq": 1000,
"memfreq": 1500,
"fanspeed": 65,
"powertune": 20,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 2672,
"worksize": 16
},
{
                    "index": 1,
                    "corefreq": 1000,
                    "memfreq": 1500,
                    "fanspeed": 65,
                    "powertune": 20,
                    "threads": 1,
                    "rawintensity": 2816,
                    "worksize": 16
                },
{
                    "index": 2,
                    "corefreq": 1000,
                    "memfreq": 1500,
                    "fanspeed": 65,
                    "powertune": 20,
                    "threads": 1,
                    "rawintensity": 2816,
                    "worksize": 16
                },
{
                    "index": 3,
                    "corefreq": 1000,
                    "memfreq": 1500,
                    "fanspeed": 65,
                    "powertune": 20,
                    "threads": 1,
                    "rawintensity": 2816,
                    "worksize": 128
                }

],
"pools":
[
{
"url": "stratum+tcp://aeonpool2.mooo.com:5577",
"user": "WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs",
"pass": "x"
}
]
}
]
}

Ok,will try it..thx Wolf0
BoscoMurray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 10:18:23 AM
 #2337

windows gpu miner is running for ~10 hours on my pool (var diff) without problems.
Code:
[08:48:08] Share accepted: 975/1072 (90.95%)
[08:48:08] Total Hashrate: 542.37H/s
if someone can confirm his % of accepted (perhaps my pool or windows build are the reason)

not tested if it's better on mooo's pool and if linux is faster.

cpu usage: 50% with peak at 80-90% every 3 seconds.
platform: win64 and hd7950, pentium g2030



I'm using a 7950 on Linux Mint Mate 17.2. The current miner gives around 680 H/s, so I've put the latest disconnect code into the original miner which gives me 700+ H/s. Even inside a PC case, with CPU also at 100%, the GPU runs at a cool 59c.

Code:
[09:56:52] Share accepted: 1240/1240 (100.00%)
[09:56:52] Total Hashrate: 701.72H/s

The driver I'm using is fglrx 14.40.1. My config:

Code:
"corefreq": 1000,
"memfreq": 1300,
"fanspeed": 65,
"powertune": 20,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 2048,
"worksize": 32

I'm mining AEON @ 900 H/s with an AMD FX-8320 at the same time. This drops to ~810 H/s when I start GPU mining at the same time.
BoscoMurray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 10:24:07 AM
 #2338

Miner is working now but it uses only 60% of the GPU and CPU usage is over 70%.

What CPU, out of curiosity? I've not added a lot of sleeping code to it, so it likely does use a lot of CPU. Still, that sounds a tad high.

i5-3570k
280x and 270x

What OS are you using and what tool is telling you 70%?

It's worth noting, in the Linux Mint that I use, System Monitor %CPU goes all the way up to 800% for CPU usage because I have an 8 core CPU. So if it showed 70% for me, that would be OK.
muchoman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 466
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 12:03:33 PM
 #2339

Miner is working now but it uses only 60% of the GPU and CPU usage is over 70%.

What CPU, out of curiosity? I've not added a lot of sleeping code to it, so it likely does use a lot of CPU. Still, that sounds a tad high.

i5-3570k
280x and 270x

What OS are you using and what tool is telling you 70%?

It's worth noting, in the Linux Mint that I use, System Monitor %CPU goes all the way up to 800% for CPU usage because I have an 8 core CPU. So if it showed 70% for me, that would be OK.

Only 280x and 270x are mining, CPU is not mining and usage is still 70%, it is not normal.
BoscoMurray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 12:53:50 PM
 #2340

Miner is working now but it uses only 60% of the GPU and CPU usage is over 70%.

What CPU, out of curiosity? I've not added a lot of sleeping code to it, so it likely does use a lot of CPU. Still, that sounds a tad high.

i5-3570k
280x and 270x

What OS are you using and what tool is telling you 70%?

It's worth noting, in the Linux Mint that I use, System Monitor %CPU goes all the way up to 800% for CPU usage because I have an 8 core CPU. So if it showed 70% for me, that would be OK.

Only 280x and 270x are mining, CPU is not mining and usage is still 70%, it is not normal.

Are you using Windows or Linux?
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 ... 290 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!