runeks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 04:51:36 PM |
|
I'm interested in buying some 84-day puts, issued on btct.co.
I'm thinking a strike price of 2.0 for a premium of 0.35 BTC per contract.
Anyone interested?
If ASICMiner shares stay above 2.0, that's a 65% annualized return - about double what ASICMiner is currently yielding.
Wow, this looks familiar. I might be interested - Are these American or European execution? 84 days out is a century in BTC land They are American.
|
|
|
|
conv3rsion
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:14:47 PM |
|
A couple things I'd like to bring up
1) The franchising model only makes sense if you believe that you have the capability to obtain a dangerously high portion of the network
2) AM has been better at the supply chain game than anyone else in the market. BFL raised much more money and developed better performing technology but they couldn't ship shit. I wonder if actually being in China matters... oh right it does.
3) Exponentially increased devices means exponentially increased devices. Friedcat hasn't made a lot of promises that he hasn't come through on. He has a distinct advantage in component pricing and sourcing.
At the end of the day, the question is do you think AM can mine with, sell, or franchise a combined 10-20% of future BTC.
I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:24:19 PM |
|
1) The franchising model only makes sense if you believe that you have the capability to obtain a dangerously high portion of the network
It is also a way to get decentralization "for free" of a mining farm. Thus it reduces dependance over local power outage, physical or digital security breaches, etc.
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:33:59 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer?
|
|
|
|
conv3rsion
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:39:23 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can.
|
|
|
|
runeks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1008
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 07:48:42 PM |
|
Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in.
At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can.
Then sell me some puts.  Unless you think dividends will surpass 0.029 on average for the next 12 weeks. I'm interested in buying some 84-day puts, issued on btct.co.
I'm thinking a strike price of 2.0 for a premium of 0.35 BTC per contract.
Anyone interested?
If ASICMiner shares stay above 2.0, that's a 65% annualized return - about double what ASICMiner is currently yielding.
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 08:01:32 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. Oh! I see. When you said "I think they are about to absolutely crush it" you meant "I think they need to halve in price before they will be worth buying."
|
|
|
|
deltanine
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 08:04:34 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. Oh! I see. When you said "I think they are about to absolutely crush it" you meant "I think they need to halve in price to be worth buying." Vycid purposely playing dumb here. How could you draw that out of what he said? You've made some legit posts before that make an investor think more deeply about their investments. This was not one of them.
|
Freedom is a state of mind, and then Bitcoin comes along..... -S4VV4S
|
|
|
conv3rsion
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 08:14:54 PM |
|
Oh! I see. When you said "I think they are about to absolutely crush it" you meant "I think they need to halve in price before they will be worth buying."
I'm not a trader, I'm a value investor. The fact that a few weeks of reduced dividends (where the reason stated for the reduction was reinvestment) scared people into dumping their shares has NOTHING to do with the company's performance or long term prospects. Reduced dividends I might add that STILL are averaging 40% APR on the current price. You're lucky that your put options were able to be executed during their window, after all the price did MORE THAN DOUBLE since the time you began selling them. Avalon failed amazingly to ship their chips, BFL failed so horribly that they had to start preorders for yet another product (without their merchant account), and no other company still to this day can sell me an asic miner that will ship this week. Its september BTW. Yet, a bunch of soon to be defunct mining companies (many of which invested in those failed avalon chips and BFL orders) sprung up and people got antsy and put bets on them. Round one is over. AM made a fuck load of money. I'm happy I own shares for round two.
|
|
|
|
oolrzr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 08:26:49 PM |
|
I thought that Asicminer sent 1 satoshi per share to identify how many shares belong to each address. 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF looks like the address used to send both dividend payments and satoshis, but it looks like the satoshis stopped being sent after 2013-05-29 ( https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF?offset=100&filter=0). Did they stop doing this? Isn't this the only official way to verify ownership of shares?
|
|
|
|
rdponticelli
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Our highest capital is the Confidence we build.
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 09:10:27 PM |
|
I thought that Asicminer sent 1 satoshi per share to identify how many shares belong to each address. 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF looks like the address used to send both dividend payments and satoshis, but it looks like the satoshis stopped being sent after 2013-05-29 ( https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF?offset=100&filter=0). Did they stop doing this? Isn't this the only official way to verify ownership of shares? The reception of the dividends is all the proof that's needed. They stopped sending the satoshis to avoid embedding dust into the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
oolrzr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 10:00:26 PM |
|
I thought that Asicminer sent 1 satoshi per share to identify how many shares belong to each address. 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF looks like the address used to send both dividend payments and satoshis, but it looks like the satoshis stopped being sent after 2013-05-29 ( https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF?offset=100&filter=0). Did they stop doing this? Isn't this the only official way to verify ownership of shares? The reception of the dividends is all the proof that's needed. They stopped sending the satoshis to avoid embedding dust into the blockchain. Well, to get more to the point, I got a dividend payment, but it came from 16fuoinLFjBmiCYmCYDXPNfERJtdPB5ASe, not from 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF directly. So am I a shareholder, or is someone holding the shares for me?
