Maybe they're trying to get to the bottom of this situation before reaching out to you with a concrete answer. I'd suggest we wait a little while.


I am not sure about fixedfloat, but binance allows account freezing if you can give them an official investigation letter from your local police and you can connect the dots [they provide a table for this] that prove the address used by the scammer is one of theirs. Maybe he's referring to this authority, your local police.

Not only the mod deleted the thread, the account also got banned, nice work.



Strangely, seclog did not shows any change in password and/or email, so I don't think it's a hacked account, but their past post history shows some interest in the topic, I can't fathom why they change course and decided to try their luck in scamming people.

Oh? The instruction was visible on the original screenshot of their internal chat where he asked for an account to be locked out of withdrawal and intiate a review,



Though it is not clear whether he's talking about demoanique7 or mookis, and can be argued that it's demonanique's that's being instructed to be locked, mookis faced the same situation, for the reason that's later became obvious as their representative explained to CG [available on the screenshot above this post].

One might argue that the representative probably just wanted to create a bad image for chips.gg, but it'll only be logical if they deliberately made it public instead of asking it to be private. And one might further argue that it's probably a reverse psychology, that the representative deliberately ask for it to be private so we think he's not with ill-intention, that he's a whistleblower. Yet, ultimately, Mookis's situation points to a conclusion that everything the representative said is valid. She got her withdrawal locked for no reason other than she win big on CT.

Further, chips.gg can always give their rebuttal by going back online to the forum with their account, as we can be quite sure they're aware of the situation here [and if the representative was indeed fired, it's an even greater sure thing that they know the existence of this situation] from the time the situation raised, yet they're still being absent from giving their side.

Hi, can you please add supporting evidence for this case? The screenshot of that result will be nice, and screenshots of email with their support won't hurt [please cover all sensitive information]. N.exchange's account was online roughly one and a half month ago, though I don't think they'll address this issue.

Where is this information available? I can't find any part mentioning this unfortunate situation to the staff on CG. Also, have you hear back from the guy with 147k on their platform?

Stunna hasn't been online for a while, more than five months, I don't think sending them a PM will be beneficial and solve this case, given a very high probability the PM will not even be noticed.

Reading your reply to multiple questions, my initial thought when learning that you use GA as your 2FA and your email was not compromised was that maybe that hacker was someone close to you and bypassing your account by the security key that you probably wrote somewhere and store it in your home. But given the IP is from Norway... I think that's quite unlikely.


Stake has a representative that forward every case against them on this board to their team to be addressed, you probably want to try to PM him to get to the bottom of this issue, Symphonized, though he probably is already aware of this situation.

I usually gladly invite representatives of casinos to address an issue or to simply inform them about an open accusation against their platform, but on our previous exchange of PM, he informed me that he's well aware of every case against Stake and asked me to stop sending him PM for such matter. Thus I am not doing it in concern that my PM will be considered as unsolicited.

I came to suggest what piebeyb suggested, that although their support team are very attentive on solving cases lately, if you don't mind doing KYC and don't want to experience any [unforeseeable] trouble in the future, do it. It'll save you from a lot of unnecessary future headache.


Lemme try to get their support representative to address this in case he missed it.

But that number is not locked, you're not getting 4% the entire time you're playing. The number is constantly changing depending on so many factors during your play, there are possible scenarios where you'll get more than 4%

I have to agree, going AWOL in the middle of your case is not... nice. I have to re-read your thread to give me a refresher course and get reacquainted with your situation.

Let's try this again, on your previous and latest reply you said you have no problem uploading images, try to do that so other can understand your situation in more detail. Conversation with their live support and screenshot of your balance [if available, though I can understand if you don't have it, given they locked you out of your account] will be nice. Upload them to talkimg, I or someone else will quote your post for visibility.

Or, if you prefer to chase another path to solve this matter, have you tried to do what Razer suggested? That you address further concern to their legal team [legal@rollbit.com]. I have an impression that Rollbit [as in the casino, not the username] has bestowed this matter to their legal division and their live support can not peek into the progress due to the sensitive information being involved, thus you get the same reply as what you got months ago.

Is it possible that they bypassed the 2FA through this method? Is there a log on your email account that shows it's accessed from different location than yours? IF we amuse your assumption for a while that someone has access to your email, perhaps the details asked by their security team are readily available in your inbox?

It's already in place, those merit-cancelling rule doesn't work for AntiHero, just like last year. The votes for them are still in place in spite of the merit they gave. I think both of them did not read Gazeta's announcement about this matter,

I understand that one of your issue is with their mines? I might be wrong, but there was a case with Stake [not with FJ] where the complainant [the complaint was not valid, though] argued that their mines are rigged, upon being tested by multiple people through their provable platform, it actually gave fair results. It might be a simple misunderstanding, I'll hail FJ's representative to give their insight on this issue, please be patient for a moment and give them time to notice my PM

I think you missed the part where they confirmed that they don't have a script to calculate the hash? Perhaps on the first screenshot? Given your first and third are the same one [the chronology hinted that the order of the screenshot is as what I posted below and what's missing should be the first one. Can you please reupload that part of the conversation?



Edit: adding the first image

Yes, they know, that's basically what's being discussed here, that the site copied the original one. And no, it didn't work that way, sending private keys or password. They change the address you wrote on the message with their own, thus the fund sent by the recipient of the message will actually arrived at the scammer's wallet instead of the original message owner.

By this logic, OP's situation actually didn't favor him, because the rule has been established for around two years, and I think OP made his account only recently, thus signed up when the rules has been changed.



I noticed OP was not returned online both on this forum or on CG to address the development of the situation. I wonder if he finally did the KYC and got his account reinstated.

As other said, please upload the screenshots as evidence, it'll help to build a basis of your case. Meanwhile, this part caught my attention,


what exactly do you mean by uploaded a wrong picture for KYC? Like you mistakenly upload your friend's photo instead of yours? How?

The fake one is an ad, they paid some amount to google so their site can be shown on the top most result. Since google did not filter out scammers, it's a very common practice used by crypto scammers and phishing site to rob their victim. This is why crypto users, especially mixer users, are... ehm, I mean are-but-soon-will-be-were always encouraged to consult to the forum before they deal with a site they found on google search result, since scammers use this trick very often.

May I suggest we also ask for GekkeBelg's input? He's quite... vocal on the gambling section, and I think his first hand experience on this refund plan can be trusted, given he had submitted his request around a month ago.

Gekke, did you get anything yet?

Updating you both with the aforementioned case of Vainica, in case you both did not follow the thread and thus missed the follow-up I just made. The case was closed [verdict: rejected] by the request of the OP. With this, I think there's currently no more active case against BC.

OP, sorry to have a quite OOT post.