Bitmex' Fork Monitor is the only such tool I know of. See https://forkmonitor.info/notifications
I think that what you need to look for is the stale block candidates, but the data returned is only since 20 Aug 2020.

The risk is usually in human behavior.
The combination between people investing money they don't afford to lose and an unexpected new leg down for the price, maybe with some FUD as seasoning, is usually so bad it tends to end with selling at lower price than the coins were bought and with a grudge against bitcoin and bitcoiners. Such people will most probably never admit they've made a mistake, instead will call bitcoin a scam.
At least this is how I see these things...

I've read that post long ago (after all, it's from 2012), and I've found it funny and poetic.
Yes, especially at the country side, people still slaughter pigs for eating. In my early years (until up to some 15-17) my family did that too and I was participating to that (so I know the details pretty good). Also I went to the country side for this Christmas and the neighbors kids came from abroad too, hence they've slaughtered 3(!) pigs just before Christmas.

However
* I don't think that anybody is sharpening his knives on the bathroom's floor, it's counterproductive
* I've never seen borandau, it may be customary in other regions, I've seen others that weren't depicted there
* somehow he forgot to say clearly that each step/operation ends with booze
* the operation needs 4, preferably 5 men, one for each of the pig's legs and the 5th should have some training as a butcher (to find easily the hearth, to cut later the various parts, to handle the recipe for sausages - and taste the raw meat - and so on). I don't think that our guy could have been getting so much help there.
* the pig makes an awfully loud noise (obviously) and in US that would attract police and all the show

Of course, it's barbaric since the pig is alive and awake when the knife enter his hearth. Plus not all butchers know what they're doing. Plus some may be already drunk when they get the knife in their hands.
However, nowadays there are so many diseases even growing pigs around the house is risky. So I expect this habit will go into oblivion too in some more decades (sadly, because many great recipes will also die off).

Sorry, nothing comes to my mind. I've done the same in the settings of BitcoinTalk SuperNotifier, but there were only 5 names in that ignore list.


Well, although I do use the bpip extension in my browser, one doesn't need anything special to see (and click) the Ignore link in the user profiles in all their posts.
I don't think that anything more complicated (greasemonkey / custom scripts) would be needed.

The source is most probably https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
However, since bitcoin blockchain is public, anybody can make such a chart.

You seem even more confused than OP.
What you mean by "does it include 100% BTC holders data?" - I mean, do you think that bitcoin's blockchain cares (holds info) about any other assets?!
What you mean "I am holding some BTC in a private wallet"? Aren't all wallets private?! If it's a proper wallet, each address of yours will be counted in that list. If it's a custodial wallet, then it depends on many factors and, as I wrote in my first answer in this topic, in that case that's not your money anyway.

You should really read more, and you should focus on real info, not the exchange platforms' advertising.

---

Just think like that. You buy a device at under 100$ and it can hold any amounts of coins safely. Plus it's very easy and straightforward to use.
(Of course, depending whether you want to also hold shitcoins on it or not, you may have to be careful on what you buy.) Make a list of questions, ask if needed, clear up your mind and get your coins into safety.

Well, calling names is not really an olive branch 
However, you have to understand that you may not be able to change others' impressions/ideas/thoughts and move on. You can start afresh also by not caring that much about what others think. It's all about (your) mindset. (But I'm not saying anything new, isn't it?)


There's no rule for an "okay"  number , it's really up to people's standards and, very important, the forum subs one is reading or ignoring.
I have P&S and also Altcoins and some others too on ignore, hence my ignore list was not very big. It had though nearly 500 entries.
I've read about people who couldn't open that settings page when reaching bigger numbers (I think that it was 2000). And I think that there's a good chance that at least 1/4 of my list was already made of inactive or banned accounts.

Multumim, Gazeta, pentru anunt, multumim 1miau pentru concurs!
Este intr-adevar unul foarte interesant! Clar, am participat chiar acum.

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bnb

---

Ich weiß, dass BNB ein Shitcoin ist, ich weiß, dass sein Preis manipuliert ist, aber genau das kann seinen Preis gut aussehen lassen.
Danke @1miau für den Wettbewerb und die Einladung. Und sorry, wenn ich Schreibfehler gemacht habe.

1.
I agree with Edwardard. You seem to be misled. You say you're counting your balance, but you show the proof that the money you're counting is in others' pocket (in this case, Binance's).
That's technically not your money. That's money Binance has promised they will give back to you if you will withdraw. But you know, promises can be broken...

Most of my balance is in my own wallet. I won't lie, I have some at a centralized platform, but the amount is much smaller than yours.

