Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

How well does any average person understand E=mc²? Who understands the math of Big Bang Theory? Many scientific theories, including the two listed, are gobbledygook to average people. But people can see intelligent design in everything - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsHkfWr5TEo - even if they don't want to recognize the Designer.

To suggest that God doesn't have scientific proof, is to suggest that one had found out just about everything about everything.

oh jeezus ...seriously dude?
intelligent design?
a youtube link to some clown interview... very convincing ...  SMFH
... "it's not so much about hunches... its about growing up, running around in the woods...blah blah miraculous blah blah"..  oh ffs ...I had to shut off the nonsense after that.

hey your fellow nutter notbatshitcrazyman posts youtube links on a 500+ page btctalk  thread too..so they must be true.
(Yeah ok, so you're not quite at 500 pages ....I rounded up)

Just because you can't understand the machinery applications in the cells of living creatures, doesn't mean it isn't there. Wake up and understand that all of our machines come from watching the machines in nature operate, or from using them. Machines have designers and makers. Why would you think that it is different with the machines of nature? You really need to start studying science before you make a fool out of yourself with silly words like you posted, above.

[1714900612]

1714900612

[1714900612]

1714900612

[1714900612]

1714900612

[1714900612]

1714900612

[BADecker]

He still believed in a god, just not a personified textbook man in the sky.

When I was young, I believed in God's existence. Now I don't have to believe God exists, because I know, because science has proven it.

[BADecker]

What do you mean 101 proofs of God?

Only 1 definitive proof of the existence of God would be necessary and this will never happen.

You can not prove non existence of something that doesn't exist.

Read some Richard Dawkins books and try prove to me that there isn't a spaghetti monster somewhere far out in deep space which of course is my God.

Science can never prove or disprove the existence of God, but if we use our beliefs as an excuse to draw conclusions that scientifically, we’re not ready for, we run the grave risk of depriving ourselves of what we might have come to truly learn.

Science proves that outer space exists. What is outer space? It is nothing, emptiness. How does science prove that space exists? By examining the relationships between objects in space... not by grabbing "nothing" and analyzing it.

In a similar way, we don't grab God and examine Him. Rather, we scientifically look at the relationships between cause and effect, entropy, and complexity. From those relationships we understand that God has to exist, or those 3 things wouldn't exist as they do.

[Astargath]

How well does any average person understand E=mc²? Who understands the math of Big Bang Theory? Many scientific theories, including the two listed, are gobbledygook to average people. But people can see intelligent design in everything - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsHkfWr5TEo - even if they don't want to recognize the Designer.

To suggest that God doesn't have scientific proof, is to suggest that one had found out just about everything about everything.

oh jeezus ...seriously dude?
intelligent design?
a youtube link to some clown interview... very convincing ...  SMFH
... "it's not so much about hunches... its about growing up, running around in the woods...blah blah miraculous blah blah"..  oh ffs ...I had to shut off the nonsense after that.

hey your fellow nutter notbatshitcrazyman posts youtube links on a 500+ page btctalk  thread too..so they must be true.
(Yeah ok, so you're not quite at 500 pages ....I rounded up)

Just because you can't understand the machinery applications in the cells of living creatures, doesn't mean it isn't there. Wake up and understand that all of our machines come from watching the machines in nature operate, or from using them. Machines have designers and makers. Why would you think that it is different with the machines of nature? You really need to start studying science before you make a fool out of yourself with silly words like you posted, above.

''Machines have designers and makers'' prove it.

[Maksim Larov]

God only exists in our heart.

[BADecker]

''Machines have designers and makers'' prove it.

Perhaps you could prove that you posted the above, first.

 

[Bangete]

the proof is our existence ... it's one of them

[Astargath]

''Machines have designers and makers'' prove it.

Perhaps you could prove that you posted the above, first.

 

Not all machines have designers or makers, therefore machines don't always need them so your argument is trash.

[Home stay]

The title is fake itself.
Or I can show more scientific proof that God do not exist.

[kwakgyimah]

There is no need to use scientific knowledge to proof that God exist, those who believe God have their reasons why they do. The same applies to the other school of thought.

[SeriosSam]

Another fiction seems to me, because I basically do not believe in this theory!

[BADecker]

''Machines have designers and makers'' prove it.

Perhaps you could prove that you posted the above, first.

 

Not all machines have designers or makers, therefore machines don't always need them so your argument is trash.

Show us a machine that doesn't have a designer.   

[BADecker]

The title is fake itself.
Or I can show more scientific proof that God do not exist.

Show us proof that God isn't spending time, right now, on a planet circling the Star Sirius. If you can't show this proof, how do you know that He doesn't exist there, or somewhere else?

[BADecker]

There is no need to use scientific knowledge to proof that God exist, those who believe God have their reasons why they do. The same applies to the other school of thought.

There are two basic lines of thought about God, here. The first is that God exists. The second has to do with believing Him. Can a person believe God, or believe in Him, without knowing that He exists? Can they believe Him if they only believe that He exists, but do not know that He does?

The title is to the point: scientific proof that God exists. It doesn't have anything to do with believing Him, or believing in Him. Even the OP is about proof that He exists.

[BADecker]

Another fiction seems to me, because I basically do not believe in this theory!

But you are talking religion. You say "believe" and "theory." "Believe" suggests religion. Is the "theory" you talk about a scientific one? Or is it non-scientific? What is the wording of this theory?

This topic is about scientific proof.

[Astargath]

''Machines have designers and makers'' prove it.

Perhaps you could prove that you posted the above, first.

 

Not all machines have designers or makers, therefore machines don't always need them so your argument is trash.

Show us a machine that doesn't have a designer.   

A cell. Plants, animals, etc etc.

[cescudero95]

Which post number do you think has the most compelling proof, if any?

[Vod]

Which post number do you think has the most compelling proof, if any?

Proof of god does not exist.  Religion is faith - what you think.  It has nothing to do with reality.  If it doesn't exist it cannot be proven.

[John.lenny]

There must be someone some architect or someone else call it however you want, someone who created all this. Created us humans, created every single living creature on Earth. You can't really think it is created based on some luck.

[pasabaringin]

depending on their respective religions and beliefs to believe ...