Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 11:42:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 ... 386 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet  (Read 679322 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Ense04
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 145
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 11:30:31 PM
 #3621

Diff is the highest its ever been, and rightfully so (thank you presstab). This is done to control inflation and help the price rise. It you want to stake at 10-11 days use 6000 coin blocks.


Vegas


6000k block at this point is a bad idea IMO. I hit max award on day 9 and I'm still waiting. Recommend 4000k block in case anyone is wondering what to do.
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 08, 2014, 11:54:31 PM
 #3622

Diff is the highest its ever been, and rightfully so (thank you presstab). This is done to control inflation and help the price rise. It you want to stake at 10-11 days use 6000 coin blocks.


Vegas


6000k block at this point is a bad idea IMO. I hit max award on day 9 and I'm still waiting. Recommend 4000k block in case anyone is wondering what to do.

Am I on the wrong wallet or something as the difficulty is at 2.1, no need for 6k blocks just yet Cheesy

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
billotronic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


Crackpot Idealist


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 11:56:40 PM
 #3623

Diff is the highest its ever been, and rightfully so (thank you presstab). This is done to control inflation and help the price rise. It you want to stake at 10-11 days use 6000 coin blocks.


Vegas


6000k block at this point is a bad idea IMO. I hit max award on day 9 and I'm still waiting. Recommend 4000k block in case anyone is wondering what to do.

Am I on the wrong wallet or something as the difficulty is at 2.1, no need for 6k blocks just yet Cheesy

well the difficulty fluctuates (and has been peaking crazy high) and I think what vegasguy was getting at is if your want your stake ASAP you HAVE to go with large block sizes (ie 6k)

This post sums up why all this bullshit is a scam
Read It. Hate It. Change the facts that it represents.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606638.msg16139644#msg16139644
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 08, 2014, 11:57:34 PM
 #3624

Ahhhh understood. Think 24/7 staking is a must now, seriously thinking of dropping some $$$ for a rasp pi staking setup.

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
chilly2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1007
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 01:07:39 AM
 #3625

Whats the minimum size block?  IE what size will just hit 1000 at day 30?  If anyone knows off the top of their heads or has a quick way to calculate it. 

         Thanks.

mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 01:26:20 AM
 #3626

Whats the minimum size block?  IE what size will just hit 1000 at day 30?  If anyone knows off the top of their heads or has a quick way to calculate it. 

         Thanks.

According to the stake calculator, I believe the minimum size block to hit the 1k reward after 30 days is 1623 HYP.

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
presstab (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:17:48 AM
 #3627

We have all been talking about an upcoming hard fork that will fix a few minor issues. I am now considering forking off of X11 hashes, and switching to a more light weight hashing algorithm. CrazyLoaf mentioned to me that blake is fairly light.  This would be quite easy to use because it is already in the code. What I would like everyone to do is to weigh in on their favorite algo. Keep in mind that the point is to lighten CPU load (having it hash 11 algo's is stupid for PoS). There is no reason to make hashing difficult, PoS provides the security. If hashing is difficult it adds PoW to a PoS only coin.

The current algo's in the code (I would prefer to use one of these, because of ease):

- blake512
- bmw512
- groestl512
- skein512
- jh512
- keccak512
- luffa512
- cubehash512
- shavite512
- simd512
- echo512

Look forward to hearing some opinions Tongue

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 02:33:20 AM
 #3628

Wait so now HYP make fork into a POW/POS like TEK if I understood that correctly? And if so, I'm most familiar with skein, groestl, and blake, all good algos.

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:40:50 AM
 #3629

@presstab, I know nothing about algorithms.  You say you want to lighten the CPU load yet HYP only uses 1.5% of my CPU and 67MB RAM.  I have a newer pentium which ain't much, running windows 8.1
presstab (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:45:15 AM
 #3630

Wait so now HYP make fork into a POW/POS like TEK if I understood that correctly? And if so, I'm most familiar with skein, groestl, and blake, all good algos.

No just thinking about switching the PoS hashing algo. Not add PoW. This is just a conversation at this point. Is it worth switching PoS algo's for any reason?

I wanted feedback from the community. Thats all Tongue

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
iantunc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 250


We are the first to program your future (c)


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:46:27 AM
 #3631

@presstab, I know nothing about algorithms.  You say you want to lighten the CPU load yet HYP only uses 1.5% of my CPU and 67MB RAM.  I have a newer pentium which ain't much, running windows 8.1

As for me, it's a very nice idea. It will let people keep the wallet on VPS without an additional overhead, that can lead to server cancellation.

HyperStake bootstrap server - hyperstrap.ml
HyperStake supply gain prediction graph - hypsupply.ml
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:11:34 AM
 #3632

Wait so now HYP make fork into a POW/POS like TEK if I understood that correctly? And if so, I'm most familiar with skein, groestl, and blake, all good algos.

No just thinking about switching the PoS hashing algo. Not add PoW. This is just a conversation at this point. Is it worth switching PoS algo's for any reason?