2.
The chart means almost nothing in the context you've written, since a wallet can have more addresses and your chart is about addresses and not wallets.

3.
You should learn that it can be dangerous to tell publicly how much bitcoins you own. Internet is not forgetting and if bitcoin price jumps to $1M soon enough you may end up with bad people looking for you to get your coins that would then worth already $100k...

Let's stay in the Christmas spirit and not start flame wars here, please. It's not the purpose of this topic and it may force me lock it earlier than I intended.

No, I don't have plans to do this on each end of the year. Maybe in 4-5 years I'll do it again

Having people on ignore list means I didn't spend time reading posts with high chance to hold no value.
And I expect to have to put most of them back though the following months, excepting those who have became inactive and the very few that have improved.
Plus, if this becomes a rule, then it becomes more a standard than a Christmas surprise , which I also don't want to happen.

They may have been changing their ToS, but not their ways of working, or at least not significantly.
I've suggested that topic in order to have a good start without the need to discuss once again what was discussed back then, instead continue, hence add what's new.
If we would continue without taking that topic into account, this one may end up with nothing new, or the new things spread out between pieces already discussed in 2020.

Of course, I can only suggest/give information. It's a free world, a free forum and you can really do as you wish.

Foarte frumos din partea ta, multumim mult!
Citisem topicul in engleza asta vara si contine intr-adevar multe informatii utile.
Depinde de cititor, nu toate vor fi la fel de apreciate - un exemplu ar fi graficul Curcubeu, care s-a dovedit deja partial incorect (preturile au iesit din plaja de valori asteptate) - dar per total este o lista impresionanta.

I'm making this post because I think that some might be interested, especially after certain discussions not very long ago related to Jerry... (so, @dkbit98, if this is a reason to ignore me, it's up to you, I am playing fair and notifying you).
I was already thinking on this back then, but I made my mind just now and I've also done it now: I've cleaned up my ignore list.

It was not only as a "second chance" gesture (Merry Christmas!), it was also done in order to make sure I won't get into troubles with unresponsive "Ignore users settings" page.
Yeah, I also think that some may have improved in the past years (it's my first such cleanup), but I know that some will think that it's highly unlikely such things happen.


As a matter of fact I've already added back one user, so please don't be too harsh with me; the show goes on.

Some of the so called changes you've posted didn't actually change anything. No matter it's maps.google.com or google.com/maps, internally they were still able to share your info between their various services.
And it's known that this is not good for privacy. Some accept that, some don't. However, your topic comes late. You may want to start reading into #DeGoogle - Take back control of your privacy which is a topic here on bitcointalk, discussing exactly this, just it does it in 2020.


PS. The OTP app is the easiest to replace. I recommend Aegis Authenticator.

People miss that part pretty often. And @fillippone was nicely funny, no matter what.
Actually I think that Foxpup may be even going a few milliseconds late on purpose

Some will not be happy with that and imho you should offer those (if there will ever be the case) the option to withdraw their existing funds before leaving the platform.
Even more if you have this kind of things in your ToS, it would be imho a good advertising to clearly write that the users who want to leave in case KYC is suddenly asked will be able to withdraw their existing funds.

You should learn and improve the original post based on the suggestions you've got, since many (especially newbies) will not have the patience to read all the answers.

Now, Coinbase / BitPay are third parties and one very important rule in bitcoin is to avoid as much as possible third parties if you want a happy life (ie don't get burned, sooner or later).
I will not say to remove them from the list - I will even add that I think that Binance too is offering such services - but you should:
* clearly state the risks of going on that path (the coins are in other businesses' pockets and some bitcoiners will avoid using those payment methods because sometimes KYC is required too there)
* add that for those with a bit of technical knowledge there's BTCPay Server as a better option, there they can control the money flow, they don't have to pay fees to third party and the bitcoins go directly to their pockets (OK, wallets); even more, since they don't have to pay fees to third party, they can offer those as discounts as you said at one of the points.

...just my 2 satoshi.

It's more than that. Bitcoin transactions are irreversible. So when you as merchant have received the coins and the transaction is confirmed, you know the money is in your pocket.
On the other hand, with banks and cards you don't know. You don't know whether the card is stolen, you don't know if for whatever reason the payment gets reversed, you can face ugly surprises. With bitcoin everything is clear. It offers more control.

They do. But in my country only in the last few months the commission has became meaningful. Until then the fees were bigger than the earned commission (of course, that's for normal people keeping there amounts of max 4-5 figures).
However, the currently bigger commission is caused by the rise of inflation and the percent of that commission is smaller than the real inflation. So Bitcoin should be a better choice, since I expect that sooner or later a bull run will start.