|
|
|
|
hlynur
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 10:47:45 PM |
|
I thought that Asicminer sent 1 satoshi per share to identify how many shares belong to each address. 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF looks like the address used to send both dividend payments and satoshis, but it looks like the satoshis stopped being sent after 2013-05-29 ( https://blockchain.info/address/115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF?offset=100&filter=0). Did they stop doing this? Isn't this the only official way to verify ownership of shares? The reception of the dividends is all the proof that's needed. They stopped sending the satoshis to avoid embedding dust into the blockchain. Well, to get more to the point, I got a dividend payment, but it came from 16fuoinLFjBmiCYmCYDXPNfERJtdPB5ASe, not from 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF directly. So am I a shareholder, or is someone holding the shares for me? list of direct shares is not up to date but check here if you bought before 07/31: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtqphFCP56ordGVCakJxSU90MlB4MlBkZENya25pS2c#gid=9i have direct shares and since 07/31 divs come from 16fuoinLFjBmiCYmCYDXPNfERJtdPB5ASe, before it was 115tTroRo3B9ZDQ6ATJGDCHcNEVbjJoZnF
|
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 11:12:51 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. This is an ABSURD statement. 2 BTC/share suggests a company value/market cap of 800k BTC. Typically that means we should see 800k BTC in profit over 10 years (about average for a fairly valued company, factoring in growth). The block reward will halve to 12.5 in 2016, and again in 2020 to 6.25. Currently there are about 1.3M BTC up for grabs per year. So the potential REVENUE given 5% mining share is around (3 + 4 * .5 + 3 *.25) * 1.3M * 5% = 374k, less than half what we need for fair value. But we need PROFIT. ASICs cost money to manufacture and take electricity to run. Long term I expect the margins to drop to 20% or below. If you're gonna give me some crap about "transaction fees" you are not a value investor, you are a speculator. There is no evidence to suggest transaction fees are going to increase to a significant level.
|
|
|
|
chriswilmer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 11:22:17 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. This is an ABSURD statement. 2 BTC/share suggests a company value/market cap of 800k BTC. Typically that means we should see 800k BTC in profit over 10 years (about average for a fairly valued company, factoring in growth). The block reward will halve to 12.5 in 2016, and again in 2020 to 6.25. Currently there are about 1.3M BTC up for grabs per year. So the potential REVENUE given 5% mining share is around (3 + 4 * .5 + 3 *.25) * 1.3M * 5% = 374k, less than half what we need for fair value. But we need PROFIT. ASICs cost money to manufacture and take electricity to run. Long term I expect the margins to drop to 20% or below. If you're gonna give me some crap about "transaction fees" you are not a value investor, you are a speculator. There is no evidence to suggest transaction fees are going to increase to a significant level. You are ignoring hardware sales, which can increase the bitcoins above what is mined (essentially what ASICMiner is doing right now, making more profit from hardware sales than from mining). Also, I fully expect transaction fees to become significant. Right now transactions fees are ~0.3-5 btc per block, and I am expecting the number of transactions per second to increase by 2-3 orders of magnitude over the next decade (as anyone who is bullish on bitcoin would). Since the value of BTC also go up, the transaction fees will go down, but not in a way that would equally compensate. Obviously we can't know how that dynamic will play out exactly, but seeing transaction fees adding up to 10-20 BTC per block is entirely reasonable to me. More to the point, however, is that bitcoin mining hardware is certainly going to be in demand 10 years from now (assuming bitcoin has not died) and so if ASICMiner is still selling hardware then, that might be a very significant source of revenue (above bitcoin mining). Don't start telling me "you can't predict what's going to happen 10 years from now" because that is just what you are doing, and I am suggesting an alternative (and in my opinion more likely) scenario.