I wanted feedback from the community. Thats all Tongue

I didn't know POS systems used an algo... I thought it was just like simulations of mining if you wanted to look at it in technical terms. Well if it's to lighten the CPU load, shouldn't you just in theory use the "easiest" algo (AKA gpu accelerated) and go with SHA-256 (or whatever algo is more ASIC friendly?).

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
presstab (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Blockchain Developer


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 03:12:05 AM
 #3633

One thing I am looking into is how much x11 is actually involved. It looks like the actual coinstake hashing done for PoS is all in SHA256, so this is not doing 11 algos per coinstake hash. At least if my reading of the code is correct.  Hopefully will have more info about this later.

Projects I Contribute To: libzerocoin | Veil | PIVX | HyperStake | Crown | SaluS
billotronic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


Crackpot Idealist


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 03:15:13 AM
 #3634

We have all been talking about an upcoming hard fork that will fix a few minor issues. I am now considering forking off of X11 hashes, and switching to a more light weight hashing algorithm. CrazyLoaf mentioned to me that blake is fairly light.  This would be quite easy to use because it is already in the code. What I would like everyone to do is to weigh in on their favorite algo. Keep in mind that the point is to lighten CPU load (having it hash 11 algo's is stupid for PoS). There is no reason to make hashing difficult, PoS provides the security. If hashing is difficult it adds PoW to a PoS only coin.

The current algo's in the code (I would prefer to use one of these, because of ease):

- blake512
- bmw512
- groestl512
- skein512
- jh512
- keccak512
- luffa512
- cubehash512
- shavite512
- simd512
- echo512

Look forward to hearing some opinions Tongue

whoa hey there cowboy.

half those I do not think have been solo in a coin. Could maybe we do a test net sex test against a few to see what would be the most beneficial?

This post sums up why all this bullshit is a scam
Read It. Hate It. Change the facts that it represents.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606638.msg16139644#msg16139644
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:21:29 AM
 #3635

What is a "test next sex test"?

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
mtwelve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1009



View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:24:30 AM
 #3636

BTW if you haven't already, please follow the HYP twitter.

https://twitter.com/HyperStake

Please retweet and interact with tweets, will help spread awareness of the coin Smiley

HIRE ME FOR SEO, SOCIAL MEDIA, COPYWRITING, AND MORE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100134.0
iantunc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 250


We are the first to program your future (c)


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 03:43:36 AM
 #3637

@presstab

Is it necessary to do a hard fork for the reason of few minor issues? It can create a lot of difficulties for users (all previous versions of the wallet will become obsolete), probably more than these issues themselves Smiley Wouldn't it be better to include these fixes in some critical update?

HyperStake bootstrap server - hyperstrap.ml
HyperStake supply gain prediction graph - hypsupply.ml
David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 03:52:46 AM
Last edit: December 09, 2014, 04:06:55 AM by David Latapie
 #3638

@presstab

Is it necessary to do a hard fork for the reason of few minor issues? It can create a lot of difficulties for users (all previous versions of the wallet will become obsolete), probably more than these issues themselves Smiley Wouldn't it be better to include these fixes in some critical update?
I think what presstab meant is "in the context of the hardfork we will have in several months, here one more thing to consider while we're at it". But the wording looked like "we will hard fork mostly for this", which is not the case.

Regarding algo
- presstab: I asked Wolf his opinion. I believe neoscrypt is the lightest to date. jwinterm on IRC proposed... SHA256 and smooth siphash, and mod (never heard of them)
- others: we won't go to PoW/PoS. But HYP is not a pure PoS (it is a PoW/PoS with a PoW phase that has ended), so it still has a dead weight, the now-useless PoW algo. presstab is trying to minimise the impact of the dead weight by using as light a PoW algo as possible (ideally, we would remove the PoW entirely, but code-wise, it would be a major work for not much advantages).

Update: Print_ proposed m7m and yescrypt.

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
December 09, 2014, 04:31:00 AM
Last edit: December 09, 2014, 04:50:44 AM by smooth
 #3639

smooth siphash, and mod (never heard of them)

To clarify I had no idea what the "hash" was being used for in the conversation. mod is of course no good for security purposes at all.

We discussed some more in IRC. It seems the thing to do is get rid of x11 for block hashing (maybe -- if that even matters). Not sure what is being used for PoS so it may or may not be worth changing at all.
David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
December 09, 2014, 04:31:46 AM
 #3640

OK guys, what we are working on for Monero (among other things)

Instead of sending to pAvP3gYfuyDVbUt98ToMbwU9rwEdBV1dHW
You could send to hyperstake.com

How this magic? Openalias (entry on the Monero FAQ)

Now, the nice thing is that it works with any crypto, as long as the wallet allows it.

And there is one more good thing about it, but I'll keep it secret for some time. Just trust me on this one Smiley

Regarding code, I'll talk with presstab.

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 ... 386 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!