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
 |
September 05, 2013, 11:44:45 PM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. This is an ABSURD statement. 2 BTC/share suggests a company value/market cap of 800k BTC. Typically that means we should see 800k BTC in profit over 10 years (about average for a fairly valued company, factoring in growth). The block reward will halve to 12.5 in 2016, and again in 2020 to 6.25. Currently there are about 1.3M BTC up for grabs per year. So the potential REVENUE given 5% mining share is around (3 + 4 * .5 + 3 *.25) * 1.3M * 5% = 374k, less than half what we need for fair value. But we need PROFIT. ASICs cost money to manufacture and take electricity to run. Long term I expect the margins to drop to 20% or below. If you're gonna give me some crap about "transaction fees" you are not a value investor, you are a speculator. There is no evidence to suggest transaction fees are going to increase to a significant level. You are ignoring hardware sales, which can increase the bitcoins above what is mined (essentially what ASICMiner is doing right now, making more profit from hardware sales than from mining). I am not ignoring hardware sales. They are just a suboptimal business decision when you have 5% of the hashrate. People will not intentionally buy hardware at a loss, so it is a better deal to run your own hardware. FC is leveraging sales at the moment because the margins are insane and he knows he'd better cash in before the competition squeezes him out. Plus he needs the operational cash to make more hardware. Going forward the prices will drop, margins will thin, and price wars will ensue (we have already seen how much AM has already slashed prices; that is all lost profit per unit). Also, I just looked at the last 7 blocks. All tx fees between 0.01 and 0.4. I suspect you are full of shit with "0.3 - 5 BTC"
|
|
|
|
chriswilmer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 06, 2013, 02:14:42 AM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. This is an ABSURD statement. 2 BTC/share suggests a company value/market cap of 800k BTC. Typically that means we should see 800k BTC in profit over 10 years (about average for a fairly valued company, factoring in growth). The block reward will halve to 12.5 in 2016, and again in 2020 to 6.25. Currently there are about 1.3M BTC up for grabs per year. So the potential REVENUE given 5% mining share is around (3 + 4 * .5 + 3 *.25) * 1.3M * 5% = 374k, less than half what we need for fair value. But we need PROFIT. ASICs cost money to manufacture and take electricity to run. Long term I expect the margins to drop to 20% or below. If you're gonna give me some crap about "transaction fees" you are not a value investor, you are a speculator. There is no evidence to suggest transaction fees are going to increase to a significant level. You are ignoring hardware sales, which can increase the bitcoins above what is mined (essentially what ASICMiner is doing right now, making more profit from hardware sales than from mining). I am not ignoring hardware sales. They are just a suboptimal business decision when you have 5% of the hashrate. People will not intentionally buy hardware at a loss, so it is a better deal to run your own hardware. FC is leveraging sales at the moment because the margins are insane and he knows he'd better cash in before the competition squeezes him out. Plus he needs the operational cash to make more hardware. Going forward the prices will drop, margins will thin, and price wars will ensue (we have already seen how much AM has already slashed prices; that is all lost profit per unit). Also, I just looked at the last 7 blocks. All tx fees between 0.01 and 0.4. I suspect you are full of shit with "0.3 - 5 BTC" Sorry, I thought it was clear that I meant 0.3 - 0.5 btc per block (which is in line with what you found).
|
|
|
|
Vycid
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
♫ the AM bear who cares ♫
|
 |
September 06, 2013, 02:41:42 AM |
|
TLDR; I think they are about to absolutely crush it.
"Guys, where's the money for 0.04 per share gonna come from?" "Volume!" Hahahahaha.  Quoting this for the future. I do. That's why I'm a buyer again.
Remind me, when were you not a buyer? Around 4 I was a holder, not a buyer. I'm pretty damn comfortable with 20% annual ROI, but I also have other things I want to invest in. At 2 btc, its a question of whether Friedcat can mine and sell 5% of the network, and I'm pretty comfortable that he can. This is an ABSURD statement. 2 BTC/share suggests a company value/market cap of 800k BTC. Typically that means we should see 800k BTC in profit over 10 years (about average for a fairly valued company, factoring in growth). The block reward will halve to 12.5 in 2016, and again in 2020 to 6.25. Currently there are about 1.3M BTC up for grabs per year. So the potential REVENUE given 5% mining share is around (3 + 4 * .5 + 3 *.25) * 1.3M * 5% = 374k, less than half what we need for fair value. But we need PROFIT. ASICs cost money to manufacture and take electricity to run. Long term I expect the margins to drop to 20% or below. If you're gonna give me some crap about "transaction fees" you are not a value investor, you are a speculator. There is no evidence to suggest transaction fees are going to increase to a significant level. You are ignoring hardware sales, which can increase the bitcoins above what is mined (essentially what ASICMiner is doing right now, making more profit from hardware sales than from mining). I am not ignoring hardware sales. They are just a suboptimal business decision when you have 5% of the hashrate. People will not intentionally buy hardware at a loss, so it is a better deal to run your own hardware. FC is leveraging sales at the moment because the margins are insane and he knows he'd better cash in before the competition squeezes him out. Plus he needs the operational cash to make more hardware. Going forward the prices will drop, margins will thin, and price wars will ensue (we have already seen how much AM has already slashed prices; that is all lost profit per unit). Also, I just looked at the last 7 blocks. All tx fees between 0.01 and 0.4. I suspect you are full of shit with "0.3 - 5 BTC" Sorry, I thought it was clear that I meant 0.3 - 0.5 btc per block (which is in line with what you found). Let me document it this time: prior 7 blocks starting from this one (newest as of right now) http://blockchain.info/block-index/414784/00000000000000040d3bd18e95ccb4c089bafaa4667f70efec145ae517e73e770.07420021 BTC 0.2445046 BTC 0.33552803 BTC 0.25201038 BTC 0.19562 BTC 0.18380026 BTC 0.19215369 BTC Only one of those is even in the 0.3-0.5 range. If someone would write a quick script and find the average over the past month that would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
penta
Member

Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 20
|
 |
September 06, 2013, 04:20:51 AM |
|
hm at current prices AM looks really strong. 40% APY 2btc price 0.014divs , with room for growth(1000ths) JD is around 35% atm with around 5k avg wagered and 50k invested, and their wagered has been declining. any better place to invest your btc?
|
|
|
|
|